| 94 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
2/08/13 9:07:05 AM#61
Originally posted by GwapoJosh It's the same thing as paying for a year long subscription, or even a CE from the newest MMO + six months subscription. If you read the package description, it comes with a ton of in game store currency - which means you'll be able to get all the unlocks you want when they added more classes, adventures, areas - and all the cosmetics you want. |
|
|
2/08/13 9:17:31 AM#62
$59 is pretty much the norm for any video game, $199 is pricey imo but it's for folks who like all the goodies, I'm glad that option makes them happy. Being ftp it's a choice I don't get the bitching, especially since people who pay any real currency are the ones funding the game. It's amazing people expect to game for 100's of hours for free and still complain. Honestly you think these people popping out games work for free?
|
|
|
2/08/13 9:33:07 AM#63
Originally posted by MMOGamer71 Maybe because the games F2P and and download it cost nothing actually. Maybe becasue there are $20 and $60 packs people could also buy if they want the incentives. People that whine that they can't have the $200 pack for $20 are just that entitled winners that want it all for little to nothing. They want the game to have big budget standards but they sure as hell don't want to pay even remotely close to what most subscription or even B2P games cost. Using your WoW example is good one, pay what $50 for the wow expansion which i assume will get you the base wow game as well. Then pay $15 a month for a year = $180 plus the $50 expansion pack cost = WoW $230 and thats if you don't buy some wow ingame cash shop mount etc.. So yeah to play WoW for a year you HAVE to pay $230 (roughly). To Play Neverwinter you HAVE to pay $0. If you want the most expensive founders pack, you know becaause getting the $20 or $60 one isn't good enough. Then yes you'll still pay less then a year of WoW and have a in game mount, companion, special race and a ton of in game money to buy cash shop items with. Really this thread just shows that people will bitch, whine, and complain no matter what you do. If they did make the top level founders pack $20 people would still complain saying it cost more then Torchlight 2 and that someone can have something the F2P players don't, or complain saying its so cheap becasue the developers believe the games worthless. |
|
|
2/08/13 9:34:35 AM#64
Originally posted by mikuniman Sadly it's something that's ridiculously common nowadays, everything has to be free - and heaven forbid that someone buys something from a store, shame on you for buying something that should've been free - and even moreso shame on the devs for selling something! :P Maybe they should try living off donations? But from someone else, right? Because then the arguement of these people would be "LOL, I'm not gonna give them money so that they can make games all day! Get a job you bums!" Conclusion; the human race is doomed! ;) |
|
|
2/08/13 9:39:43 AM#65
Originally posted by mikuniman 59 bucks is norm for video games that are: A)A game that is know for its quality and for the quality of its gameplay like skyrim B)A very hyped product like call of duty
This Neverwinter mmo does not fit in any of those categories, heck not even GW2 or SW:TOR standard packs were priced 60 bucks "Some of the less objective people tend to be close-minded though and basically disregard any possible shortcomings that gw2 could have." |
|
|
2/08/13 9:59:34 AM#66
Originally posted by dinams It’s still ftp and paid packages are an option so what’s your point? Those games you mentioned a decent number of people like and are currently playing. To them it’s worth it. Quality seems to be maybe what your opinion might be, what people like when it comes to gaming is a matter of preference. Hype is what you make of it, it’s marketing and if it works on you them it works for gaming company. Hype, personally I like it, it gets me excited for a new title. Whether I take the plunge it’s my dollar and my consequences and I don’t beat the company up for selling me. Do your research and then own up if you made a mistake man. |
|
|
2/08/13 10:01:48 AM#67
Originally posted by mikuniman In your act of zealotry you just missed my point completely I forgive you tho, you are on the little(very tiny) bandwagon that this game has "Some of the less objective people tend to be close-minded though and basically disregard any possible shortcomings that gw2 could have." |
|
|
2/08/13 10:02:52 AM#68
Originally posted by Jemcrystal yea right, just let em pay 200$ and dont give em shit for their money, sounds like a valid plan to me. totaly.
or wait. not it does not. 20$ for you is too much????? pathetic "I'll never grow up, never grow up, never grow up! Not me!" |
|
|
2/08/13 10:02:53 AM#69
Originally posted by Jemcrystal What illusion? There's more free to play games now than there ever were. If gamers were rich and were willing to pay higher prices, then all games would be more expensive and there would be no reason for any game to be free to play (which this game is btw). They selected those prices because their market research shows that people will be willing to pay them. This is an entertainment business afterall, and entertainment, especially video games, are a luxury not a necessity. Therefore it is perfectly acceptable for them to set whatever price they want and if it is not to your liking then you can simply avoid it and pursue another venue from which to get your entertainment. If you don't feel comfortable with those prices, even if you could afford them, then it is probably best to just avoid the game altogether. This way you save yourself time, money and frustration. If enough people do this then the company will know something was wrong with their business. |
|
|
2/08/13 10:08:09 AM#70
Originally posted by dinams You're probably right I guess I don't get you, You have to admit it seems you have some real hate for this title going on. |
|
|
2/08/13 10:10:09 AM#71
Originally posted by MMOGamer71 It is less expensive than a regular box xpac fee + a year worth of subscription to WoW. $15 * 12 + $60 = $240. Additionally at the end of that year you don't get to play WoW anymore if you stop paying. Sounds like little logical thought has gone into your argument. |
|
|
2/08/13 10:13:27 AM#72
Originally posted by MMOGamer71 Why isn't it whining when: a) no one is forced to pay it to play the game, and b) you don't even have to play the game, and c) it is a free world, why should devs be able to charge ANYTHING for their game? |
|
|
2/08/13 10:57:56 AM#73
Originally posted by leobreBecause BETA is confused with "Head Start". I'm taking a shot of vodka every time I see a reference to a game being a WoW or Diablo clone. |
|
|
2/08/13 11:00:52 AM#74
Originally posted by MMOGamer71 So you are saying U$60 gives headstart but U$ 20 would be impossible ? |
|
|
2/08/13 11:01:09 AM#75
Originally posted by Torvaldr Wasn't talking about subscription vs F2P and was talking about and comparing buying top end products from WoW and Neverwinter which you ignored and made a post which had nothing to do with a F2P game charging more than Blizzard.
And little thought when into my argument? I'm taking a shot of vodka every time I see a reference to a game being a WoW or Diablo clone. |
|
|
2/08/13 11:10:21 AM#76
Originally posted by Ramonski7 First, thanks for making a thoughtful post. Even though I don't agree, at least you took the time to reason it through and that seems so rare lately. This is the basis of my argument. The fact that it is not a barrier to entry, makes the complaint a convenience issue. When defining something as a money grab there are a few very subjective terms in the concept. That is the Oxford dictionary definition. The Urban Dictionary has another interesting definition: "Obtaining money from someone without returning anything of real value. Requiring someone to pay a fee out of purely greedy or opportunistic motives." It's true the actual package likely took little effort to assemble, but the components did take effort. So, at face value without looking at the entire package, one might try and label it as a money grab. But in light of the entire project I don't consider it unscrupulous or undignified to recoup costs. I like the Urban dictionary definition too because it defines what that unscrupulous and undignified behavior is: an opportunistic fee without a return of real value. That is also subjective, but let's look at that $200 package - 3 extra character slots, 750K astral diamonds (analogous to Dilithium in STO), extra inventory bags (for each character), a mount, and a combat pet, along with an exclusive appearance skin. While I might not consider that worth $200, I do consider that a return of value for the money. Not only that the fee is not required, which is also part of the Urban definition. Therefore, I conclude it's not a money grab. It is however a high end luxury package likely targeted at enthusiasts. The OP used the word jealous to paint a picture of class disparity. That's not my word, but theirs. I took issue with that and, though entitlement is thrown around loosely now, the OPs post is the definition of self-entitlement. Most of these items, except the possibility that the skins are exclusive, will be available for purchase after the game goes live. The fact that the OP and the rest of the dissenters are angry shows that they want the package, giving it value, but don't want to pay. What other games charge is irrelevant. If I were to go buy WoW today (just standard) and pay for a years sub it would cost me over $240, plus there is the cash shop there. It's more money, but it is irrelevant to what everyone else charges with regards to being fair. We live in a capitalist commericalistic society and we inform businesses on what is fair by purchasing or not purchasing their product. What Cryptic is charging is expensive, no argument there, and I'm not buying one, but it's totally fair and ethical. edit: forgot to add colors. |
|
|
2/08/13 11:17:21 AM#77
Originally posted by mikuniman The problem is the game is entirely free - the benefits you get from spending said $59 nets you very little. It doesn't net you the game, you already get that for free. What if you had to pay $120 NWO to get the stuff that is $60? Would that somehow be worth it?
|
|
|
2/08/13 11:31:50 AM#78
Originally posted by MMOGamer71 LIttle logical thought went into it. Logic was the keyword. The ridiculous "nom nom nom" comment to make purchasers sound like idiots only supports that you're using a baseless emotional argument and not logic. You can't take each fee and charge in a vacuum. You're talking about the expense of playing the game. For one the WoW expac/box fee is required to play the game. The founder pack is not. What I hear you saying is that this is expensive compared to WoW. What I'm saying is that there are other costs to WoW that end up making it a potentially more expensive package overall an option for one game is not more expensive than the requirement for the other. To turn that argument around, let's say I don't buy any founder packs so my cost of entry is $0, but WoW charges at least $60 as a base entry just to start playing the game, in addition to continued recurring fees and a cash shop. |
|
|
2/08/13 2:55:39 PM#79
Originally posted by Torvaldr actually WOW is free for the first 20 levels. So you *can* start at $0. But the point is well taken. It is silly to complain about how a FREE-to-play game is priced. Don't like the price, don't pay it. No one is forcing you.
|
|
|
2/08/13 4:17:26 PM#80
Originally posted by Jemcrystal In general, people don't become rich by being "silly" with their money. Lottery winners being the notable exception.
"How should I know if it works? That's what beta testers are for. I only coded it." |
|