Trending Games | World of Warcraft | Elder Scrolls Online | Firefall | ArcheAge

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,739,241 Users Online:0
Games:715  Posts:6,177,358
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Deco Online Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Phoenix Edition LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Project Blackout Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Puzzle Pirates Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Hammers End The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Total Domination Transformers Universe Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

General Discussion

General Discussion 

The Pub at MMORPG.COM  » What determines if an MMO is successful is its population.

6 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 » Search
114 posts found
  Consuetudo

Novice Member

Joined: 6/20/12
Posts: 94

 
OP  11/30/12 9:17:15 PM#1

The first factor either consciously or subconsciously weighed when deciding what MMORPG to play is which one features the most players. The inherent attraction to the genre, as specified in the very name of it, is the fact of a vast amount of players in a virtual world: a feature fundamentally desired by people playing these games. Whether as a solo, more casual player, or as a grouped, more party-oriented player, it follows that the game which appears the most fundamentally attractive is the MMORPG that is the most massively multiplayer. 

Therefore, initially, you are more likely to play a game with more players, than you are a game with less players. 

Then, the various technical wants and interests of a given player are added into the equation. Some prefer combat as their main interest; some prefer crafting; some prefer solving puzzles in the form of taking down bosses; some prefer completing a story. And yet even if a game has these features desired by you, if it fails to have the most players, it is not a successful game. It is for these reasons that Mortal Online is not flooding the main page; Darkfall; Asheron's Call; Ultima Online. All of these games are able to be played, and some were previously successful. Now, all of them have low populations, and we no longer conceive of them as presently successful.

If they were successful, then they would continue to attract more players. Presently, World of Warcraft has the most players. Since this is the case, and since World of Warcraft keeps gaining new players, it remains successful throughout time, while causing other MMOs to fail. Even if your interests in an MMO don't coincide with what is found in World of Warcraft, you neither deny that it is successful, nor that its population is the factor causing its success to be the case. 

A new game is unable to initially have the most players, because it is new; but if it retrospectively exists with enough potential that it eventually comes to be the most successful game, then, theoretically, it was always more successful than all other games considered successful which existed prior to its becoming a success, and until new games came to supplant it in popularity. But you do not consider games that we come to view as successful as successful until they have the most players, and are popular. 

Seeing that World of Warcraft is the most successful game presently, but you are not playing it, it means that your net total of desire to play the game is inferior to your actual disillusionment from it. It also follows that since the MMORPG we consider to be successful is the one the most populated, and that you aren't playing that one, this means that the longevity of your playing any other MMORPG will last only as long your delusion that you don't want to play the most successful game will last. If the game in question retrospectively existed with enough potential to actually become the most successful game (i.e. it did become the most successful game at some point, even if in a time future to now), then it follows your longetivity of playing it would be maximum; if the game in question retrospectively didn't exist with this same potential, then your longevity of playing it would be minimal. 

If it wasn't the case that your longevity was minimal of playing a game that retrospectively did not exist with the potential to be successful, then it follows that that game would not only not be losing players, and/or not remain stagnant, but it would also actively be gaining more players than it is losing, and it would go on to become successful. 

When a game has a stagnant population, if we actually consider it successful, then it will continue to be considered thus as long as it remains stagnant and has a greater population than all other games; when a game has a stagnant population, and if we do not consider it successful, it follows that some players delude themselves into believing it is successful, while most do not. For example, many people play EVE and consider it to be successful, but as it does not have the greatest population, this means that most players do not consider it to be successful. 

In conclusion, at all times, the best MMORPG to make is that which seems to have the potential to become the most successful, i.e. the most popular, because insofar as it exists and isn't the most popular, it means that it is only being played as long as players can delude themselves into believing the most important aspect of an MMORPG isn't its popularity in comparison to all others; it also means that the mechanics of a game, whether they are liked by you or not, can only affect your playing or not playing a game as long as you can maintain the delusion mentioned. If you are presently not playing MMORPGs even though you recognize what the most popular MMORPG is and do not want to play it, then it follows both that the force of your disillusionment from the most popular MMORPG exceeds your net total desire to play MMORPGs in the first place, and also that the only MMORPG you will ever enjoy is that which is neither the present most successful one nor one which succeeds to produce more disillusionment in you than desire to play, i.e. it is only another future release which will come to either supplant the present most successful game in popularity, or which retrospectively existed at the time of your deciding to play it with enough potential to actually become the most successful game in the future, that will ever garner your maximum interest to play it & the most longevity of doing so.

 

Originally posted by grimgryphon

I think people are confusing "success" and "value" in their arguments here. One is based on factual criteria, the other based on opinion.

Is American Idol a success? Yes (viewer data supports it). Does it provide value to television entertainment? No, it's a jackass gameshow knockoff (IMO).

Is GW2 a success? Yes (sales support it). Does it provide value to the MMO genre? No, it's just another themepark knockoff (IMO).

So yes, population can be a criterion of success.

 

  Quizzical

Guide

Joined: 12/11/08
Posts: 13125

11/30/12 9:40:53 PM#2
Originally posted by Consuetudo

It is for these reasons that Mortal Online is not flooding the main page; the Chronicles of Spellborn; Asheron's Call; Ultima Online. All of these games are able to be played, and some were previously successful. Now, all of them have low populations, and we no longer conceive of them as presently successful.

I thought they pulled the plug on The Chronicles of Spellborn.  Is it back up now?

-----

As for the substance of your argument, the population is really only relevant if it is enough to support the game.  Spiral Knights, for example, would be playable even if it only had 50 people online at a time.  Aion, on the other hand, would need a huge number of players in order to make it practical to get enough players for endgame raiding.

And furthermore, what matters is whether there are enough players online that you have access to, not merely the total number online.  If you need 1000 players per server for a game to be viable, and the game has 10000 players online, but split between 100 servers, it might not be playable on any of them.  See the problems that SWTOR had before the server merges, for example.

But no, what really determines whether a game is successful is how much revenue it brings in, as compared to how much it cost to build.  A game that cost $100 million to make but only brings in $10 million in revenue is a spectacular failure.  A game that costs $1 million to make but brings in the same $10 million in revenue is a runaway success.  The primary reason SWTOR is probably a commercial failure is nothing about game mechanics, but rather merely that it cost far too much to make.

  Consuetudo

Novice Member

Joined: 6/20/12
Posts: 94

 
OP  11/30/12 9:49:57 PM#3
Originally posted by Quizzical
Originally posted by Consuetudo

It is for these reasons that Mortal Online is not flooding the main page; the Chronicles of Spellborn; Asheron's Call; Ultima Online. All of these games are able to be played, and some were previously successful. Now, all of them have low populations, and we no longer conceive of them as presently successful.

I thought they pulled the plug on The Chronicles of Spellborn.  Is it back up now?

-----

As for the substance of your argument, the population is really only relevant if it is enough to support the game.  Spiral Knights, for example, would be playable even if it only had 50 people online at a time.  Aion, on the other hand, would need a huge number of players in order to make it practical to get enough players for endgame raiding.

And furthermore, what matters is whether there are enough players online that you have access to, not merely the total number online.  If you need 1000 players per server for a game to be viable, and the game has 10000 players online, but split between 100 servers, it might not be playable on any of them.  See the problems that SWTOR had before the server merges, for example.

But no, what really determines whether a game is successful is how much revenue it brings in, as compared to how much it cost to build.  A game that cost $100 million to make but only brings in $10 million in revenue is a spectacular failure.  A game that costs $1 million to make but brings in the same $10 million in revenue is a runaway success.  The primary reason SWTOR is probably a commercial failure is nothing about game mechanics, but rather merely that it cost far too much to make.

And yet, I don'tconsider Spiral Knights successful, not only because I've never heard of it, but also because it clearly doesn't have a grand enough population to seem appealing. If it did seem appealing, it would have a high initial population, and it would be continuing to gain more players over time. 

I played Aion in beta, and didn't find it appealing enough to continue playing: its actual potential to become the most successful game appeared to me to be low in such a way that it increased my disillusionment from it to a level so high that it exceeded my desire to play the game. 

Your argument about revenue is inherently connected to population. Considering that it costs money to play SWTOR, it follows that if the game retrospectively existed with enough potential to become the most popular, not only would it have a high initial population, but it would continue gaining players due to the excessive good reviews made by the ones already playing it. Since more people are stopping to play SWTOR than they are joining, it follows that the game did not have the potential to become the most popular, and it is not successful. If SWTOR did continue gaining players, then it follows that if it costs less money to maintain the game than the amount of profits Bioware is taking in to an extent greater than the net amount of profit coming from playersBioware deemed necessary in order for a profit in this area to be gained, then, still, the high population is what caused the net profit, and is the only factor in the end that could do so. 

Thus, ultimately, the game that is successful is the one with the highest population. 

 

I suppose you're right about Spellborn. I wasn't aware it'd closed, but played it once, and even came back for a day once. 

  Quizzical

Guide

Joined: 12/11/08
Posts: 13125

11/30/12 10:11:47 PM#4

My point was not that Aion or Spiral Knights were successful or not.  Rather, it's that the threshold at which a game has enough players to be viable varies wildly from one game to the next.  Maybe you don't want to play in an empty game world.  But should you really care about the difference between a game that has enough players to fill at least two instances (or servers or whatever the game server model is) of everything as opposed to one that has enough to fill 20 instances of everything?

Yes, having more players is pretty strongly correlated with having more revenue.  But my point is that expenses matter just as much as revenue for determining whether a game is commercially successful.  Besides, if I'm picking a game to play, I want to know if I like the game, not whether it's a commercial success.

  Consuetudo

Novice Member

Joined: 6/20/12
Posts: 94

 
OP  11/30/12 10:20:23 PM#5
Originally posted by Quizzical

My point was not that Aion or Spiral Knights were successful or not.  Rather, it's that the threshold at which a game has enough players to be viable varies wildly from one game to the next.  Maybe you don't want to play in an empty game world.  But should you really care about the difference between a game that has enough players to fill at least two instances (or servers or whatever the game server model is) of everything as opposed to one that has enough to fill 20 instances of everything?

Yes, having more players is pretty strongly correlated with having more revenue.  But my point is that expenses matter just as much as revenue for determining whether a game is commercially successful.  Besides, if I'm picking a game to play, I want to know if I like the game, not whether it's a commercial success.

I'm not arguing as to whether or not someone should care whether there are more people, but that we actually do. 

  Suraknar

Apprentice Member

Joined: 12/26/07
Posts: 808

*Everyone dies, not everyone really fights*

11/30/12 10:59:25 PM#6
Originally posted by Consuetudo
Originally posted by Quizzical

My point was not that Aion or Spiral Knights were successful or not.  Rather, it's that the threshold at which a game has enough players to be viable varies wildly from one game to the next.  Maybe you don't want to play in an empty game world.  But should you really care about the difference between a game that has enough players to fill at least two instances (or servers or whatever the game server model is) of everything as opposed to one that has enough to fill 20 instances of everything?

Yes, having more players is pretty strongly correlated with having more revenue.  But my point is that expenses matter just as much as revenue for determining whether a game is commercially successful.  Besides, if I'm picking a game to play, I want to know if I like the game, not whether it's a commercial success.

I'm not arguing as to whether or not someone should care whether there are more people, but that we actually do. 

Many people do, not all people do.

I do not look at the popularity of a game when I make a decision to play it I look at the quality of entertainment it has to offer according to the combination of elements which form Fun Value.

Choosing to play an MMO just based on the Fact of it being popular and having a large population, in my book is Sheep Mentality.... and if this statement implies that WoW is filled by a bunch of Sheep, then so be it.

- Duke Suraknar -
Order of the Silver Star, OSS


ESKA, Playing MMORPG's since Ultima Online 1997 - Order of the Silver Serpent, Atlantic Shard

  Loktofeit

Elite Member

Joined: 1/13/10
Posts: 11845

Currently playing EVE, SMITE, Wildstar, and Combat Arms

11/30/12 11:49:11 PM#7
Originally posted by Quizzical

As for the substance of your argument, the population is really only relevant if it is enough to support the game.  Spiral Knights, for example, would be playable even if it only had 50 people online at a time.  Aion, on the other hand, would need a huge number of players in order to make it practical to get enough players for endgame raiding.

And furthermore, what matters is whether there are enough players online that you have access to, not merely the total number online.  If you need 1000 players per server for a game to be viable, and the game has 10000 players online, but split between 100 servers, it might not be playable on any of them.  See the problems that SWTOR had before the server merges, for example.

But no, what really determines whether a game is successful is how much revenue it brings in, as compared to how much it cost to build.  A game that cost $100 million to make but only brings in $10 million in revenue is a spectacular failure.  A game that costs $1 million to make but brings in the same $10 million in revenue is a runaway success.  The primary reason SWTOR is probably a commercial failure is nothing about game mechanics, but rather merely that it cost far too much to make.

This---^

Population doesn't determine success - revenue vs cost and target profit margin does. Puzzle Pirates was built for a couple thousand and got 34k players. ATITD was built for about 1,000 and was at about 2.5k at one point. Both saw healthy, active in-game populations and exceeded subscriber numbers needed to be profitable. 400k would be troubled waters for SWTOR, a profitable number for EVE and a year of swimming in hookers and blow for the Asheron's Call team.

  Consuetudo

Novice Member

Joined: 6/20/12
Posts: 94

 
OP  12/01/12 12:22:18 AM#8
Originally posted by Loktofeit
Originally posted by Quizzical

As for the substance of your argument, the population is really only relevant if it is enough to support the game.  Spiral Knights, for example, would be playable even if it only had 50 people online at a time.  Aion, on the other hand, would need a huge number of players in order to make it practical to get enough players for endgame raiding.

And furthermore, what matters is whether there are enough players online that you have access to, not merely the total number online.  If you need 1000 players per server for a game to be viable, and the game has 10000 players online, but split between 100 servers, it might not be playable on any of them.  See the problems that SWTOR had before the server merges, for example.

But no, what really determines whether a game is successful is how much revenue it brings in, as compared to how much it cost to build.  A game that cost $100 million to make but only brings in $10 million in revenue is a spectacular failure.  A game that costs $1 million to make but brings in the same $10 million in revenue is a runaway success.  The primary reason SWTOR is probably a commercial failure is nothing about game mechanics, but rather merely that it cost far too much to make.

This---^

Population doesn't determine success - revenue vs cost and target profit margin does. Puzzle Pirates was built for a couple thousand and got 34k players. ATITD was built for about 1,000 and was at about 2.5k at one point. Both saw healthy, active in-game populations and exceeded subscriber numbers needed to be profitable. 400k would be troubled waters for SWTOR, a profitable number for EVE and a year of swimming in hookers and blow for the Asheron's Call team.

What you've really done that is add a new factor of subgenre: provided that this MMO inherently is designed not to become the most populated one by design, then the need of its population depends alone on those players to whom the love of a certain game mechanic rather than a massively multiplayer experience. After all, if WoW is a game that is massively multiplayer, a game that barely dents a fraction of its population by design of it can't be called massive. 

The desire of the players in choosing a game that inherently cannot have a massive population are therefore looking for a game for different reasons.

 

Originally posted by Suraknar
Originally posted by Consuetudo
Originally posted by Quizzical

My point was not that Aion or Spiral Knights were successful or not.  Rather, it's that the threshold at which a game has enough players to be viable varies wildly from one game to the next.  Maybe you don't want to play in an empty game world.  But should you really care about the difference between a game that has enough players to fill at least two instances (or servers or whatever the game server model is) of everything as opposed to one that has enough to fill 20 instances of everything?

Yes, having more players is pretty strongly correlated with having more revenue.  But my point is that expenses matter just as much as revenue for determining whether a game is commercially successful.  Besides, if I'm picking a game to play, I want to know if I like the game, not whether it's a commercial success.

I'm not arguing as to whether or not someone should care whether there are more people, but that we actually do. 

Many people do, not all people do.

I do not look at the popularity of a game when I make a decision to play it I look at the quality of entertainment it has to offer according to the combination of elements which form Fun Value.

Choosing to play an MMO just based on the Fact of it being popular and having a large population, in my book is Sheep Mentality.... and if this statement implies that WoW is filled by a bunch of Sheep, then so be it.

As I've said, both your fun value will be impacted in its longevity by the success of the game in terms of the population factors argued for, and the game wouldn't be considered a success unless if it is. 

And as in the previous reply of mine, I maintain that if a game inherently is incapable of even denting a fraction of the population of a true MMO like WoW, it really can't be considered massive. 

  Drakha

Novice Member

Joined: 1/20/11
Posts: 28

12/01/12 2:34:43 AM#9
Originally posted by Consuetudo

The first factor either consciously or subconsciously weighed when deciding what MMORPG to play is which one features the most players. The inherent attraction to the genre, as specified in the very name of it, is the fact of a vast amount of players in a virtual world: a feature fundamentally desired by people playing these games. Whether as a solo, more casual player, or as a grouped, more party-oriented player, it follows that the game which appears the most fundamentally attractive is the MMORPG that is the most massively multiplayer. 

Population may be a factor in choosing a mmorpg, but it's neither the most important nor the first factor when I choose a mmorpg to play.There are more important factors than the total number of people playing the game.When I first started playing WoW it had a much smaller population than it does now but I haven't played if for 2 years.If population mattered that much wouldn't I still be playing WoW?Wouldn't everybody be playing WoW?Since not everybody plays WoW player population obviously isn't the most important factor.It's probably one of the last things I look at when looking for a mmorpg to play.

  worldalpha

Novice Member

Joined: 11/03/11
Posts: 401

Working hard on WorldAlpha

12/01/12 6:43:29 AM#10
What exactly does successful mean?  Financial success?  If so, I'm sure there are MMOs out there with lower populations that are still financial successes.

Thanks,
Mike
Working on Social Strategy MMORTS (now Launched!) http://www.worldalpha.com

  defector1968

Novice Member

Joined: 6/16/10
Posts: 400

Real Animal lovers are ONLY the vegetarians

12/01/12 6:47:12 AM#11

with 1 word since most people agreed ..... yes, popularity determines it

but are 2 different categories personally that cant fit together, the subed and the f2p games

f2p = those that dont spend a dime to get what the game offers (slower but full game)

  Bossalinie

Advanced Member

Joined: 8/29/07
Posts: 618

12/01/12 6:57:33 AM#12

I don't think this is the case. I mean I see the point attraction-wise, but does it really matter if 11 million people played game A, but you can only possibly have a chance to interact with 20k-40k in a realm?

I've seen the grim days of Eve when the average active users dropped to 25K...and the game kept going. 

I'll take game with a few who desire to play game over a bunch who ony play because others are playing.

  free2play

Advanced Member

Joined: 10/13/05
Posts: 1780

12/01/12 10:18:04 AM#13

Popularity isn't hype. Plenty of games had huge showing in the early release. See what a game looks like on its one year.

Add in, do you view yourself as 'normal'? Or at least have normal game expectations. Chances are if everyone else likes it, you will too. I liked FF14, I like EVE, I like PotBS, none of those games are 'popular'. I like LotRO too, it kind of holds a popular standing but I am sure that has more to do with the franchise. All those games have something else in common as well. They are polished. Companies budget for release, they often don't budget both time and money for the polish.

  Icewhite

Made History

Joined: 7/11/11
Posts: 6495

Pink, it's like red but not quite.

12/01/12 10:32:40 AM#14
Originally posted by Consuetudo

The first factor either consciously or subconsciously weighed when deciding what MMORPG to play is which one features the most players.

Almost.  That is certainly a strong consideration for some people.

Stretch of credulity to speculate some => all.  We call that dicto simpliciter in Latin.  Hasty Generalization in English.

Best game released in the last 15 years, for me, never topped 200k subs.  Crushed by the subscription bases of many other games...yet, as a long term (really long) gamer, it has yet to be dethroned by any of them.

What brand of coffee do you like?  Did you say anything other than Folgers?  Hmm, Kopi Luwak gets high critic praise, yet is not even a blip on the coffee market...wth? It comes from where? And people like it?

Self-pity imprisons us in the walls of our own self-absorption. The whole world shrinks down to the size of our problem, and the more we dwell on it, the smaller we are and the larger the problem seems to grow.

  Gruug

Elite Member

Joined: 4/03/08
Posts: 1134

The more you know, the more you know you don't know.

12/01/12 10:43:19 AM#15

This entire thread is discussion based upon the lemming mentality. In other words, if people see a lot of others doing a thing they think they too MUST be doing that same thing too. It does not mean that something is "successful" as far as quality goes however. You can get thousands of people to buy ANY product if the marketing is done correctly. But it still does not mean that what was marketed is really what the person wanted or needed.

As far as mmo's are concerned. I don't give a hoot has to how many people play that mmo. The ONLY thing I care about is the QUALITY of the game play and if the game is FUN.

 

Let's party like it is 1863!

  Wizardry

Elite Member

Joined: 8/27/04
Posts: 6546

Perhaps tomorrow will be better.

12/01/12 10:52:28 AM#16

NOPE,the LARGE numbers are the result of player base,but the START of a large player base has more to do with HYPE/marketing,it is why devs spend millions on marketing.

We have seen LArge amounts of people claim they are going to buy a gamwe  before it even comes out,so they are basing it on NOTHING but what the dev tells them.Devs are not in the business of telling the truth,they are in the business of selling their product and fabricating/stretching the truth.

I actually find iot sad that even after many years,i still see people  get defensive in choosing Wow to play and backing it up with ideas they would have NEVER seen until already in the game for weeks/months.You don't make decisions based on something you have not seen yet and use that for an excuse like yo uHAVE already seen it.It shows people are playing because firends are or they have been fed that mass marketing and hype that the game is THE BEST ideas and if you don't play you are some kind of noob playing other inferior games.

Truth is often people are just jumping in with little to no idea why.After a game gets some big numbers,THEN the large masses jump on the bandwagon.

http://www.youtube.com/user/Napolianboo#p/u/15/rCYLLQCNc1w
Samoan Diamond

  Estelvea

Novice Member

Joined: 10/09/11
Posts: 5

I'm just a tangle in this trampled wheat.

12/01/12 10:56:10 AM#17
Originally posted by Consuetudo

The first factor either consciously or subconsciously weighed when deciding what MMORPG to play is which one features the most players. The inherent attraction to the genre, as specified in the very name of it, is the fact of a vast amount of players in a virtual world: a feature fundamentally desired by people playing these games. Whether as a solo, more casual player, or as a grouped, more party-oriented player, it follows that the game which appears the most fundamentally attractive is the MMORPG that is the most massively multiplayer. 

Therefore, initially, you are more likely to play a game with more players, than you are a game with less players. 

Then, the various technical wants and interests of a given player are added into the equation. Some prefer combat as their main interest; some prefer crafting; some prefer solving puzzles in the form of taking down bosses; some prefer completing a story. And yet even if a game has these features desired by you, if it fails to have the most players, it is not a successful game. It is for these reasons that Mortal Online is not flooding the main page; Darkfall; Asheron's Call; Ultima Online. All of these games are able to be played, and some were previously successful. Now, all of them have low populations, and we no longer conceive of them as presently successful.

If they were successful, then they would continue to attract more players. Presently, World of Warcraft has the most players. Since this is the case, and since World of Warcraft keeps gaining new players, it remains successful throughout time, while causing other MMOs to fail. Even if your interests in an MMO don't coincide with what is found in World of Warcraft, you neither deny that it is successful, nor that its population is the factor causing its success to be the case. 

A new game is unable to initially have the most players, because it is new; but if it retrospectively exists with enough potential that it eventually comes to be the most successful game, then, theoretically, it was always more successful than all other games considered successful which existed prior to its becoming a success, and until new games came to supplant it in popularity. But you do not consider games that we come to view as successful as successful until they have the most players, and are popular. 

Seeing that World of Warcraft is the most successful game presently, but you are not playing it, it means that your net total of desire to play the game is inferior to your actual disillusionment from it. It also follows that since the MMORPG we consider to be successful is the one the most populated, and that you aren't playing that one, this means that the longevity of your playing any other MMORPG will last only as long your delusion that you don't want to play the most successful game will last. If the game in question retrospectively existed with enough potential to actually become the most successful game (i.e. it did become the most successful game at some point, even if in a time future to now), then it follows your longetivity of playing it would be maximum; if the game in question retrospectively didn't exist with this same potential, then your longevity of playing it would be minimal. 

If it wasn't the case that your longevity was minimal of playing a game that retrospectively did not exist with the potential to be successful, then it follows that that game would not only not be losing players, and/or not remain stagnant, but it would also actively be gaining more players than it is losing, and it would go on to become successful. 

When a game has a stagnant population, if we actually consider it successful, then it will continue to be considered thus as long as it remains stagnant and has a greater population than all other games; when a game has a stagnant population, and if we do not consider it successful, it follows that some players delude themselves into believing it is successful, while most do not. For example, many people play EVE and consider it to be successful, but as it does not have the greatest population, this means that most players do not consider it to be successful. 

In conclusion, at all times, the best MMORPG to make is that which seems to have the potential to become the most successful, i.e. the most popular, because insofar as it exists and isn't the most popular, it means that it is only being played as long as players can delude themselves into believing the most important aspect of an MMORPG isn't its popularity in comparison to all others; it also means that the mechanics of a game, whether they are liked by you or not, can only affect your playing or not playing a game as long as you can maintain the delusion mentioned. If you are presently not playing MMORPGs even though you recognize what the most popular MMORPG is and do not want to play it, then it follows both that the force of your disillusionment from the most popular MMORPG exceeds your net total desire to play MMORPGs in the first place, and also that the only MMORPG you will ever enjoy is that which is neither the present most successful one nor one which succeeds to produce more disillusionment in you than desire to play, i.e. it is only another future release which will come to either supplant the present most successful game in popularity, or which retrospectively existed at the time of your deciding to play it with enough potential to actually become the most successful game in the future, that will ever garner your maximum interest to play it & the most longevity of doing so.

No shit, sherlock. Captain Obvious to the rescue once again!

  VendettaDFA

Novice Member

Joined: 11/26/12
Posts: 74

12/01/12 10:58:24 AM#18

Population is an end result of the growth and content of a game. A large population gives the game a better survivability at launch but if the content can't maintain the population, they will leave.  The budget of the game needs a given population to survive but that doesnt mean a lower population game thats been around for 5 years is less successful than a high population game that shuts down in 2.

WoW is popular because they have expanded on the base game. Vanilla WoW if never expanded on would be a footnote from 2004 and not what it is today. Success depends on the criteria you apply. No one can really argue a premise that success=population anymore than success=profit for the gaming company or success=innovation that makes or shakes up a genre etc... I personally feel success to me is a game that I want to revisit and the population of that particular game is secondary to other factors.

  Razperil

Novice Member

Joined: 9/13/04
Posts: 307

Everything has it's time and its place, know yours?

12/01/12 11:06:17 AM#19
Originally posted by Consuetudo

The first factor either consciously or subconsciously weighed when deciding what MMORPG to play is which one features the most players. The inherent attraction to the genre, as specified in the very name of it, is the fact of a vast amount of players in a virtual world: a feature fundamentally desired by people playing these games. Whether as a solo, more casual player, or as a grouped, more party-oriented player, it follows that the game which appears the most fundamentally attractive is the MMORPG that is the most massively multiplayer. 

Therefore, initially, you are more likely to play a game with more players, than you are a game with less players. 

Then, the various technical wants and interests of a given player are added into the equation. Some prefer combat as their main interest; some prefer crafting; some prefer solving puzzles in the form of taking down bosses; some prefer completing a story. And yet even if a game has these features desired by you, if it fails to have the most players, it is not a successful game. It is for these reasons that Mortal Online is not flooding the main page; Darkfall; Asheron's Call; Ultima Online. All of these games are able to be played, and some were previously successful. Now, all of them have low populations, and we no longer conceive of them as presently successful.

If they were successful, then they would continue to attract more players. Presently, World of Warcraft has the most players. Since this is the case, and since World of Warcraft keeps gaining new players, it remains successful throughout time, while causing other MMOs to fail. Even if your interests in an MMO don't coincide with what is found in World of Warcraft, you neither deny that it is successful, nor that its population is the factor causing its success to be the case. 

A new game is unable to initially have the most players, because it is new; but if it retrospectively exists with enough potential that it eventually comes to be the most successful game, then, theoretically, it was always more successful than all other games considered successful which existed prior to its becoming a success, and until new games came to supplant it in popularity. But you do not consider games that we come to view as successful as successful until they have the most players, and are popular. 

Seeing that World of Warcraft is the most successful game presently, but you are not playing it, it means that your net total of desire to play the game is inferior to your actual disillusionment from it. It also follows that since the MMORPG we consider to be successful is the one the most populated, and that you aren't playing that one, this means that the longevity of your playing any other MMORPG will last only as long your delusion that you don't want to play the most successful game will last. If the game in question retrospectively existed with enough potential to actually become the most successful game (i.e. it did become the most successful game at some point, even if in a time future to now), then it follows your longetivity of playing it would be maximum; if the game in question retrospectively didn't exist with this same potential, then your longevity of playing it would be minimal. 

If it wasn't the case that your longevity was minimal of playing a game that retrospectively did not exist with the potential to be successful, then it follows that that game would not only not be losing players, and/or not remain stagnant, but it would also actively be gaining more players than it is losing, and it would go on to become successful. 

When a game has a stagnant population, if we actually consider it successful, then it will continue to be considered thus as long as it remains stagnant and has a greater population than all other games; when a game has a stagnant population, and if we do not consider it successful, it follows that some players delude themselves into believing it is successful, while most do not. For example, many people play EVE and consider it to be successful, but as it does not have the greatest population, this means that most players do not consider it to be successful. 

In conclusion, at all times, the best MMORPG to make is that which seems to have the potential to become the most successful, i.e. the most popular, because insofar as it exists and isn't the most popular, it means that it is only being played as long as players can delude themselves into believing the most important aspect of an MMORPG isn't its popularity in comparison to all others; it also means that the mechanics of a game, whether they are liked by you or not, can only affect your playing or not playing a game as long as you can maintain the delusion mentioned. If you are presently not playing MMORPGs even though you recognize what the most popular MMORPG is and do not want to play it, then it follows both that the force of your disillusionment from the most popular MMORPG exceeds your net total desire to play MMORPGs in the first place, and also that the only MMORPG you will ever enjoy is that which is neither the present most successful one nor one which succeeds to produce more disillusionment in you than desire to play, i.e. it is only another future release which will come to either supplant the present most successful game in popularity, or which retrospectively existed at the time of your deciding to play it with enough potential to actually become the most successful game in the future, that will ever garner your maximum interest to play it & the most longevity of doing so.

A paper for PSYC 101? Your ramblings about population versus this and that are "delusional". The very word you continued spewing over and over again to convince yourself that population means everything in a game. And this whole crap about "most" people thinking this and that; don't speak for me or anyone else for that matter. You're free to have your opinion on the topic, but that is about it.

People play games generally because they usually enjoy playing that game/games. I'm not saying there are not those that do jump on the bandwagon just because others do, we all know tons do. Your over-analysis of the whole topic is truly extreme.

If I need an analysis of anything in the future, I'm better off looking in the yellow-pages. (I know, this will get me a ban once again for speaking my mind and tending to forget that sugary topping :)

  Kyleran

Bitter Vet™

Joined: 9/13/06
Posts: 18727

Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

12/01/12 11:09:29 AM#20
For me as long as the game world I'm on has a healthy population, I don't care of there are 1k subs or 13m.

"In these forums 'honest' seems to be a symonym for 'hates the game just like I do'" - ohioastro
Kyleran - Bitter Vet ™ since 2006
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon

6 Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 » Search