| 65 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
TheScavenger
Elite Member
Joined: 7/05/12
Those who ask a question, are stupid for 30 seconds. Those who never ask, are stupid for life. |
Why is every single sandbox that has been released in the past 5 years been PvP and PvP and PvP?
Asheron's Call...sandbox...does have a PvP server...but plenty of PvE servers...but its ancient Istaria is probably my favorite, only because of playable dragons...but its ancient too There was SWG...personally I didn't like it...I think I was way more into Anarchy Online back then, which after the rough launch, was what I played (along with Istaria)
The only modern PvE sandbox that still looks good is Saga of Ryzom...its fun...but the game is so dead. No one is playing it...even the trial isle is completely dead. See 1-3 people at most in town, sometimes I'm only one in the main town...
You (well us?) sandboxers complain about lack of sandbox...but its WAY worse for those that want PvE sandbox. At least you guys get way more choices that are modern, and don't have to go to an ancient MMO or an MMO that is completely dead.
And no, after playing WoW for years...every themepark game I've played (even GW2), I go "okay...done all the content...like WoW way more (mostly for the lore and it being warcraft)...next"...I don't want a themepark MMO. If I did, I'll just play WoW, it does themepark the best imo. But I'm done with WoW and themepark MMOs. I can't get into them at all.
No, what I want a PvE sandbox game. And the only choice out there is Ryzom...and I would play that, if the game wasn't so dead...I actually thought the server merges would boost population, but after merges, population plummeted to worse than vanguard ever was. I've never seen such a dead game. At least vanguard ALWAYS had 20+ people on the trial isle. Ryzom there is 1-3 (or 0 before I get on it)...and at peak maybe its 8 or 9, once in a while it gets to 10 (very rare)...its just so dead.
So when you complain about lack of sandbox...think of those that want a PvE sandbox...we literally have no MODERN choices at all.
Current MMOs: Defiance, Guild Wars 2, TERA, SWTOR |
|
11/22/12 7:24:03 PM#2
I approve of this thread. I loved Asheron's Call back in the day, and WoW was fun until Cata. I gave up on MMOs completely after the SWTOR fiasco. FF14 ARR looks promising but videos really dont give the real scope of how big and open the world really is. Other than that I am not really looking forward to any mmos, devs are either making action based combat or pvp focused mmos. Which I have no interest in, but I guess companies are saying "it's time for us old geezers to move along".
|
|
|
11/22/12 7:30:21 PM#3
There is Greed Monger. It has PvE in most of the map and only a few areas of FFA PvP.
|
|
|
11/22/12 7:32:18 PM#4
It goes back to before WOW that is I think when companies started making keybaord based control-abled lamer then mouse veggie games. I mean games like Ultima Online was great all with mouse veggie control scheme. Laid back PvE mouse veggie games are my favorites as compared to super hyped hyper actioned or PvP modeled games. My favorited game ever is Lineage 2, then Aion second, and third would be currently playing since it is free 'til level 49 of 50 in south korea, Rift. Well I agree and let's enjoy gaming... 'happy' gaming, folks~!
|
|
|
11/22/12 7:53:59 PM#5
Xsyon just startert there kickstarter, it is mostly about building stuff and hunting animals for ressources. http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/382040989/xsyon-apocalypse |
|
|
11/22/12 7:57:40 PM#6
There is A Tale in the Desert, but that's more than five years old as you said. There is also Uncharted Waters Online, which did release in 2005 in Japan, but not until 2010 in the US. And it's still getting new content, too, with the latest expansion released in Japan earlier this year. |
|
|
11/22/12 8:04:04 PM#7
Agreed.
All of these pvp centric sandbox wanabe's miss the point of a virtual world just like themeparks do. And I say this as an avid PvPer..
Truth be told, a lot of the 'sandbox' MMOs that are out today are really just PvP themeparks. |
|
|
11/23/12 2:32:43 AM#8
Originally posted by fernetek This is the game to watch if you are into PvE sandbox games. |
|
|
Graveblade
Advanced Member
Joined: 11/26/04
"In the wheel of chance and fate, spinning as we watch and wait" |
11/23/12 2:46:09 AM#9
We need Ultima Online 2 damnit! :P
|
|
11/23/12 2:55:41 AM#10
That is really a good question. I have nothing against PvP sandboxes but if sandboxes want to be a larger part of the MMO genre again we need different varieties. A game more similar to Minecraft would be a good addition to the genre... |
|
|
11/23/12 3:01:04 AM#11
There's planty of modern choices of what you call sandbox PvE games. It's just that some of us call them themeparks. ;)
|
|
|
Shaike
Apprentice Member
Joined: 4/23/12
At first there were games, then MMOs, then MMORPGs then i understood i had no life :-) |
11/23/12 3:10:49 AM#12
Originally posted by StarI Give examples please because i do not know any...... |
|
11/23/12 3:11:49 AM#13
Where is the Sandbox pvp? EVE comes to mind, but what else? We have like a gazillion pve games FFS. |
|
|
11/23/12 3:15:15 AM#14
Originally posted by StarI No there isnt. Themeparks tend to be questdriven games focused on looting stuff. There are a few hybrids like Vanguard with some sandbox parts but nothing really focused on building stuff which is the main part of real sandbox mechanics. Sandboxes have player created content, themeparks usually tells you what to do. |
|
|
11/23/12 3:20:01 AM#15
Originally posted by Grimmx There are a few others, like Darkfall, Mortal online and a few more. Adding a PvE sandbox wouldnt really hurt the PvP games and might actually boost sandboxes rather weak position in the genre right now. Salem is coming out pretty soon as well, and rumors say that a westernized version of Archeage isnt far away either. It is clear the the genre needs a few quality sandboxes right now, but sandboxes needs to vary as well. Just cloning Eve or UO aint enough, just like cloning EQ and Wow isnt. |
|
|
11/23/12 3:34:28 AM#16
Originally posted by Loke666 No it isnt. Darkfall is closed for the moment. DF2 is starting up again soon, but its not certain when because they have postponed once they can do it twice. Mortal Online? dont make me laugh. Its an indie game insulting indie developers. Salem? again Indie. Archage, hasnt come out so why mention it? That leaves EvE ? EvE isnt for everyone because its a space MMO. Ive personally tried playing EVE 3 times because its the ONLY MMORPG with FFA out there now. Thats why find it hillarious that people post about why pve people doesnt have a sandbox pve game? Seriosly, get a grip. Its pve everywhere. |
|
|
Graveblade
Advanced Member
Joined: 11/26/04
"In the wheel of chance and fate, spinning as we watch and wait" |
11/23/12 3:41:24 AM#17
I agree Loke but also imagine UO2.
I would still play ultima online if they updated the graphics (again lol) made it run smooth and a better UI. Or a 3d version. Fact is, as Richard Garriot has said, they wanted to make everything interactable in the world for UO. Just because of that very fact it meant the pve was quite substantial. You could do what you want within the world when it came to tradeskills and such.
Why will no one make a game like that nowadays?
Time and money I guess... Companies want max profit for minimal work. People do not make a game because they are an entrepreneur and have a creative "vision". To make a game like that, especially if it was 3d, would be a hell of alot of work and it is a gamble but it could also be the best mmorpg ever. |
|
Loktofeit
Elite Member
Joined: 1/13/10
EVE in 2013 - DUST 514, CSM8, Fanfest, 10th Anniversary, Uprising, Odyssey. Gonna be a good year :) |
11/23/12 3:44:54 AM#18
Originally posted by TheScavenger There are plenty of PvE sandboxes; they're just not for you. Most AAA devs aren't going to create a PvE sandbox for the average jaded gamer because they know that the vocal minority will tear it to pieces as "fail" within minutes after the first announcement of it. Making a game where half of your PR and marketing is spent trying to counter the negativity from the same people you are making it for is just not a sound business plan. ATITD, Free Realms and Puzzle Pirates are three sandbox style MMOs. None of them you want. Of the sandbox-style games that also have a heavy social influence - Second Life, Kaneva, There, vMTV - you don't want those either. The vocal sandbox crowd has complained themselves into irrelevance, so that style of game, which is predominantly PvE, is designed to target other segments. The most classic example is UO. UO has both PvE sandbox and PvE sandbox on every shard. You never hear players extolling the virtues and greatness of Trammel, which means devs aren't hearing it either. There's a definite market for PvE sandboxes which is why devs are creating them. Unfortunately you're not part of that target market.
filmoret: One thing I have never figured out is why the game devs hardly ever fix simple problems that arise. It is like they don't care about the pvp community. Nitth: What makes you so sure its a simple fix? filmoret: Because most of them are. Sometimes its just changing a number in a code string other times its creating a few variables. However none of them should take over a few hours of coding. |
|
11/23/12 3:57:55 AM#19
Originally posted by TheScavenger
|
|
|
11/23/12 4:00:11 AM#20
Personally I think a sandbox mmorpg should be integrated PvE & PvP. And when I say pvp, I mean player interacting with player as well as interacting with Environment for pve. Out of:
-> Most people want to play the soldier archetype, so that tends to be where the gameplay is? If the game can provide integration with all the above, it means the soldiers need resources from the pve and items from the crafters and money from the merchants and idk about scholars... perhaps they can work things, upgrade things? |
|