| 65 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
We've been playing SOE's free-to-play MMOFPS, PlanetSide 2, and today we're kicking off our review-in-progress series with a focus on character creation and first impressions.
Read more of Michael Bitton's PlanetSide 2: Review in Progress #1 – Character Creation & First Steps. |
|
|
11/20/12 8:23:09 AM#2
The massive confusion of the initial drop and first fight is the best part. That best replicates what war is and I loved it. It was one of few times in a game, let alone a MMO that I felt a "rush" from the first second of the game.
I understand for some people this is to much, but that is the difference between a soldier and a civilian. Soldiers thrive on that, civilians dont. Not knocking civilians, as I am one myself now thanks to injuries from my time in the service, but not everyone is cut out to fight. And that is what sums up PS2, not everyone is cut out to play this game. So much crap, so little quality. |
|
|
11/20/12 8:25:48 AM#3
Originally posted by Hodo Cringe. |
|
|
11/20/12 8:30:42 AM#4
I'm going to go ahead and say that the nature of a shooter is probably a little to much for regular mmorpg gamers. I've seen enough rpgers blow thier top and I've got a feeling mixing the shooter in is just going to increase those experiences.
Like this guy up here that wants to compare this to real life war lol he is in deep and wait till someone pops his head off his neck in game, bet he breaks another keyboard :-) |
|
|
11/20/12 8:36:37 AM#5
I love planetside 2, really I do but sometimes i wish there were other enemies populating those massive maps than just players. You trek across a massive plain and there's nothing to do. Playing: GW2 |
|
|
11/20/12 8:36:48 AM#6
My experience with the weapons, both for infantry and vehicles, and their upgrades, is that right from the get-go, you are effective. The next guy can buy the AP anti-armor gun for his tank, but he wont do squat against infantry. So basically, every weapon will allow you to excel in a certain area, while becoming worse in another one.
I wanted to type something really smart as a reply to this subject, but the Scarlet Blade ad got me distracted and I forgot what I wanted to type. |
|
|
11/20/12 8:42:08 AM#7
You know... I see these complaints all the time... "huge treks for nothing" ... are you SERIOUS!?!? Do you NOT LOOK AT THE MAP? Listen, look at the map. There are "instant action" drops that put you RIGHT into combat. Highlight the area hex's... it'll say... enemy detected, enemy platoon detected, no activity detected. The United States in WORLD WAR II was in the war but how many major fights were in Iowa or Arkansas? None. So why would you DEPLOY there? You'd deploy to the action. |
|
|
11/20/12 8:48:52 AM#8
Originally posted by Ikeda There's a timer on the drop... if you drop down and there's very little fighting you could be stuck out in the open. Its like traveling in DayZ, could take forever and a day to get to the next "hotspot" and that skirmish could be over as well or it could be one single newb just fliping stuff... then you have to trek again. Playing: GW2 |
|
|
11/20/12 8:57:21 AM#9
Originally posted by Z3R01 warp to HQ and buy a mosquito. |
|
|
11/20/12 9:12:09 AM#10
I suggest finding a squad and traveling with them it leads to more chances of action and it will be safer for you, large open swaths of the battle field are part of the game, and make perfect areas to set up ambushes, especially when you can start figuring out the direction enemys are more likely to start hoofing it from. Going out alone will start to lead to you getting ambushes and killed and then we gotta hear people complaining about gankers, when in a war senario such as this its a legitimate tactic. Also stated above, theres plenty access to ground or flying vehicles that help get to combat quicker, but you cant expect to see whats going on everywhere all the time, plenty of groups tend to avoid action untill they get to where they wanna strike and then Blitzgrieg it.
Im watching the count down timer patiently....more or less lol Mess with the best, Die like the rest |
|
|
11/20/12 9:18:22 AM#11
Originally posted by Kalafax I love the game, my complaint wasn't with the long treks so much as the big dead world we play on. They could spruce it up a bit, make the world feel like a living breathing thing. Its not that big of a complaint to be honest and wont stop me from playing. Its just something that i wonder when i am on my treks here and there. Playing: GW2 |
|
|
11/20/12 9:37:05 AM#12
The world seems big when you first get in, but after you've got like 10 hours (or even less) on your belt, you start to recognize locations. At least that's how I felt.. And once you know the map, and how the instant drop / spawn on squad leader / and re-deploy works, it's very very easy to get to the action, even if you die, it shouldn't take you more than a couple of minutes to be right back in there.. If you wish.
Anyone who reads this, if you're one who thinks the world is too large and dead, try this... Spawn Scythe / Mosquito / Reaver, fly from your own warpgate, to someone elses warpgate, maybe even time it, I gurantee you'll be surprised at how short the distance really is, and how fast you got there.
|
|
|
11/20/12 3:13:56 PM#13
Well i played beta extensively and bought the alpha squad to accellerate my initial unlocks mostly because I felt the game was good enough for $40 and After so much beta I don't want to wait for unlocks. Does this give you an advantage? Yes, but imho only with vehicles/MAX.. As a standard foot soldier at lvl 1 with zero certs you can still slaughter enemies that are all cert-ed up with a little skill and a little strategy.
Also IMHO, if you are a true mmorpg player than this game is NOT for you! PLANETSIDE 2 IS A SHOOTER MUCH LIKE BATTLEFIELD!! IF YOU DON'T LIKE SHOOTERS DON'T TRY IT YOU WON'T LIKE IT! For me, i've been waiting for a futuristic shooter game like this ever since Battlefield 2142 and this is much better than 2142 was and I will be enjoying this game for a long time (hopefully). |
|
|
11/20/12 9:04:24 PM#14
I tired it today for about 2hours. Im completely new to FPS's and I found the "tutorial" info severely lacking. even the Tutorial youtube videos assume you have prior experience with PS and fps in general. I found the minimap confusing, i couldn't intuitively tell what all those little blips were, noone was talking and I was killed 3 times in those 2 hours by what the game told me was friendly fire. Watch your thoughts; they become words. |
|
|
11/20/12 10:10:26 PM#15
I can't play more than half an hour without crashing.
|
|
|
Vannor
Elite Member
Joined: 8/11/03
I am the lucid dream. BOW DOWN BEFORE THE GOD OF DEATH! |
11/20/12 11:15:20 PM#16
Originally posted by Hodo hmm.. not really. In real life you don't get dropped into a war without any training. In fact, you spend months training. People here are just asking for a decent hour long tutorial or something. |
|
11/20/12 11:56:19 PM#17
FACT: This game sucks. After playing the crap outta the first Planetside I am pretty sure PS2 has actually gone backwards in the quality of the game. Next time, steer clear of the F2P model. Ruins everything. |
|
|
11/21/12 1:15:14 AM#18
Originally posted by Sp00sh FACT: That is not a fact, that is your opinion.
That said, I played for somewhere between 3-5 hours. I've been playing VS and an engi and having a blast. I'm not a FPS gamer by any stretch of the imagination. I think the most I've EVER put into an FPS would be 44 hours into TF2, and a bunch as well into Perfect Dark back on the N64. Also, I've never played the first, so I had no idea what to expect. But I enjoyed it, and that's what matters to me. |
|
|
11/21/12 2:49:36 AM#19
This is so fail that I don't even have words to describe it. My attempt at a summary:
1) Netcode is terrible 2) Graphics and animations are extremely dated (not even rag doll physics for kills - only scripted animations), making the game feel stiff and unresponsive compared to today's FPS games. 3) Pay 2 Win
I'm confused what the target audience is for this game, since true FPSes will not play such a mediocre shooter and MMO fans who are the typical F2P suckers will not be interested in this, so... yeah. My bet is on this game doing quite poorly. |
|
|
11/21/12 2:58:15 AM#20
Originally posted by Denambren Planetside 2 looks even worse if you compare it to Planetside 1, but... Planetside 1 is P2P, and then there is the whole 'sequalitis' thing, but yeah, you get what you pay for, and what little Planetside 2 does have, isnt really that appealing, i can't see other Planetside 1 vets going for it either, which may be intentional if they want people to continue subbing to Planetside 1. I would be very surprised if Planetside 2 was in any way successful tbh, it may be F2P but the free part isnt really all that free, and if your going to spend money anyway, then Planetside 1 has much better VFM. |
|