| 195 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
11/18/12 12:18:59 PM#181
some of you just need to take some responsibilty for your own actions and stop blaming everyone else.
|
|
|
11/18/12 12:24:35 PM#182
Originally posted by expresso if only, so many people treat security like a joke, and when they get hacked, or fall foul of a phishing mail etc, they complain that its everybody elses fault except their own, honestly some of the complaints, reasons for complaints just highlight how little they know about the subject, hell some of them shouldnt be allowed within 3 feet of a computer, let alone one that has access to the internet. People seriously need to learn how to protect themselves online, especially if their trawling the seedier side of the internet, as seems likely. |
|
|
11/18/12 12:27:14 PM#183
99% hacked accounts are because people go websites for bots, buying gold, unsecured websites, etc.. deal with it.
|
|
|
11/18/12 12:31:17 PM#184
Originally posted by grimgryphon All will probably become clearer, if you take into account that the site he was trying to log into, wasnt the real one. |
|
|
11/18/12 3:55:44 PM#185
Originally posted by Lienhart Fireblade? wtf are you talking about? once again let me try to make this very simple so you understand. i give blizzard my info. they get hacked and now my info is in enemy hands. that is THEIR fault. do you understand? or do i need to bust out the flash cards? |
|
|
11/18/12 4:00:06 PM#186
Originally posted by DrunkWolf
Did they get hacked? I have never heard that news. |
|
|
11/18/12 4:03:33 PM#187
They've kept it quiet but yes. And they werent the only ones.
Sony account security is better than most people realize and they got hammered too. EA got friggin taken down. That WOULD be blizzard's fault. |
|
|
11/18/12 4:08:20 PM#188
Originally posted by Psychow Yes, they wer hacked in August. The mere fact that you did not hear about it only supports the claims of the Plaintiff that Blizz did not do enough to warn their players after the hack occured.
Again, I have seen Blizz's official response to the suit. Many here have. They refute a lot of claims of the plaintiff. But, they do not refute the claims that Blizzard has made a profit off the sale of authenicators. There is also the may 22 statement where they say no customers with authenticators have been hacked, then the massive outcry of people on the forums claiming that was untrue and the may 26th reversal by Blizz of that statement saying that people with authenticators had in fact been hacked. So there was deception there about a product they sold,. That is not at all in doubt.
|
|
|
11/18/12 4:36:51 PM#189
I'm guessing this is going to be laughed out of court. Blizzard offers authenticator's as an extra security layer, and as an additional service. Last time I checked, companies usually charge extra for additional services. You aren't guaranteed security by anyone. If you believe their services aren't secure I'm sure you have every right to discontinue your account and have all your information wiped from their systems. It's funny that people think Blizzard is less secure than any other company that deals with customer information. There is no such thing as absolute security on the internet. If you're so worried about your information being disclosed then you better avoid the internet alltogether.
Some games don't even offer authenticators... one reused password, keylog, etc and your account is gone.
Of coarse it's always everyone elses fault except your own, time to get sue happy!
Blizzard will win this without a doubt... I think it will be fairly easy to check the browsing and security practices of the userbase involved, and I'm guessing it won't be pretty. |
|
|
11/18/12 4:45:17 PM#190
Originally posted by Burntvet Horseshit. My company uses authenticators also. Its additional security, period. This is a bullshit case that will go nowhere as blizzard does not require the authenticator. In addition, they do offer it or free for hose who have a device at can utilize it. They only charge ( very little I might add) for the device as they are made, which isn't free. |
|
|
11/18/12 4:49:01 PM#191
Originally posted by DrunkWolf Nice try. Hacking is an illegal action and does not make Blizzard liable. Do you realize how dumb that sounds? |
|
|
11/18/12 5:03:42 PM#192
Originally posted by Praetalus I agree that first part you said sounds really dumb |
|
|
11/18/12 6:46:29 PM#193
If fbi gets hacked can I sue the fbi? I know they have my info...I'm onto you fbi!!! <.< >.> But, speaking more seriously, if Blizzard failed to pursue the necessary measures, in accordance with the law, that they promised to their customers for protecting them, then there might be a case. However, if they did pursue those measures and they were still hacked, then they are not at fault. Simple. |
|
|
11/18/12 6:48:16 PM#194
Originally posted by DrunkWolf You should really read the article I linked earlier, so you don't sound as delusional as you do.
|
|
|
11/18/12 7:38:20 PM#195
Originally posted by Phry How many helpings of derp did you consume before uttering that response? If you think any of that was a hacking attempt, then you need to learn how security strikes happen. /onegreatbiggiantfacepalm
|
|