| 34 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
"9) Have any changes been made to boats and naval warfare in general to help mitigate the threat of swimmers boarding your boat? 1.) So many features are missing from the game 2.) AV have rushed the game in a short space of time The reality? We've read information of higher end boats and siege equipment being disabled. The rest of the interview shows new features they've added to the game. So number 1.) is complete nonsense from people panicing. Clearly AV are still balancing these expensive pieces of equipment and will re-add them when they are satisfied the risk/reward for using each one is balanced. This shows they're taking their time with important decisions hopefully to get it right. Why it won't affect us - at all. Just like the original game, all resources will go into city building and NO CLAN will be willing to risk something as expensive as a warhulk for a siege. Even months into the game a massive amount of the materials generated by players will be soaked up into player holdings. The rarer materials needed to craft the higher end products will also require high end characters to farm them. This all takes time. AV has this time to figure out balancing and reintroduce the top end siege equipment slowly. |
|
|
10/31/12 9:29:48 AM#2
It's not bad at all, and in a way a good sign because it means the changes must be significant, rather it not be in, than in broken.
|
|
|
10/31/12 10:02:04 AM#3
This is something that is easy to pick up and bitch about and unfortunately a lot of people would rather post an attack on AV then actually think about it for a second. If they did think they would come to the conclusion that it may not make any difference and it is also nice that they are changing these things for the better. There is the possibility it will be bad if they don't implement it by the time we will actually use them. However this is only a possibility so we should not assume it will be true or false. |
|
|
10/31/12 10:24:27 AM#4
It wont matter anything as no one will be able to afford any of those sorts of siege machines at release anyway.
|
|
|
10/31/12 10:27:19 AM#5
Originally posted by Kaminaxius Thtas a fairly lame excuse |
|
|
10/31/12 10:49:49 AM#6
Developers have not chance based on how some people react. If they put this broke ships/warhulks in people will say fail, they wait and put the fixed ones in, people say whatever you waited to long to launch the game. Bottom line is they see a problem, they openly tell us the problem, now they work on the problem. Nothing wrong with this at all.
Incognito |
|
|
10/31/12 10:57:39 AM#7
Originally posted by afhn2110 Lol sure...The new and improved Darkfall has half the features as its predecessosr.
DF-UNHOLY WARS... the first "expansion" in history to remove features. |
|
|
10/31/12 11:18:45 AM#8
Originally posted by Hancakes [mod edit] DF:UW has added features like the contract system, roles/schools, new lighting system, multi-core support, territory control via villages, new portal system and so on. They have also redone the map, improved the layout of cities, made walls meaningful and tonnes more. An yet people like you still spew bile because a couple of things they are remaking aren't in at launch when we couldn't use them anyway. |
|
|
10/31/12 11:25:20 AM#9
Originally posted by Falesh Yawn...Fluff vs CORE FEATURES!!! [mod edit] |
|
|
10/31/12 11:45:24 AM#10
[mod edit] |
|
|
10/31/12 12:33:11 PM#11
[mod edit]
My only concern is...well, them waiting until 3.0 to patch these things in lol. |
|
|
10/31/12 12:35:30 PM#12
Originally posted by Falesh The only joke I see is people trying to defend AVs removal of key game mechanics. Lets face it...Darkfall UW is nothing more than a pay to beta for the pending Asian client.(i assume Mgame wants a complete game for their $ 3.4 Million USD investment) AV hasn't talked much, but in the little said we have too much pending. "balancing,tweaking and more thought" IE Not finished Boats, Warhulk,Towers Cannons, Market ...and this is just for starters!!! There are many other questions that have gone unanswered by AV. Wonder why??? I was hoping UW would be fairly complete, not a shell.
|
|
|
10/31/12 1:36:05 PM#13
Originally posted by Hancakes Then you should rejoice because it is way more then "fairly complete". They had a choice:
They chose option 3 which is, in my opinion, the right choice because by the time we can actually make the stuff they could have finished remaking them. It is nice to know they aren't taking an easy way out and just leaving it as it was in the origional even though they know that by doing so they open themselves up for abuse. They have also added a huge amount to the game, far far more then anything that is temporarily left out. I know trolling AV is fun for a lot of people but it is sad to see because the false information given by the trolls could put some new players off trying a unique and amazing game from one company that actually stuck to their vision and made a game that isn't yet another WoW clone. |
|
|
10/31/12 1:47:54 PM#14
Originally posted by Falesh Based on???
Oh and please specify what EXACTLY is false?
Huge amount added? Its all fluff ... The only thing of note (still fluff) is the partial Contract System which relates directly to seige.
If you want to defend it do so....but not by yelling troll, opinion or generalizations. |
|
|
10/31/12 1:53:51 PM#15
there are many reasons to put ships and warhulks etc on hold at launch. One of them is what AV claim, but there are also reasons they don't mention that in itself is a good enough reason alone. They do it for a good reason because in reality none will be using ships and warhulks at the start of the game
|
|
|
10/31/12 1:55:58 PM#16
Originally posted by naljeja and the reason are what? Other than not being finished??? |
|
|
10/31/12 2:13:25 PM#17
Originally posted by Hancakes The seawater is acidic and will eat any ship that sails until a community quest is finished to cleanse the seas. Duh. |
|
|
10/31/12 2:30:44 PM#18
Originally posted by bliss14 theres beginner boats still in game just not the advance ones |
|
|
10/31/12 2:31:21 PM#19
Originally posted by bliss14 touché |
|
|
10/31/12 2:34:01 PM#20
Originally posted by Raxeon
|
|