Trending Games | ArcheAge | World of Warcraft | Guild Wars 2 | Destiny

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,856,705 Users Online:0
Games:740  Posts:6,241,577
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Angry Birds Epic Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Ascend: Hand of Kul Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Boot Hill Heroes Borderlands 2 Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel Bound by Flame Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Bravada Bravely Default Bravely Second Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Cast & Conquer Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Child of Light Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Dead Island Dead Island 2 Dead Island: Riptide Deco Online Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Divinity: Original Sin Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Age: Inquisition Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Drakengard 3 Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dungeon of the Endless Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Fearless Fantasy Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy Type-0 HD Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Heart Forth Alicia Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes & Legends: Conquerors of Kolhar Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Icewind Dale: Enhanced Edition Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Phoenix Edition LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Lichdom: Battlemage Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lords of the Fallen Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Moonrise Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Persona V Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Project Blackout Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Project Zomboid Puzzle Pirates Quest for Infamy Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Risen 3: Titan Lords Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sacred 3 Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Chance Heroes Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow Realms Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Styx: Master of Shadows Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Banner Saga The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Hammers End The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing 2 The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Total Domination Transformers Universe Transistor Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune Wasteland 2 WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenoblade Chronicles: X Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

General Discussion

General Discussion 

The Pub at MMORPG.COM  » Did modern graphics kill the seamless world?

9 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Last Search
167 posts found
  Quizzical

Guide

Joined: 12/11/08
Posts: 13389

9/28/12 12:28:13 PM#61
Originally posted by fenistil
Originally posted by Quizzical

Zones, and more to the point, loading screens, are a very different matter.  The only reason why any game would ever have loading screens at all is technical impediments that make it so that they have to stop to load things, or at least have serious gameplay problems if they don't.  Surely no game designers think, hey, this loading screen is really cool, so we bet players would like to sit there and stare at it for an extra five seconds every time.  You make the loading screen as short as you can.

It is not only about loading screens and way to not have load another terrain.   In zoned games - zone is usually an indepenent piece of land that is not simply part of bigger whole just cut of.   You could not simply merge few zones and create a whole region.   

It is like you would do an mmoprg that would have whole USA as an world. 

(Technical and practical things aside for discussion) Seamless is like taking everything : mountains, villages, small and big cities, forests, lakes. etc

Zoned could be simply above chopped to pieces with loading screens.  That's not how zoned games opeatae though.  Zoned mmorpg would be like taking part of few cities and part of few regions. 

Comparing parts of few regions and parts of few cities would not create whole USA.

 

I am talking about how zoned mmorpg's are done and not how technicaly could have been done. Because obviously it would be possible to take in example Ultima Online and simply chop it to few zones with like scissor cut. 

It depends greatly on the game.  In Guild Wars, for example, there's a world map, and most of the time that you cross a zone boundary, it's just loading what is on the other side of some line on the world map, such as from Old Ascalon to Regent Valley.  The zones may have nothing to do with each other in the internal code, but intuitively, they're right next to each other.

But even when the zones intuitively aren't right next to each other, there's no game design reason to make players sit and stare at a loading screen longer than you have to.  If it were trivial to do so, they'd make it so that it went from drawing you standing there in one zone to drawing you standing there in the other zone mere milliseconds later, with no loading screen between them.

Even if a seamless world internally uses zones, it doesn't have to be obvious where the zone boundary is.  The way to load things in a seamless world is that you load a little bit of data that says where everything is ahead of time (e.g., "there is a tree at (593.9534, 190.9843)"), and periodically look around and see if you're getting close to anything that needs to be loaded from the hard drive.  If you are getting close, then you load the relevant textures or sound effects or whatever, and if relevant, upload them to the video card.

Even if you're going to do this, you still want to use zones internally to help you find what you need to load.  Otherwise, every time you check to see what needs to be loaded, you'd have to check on every single tree, rock, wall, and so forth in the entire game world.  But if you break things into zones, then you can only check the ones in your current zone and adjacent zones.  But the "zones" for this could be a simple square grid drawn on the map and not correspond to anything at all that players can see in the game world.

  Quizzical

Guide

Joined: 12/11/08
Posts: 13389

9/28/12 1:02:47 PM#62
Originally posted by SnarlingWolf

It is easier to build an MMO engine that has zones. You don't have to move players across server boundaries on the fly while trying to make it feel completely seamless (no pause or hiccup) as they do so. Instead you flat out say "Hey, take a rest for a second, we are moving you to another server).

 ...

I do think a company could create an instance that you phased across so it felt seamless, but I think it would cause too much confusion to be worth it. People would try to run across it not in a group and wonder where everyone else went.

Server boundaries aren't the issue.  All of the data associated with a player that a game world server needs to see at a given time might come to hundreds of bytes, or at most thousands.  Sending that over a LAN takes maybe a few milliseconds if that--and if it's in the range of milliseconds, most of it is latency waiting for something or other rather than actively transmitting data.  The part of actively transmitting data takes microseconds.

In fact, moving your data from one physical server to another is so fast that, unless you live near the server (in real life), there may not be any particular moment in time that you can correctly say that it's transferring you from one server to another.

Just to make a point, let's talk about something much harder that MMORPGs intrinsically have to deal with:  Internet latency.  If you're 1000 miles away from the server, then it would take light a little more than 5 ms to travel that distance in a vacuum.  That means that if there's one event that occurs on your computer, and another event that occurs on the server, observers at different points in the universe wouldn't necessarily agree on the time gap between them.  If the events occurred at close enough times, there might be disagreement as to which happened "first".  Even if they agree on which event came first, they could disagree with as to the time gap between them by as much as a little over 10 ms.  This isn't a measurement error or because the observers are stupid, either; it's the nature of the universe.

So now, a player sitting in his house playing your game presses a button to attack.  At what time should the attack officially take place?  The time at which the event "occurs" in his house doesn't match your server, let alone any other players connected to your server.  And then actually transmitting it from the client to the server takes longer yet.

The naive answer is, the attack occurs when the server finds out about it.  But that's the wrong answer.  That will make the game feel horribly laggy and players will complain.  You have to accept that attacks started before the server finds out about them.  But how long before?  Surely to a player, it shouldn't look on his own computer like the attack started before he pressed a button.  And what about other players that don't find out about it until later?

And how do you synchronize the time between the server and the various players, anyway?  If it's 3:48 pm on the server and 3:47 pm on a player's computer because one of the clocks is slightly off, attacks that register on the server shouldn't take a full minute to appear on a player's computer.  But you can't perfectly synchronize time because, not merely does it take varying amounts of time to transmit data, but saying two events in different places happened "at the same time" is scientific nonsense, as discussed above.

And yet, every event in the game world needs to appear to a player as though it happened at some exact time.  And it has to seem like it happened at a logical time, so that it doesn't look to the player like things are rubber-banding or it's taking a long time for the game to accept anything he tells it to do.

There isn't a perfect solution to this.  But if you can't come up with a passable solution, you can't make a real-time MMORPG, whether seamless, heavily-zoned, or anything else.  You could still make something that is completely turn-based--not the real-time attack every 2.2 seconds that players sometimes call "turn-based", but really turn-based along the lines of Civilization.

Taking a few seconds to move a player from one physical server to another and cover that up so that a player doesn't notice?  That's trivial by comparison.

-----

Creating an instance that the player phases across as you describe would be pretty trivial to do.  You run into the same complications of loading the stuff on the other side as you would in a seamless world, but nothing worse than that.

  fenistil

Novice Member

Joined: 9/22/11
Posts: 3016

9/28/12 3:54:08 PM#63
Originally posted by Quizzical
Originally posted by fenistil
Originally posted by Quizzical

Zones, and more to the point, loading screens, are a very different matter.  The only reason why any game would ever have loading screens at all is technical impediments that make it so that they have to stop to load things, or at least have serious gameplay problems if they don't.  Surely no game designers think, hey, this loading screen is really cool, so we bet players would like to sit there and stare at it for an extra five seconds every time.  You make the loading screen as short as you can.

It is not only about loading screens and way to not have load another terrain.   In zoned games - zone is usually an indepenent piece of land that is not simply part of bigger whole just cut of.   You could not simply merge few zones and create a whole region.   

It is like you would do an mmoprg that would have whole USA as an world. 

(Technical and practical things aside for discussion) Seamless is like taking everything : mountains, villages, small and big cities, forests, lakes. etc

Zoned could be simply above chopped to pieces with loading screens.  That's not how zoned games opeatae though.  Zoned mmorpg would be like taking part of few cities and part of few regions. 

Comparing parts of few regions and parts of few cities would not create whole USA.

 

I am talking about how zoned mmorpg's are done and not how technicaly could have been done. Because obviously it would be possible to take in example Ultima Online and simply chop it to few zones with like scissor cut. 

It depends greatly on the game.  In Guild Wars, for example, there's a world map, and most of the time that you cross a zone boundary, it's just loading what is on the other side of some line on the world map, such as from Old Ascalon to Regent Valley.  The zones may have nothing to do with each other in the internal code, but intuitively, they're right next to each other.

But even when the zones intuitively aren't right next to each other, there's no game design reason to make players sit and stare at a loading screen longer than you have to.  If it were trivial to do so, they'd make it so that it went from drawing you standing there in one zone to drawing you standing there in the other zone mere milliseconds later, with no loading screen between them.

Even if a seamless world internally uses zones, it doesn't have to be obvious where the zone boundary is.  The way to load things in a seamless world is that you load a little bit of data that says where everything is ahead of time (e.g., "there is a tree at (593.9534, 190.9843)"), and periodically look around and see if you're getting close to anything that needs to be loaded from the hard drive.  If you are getting close, then you load the relevant textures or sound effects or whatever, and if relevant, upload them to the video card.

Even if you're going to do this, you still want to use zones internally to help you find what you need to load.  Otherwise, every time you check to see what needs to be loaded, you'd have to check on every single tree, rock, wall, and so forth in the entire game world.  But if you break things into zones, then you can only check the ones in your current zone and adjacent zones.  But the "zones" for this could be a simple square grid drawn on the map and not correspond to anything at all that players can see in the game world.

Never played GW1 so I cannot say.  GW2 definately is made in a way I said though.  Zones don't even always have shape that would allow to think of them like just a world divided into fitting piece puzzles. 

 

I know that even seamless world usually have zones, but in some games that zones are more technical rather than pure design term.    World of Warcraft is kind of hybrid. Open world in it in Vanilla was seamless (not counting instanced dungeons) - well actually it was two instances one for each continent, but for sake of simplicity.

It had actual zones even design zones I would say.  I wonder if that game zones were also zones in technical terms.

 

Anyway to end player - final result matter the most.  Unless technicalities can be abused to create exploits or are causing bugs / huge lags.

I agree with "grid" thing. I even read it once about some world in mmorpg. Don't really remember which one it was though.  It was basically using same mechanism you said. Game loaded everything in "grid" player was in and adjacent ones.

 

Basically zones can be purely technical term or can be design term.  Those two can correspond (like in GW2, it seem each zone is diffrent IP and thus propably diffrent machine , but I would guess on their server farm there is some dynamic load / virtualizaton going on as well so nowadays you cannot be 100% sure how it is physically  ) and design zone can be also technical one at same time.

  Quizzical

Guide

Joined: 12/11/08
Posts: 13389

9/28/12 4:45:25 PM#64
Originally posted by fenistil

I agree with "grid" thing. I even read it once about some world in mmorpg. Don't really remember which one it was though.  It was basically using same mechanism you said. Game loaded everything in "grid" player was in and adjacent ones.

There are technical details of how to implement it.  If you load everything for one zone as soon as you enter an adjacent one, then you're going to be loading a bunch of things at once.  You may be able to cover up the hard drive accesses just fine, but if you have to stop the rendering thread from doing anything while you upload a bunch of textures to the video card at once, you're going to get a rather nasty case of hitching.  Spread out the uploads from system memory into video memory and making several consecutive frames take 1 ms longer than "normal" sure beats making one frame take 50 ms longer than normal.

What I actually said was to only check to see if you need to upload things in adjacent zones, not to actually upload everything when you cross a zone boundary.  But there are a lot of different ways to implement things.  Depending on internal details of the game engine, if you can squeeze the texture uploads into gaps when the rendering thread would have otherwise been idle, that would be ideal.   But it may not be possible.

  Sukiyaki

Advanced Member

Joined: 8/14/09
Posts: 1298

9/30/12 10:44:45 AM#65
Originally posted by Quizzical

The problem is hard drives.  Or more to the point, loading times off of hard drives.  If you want to load too much stuff off of a hard drive too often, then a seamless world is impossible and you have to make the game heavily zoned.  Reduce the amount of stuff you have to load off of a hard drive and a seamless world is easy to implement.

One way to do this is by requiring everyone to have an SSD in order to play the game.  While SSDs are seeing wider adoption, that would still greatly restrict your potential playerbase.

The other way is to reduce what players have to load, period.  What are games loading off of hard drives so much?  Mostly it's textures as used in 3D graphics.  Don't give a game so many textures or such high resolution textures in a given area, and making the world seamless would be easy.  Alternatively, if the textures are procedurally generated rather than loaded off of a hard drive, then you can skip the loading times.

It's not modern graphics in general that killed the seamless world.  A wide variety of high-resolution textures stored on the hard drive is the specific culprit.  Everything else in modern graphics is perfectly compatible with a seamless world.

It's a rare pleasure for me to see someone who understands the backgrounds of these design concepts, as well as their limitations. I share the same sentiment but with apparently much less insight.

While I would treat myself still as a laymen when it comes to this,  wouldnt want to group myself up with the people who make up all kind of irrational nonsense, why (their usually favorite) games have a seamless world (if at all) while other have not, or opposite have no understanding of the limitations like everything about the loading of assets.

Though what I would like to hear from you is your opinion on games like Archeage, which both has astonishing high quantitiy and quality of graphical assets, but doesnt just offer a seamless world, but also quite a large seamles one at that too and as if that isnt enough offer slightly more advanced game and combatmechanics (inc. use of physics) with "massive" amounts of player in a single area, yet somehow the game runs smoothly on a computer with "good" hardware and of course good connectivity.

Is it a technical leap or am I missing something out here?

  Quizzical

Guide

Joined: 12/11/08
Posts: 13389

9/30/12 1:35:14 PM#66
Originally posted by Sukiyaki

Though what I would like to hear from you is your opinion on games like Archeage, which both has astonishing high quantitiy and quality of graphical assets, but doesnt just offer a seamless world, but also quite a large seamles one at that too and as if that isnt enough offer slightly more advanced game and combatmechanics (inc. use of physics) with "massive" amounts of player in a single area, yet somehow the game runs smoothly on a computer with "good" hardware and of course good connectivity.

Is it a technical leap or am I missing something out here?

Whether the seamless world is large or small has nothing to do with how hard it is to make it seamless, unless the world is so small that you can load everything in the game all at once.  For the latter, think stuff like Tetris or Asteroids, not RPGs.

Physics has nothing to do with making it seamless.  Pick your favorite game and check the size of the executable file.  All of the underlying game mechanics (including physics) are packed in there, and it's easily small enough to load everything when you launch the game and keep it in system memory the whole time.

There are a number of tricks that you can use to cover up loading, but there are drawbacks to all of them.  I haven't played ArcheAge, so I don't know what it uses or doesn't use.  Some options:

1)  Load textures with a much greater lead time than most games would, so you start trying to load a texture well before it might plausibly be used.  Also, don't be as quick to delete them as most games would be, so that you don't have to reload it in case the player doubles back.  The downside of this is that you need a lot more system memory to hold all of the textures you've loaded there.

2)  Have a thread where all it does is load stuff of the hard drive, and assume it will always have a processor core available.  This means extra stuff going on while the game is active, so your game probably won't be playable on a single-core processor, and even a dual-core might be dicey.  But for players with extra processor cores that you weren't going to put to good use anyway, there isn't much of a drawback.

3)  Reuse textures really a lot.  Don't just have a texture and use it on one object.  Use it on a bunch of objects in the area.  You can put the same texture on different shapes, or with different lighting, so you don't necessarily have to have a bunch of identical objects.  But they will be similar.  If you use each texture twice as often in a given area, then you only have to load half as many of them.

4)  Pack several textures into the same file, and then always use them together.  This lets you often skip the performance hit that results from finishing loading one file and waiting for the hard drive to physically spin to the right spot to start loading the next one.  This doesn't have to be several textures for the same object.  It could, for example, be a texture for a wall and a texture for a chair sitting next to the wall.  The downside is that your world design makes it so that whenever you use one of the textures, you have to load all of them, so in order to be efficient, you have to use all of them in the same place every time.

5)  Go ahead and assume that loading will work right, even when you know that for some players, it won't.  You can leave things invisible when they aren't loaded, or have some generic textures that you use when the right texture isn't loaded.  For players with an SSD or even a relatively fast and properly defragmented hard drive, it will work.  But for players with a 5400 RPM laptop hard drive and/or a badly fragmented hard drive, there will be lots of problems with hitching, objects not appearing until they're close, or whatever your fallback option for when things aren't loaded right is.

-----

One thing I've been messing with lately is to say, don't store textures on the hard drive at all.  Instead, generate them on the fly on the processor.  You don't get AAA quality graphics that way, but it does make it pretty trivial to make a game world seamless.  It also has the drawback that most game companies can't do it at all because they don't have a good mathematician to write the code.  A quick picture, in case you want to see what it looks like:

The big rock you see in the front is, as far as the CPU knows, four triangles.  The tree trunks are also four triangles.  Each rock off in the distance is likewise four triangles.  And furthermore, they're exactly the same four triangles, just tessellated differently and with different textures.

Aggressive use of tessellation makes it pretty easy to load all of the vertex data for the entire game and store it in video memory when you launch the game.  That means no need to worry about loading it later, whether from the hard drive to system memory or from system memory to the video card.  The problem is that it requires a bunch of graduate level mathematics, so most game programmers have no clue how to do it.

  Presbytier

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 7/12/10
Posts: 426

9/30/12 1:39:21 PM#67
Originally posted by snapfusion

Stop making excuses for lazy developers or blaming computer hardware.  Few developers want to invest the time needed to pull it off ITS THATS SIMPLE.

Every other reason in this thread is just an EXCUSE period.

The time difference in making a heavily instanced game like GW2 AOC TSW etc, and something like DF, RIFT, WOW is enormous.  Instancing should be reserved for dungeons only, but games like Vangaurd and AC have proved its technically possible in any development lifecycle.

Lobby games even with big zones are easy mode to develop.

This is just comepletely wrong a good example is FFXIV. In it they where going for a seamless world, but it seriously crippled the overall game.

"Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game."-Guybrush Threepwood
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me."-Hunter S. Thompson

  fenistil

Novice Member

Joined: 9/22/11
Posts: 3016

9/30/12 3:02:21 PM#68

@Sukiyaki

 

Question was not for me, but anyway. 

There are propably few things that AA do but that's what anyone can see on AA videos are:

1. While graphic quality is real nice - there is less details in some parts of game than in other top notch games

2. Ground has frequenly ( especially in terrain is very open ) also small amount ot details and additional things, in some places is just simple flat texture without anything.

3. Part of high hills, mountains, placec in building where player rarely will be (like on top of high building), etc are really low-res

  fenistil

Novice Member

Joined: 9/22/11
Posts: 3016

9/30/12 3:05:19 PM#69
Originally posted by Presbytier
Originally posted by snapfusion

Stop making excuses for lazy developers or blaming computer hardware.  Few developers want to invest the time needed to pull it off ITS THATS SIMPLE.

Every other reason in this thread is just an EXCUSE period.

The time difference in making a heavily instanced game like GW2 AOC TSW etc, and something like DF, RIFT, WOW is enormous.  Instancing should be reserved for dungeons only, but games like Vangaurd and AC have proved its technically possible in any development lifecycle.

Lobby games even with big zones are easy mode to develop.

This is just comepletely wrong a good example is FFXIV. In it they where going for a seamless world, but it seriously crippled the overall game.

Seamlessnes is not a problem in FFXIV.  Problem is that they did bad game.  They did not spend enough resources, making cheap open world copy & pasting or maybe even using generator.  + they developed horrible horrible engine. 

 

They just did bad game and it looked like it was totally rushed one as well.

  Nacario

Novice Member

Joined: 3/16/12
Posts: 217

The real world is roleplay and background noise

9/30/12 3:11:20 PM#70
One of the main reasons are the amount of players, with the possibility of having too many at the same zone/spot at the same time. That's why they should make servers have like max 500 players and more servers (which would also remove channels). A key move to create a seamingless world.
  Quizzical

Guide

Joined: 12/11/08
Posts: 13389

9/30/12 3:12:05 PM#71
Originally posted by fenistil
Originally posted by Presbytier
Originally posted by snapfusion

Stop making excuses for lazy developers or blaming computer hardware.  Few developers want to invest the time needed to pull it off ITS THATS SIMPLE.

Every other reason in this thread is just an EXCUSE period.

The time difference in making a heavily instanced game like GW2 AOC TSW etc, and something like DF, RIFT, WOW is enormous.  Instancing should be reserved for dungeons only, but games like Vangaurd and AC have proved its technically possible in any development lifecycle.

Lobby games even with big zones are easy mode to develop.

This is just comepletely wrong a good example is FFXIV. In it they where going for a seamless world, but it seriously crippled the overall game.

They did not spend enough resources, making cheap open world copy & pasting or maybe even using generator.

Lots of copy and paste means not having to load new stuff off of the hard drive.  That's what enabled a seamless world.

  Quizzical

Guide

Joined: 12/11/08
Posts: 13389

9/30/12 6:50:22 PM#72
Originally posted by ayronamic
One of the main reasons are the amount of players, with the possibility of having too many at the same zone/spot at the same time. That's why they should make servers have like max 500 players and more servers (which would also remove channels). A key move to create a seamingless world.

Showing other players has no effect on seamless versus zoned unless the game doesn't have an open world at all.

  fenistil

Novice Member

Joined: 9/22/11
Posts: 3016

9/30/12 7:12:53 PM#73
Originally posted by Quizzical
Originally posted by fenistil
Originally posted by Presbytier
Originally posted by snapfusion

Stop making excuses for lazy developers or blaming computer hardware.  Few developers want to invest the time needed to pull it off ITS THATS SIMPLE.

Every other reason in this thread is just an EXCUSE period.

The time difference in making a heavily instanced game like GW2 AOC TSW etc, and something like DF, RIFT, WOW is enormous.  Instancing should be reserved for dungeons only, but games like Vangaurd and AC have proved its technically possible in any development lifecycle.

Lobby games even with big zones are easy mode to develop.

This is just comepletely wrong a good example is FFXIV. In it they where going for a seamless world, but it seriously crippled the overall game.

They did not spend enough resources, making cheap open world copy & pasting or maybe even using generator.

Lots of copy and paste means not having to load new stuff off of the hard drive.  That's what enabled a seamless world.

Yeah, but you played a FFXIV?   I am not saying about copy & paste assets like same trees, textures, etc- I am talking like IDENTICAL places like identical valleys with exactly same trees, rocks, in exactly same places almost next to each other. 

I doubt it was done to lessen strain on hard drive.  It looked like a cheap very fast way to make open world and push game through the door.

NONE and I mean none seamless mmorpg game I played or even saw on videos looked like that.  

  DavisFlight

Hard Core Member

Joined: 9/25/12
Posts: 2571

10/01/12 12:23:19 AM#74
Originally posted by fenistil
Originally posted by DavisFlight

First issue. People need to stop saying instance when they mean zone.

Second issue, it's purely design.

Actually zone is an instance. 

Totally seamless world is just one big instance. 

Game composed of 10 zones with loading screens are just 10 instances.

There can't be just ONE instance. An instance, by definition, is one of many. A single piece of a whole.

ZONES, aren't instanced. You can have as many people as you want in a zone, with no player cap.

  DavisFlight

Hard Core Member

Joined: 9/25/12
Posts: 2571

10/01/12 12:26:25 AM#75
Originally posted by Quizzical
Originally posted by DavisFlight

There have been dozens of MMOs in the past and present that are not only seamless, but have no instances either. It's all about how you design the game. A game like WoW would break in half if there weren't instances. Meanwhile, a game made with much worse tech, dark age of Camelot, NEVER had issues with crowding, camping, or anything like that, and there wasn't a single instance in that game.

Instances have some major gameplay advantages. I haven't found any. For starters, they let players see the world as it is "supposed" to be Er... not really, considering the devs made the game with the intention of having other players in it, so its not "supposed" to be a static world. Its a multiplayer game., rather than heading out to kill a mob only to find that someone else already did.  That's what makes it a virtual world. There are drawbacks, too, but even with no technical impediments, there are good reasons why a game might want to use instances in various ways Not if you want to make an MMO.

You cite DAoC, but that game had instances, too.  It did indeed add instances in 2005, it was one of the things that made everyone quit. A "server" (as it appears to players, not necessarily a physical server on the back end) is an instance. Not in the traditional MMORPG definition of an instance, no. 

 

  Quirhid

Elite Member

Joined: 1/28/05
Posts: 5540

Correcting wrongs on the Internet...

10/01/12 2:23:00 AM#76
Originally posted by DavisFlight
Originally posted by Quizzical
Originally posted by DavisFlight

There have been dozens of MMOs in the past and present that are not only seamless, but have no instances either. It's all about how you design the game. A game like WoW would break in half if there weren't instances. Meanwhile, a game made with much worse tech, dark age of Camelot, NEVER had issues with crowding, camping, or anything like that, and there wasn't a single instance in that game.

Instances have some major gameplay advantages. I haven't found any. For starters, they let players see the world as it is "supposed" to be Er... not really, considering the devs made the game with the intention of having other players in it, so its not "supposed" to be a static world. Its a multiplayer game., rather than heading out to kill a mob only to find that someone else already did.  That's what makes it a virtual world. There are drawbacks, too, but even with no technical impediments, there are good reasons why a game might want to use instances in various ways Not if you want to make an MMO.

You cite DAoC, but that game had instances, too.  It did indeed add instances in 2005, it was one of the things that made everyone quit. A "server" (as it appears to players, not necessarily a physical server on the back end) is an instance. Not in the traditional MMORPG definition of an instance, no. 

  1. Better performance
  2. More profound effects without disrupting other players' gameplay
  3. Prevent other players from griefing or disupting your gameplay
  4. Customzed content
  5. Difficulty can be adjusted
  6. No need for respawning mobs or anything of the sort
  7. You can choose your company

I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been -Wayne Gretzky

  IAmMMO

Advanced Member

Joined: 5/17/08
Posts: 1320

10/01/12 2:34:56 AM#77
Originally posted by snapfusion

Stop making excuses for lazy developers or blaming computer hardware.  Few developers want to invest the time needed to pull it off ITS THATS SIMPLE.

Every other reason in this thread is just an EXCUSE period.

The time difference in making a heavily instanced game like GW2 AOC TSW etc, and something like DF, RIFT, WOW is enormous.  Instancing should be reserved for dungeons only, but games like Vangaurd and AC have proved its technically possible in any development lifecycle.

Lobby games even with big zones are easy mode to develop.

Don't forget the MMO now called Istaria pulled it off too, though very badly performance wise in the beginning. They even had flying in the seamless world for the playable dragon race. I still wonder why no other new MMO has taken the dragon you grow from a baby to flying adult idea to another MMO. It would be perfect for a new sandbox MMO world.

  fenistil

Novice Member

Joined: 9/22/11
Posts: 3016

10/01/12 5:08:50 AM#78
Originally posted by DavisFlight
Originally posted by fenistil
Originally posted by DavisFlight

First issue. People need to stop saying instance when they mean zone.

Second issue, it's purely design.

Actually zone is an instance. 

Totally seamless world is just one big instance. 

Game composed of 10 zones with loading screens are just 10 instances.

There can't be just ONE instance. An instance, by definition, is one of many. A single piece of a whole.

ZONES, aren't instanced. You can have as many people as you want in a zone, with no player cap.

Zones ARE instances.  There IS player cap.    Newest example -  Guild Wars 2  - each zone have player cap.

Same thing was with Swtor game spawned new instance of zone if there was more players than cap. Same now with Lotro.

And with many other zoned games.

 

I will quote you "One of many.A single piece of a whole" - game world chopped into zones with loading screens = instanced world.   

  wyldmagik

Apprentice Member

Joined: 9/12/07
Posts: 239

10/01/12 5:18:24 AM#79

You are all in some sort of denial about various things with mmo's today..

 

Go play Asherons call, and try and actually embrace the way questing is done by means of search and figuring out stuff, and having to group to do such parts that crop up in middle of said quests..

gfx? pfft they are nice of course dont get me wrong here, I love good eye candy, but way too much is sacrificed these days to fit the fast buck earning bill...

Id plant a good 6 years solid into a new asherons call, and they can still have blocky/squared off shoulders for all I care..

you are all spoilt and think things should be a particular way to be good lol's..

laters... :)

  Quirhid

Elite Member

Joined: 1/28/05
Posts: 5540

Correcting wrongs on the Internet...

10/01/12 5:54:17 AM#80
Originally posted by fenistil
game world chopped into zones with loading screens = instanced world.   

No. Just no.

I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been -Wayne Gretzky

9 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Last Search