Never because a lot of people are actually complaining about not having quest hubs. So billzard will keep them to keep that market share. Personally I hate quest hubs that send you to next one ect ect. Its boring.

I saw someone mention TSW as innovative... not really. Adding in Mist style puzzles and making your game more like a single player RPG doesn't innovate. 

---

Originally posted by Tardcore How long before MoP sales are picking little peices of GW2 sales out of its gigantic teeth? Oh yeah, 14 more days.

---

Originally posted by xpiher

Never because a lot of people are actually complaining about not having quest hubs. So billzard will keep them to keep that market share.

I saw someone mention TSW as innovative... not really. Adding in Mist style puzzles and making your game more like a single player RPG doesn't innovate. 

Originally posted by QuicklyScott
oh god, I hope never.  The questing is the worst part of GW2 :/

I completely agree, chaotic mess questing is a terrible design. And yes thats how I see it.

GW2 DOESNT HAVE QUESTS!!!!!!!!

Oops, sorry. I thought it was 2011 for a second, heh.

Originally posted by smh_alot

Originally posted by xpiher

Never because a lot of people are actually complaining about not having quest hubs. So billzard will keep them to keep that market share.

I saw someone mention TSW as innovative... not really. Adding in Mist style puzzles and making your game more like a single player RPG doesn't innovate. 

 

It's all very subjective, I think. To you, TSW isn't really innovative, to others GW2 isn't really innovative, again others think both have innovative elements (me) and other others think both aren't really innovative. It's all relative, the man Einstein alrdy said it.

Both games don't really innovate in terms of questing design. GW2 has the potential to make their system more dynamic though with a few tweaks since each DE and zone has 1-3 paths the quests chains can go. The problem is, they aren't hard enuogh to force players into the "failed zone" or the "we lost the battle but won the war" chain. ANET should force losses IMO to show people how dynamic the event actually can be. 

Originally posted by Misaris

Blizzard will teach the industry what *real* innovation means. With Titan I´m pretty sure they come up with more than yellow circles and a "dynamic" quest log.

No need to copy anything from GW2 (please, no cow feeding Blizzard.. please).

Further *real* innovation, look at World of Darkness and TSW

Like Blizzard showed us such amazing innovation after 7 years of development on Diablo 3.

I hope Titan is great but not holding my breath expecting it to be.

Originally posted by Misaris

Blizzard will teach the industry what *real* innovation means. With Titan I´m pretty sure they come up with more than yellow circles and a "dynamic" quest log.

No need to copy anything from GW2 (please, no cow feeding Blizzard.. please).

Further *real* innovation, look at World of Darkness and TSW

TSW skill wheel is just arenanet's own GW1 skill system copied to death and a wheel added to it yet you call that game innovative.

I don't prefer one game's questing to another.  GW2 questing system is already similar to WoW's so I doubt WoW would copy much.

I'm confused why they would copy it in the first place. It's not new, it's not fun (to a certain degree) and it becomes repetative and boring. I don't get these dynamic events at all. I view it just like SWTOR quests. I would rather have them spend the 100 million they wasted on interactive questing and put it somewhere useful. Like endgame, armor design's, player housing, crafting, PvP, balancing, spells, etc. I think MMORPG's are going the wrong direction. The RPG part comes from the MMO part. The money does not need to be wasted on quests. If I wanted to sit there and solo quests all day long, I would play RPG's!

I hope Titan doesn't do anything remotely similar to GW2.

lol, OP you act as if the ball is in Anets court...

GW2 hasnt even been out a month,who's to say the game wont be a ghost town 2 months from now?

Blizzard may use some ideas from Anet,just like any other company would..

its common practice.

I went out on a limb and guessed "never"

But I could be wrong. Maybe there will be some form of "Dynamic Events' in the future. But it won't replace questing. It will just be additional content. That might make it even more fun, if you think about it. Scrap all those escort/ filler DE's and keep the fun/exciting ones.

Originally posted by Misaris

Blizzard will teach the industry what *real* innovation means. With Titan I´m pretty sure they come up with more than yellow circles and a "dynamic" quest log.

No need to copy anything from GW2 (please, no cow feeding Blizzard.. please).

Further *real* innovation, look at World of Darkness and TSW

LOL thats right they will copy someone else's idea right. World of darkness does look cool will see how that turns out and TSW is about the same as GW2 with a diffrent setting. We can't really say about titan because its already being made but I'm sure will see plenty of what we've seen before. Really what else can they do to make mmo's different or any game for that matter. Its all the same just in a different way. So find a game thats fun and enjoy it. 

Originally posted by hikaru77
GW2 already have quest hubs but is called ¨heart hub¨. Cant wait for MoP, i hate WoW with all my heart,but i cant wait to see how MoP will take more than a Half of the GW2 active population.

LOL now thats a joke and maybe for a day till they relize combat sucks in wow. Heart hubs gotta love it. Guess what you don't have to do those lol.