| 62 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
7/29/12 1:55:59 AM#21
GW1 was put on steam fairly late in it's life. I'm not sure if it's even been up there a full year (and GW1 is going on it's 8th year). It's always possible that GW2 will be available on steam, but it's a pretty good bet you won't see it up there for at least another year. As others have stated steam takes a cut of the profits, and on top of that Valve is pretty picky about which games it supports on their service. It's basically a lot of hoops for a new game to jump through. |
|
|
7/29/12 1:56:16 AM#22
None the less...its still on steam, which is what i was pointing out to the quoted poster. |
|
|
7/29/12 2:04:34 AM#23
No, actually, the fact that you're saying that shows you have absolutely no idea how Steam works. I can launch GW1 right now from Steam, and it will be running the same version as the non-Steam version. Developers do not have to run their patches through Valve first. One of the objectives of Steam is to make it easier for developers to reach their customers, something that Gabe Newell has stated is distinct from consoles. Please don't make things up and post them. Someone who knows even less might actually believe you. "Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." -Dr. Seuss |
|
|
7/29/12 4:07:45 AM#24
Originally posted by jpnz "Attack on Steam?" There was no attack on Steam. Anet disagrees with whatever terms that Valve placed on them, and so will many other MMO developers. I don't know what they are, but the point is, it's probably not going to be on there. |
|
|
7/29/12 4:51:04 AM#25
Originally posted by khamul787 Shh. Saying a bad thing about Steam on popular gaming forums get's those torches and pitchforks out in seconds. If i recall correctly the issue is pretty simple. Valve forced microtransactions to go through Steam instead of going through the actual developer/publisher, meaning they get a cut from it. Not eveyrone is willing to share their profits with Valve, which is udnerstandable, especially if you have strong enough franchise that can hold on it's own withotu the need of advertising on Steam. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:03:11 AM#26
Originally posted by khamul787 That is a HUGE positive,about time a developer stands up to Steam and tells them NO. I really got miffed at STEAM when i tried dealing with their customer support,they use a cop out "go to the actual develoepr for support.Well the rpoblem using Steam is they cover every program with a SHELL,meaning yo ucan do very little with it and at times as i experienced made some content unuasable. I am sure some people have found a way around that shell,but to the average user,we expect FULL control over a product we purchase and Steam does not allow that. There is yet one other problem associated with that Shell.I have witnessed consumers that made chargebacks agaisnt Steam and they went on to clsoe their entire account leaving them with no access to all the games the yhad purchsed.I would think that is illegal but not sure how an average consumer could fight that. I would encourage nobody to use Steam,stay as far away as possible.This is one of the smart moves by A-Net and i approve. http://www.youtube.com/user/Napolianboo#p/u/15/rCYLLQCNc1w |
|
|
7/29/12 5:03:51 AM#27
Originally posted by khamul787 So you speak for 'other MMO developers'? Like I said, disagreeing and deciding to not do XYZ together with someone is fine. Disagreeing and then saying 'We didn't do XYZ together and so will other companies' is another issue. Speaking for 'other' parties is unprofessional and makes you look petty. Wonder why there seems to be more haters on the internet? Read this by an actual marketing guy to find out why. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:05:04 AM#28
Originally posted by Ezhae Yeah, that seems like a pretty good reason to not put your game on there. Anet doesn't really need the added publicity from Steam, and they probably won't make enough to justify those cuts that Valve will take off the top. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:06:37 AM#29
Originally posted by Ezhae This post is factually false. Valve does not force micro-transaction to go through Steam. EVE-Online has MT and even if you buy the game from Steam, MT is done through CCP (Makers of EVE-Online).
Dealing with Steam is filled with NDA so you won't get much proof, but from what we have (public info), Valve doesn't restrict microtransaction to go through Steam. If the dev wants to go through Steam, they can use the Steam Wallet feature. Wonder why there seems to be more haters on the internet? Read this by an actual marketing guy to find out why. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:07:14 AM#30
Originally posted by jpnz I'm not; Arenanet is, and they would be right. It's perfectly valid reasoning, and frankly, they would know better than you would. They're not saying "we won't do it so no one should," they're saying "this is why we, along with many others, aren;t doing this." It's hardly unprofessional; it's pointing out the facts of the system. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:08:06 AM#31
Originally posted by jpnz That's not what he's saying; he's saying that MTs of games that go through Steam will have some taken from the top, and this is true. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:14:40 AM#32
Originally posted by jpnz EVE was on steam before that. It started when Steam introduced F2P MMOs in their system, all of them go through Steam system these days. I'm not sure whenever it's restricted if your game is avalible outside of Steam as well (as in doesn't require Steam to run), but when You buy/download it thorugh Steam, then the ingame shop has to go through Steam services for MT. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:18:39 AM#33
I think someone should provide a link to the steam "dev" terms of service to put the debate straight once and for all? |
|
|
7/29/12 5:19:41 AM#34
Originally posted by Ezhae Not true at all. Valve doesn't force MT to go through Steam. If I make a game and I want the MT to go through Steam, I can. But I am not forced to even IF my game is on Steam.
ANet didn't elaborate what their disagreement was which is fine. I have no issue with that. Doubt ANet can anyway since Steam / Valve is NDA-Central. I did find ANet speaking for other developers unprofessional. Wonder why there seems to be more haters on the internet? Read this by an actual marketing guy to find out why. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:22:36 AM#35
Originally posted by jpnz Almost all new he said, those games are from 2003. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:23:23 AM#36
Originally posted by jpnz From F2P FAQ avalible on Steam: If you wish to purchase in-game items or content, you will need to fund your Steam Wallet. Please see theSteam Wallet FAQ for more information. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:26:03 AM#37
Never understood why people need games to be sol through Steam. You can add game to steam if you really feel you want., even if you havet bought it. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:29:34 AM#38
Originally posted by fenistil Pretty sure people are not upset at Steam not having GW2 at least on this thread. I did took exception at the ANet's statements which was unprofessional but that's about it. Wonder why there seems to be more haters on the internet? Read this by an actual marketing guy to find out why. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:33:19 AM#39
Originally posted by Ezhae And... this is relevant how? GW2 is F2P? o_O Wonder why there seems to be more haters on the internet? Read this by an actual marketing guy to find out why. |
|
|
7/29/12 5:36:54 AM#40
Originally posted by fenistil because I get a lot of stuff at 50%+ off |
|