| 248 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
7/27/12 11:06:01 AM#61
Originally posted by otinanai123 As someone how has played both, this is just laughable |
|
|
7/27/12 11:07:32 AM#62
I also think that it slows the gameplay down and the balancing between the professions in their down states is currently off, even if they are going to keep it. I honestly just do not see that the very small layer of strategy that it adds is worth the frustration or the lack of ability to skillfully outplay 2 people in a 2v1 scenario and still come out on top. With the current downed system there is no way for your to win a 2v1 against just competent people let alone good ones. |
|
Originally posted by Gaia_Hunter You got me here. I like to play rogue classes, harass, hit and run, scout, take on multiple enemies, help my team by soloing. And gw2 doesn't seem to allow that playstyle. In fact GW2 seems to force us to play a certain way to have a chance in PvP (just like WoW). I won't be surprised if each class has 1-2 viable builds in PvP a month or two after launch. |
|
|
7/27/12 11:08:12 AM#64
Originally posted by silvermember If I offended anyone with the commetn about President Obama that was not my intention. I was just reminded of that scene by albers comment. In life, some instances stick with you more than others, for some reason I always think of that scene with the President cause it was just so obviously and painfully clear that he had no idea what he was saying. having said that, I'll leave it at that and will try to come up with a non-political example next time. cheers! |
|
|
7/27/12 11:09:39 AM#65
Originally posted by orsonstfu Not true, I have done it. In WVW I was able to defeat 2 players. I'm starting to wonder if any who are against the downed mechanic have even played GW2?? |
|
|
7/27/12 11:10:48 AM#66
Originally posted by albers I love it how someone who hasn't even played the game can promise how things will go down in a game... genious! |
|
|
7/27/12 11:12:04 AM#67
Originally posted by joocheese Depends on what aspects that you personally put more weight into. WoW certainly had and still has a more reactive and instantaneous combat system. You click a button in WoW or hotkey one and the ability you want to use happens at that exact moment. In guild wars 2 it has a major delay.
However, guild wars 2 is built from the ground up to be at least a 50% PvP game - so it has much better class balancing and the lack of god like healers makes it better in my eyes. |
|
|
7/27/12 11:13:17 AM#68
Originally posted by Purgatus Your first problem is that you're going solo... again, this isn't WOW, this is GW2... why or why would you ever go solo, in both SPVP and in WVW. |
|
|
7/27/12 11:14:54 AM#69
Originally posted by joocheese You missed the most important part of the post. read the last sentence. COMPETENT. You cannot beat competent players in Numbersv1. Because competent players will lock you down and help their buddy up or toss down an ability that will rally. I beat tons of people 3v1 and 2v1 during all the betas.
Also making a stereotype against people - who just happen to be of a different opinion. Well it makes you look like a fool, So stray away from doing that because it doesn't help your argument at all. |
|
|
7/27/12 11:15:16 AM#70
Originally posted by otinanai123
|
|
|
7/27/12 11:17:47 AM#71
Originally posted by joocheese Going solo has tons of merit in WvW - someone needs to find where people are and relay enemy movement. Hell, I even send my pet off to stay somewhere just so I can have more map awareness while I am off defending or zerging.
You do not win SPVP by zerging around as a group. Solo or duo works MUUUUCH better. You split up and take multiple spots faster... or while you are sitting in a zerg caping a point. I kill your svanir or the giant solo.. |
|
|
7/27/12 11:18:22 AM#72
Originally posted by orsonstfu So you can never ever in the whole existence of time ever beat a competent player? never? even once? even just a little? I love how you use linguistics to create closed systems and thus have a "solid" argument... And as to your last comment, you obviously didnt read what I said... "I'm starting to wonder". Not making any stereotypes, but rather wondering if people have played the game... have you? P.S. try staying away from insulting people, it makes you look childish |
|
Originally posted by joocheese You could beat 2 players. so what? that doesn't prove anything. When the system starts matching you with players of similar skill level you will not be able to do this. |
|
Originally posted by joocheese Maybe once every few months when one of them is afk. |
|
|
7/27/12 11:21:03 AM#75
Originally posted by joocheese Yawn, I am gonna stop this argument here because you can't seem to find the difference between a competent player and guy who just jumped into PvP for the first time and gets himself owned with his wife at his side. So you won that 2v1... but a competent group of players you cannot. I have beaten tons of competent players 1v1. I promise you with the downed mechanic that you will not beat competent players at anything more than a 1v1.
|
|
|
7/27/12 11:21:10 AM#76
Originally posted by orsonstfu teaming up in twos in spvp makes sense, running around alone in wvw not much, there are plenty of players running around already and you can see where fights are taking place by looking at the map... plus, you're no good to anyone alone if any groups come your way. Not a bad idea but I would do scouting differently, in groups in order to increase your chances of beating other groups if you run by them, and you have a chance at taking supply camps too. |
|
Originally posted by joocheese All 3 BWEs and almost all stress tests(I missed one because of a EURO2012 semifinal). Which doesn't mean I'm not still a newbie with less than 7-8 days played (and so are you)
btw are you sure you're a PvPer? |
|
|
7/27/12 11:25:23 AM#78
Originally posted by orsonstfu You misunderstand me orsonstfu... I have nothing against you. But what I do have an issue with is the fact that you define a competent player as someone who cannot be defeated based on the situation that you created; that's too easy to do. One of the things that I like about GW2 is that even competent players have to work at it. If yo'ure running by yourself, in my opinion, you're already doing something wrong. You can play solo and prob win a few fights solo, but if you're using strategy you'll stick with other players (at least with another one) in order to increase your chances of winning. Again I ask, have you played GW2? I'm not trying to call you out, just trying to, I guess in a way, collect information on the people who hold a speicific opinion. I guess you could say either way I would not have any way to prove otherwise, but I'll take your word for it. |
|
|
7/27/12 11:27:00 AM#79
Originally posted by otinanai123 nice! I've played all BWEs and all stress tests. Btw, which team were you chearing for? I'm originally from Spain so the Euro 2012 ended quite well for me :-) this is not a competition to see who has logged more hours, I was just curious to see who all, who are against the downed mechanic, has actually played the game.... just curious more than anything. |
|
|
7/27/12 11:27:59 AM#80
Originally posted by otinanai123 Course you can, as long as you yourself are "competent". Not exactly the hardest subject to grasp mate. System matches you up with similarly ranked servers to keep everything relatively competitive in WvWvW. Which, of course, means you need to adapt as you are fighting them. Idiot player will keep going into battles with the same strategy they've been using from the beginning. Smart players will change skills/equipment as needed. |
|