AI-less Stationary NPCs needs to go from MMOs.

NPCs needs to do their thing. They need to have objective, progression, purpose. Past, Present, Future. They need to be able to die. They need to be able to protect themselves.

They need to be part of the economy, instead of having infinite wealth, printing their own currency.

No more, EVERY NPC needs help with stupid things. If its not logic and reasonable, then they should go do their own stuff.

No more, EVERYONE DOING THE SAME QUESTS FROM THE SAME NPCS.

If you do a quest, its over, nobody else's does it again. Unless the activity itself has sense in being repeated or offered to many people.

AI needs needs. Needs home/place to rest. Needs food. It needs to gather its own food, or buy it.

It needs to do activities when its not sleeping or eating. Participate in the society, politics, drama, economy, whatever work or activity it decides to do, based on current situation, needs, goals.

In short, each NPC has to have its own agenda going on. Autogoverning itself.

It needs to be griefable by players and it needs to be programed deal with it.

I just heard of the Elders Scroll Online MMO being made to feature the same stationary quest givers robotic npcs of near decades ago.

No MMORPG can be considered AAA without a organic, dynamic feeling "alive" world.

I want to see a MMORPG world being built to be fully functional and complex, like a machine. I want to see "actors" actually acting

They used to, in older MMOs. They used to patrol, move from zone to zone, have a massive amount of dialogue and emotes, and you could even type things to them.

But then developers stopped caring about making virtual worlds. Closest we ever got was Ultima Online.

i think friendly NPCs should be minimised. game should be designed so that players take on the role of friendly NPCs allowing for emergent gameplay

Ive seen some measure of AI in MMOs.

Fallen Earth has some carnivorous AI animals attacking each other (not the player).

Saga of Ryzom had a complex AI for animals, migrating, hunting each other, protecting territory.

But those were for animal/mobs AI. Im looking for HUMANOID/INTELIGENT  races AI.

Ive seen some measure of it in some space games, single player and online.

I would like to see some of the AI from the Gothic 2 (Skyrim comes close), or from the Space Rangers 2 game, if any of you are familiar.

Besides npc improvement.Text doesnt cut it for me. I would like to speak through my character and it wouldn't be to hard. Animators can use a limited set of mouth shapes to simulate the consonants we use to speak. Transients are the individual shapes that make up waveforms and can be analyzed to trigger the proper mouth animations. If any game developer did this it would be a huge step forward in player immersion.

Originally posted by DaezAster

Besides npc improvement.Text doesnt cut it for me. I would like to speak through my character and it wouldn't be to hard. Animators can use a limited set of mouth shapes to simulate the consonants we use to speak. Transients are the individual shapes that make up waveforms and can be analyzed to trigger the proper mouth animations. If any game developer did this it would be a huge step forward in player immersion.

 

Or instead of spending half the budget on voice and the other half on advertising the voice (SWTOR) we can stick with text :P in my opinion. You can do a LOT more with text. Speech kills most RPGs.

Originally posted by Garvon3

They used to, in older MMOs. They used to patrol, move from zone to zone, have a massive amount of dialogue and emotes, and you could even type things to them.

 

But then developers stopped caring about making virtual worlds. Closest we ever got was Ultima Online.

There are VERY few examples of that. Even before WoW. VERY few.

Yes, there are older games in which NPCs patrol, but everything else he mentioned? Nope, not really.

Probably the best examples I can think of would be early EQ2 or Vanguard.

- Btw, if the OP is really that interested in NPCs, he may want to check out GW2. They do a lot of that ingame, and most NPCs that I see do their own thing. There are some that are stationary, that sell things, etc. But there are other merchants that need to travel to get supplies, and things of that nature. It really is refreshing to see. Example

May as well not have quests then.

If you can kill npc's, there needs to be a mechanism to add new ones that take up the same role so content is not duplicated.

I'm all for it in a game like Fallen Earth where a town could be ghosted until travellers slowly repopulate.

Just dont expect a rich story line with dialogue.

Originally posted by rounner

May as well not have quests then.

If you can kill npc's, there needs to be a mechanism to add new ones that take up the same role so content is not duplicated.

I'm all for it in a game like Fallen Earth where a town could be ghosted until travellers slowly repopulate.

Just dont expect a rich story line with dialogue.

Ya I was just thinking that.  The NPC need mechanism to mate with each other, or with other players, so they can bread and repopulate.

You know how players like to kill any NPC that they can kill.

Originally posted by aesperus

Originally posted by Garvon3

They used to, in older MMOs. They used to patrol, move from zone to zone, have a massive amount of dialogue and emotes, and you could even type things to them.

 

But then developers stopped caring about making virtual worlds. Closest we ever got was Ultima Online.

There are VERY few examples of that. Even before WoW. VERY few.

Yes, there are older games in which NPCs patrol, but everything else he mentioned? Nope, not really.

Probably the best examples I can think of would be early EQ2 or Vanguard.

 

- Btw, if the OP is really that interested in NPCs, he may want to check out GW2. They do a lot of that ingame, and most NPCs that I see do their own thing. There are some that are stationary, that sell things, etc. But there are other merchants that need to travel to get supplies, and things of that nature. It really is refreshing to see. Example

Here is another video by the same person, it illustrates really well how NPCs can be made to contribute to immersion even with scripting that is both repeatable and dynamic.

Expecting truly living, breathing worlds is simply unrealistic and quite frankly ignorant. But it's the little touches that can make a place seem like it's more alive, and that's all that matters for now.

Originally posted by Garvon3

Originally posted by DaezAster

Besides npc improvement.Text doesnt cut it for me. I would like to speak through my character and it wouldn't be to hard. Animators can use a limited set of mouth shapes to simulate the consonants we use to speak. Transients are the individual shapes that make up waveforms and can be analyzed to trigger the proper mouth animations. If any game developer did this it would be a huge step forward in player immersion.

 

Or instead of spending half the budget on voice and the other half on advertising the voice (SWTOR) we can stick with text :P in my opinion. You can do a LOT more with text. Speech kills most RPGs.

Don't think you undestood what I said there at all. I'm not talking about voice actors I'm talking abou your words being spoken by your character.

Originally posted by DaezAster

Originally posted by Garvon3

Originally posted by DaezAster

Besides npc improvement.Text doesnt cut it for me. I would like to speak through my character and it wouldn't be to hard. Animators can use a limited set of mouth shapes to simulate the consonants we use to speak. Transients are the individual shapes that make up waveforms and can be analyzed to trigger the proper mouth animations. If any game developer did this it would be a huge step forward in player immersion.

 

Or instead of spending half the budget on voice and the other half on advertising the voice (SWTOR) we can stick with text :P in my opinion. You can do a LOT more with text. Speech kills most RPGs.

Don't think you undestood what I said there at all. I'm not talking about voice actors I'm talking abou your words being spoken by your character.

Sure new technology is cool but then you're just playing yourself and the technology. Using more complex technology to essentially do the same thing is not player immersion.

Originally posted by Poison_Adele

Originally posted by DaezAster

Originally posted by Garvon3

Originally posted by DaezAster

Besides npc improvement.Text doesnt cut it for me. I would like to speak through my character and it wouldn't be to hard. Animators can use a limited set of mouth shapes to simulate the consonants we use to speak. Transients are the individual shapes that make up waveforms and can be analyzed to trigger the proper mouth animations. If any game developer did this it would be a huge step forward in player immersion.

 

Or instead of spending half the budget on voice and the other half on advertising the voice (SWTOR) we can stick with text :P in my opinion. You can do a LOT more with text. Speech kills most RPGs.

Don't think you undestood what I said there at all. I'm not talking about voice actors I'm talking abou your words being spoken by your character.

Sure new technology is cool but then you're just playing yourself and the technology. Using more complex technology to essentially do the same thing is not player immersion.

Huh? Chat is more immersive than actual speach? Why do gaming headsets have mic's then? Imagine walking your toon up to someone and saying hello for real. Might be freaky with the barry white voiced dude's playing female toons though but still, would be cool.

Current mmo's in general needs to have their dev teams taken out back and executed, In the last few years I haven't played ONE pay 2 play mmorpg that felt fresh or orignal, every single one has felt like the exact same game in a new skin. Most recent one was the secret world that I wasted money on.. Its just yet another generic wow-like mmo. With pointless endgame, and a boring repetive linear quest grind. These devs wonder why their games cannot hold subscribers as of late, this is why, they rely WAY too much on quests for content and people can go thru it fairly fast without even trying. GW2 will be the next mmo to be fairly worthless and lackluster more than likely. Because honestly? from what I have seen of the game it just looks like world of warcraft cept with so called "dynamic events" insted of the normal quests. I'm in the weekend beta thats coming for gw2 but to be honest I don't expect much out of gw2/mmo's now a days.

Originally posted by Siveria

Current mmo's in general needs to have their dev teams taken out back and executed, In the last few years I haven't played ONE pay 2 play mmorpg that felt fresh or orignal, every single one has felt like the exact same game in a new skin. Most recent one was the secret world that I wasted money on.. Its just yet another generic wow-like mmo. With pointless endgame, and a boring repetive linear quest grind. These devs wonder why their games cannot hold subscribers as of late, this is why, they rely WAY too much on quests for content and people can go thru it fairly fast without even trying. GW2 will be the next mmo to be fairly worthless and lackluster more than likely. Because honestly? from what I have seen of the game it just looks like world of warcraft cept with so called "dynamic events" insted of the normal quests. I'm in the weekend beta thats coming for gw2 but to be honest I don't expect much out of gw2/mmo's now a days.

Evaluating games by "seeing them" leaves a lot out.

Yea, the way that most devs are using NPC in mmos got to change. They have to be more active, to have some more logical role than to just be stationary objects. Like you said, they are just standing there and everybody is doing the same quests from them. Not very interesting or inspiring.

And when I finish my quest for the given NPC and he is dead somewhere, killed by some blood thirsty, maniacal PC, what then? Does he respawn at a later time?

One time quests? Are you serious? Devs cannot think of many good repeatable quests and you want them to think up literally millions of one-time quests?

How about the players that don't start the game from launch? How do they get into the game with most of the quests done already?

It will become a race to "take out quests." Those that don't play 24/7 will just lose out to those who do.

On the plus side, there would not be all this information online about how to do a quest.

It would be great to see something like this, but in all practicality, it isn't very feasible.

Everyone keeps mentioning the dynamics of Sims 2.  What I have been saying since I started gaming.  There needs to be an mmorpg that merges with Sims 2.

Also, everyone keeps talking about the past Ultimate and no one answers my question if Ultima Online is a resurrection of that game?  http://www.uo.com/ageofshadows/viscent.html

In SWG beta the creatures would charge at you stalk you even if you got close to a lair or nest. then they would out of nowhere chase you away or go full out attack if you kept bugging them.

Was pretty cool. of course it never made it to release it got axed for some reason.

Originally posted by bishbosh2

i think friendly NPCs should be minimised. game should be designed so that players take on the role of friendly NPCs allowing for emergent gameplay

realistically, the problem is, that players arent online 24/7, so players who play at different times of the day will lost out on things which leads to a lost of fun for certain groups over others, which leads to less subs and less support from consumers over time.

see how TIME is linked to everything MMO related?