| 95 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
6/20/12 3:45:20 PM#81
Originally posted by stragen001 Organizing and coordinating large numbers of players is not as easy as you make it sound. As someone who is red to goons I do have to give them kudos for their high level of organization. We've gone roaming to their "space capital" a few times and each time we were mindful to gank a few people and go as fast as we came because of their ability to marshal large numbers of players in a relatively short period of time. Mittani is literally like space jesus to the EVE goons. You would be hard pressed to get to him without going thru a goon army, its not like he's chilling around the places the average joe player hangs out in high sec. The dude literally orders invasions and whole regions of EVE get flooded by thousands of goon + allies. He's good at getting large numbers of ppl to sit at their PCs for him because he makes it fun for them. Part of making it fun for his followers is to make it not fun for everyone else and then gloating about "winning". |
|
|
6/20/12 7:06:55 PM#82
Originally posted by Czanrei Mittani bin Laden. I like the sound of that. Maybe you should report him to the Dept of Homeland Security. "How should I know if it works? That's what beta testers are for. I only coded it." |
|
|
6/25/12 4:17:16 PM#83
Originally posted by Gdemami And you clearly haven't been paying attention to this thread. Of course the APOC can't mine as well as the Hulk, hence the "not terribly efficient" phrase. The idea is to use a much tougher ship for mining. Sure, you won't mine as much, but you can take quite a pounding before you die unlike what a Hulk could take so you'll be much less likely to get ganked. Side note, I'm surprised Kyleran suggested the Apoc and not the Rokh; the Apoc has serious CPU issues when fitted for mining. |
|
|
6/28/12 8:17:25 AM#84
Originally posted by stragen001
Mittens famously doesn't even log in much. He plays EVE via the metagame; communicating with people via forums, Jabber, Skype. To beat him in the way you're suggesting would be impossible, and would be meaningless even if you managed it. He could carry on playing EVE in the way he does now even if CCP banned all his accounts and censored his name from the forums. Give me liberty or give me lasers |
|
|
Kyleran
Bitter Vet™
Joined: 9/13/06
Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV |
6/28/12 9:12:20 PM#85
Originally posted by Kiljaedenas Hey, I never said I was a miner, but I do recall fitting a BS to do some mining, might have been a Rokh, my characters can fly both. And you are correct, I was suggesting that it is possible to mine at less than optimal efficiency if one wishes to make getting ganked less possible. Besides, I've been a way from EVE for a while, starting to forget some things, happens at my age.
"What gamers want ... is new game play patterns different from what they've experienced before" - Axehilt |
|
6/29/12 12:33:17 PM#86
Clearly I do as poster admitted himself that he isn't very knowledgeable about mining.
|
|
|
Betaguy
Hard Core Member
Joined: 12/31/04
The king and the pawn go back to the same box at the end of the day. |
6/29/12 12:35:06 PM#87
sweet good to know... |
|
6/29/12 12:45:47 PM#88
well then y not fight fire w fire n bounty them? im sure theyd b hunted down by bounty hunters if the prize is right. n im sure theyd ave it harder to b up to mischief if they thmself get targeted and hunted down :) or perhaps have good cloaked battleships nearby to ambush them?
|
|
|
Xzen
Apprentice Member
Joined: 5/01/06
A sword is never a killer, it is a tool in the killer's hands. |
6/29/12 12:47:31 PM#89
Originally posted by dorugu They would collect the bounty on themselves. |
|
6/29/12 12:54:39 PM#90
Originally posted by Xzen yep they would just have one of their corp mates kill them, or better yet, an alt account. |
|
|
6/29/12 3:49:08 PM#91
Originally posted by Derros And there's the breakdown of the system. When there really are no negatives to doing it, why not act like a homicidal chimpanzee with a rape fetish? Emergent gameplay in EVE is little more than an exercise in creative rogering. How exciting. |
|
|
7/02/12 11:00:09 PM#92
Is the word 'ironic' used in a situation like this? Hulkageddon destroys ships that can only be built via technitium which Goonswarm and its allies have sole control over. Wonder why there seems to be more haters on the internet? Read this by an actual marketing guy to find out why. |
|
|
7/08/12 11:48:54 AM#93
Originally posted by dave6660 A few months ago, I thought I'd try Eve again. I played beta and then bought it on release. Played for a year or so. Now came back after years of not playing. My character is a miner, I worked hard getting his skills and mining ship. I re-subscribed right into Hulkgriefon. So basically I had to essentially start over since I couldn't really play my miner. I let my single-month sub run out. So I unsubbed, and didn't post anything about it. I just wanted to throw out another perspective out there. Whether you support or oppose the behaviors plagueing Eve, the fact is, people ARE in fact leaving the game. Yes, Eve is "sandbox", a "play it however you want to play it" game. But when your survival is largely based on the few "choices" you have in how you decide to play the game, the fun is gone for all the people who would rather not be a ganker, griefer or scammer. In short, I came back to eve after about 6 years of not playing. Then I basically couldn't even play my character because of this "hulkageddon" farce crappy excuse for the "it's a sandbox game--deal with it" attitude. Sorry, but when CCP says their game is fun and should appeal to all players, and then turn around and support a player who pays people to go wreak havok in secure space, goes against what EVE is claimed to be all about. Anyway, I'm not going back; not gonna pay money for a game where I have to conform to the status quo or else die. |
|
|
7/10/12 9:40:03 AM#94
Originally posted by Giluvas I wouldn't go as far as saying CCP supports it rather I would say that it would go against thier philosophy to make a special case and intervene in what is essentially a player run world. In fact intervention would be against what EVE is about, players created the "farce" as you call it and its up to players to try and stop it. There is consistency there. |
|
|
7/29/12 8:03:21 AM#95
Originally posted by jpnz Looks pretty ironic to me! Keep on rockin'! |
|