Player Housing IS possible. It just is not a priority. If people do not like the game or if they do not find the game fun, they will not build a house.

 

 

The reasons make sense though. You could create the best housing feature-set we have ever seen in a game but if nobody enjoys the game to that point, they will not stick around just to have a cool house.?

 

Seem as if developers now days see no importance in this feature known as player housing. The quote has a point. If Developers put too much resources into Housing over other features, than players may not be interested in the game and wont build houses regardless of how detailed that feature is.

but why has this feature been tossed under the bus over the last few years?
seem like this feature has become very unpopular in the developers offices lately.



Player Housing seem like a dynamic feature that gives players something to do when raiding/leveling/other grinds come to a end. Seem like a win win feature from a consumer point of view, but not from a developer.

What turn of events causes this?

Ah, because most new initiates to the genre never had experience with it, and will instinctively call the rest of us out as "being sissy". Because of that, developers see no need to devote investments towards it, because most players simply don't get it, and likely never will... they will get paid either way.

What they fail to see, though, is that dynamic housing is what generally keeps people paying a sub just to keep an ideal location, even long after they stop playing and just keep their subscriptions current in order to not lose the spot. So the joke is on them, mwhahaha!

Because lately, too many people feel these games are no longer fun. No longer fun = devs need to spend more time making the game fun. Spending more time making the game fun = housing on the backburner. 

Or... Just being honest since I have been on some teams like what I will describe... -> When you are building a MMO, you hire talent from many companies who have already built their MMO. When they come over those people at times feel its common nature to share some numbers they aren't supposed to. If they come out and say when I left X company we only saw 40% of the active subscribers building a house, and each of them spent less than 2 hours a month on it. This is just an example but it is highly likely. If the new company can not create housing that blows you away at that point it becomes something that loses priority. It sucks developing something and spending hundreds of hours on it to see so few people use it, and even less people ENJOYING it.

Because by and large it's become useless from a gaming standpoint.

Devs often try to find soemthing useful to do with homes, to encourage players to visit them often. But at best they end up being a location the player jumps into from time to time, to collect some special item, get a buff, ot craft. Then it's back out in the world the other 99% of the time. Why waste resources developing a segment of content players only spend a tiny amount of time in?

Also player hoursing is viewed as a staple of RPing, which has declined quite a bit in MMOs. 

Keep in mind I'm not saying I have an opposition to player housing...I remember the fun I had opening up my Jobe house in AO for the first time and decking it out. But I don't thinkit's something enough people care about and will use for most mainstream developers to care.

As a SWG player, I found that the majority of my time in-game was spent searching for mobs that drop items I haven't seen before, solely to display them in my house.

If other games have such low numbers in people that actually mess with it (and I have an *extremely* hard time believing poster #3 is directly involved in any kind of studio, rather than talking out of his ass), then it's because their take on housing is half-assed, and no more than a glorified storage unit with little in the way of customization. A.K.A., LotRO housing... and basically anything else out there post-SWG glory days (besides Wurm, which does it right as well).

Seriously, very few games past UO and SWG take the concept seriously, and just aim at the bare-minimum in order to say they have it as a feature. It becomes trite, and nobody messes with it.

I get the impression that housing is something which is hard to get right in MMOs.  

If they make it instanced then people can lose the feeling of uniqueness their home brings.  If they make it buildable in the world then the problems of finite space, land hogging and ghost towns crop up.

I also believe the design focus of the game can impact how useful housing will be.  In a linear themepark where players are constantly relocating to new areas for character progression housing becomes less convenient, however, in a sandbox that is trying to simulate a world where individuals are linked to a particular territory housing can more easily become a fully fledged and enriching feature.

Perhaps once the majority of MMOs started dropping the world simulating elements of their predecessors and began to focus solely on being a 'fun' game housing became less relevant?

Originally posted by terrant

Because by and large it's become useless from a gaming standpoint.

 

Devs often try to find soemthing useful to do with homes, to encourage players to visit them often. But at best they end up being a location the player jumps into from time to time, to collect some special item, get a buff, ot craft. Then it's back out in the world the other 99% of the time. Why waste resources developing a segment of content players only spend a tiny amount of time in?

 

Also player hoursing is viewed as a staple of RPing, which has declined quite a bit in MMOs. 

 

Keep in mind I'm not saying I have an opposition to player housing...I remember the fun I had opening up my Jobe house in AO for the first time and decking it out. But I don't thinkit's something enough people care about and will use for most mainstream developers to care.

Pretty much this.

I can handle them throwing us some instanced stuff as a place to hang a trophy or 3, but I want the land mass used for as much PVE as possible, and it is impossible if they are reserving it to build on.

IMO EQ2 did housing correctly in the early days.

Wizard101 and Glitch.  The housing in those games is unrivaled, unless we consider the housing in Sims.

Easy Answer for you. They hate us.

Originally posted by lifesbrink

Wizard101 and Glitch.  The housing in those games is unrivaled, unless we consider the housing in Sims.

Nope.

Everything in that vid is either player-crafted, some kind of reward, or gotten from a mob. Then placed, by hand, using an amazing system to put anything, anywhere.

Originally posted by GTwander

Ah, because most new initiates to the genre never had experience with it, and will instinctively call the rest of us out as "being sissy". Because of that, developers see no need to devote investments towards it, because most players simply don't get it, and likely never will... they will get paid either way.

What they fail to see, though, is that dynamic housing is what generally keeps people paying a sub just to keep an ideal location, even long after they stop playing and just keep their subscriptions current in order to not lose the spot. So the joke is on them, mwhahaha!

This.

Hell I kept my EQ2 sub going forever because of my awesome home/shop... Would log in and take care of my orders (buy, sell, craft, whatever) while socializing with friends, growing my wealth and making my house even cooler- Long after I was bored with the Endgame treadmill.

i enjoyed housing in VG, especially from a crafters perspective.the houses were player built and basically everything in it. guild halls were crafter also in a way also. lots of plots to choose from across the land, would try to find a bunch of plots my guild and i could build together close by. Can't find any of that anymore, just like a good/meaningful craft system and good pvp, it's all gone! gone! gone!!

OP already answered his own question: Its not a game defining feature - just something extra. If you barely have a game in the first place why waste money on the extras? And even if you made the effort to create housing with the kind of depth some fans want, chances are only a small portion of the player base will spend time with it anyway. Its not worth it.

As I normally would never never respond to the OP for obvious reasons I will make an exception and state categorically MMOExposed brings up a good point.

Player housing is easily one of the best innovative features a game could incorporate.  It adds a level of endgame content that is IMO highly addictive and fun but alas the reason why it isnt done is threefold.  Most developers see it as either a waste of time, do not know how to properly integrate it into their game becasue it wasnt in the original bluepronts for the game or think they must amke the all inclusive, meaning if not everyone can have a house then dont bother because there is no way they will make a landmass big enough to support houses for the millions of players they hope to snag.  The problem with this 3rd theory is asanine because those same developers already institute niche style gaming elements into their game such as raiding or PvP.  Its silly to think because they cant implement player housing for the masses due to constraints but they go right ahead and include niche elements already in their game.

I tell you all you need to do is open up a small percentage of your games landmass to housing and let the players use it as a source of economy and bartering much the same way Asherons Call did it.  Not everyone could afford to, or be lucky enough to find a housing unit but thats ok because the housing market opened up further deepening the economy of the game and that is always a good thing IMO.

Because it has never been a priority in any MMO after UO, and in UO it ruined the landscape.

Doesn't matter as long as the MMO's I care about have this feature.

Originally posted by Moaky07

Originally posted by terrant

Because by and large it's become useless from a gaming standpoint.

 

Devs often try to find soemthing useful to do with homes, to encourage players to visit them often. But at best they end up being a location the player jumps into from time to time, to collect some special item, get a buff, ot craft. Then it's back out in the world the other 99% of the time. Why waste resources developing a segment of content players only spend a tiny amount of time in?

 

Also player hoursing is viewed as a staple of RPing, which has declined quite a bit in MMOs. 

 

Keep in mind I'm not saying I have an opposition to player housing...I remember the fun I had opening up my Jobe house in AO for the first time and decking it out. But I don't thinkit's something enough people care about and will use for most mainstream developers to care.

Pretty much this.

 

I can handle them throwing us some instanced stuff as a place to hang a trophy or 3, but I want the land mass used for as much PVE as possible, and it is impossible if they are reserving it to build on.

 

IMO EQ2 did housing correctly in the early days.

Look at games like WoW with millions of players.  The vast majority of the players life will only see minimal use of the available landmass so your theory is moot.  The day that a typical MMO usses 100% of its landmass for 100% of its gameing is the day I switch to that game.  In essence that is exactly what GW2 is trying to accomplish but thats a different story for a different thread.  A game like a WoW, Rift, or soon to be TESO could benefit greatly from a small percentage of its landmass utiliyzed for player housing with minimal to no bad effects.

Originally posted by Lord.Bachus

Because it has never been a priority in any MMO after UO, and in UO it ruined the landscape.

Well you can rectify that by allowing only select placement of housing units and theres nothign wrong with having small hamlets of player housing dotting the landscape in fact it would actually get players out into the surrouding areas alot more efficiently instead of having 90%+ of them sitting in capitol cities with their thumbs up their arse wiating on their next dungeon or pvP queue.  As a side effect this would make the world fill more alive.

Originally posted by terrant

Because by and large it's become useless from a gaming standpoint.

 

Devs often try to find soemthing useful to do with homes, to encourage players to visit them often. But at best they end up being a location the player jumps into from time to time, to collect some special item, get a buff, ot craft. Then it's back out in the world the other 99% of the time. Why waste resources developing a segment of content players only spend a tiny amount of time in?

 

Also player hoursing is viewed as a staple of RPing, which has declined quite a bit in MMOs. 

 

Keep in mind I'm not saying I have an opposition to player housing...I remember the fun I had opening up my Jobe house in AO for the first time and decking it out. But I don't thinkit's something enough people care about and will use for most mainstream developers to care.

EQ2 handles this very well with housing competitions and rating systems. More companies should follow their lead on player housing.

I miss SWG style housing/gathering in general. I agree with many posters that it adds a ton of immersion into the game when players are able to directly affect the world they interact with (other than just mowing down NPC's that will respawn in 5-30min).

It is often just treated as yet-another-marketing-tick-box, with some obligatory instanced area that is nothing than a virtual closet. The fact that WoW does not include it has seemed to re-enforce/prove the idea that you don't need it.

Hopefully we see some of that come back in ArcheAge.