| 157 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
6/05/12 12:37:45 AM#121
Originally posted by TwoThreeFour Wrong you are changing this agruement into somethign that its not. I will expound: Here is the basis: "I think saying " Your shit's weak!, F***ing n00b, etc is fine on the passby. " This is ok , but you reply "One rational reason is that a person being new to the game can indeed affect their performance for the worse compared to someone who has played the game a long time." But then their intial possition would also be incorrect (by your standards) , thus you did not answer my question but a different unasked question. Note the question is why is it ok to insult but not with gender/race included, the result is the same you have attack someones psyche. As a hyperbole- its ok to shoot me in the head with a .38 but not a .45. Sure the 45 may do more damage, but its really the same thing. "How is it rational to blame someone's gender/sexuality/race for something that happened in the game?" Its not, but nor is much of the blaming of fault that occurs in competitve games, no one is calling for a ban/punisment of bad players, or people who think everything is someone else's fault. How are we as humans rational? We're often not. Now we can find rational reasoning in why we do things, to defend our ego if the most common with this type of behavior. But there are more, such as because it fun to watch conditioned people explode at such confrontations. We as humans like to win, feel superior, etc. before you demonize that reasoning thats the point of competitive games btw / games in general triumphing over challenge (in pvp game its over others). Sorry thats reality. So the verbal attack to establish superiority in pvp game is not only expected, its part of the same thought process as the game itself. "Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one ..." - Thomas Paine |
|
|
6/05/12 12:44:07 AM#122
Originally posted by patsfan32
I recall several articles (although not many in English) about people behaving badly over the internet. As for "not dealing with situations equally": different problems may be of different magnitude and have different partial solutions.
I don't think it is a common problem that men are being insulted based on their gender. I am far more familiar with players being insulted due to their assumed intellect, ingame choices and assumed social competence.
There is also a difference between feeling guility and recognizing past mistakes.
|
|
|
MMOarQQ
Novice Member
Joined: 2/20/12
"Against stupidity the very gods themselves contend in vain." |
6/05/12 12:45:53 AM#123
They won't stop until all men are psychologically castrated and fueled by self-loathing. The straight, virile, Western White male has been targeted for elimination. |
|
6/05/12 12:50:34 AM#124
Originally posted by Jetrpg
There are different degrees of insults. I explained why one kind of insult can be considered to be worse than another one. The verbal attack is an immature way to try to establish superiority regardless of its content.
|
|
|
Lissyl
Apprentice Member
Joined: 4/12/12
If cosmetics aren't content, why don't people demand a cheaper game done in full grayscale? |
6/05/12 12:50:55 AM#125
I think that codes of conduct that mirror reality are not only needed, but should be expected if the internet is going to continue to exist in any shade of its present format. The only question is this: will we, or the companies we work spend our money with, enforce this? Or will a governing body be forced to step in?
The argument is simple, really, at least as I see it. 1. It is illegal to create a contract for murder in the real world. It is illegal to create a contract for murder online. 2. It is illegal to possess underage pornography in the real world. It is illegal to possess underage pornography online. 3. It is illegal to provide material support for designated terrorist groups in the real world. It is illegal to provide material support for designated terrorist groups online. 4. It is illegal to steal copyrighted works in the real world. It is illegal to steal copyrighted works online. 5. It is civilly liable to post libelous remarks in the real world. It is civilly liable to post libelous remarks online. 6. It is illegal to intimidate in the real world. But online, you should just leave and ignore it, because surely they mean nothing by it?!? That's just how people are? Boys will be boys? If these very same remarks were sent to a governing official, would they laugh them off? 'Grow a thick skin'? I'd wager the answer to that would be a loud 'no', followed by the resounding click of a jail cell. |
|
6/05/12 12:53:18 AM#126
Originally posted by MMOarQQ
Do you really believe that? |
|
|
6/05/12 12:53:20 AM#127
Originally posted by TwoThreeFour
"Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one ..." - Thomas Paine |
|
|
6/05/12 12:57:35 AM#128
Originally posted by TwoThreeFour
None of that is relevant to what I was trying to say. A lot of men like being men, being called girls or pussys may be insulting to women, but is it not also an insinuation of lack of masculinity of the male? is this not an attack ont he males sense of his own masculinity? Is this not a gender specific attack? Just because your thought is in a straight line does not mean thats how the world works. Just because a word can isult a female does not mean it is not equally offensive, though in a different way to a male. Yet for the most part males largely ignore this, the rally to arms only occurs when these attacks are done against another group of people. A group who wants to be equal in all regards, yet insists on special treatment. Here is equality for you, continue bringing this up in your own way, you have every right to as an equal member of a democracy. Just know that you are the minority, as the majority could care less. It is largely ignored because it honestly bares little relevance in a persona every day life. A few extreme cases have led to extreme consequences, however to most these online trolls are harmless. Your equality is assured as you have your rights to protest, just know that the majority moves the wheel, and since we all deal with the same problem the majority has chosen to deal with it in the way that is most logical. Censorship can never happen for your own needs because it starts a domino effect to censor everything. So being told to thicken your skin may be misogynist, but it is the best damn advice you are going to get because i will be damned If ten years from now we are mindless censored drones, because every individual is insulted by some different thing, so the only way to equal us all is to censor everything and mind numb us in pseudo-moral political correctness. |
|
|
6/05/12 12:58:43 AM#129
Originally posted by TwoThreeFour
"Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one ..." - Thomas Paine |
|
|
6/05/12 1:21:06 AM#130
As a male gamer I have been called certain names and my sexuality speculated on by players who do not even know me, because of the character I was playing. Or because I had kicked their arse in combat. As someone who realy doesn't care what other people say I just wind them up even more till they rage quit. Its very easy. Online gaming has a lot of name calling no matter if your a man or woman.
I think its great more women are playing games online and in MMO's its refreshing to hear them on voice comms.
|
|
|
6/05/12 1:24:10 AM#131
If a person is not mature enough to defend themself from attacks they are probably not mature enough for the games they are playing. One of my favorite YouTube 'stars' is "GirlGoneGamer" who plays on the common sexism in CoD by starting every video by cooking some food (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQFWs4HrRKU). Imagine a white person going to the hood. I presume a white person traveling to the hood would get made fun of how small, skinny and white he is. This white kid has the choice of NOT GOING TO THE HOOD. The same is true with video games. If you do not want to deal with racism, sexism, or any of that stuff then don't play the games that draw on it heavily (League of Legends/Call of Duty). It's like when you are watching the old movie Huckleberry Finn and his friend's name is Nigger Jim. If you find the fact that the locals refer to him Nigger Jim you can just not watch the movie. The liberalism of language in the 70s did nothing but enhance racist slang. If you are upset by people calling you names just play games that have a G rating. Problem solved. Website: http://www.thegameguru.me / YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/users/thetroublmaker |
|
|
6/05/12 1:34:42 AM#132
It can be argued that in a given situation, it is worse to insult someone based on something that is likely irrelevant to the situation than something that may be relevant. Using that reasoning, if person A thinks person B did a very bad move which he thinks is due to B being new to the game, then using "noob" to insult player B is better than to use " fat whore". Neither "fat" or "whore" can directly explain why the "bad" move was done, but being new to the game can. Neither being short, socially inept, talking funny or eating weird foods would directly explain why the "bad" move was done, so they would all be worse than calling someone a "noob". I do see that the effect of an insult which is very much tied to the actual scenario may have a larger impact on the person. The impact does not necessarely need to be completely negative though.
As for your last paragraph: can't really do a statement about the situation in the 18th century, I would have to read more about that subject. As for equal and unequal treatment: men and women are biologically equal in many aspects, but not equal in several aspects as well. How we treat them should reflect that. This is why we seperate women and men in athletic competitions, but we strive to give them equal salary for a certain work done.
|
|
|
6/05/12 1:36:10 AM#133
Very much this. The idea that you have to treat me differently because I am a woman IS sexist, and it follows a subtext that I am weak and incapable of defending myself or that I am not strong enough to take it. The special treatment is what would be misogyny, NOT name-calling or harassment. Literally everyone gets harassed in online games. It is stories like this one that cause sexism to persist. It is people that feel they have to be PC that cause any -ism to persist. Walking on eggshells is what perpetuates the idea that I am weak just because I am a woman. When you do this, you are subconsciously (I hope not deliberately) treating me differently because you think I am weaker. Giving anyone special treatment just because of race/sex/orientation/religion is what accentuates the differences between us and makes us think we are not equal. This might make me angrier than any other gaming issue. "Gamers will no longer buy the argument that every MMO requires a subscription fee to offset server and bandwidth costs. It's not true — you know it, and they know it." —Jeff Strain, co-founder of ArenaNet, 2007 |
|
|
6/05/12 1:39:35 AM#134
Originally posted by troublmaker but now take a black kid and throw him in to a white neighborhood where he is made fun of. Now all of a sudden these white kids are labeled racist and expelled from school. (You see this often in the news) This is what this so called "equality" everybody wants get us. It is nothing but a sack of double standards and special rules that these groups dont give a crap about because they favor their own group. Nobody wants to be equal, they simply want to be the group in power. You will never see a black kid labeled a racist for making fun of a white kid. Until I do see this there will never be equality. Until every single person is held to the same set of laws we will never be equal. As it is right now it is like we have a book of laws, yet it is seperated in to different appendices according to group of people, in which the main law is used as merely a guide and each group has its own string of laws, regulations and social norms. People have a skewed idea of equality. |
|
|
6/05/12 1:39:49 AM#135
Originally posted by Jetrpg
The former poster gave a conclusion, then you asked for rationalization, I gave you a rationilazation based on the axiom that an insult is worse if it is irrelevant to the situation. The axiom was implied in my previous post.
|
|
|
6/05/12 1:43:55 AM#136
Originally posted by Dubhlaith god i wish there was a way to like posts, i would smash my head in to my keyboard 1000 times to give this 1000 likes. You want true equality. The moment the special treatment ends the equality begins. |
|
|
6/05/12 1:52:51 AM#137
Originally posted by patsfan32
While calling someone a male a "pussy", is a gender-specific attack, it does not attack the gender "male" in itself. It is instead refering to that the person is being a coward, which may very well be of relevance in the situation.
Depending on which country and even which city you live in, you may or may not belong to the majority. As the internet continue to grow in influence, I believe how we act there is becoming more and more important for the overall population.
While thickening the skin is one way for specific people to handle certain people, it doesn't mean that we should accept things the way they are and the we should stop trying to change and arguing against "wrong" behaviour.
|
|
|
6/05/12 1:55:41 AM#138
Originally posted by troublmaker
A white kid should be able to go to the hood without being made fun of how small, skinny and white he is. The society should not just forget the problem and it is their duty to actively try to change the situation for the better. |
|
|
6/05/12 2:03:25 AM#139
42% of gamers are now women in the United States, no? Does that not mean that women are also insulting others, both men and women? Why are the males being singled out in this? Do we get some form of a pass because we happen to have breasts in an online environment? I can assure all of you that the verbal abuse is exponentially worse between two women that go at it than it is between a male and a female.
The problem as a whole is not restricted to women alone. It's a universal issue on the internet and has been around forever. Why a few of us believe we get a pass and we should be up in arms about a natural occurrence in an online environment is beyond me. Especially because there are a large number of us that do the -exact same thing- that was being covered in the article. Too many people truly do need to grow thicker skin. The fact of the matter is that these are random comments tossed at you by a random person that you will never see in your daily life. They are absolutely meaningless. However, if it comes into your daily life from a virutal environment, there is an issue. But that is an entirely different argument. Nonetheless, the fact remains that the internet allows you to remain anonymous and hide behind a screen of text. This also means that your gender is and always will be an unknown factor unless you make it otherwise evident, whether by telling someone or speaking over a VOIP. It's actually a very indiscriminate piece of technology if everyone would look at it equally; No one gives a damn what gender, ethnicity or religious belief you are. If someone were going to insult you, then they're going to insult you. The only difference your gender makes is what form of insult is headed your way. It's the exact same thing in real life. It's something you don't take to heart and simply walk away from. Not nearly as big of an issue as it seems we're making it out to be. Quite embarassing at times, actually. |
|
|
6/05/12 2:18:42 AM#140
Originally posted by TwoThreeFour Well while we're making this a larger issue who is "the society" that you are describing. A lot of people like to throw around generic terms to try and make a point. But honestly who is "the society." Are we talking about everyone? Are we talking about the racist black community? Are we talking about government? Society isn't just one thing. And change what for the better? Who decides what is better. Am I supposed to just accept that an egalitarian model of society is the best one? The best one considering that we are all born into inequality? Or can we just be grown ups and make choices. These girls who are supposedly being harassed in games don't have to be in that atmosphere. They have the ultimate choice of logging off. In an MMO they can just change servers. They don't even have to declare that they are women. If you are a Jew and you choose to travel to Egypt you are purposely going to a hostile location and choosing to set yourself up for bad experiences. I cannot change how people feel or what they feel. We can cry about how people ought to be, all we want but it won't change anything. The best we can do is choose what atmosphere we put ourselves in. Next on the list of sexism witch hunts is removing all sexist references from cinema! Website: http://www.thegameguru.me / YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/users/thetroublmaker |
|