Looks very carebear to me.

Don't know when devs will realise that unless you create a world that is dangerous i.e. you can be attacked by other players (Faction v faction) while you are questing or the game becomes boring and will no doubt fail.

the graphics, large weapons and slinky ladies makes this game look like Tera.

Originally posted by marz.at.play

Originally posted by Morv

Originally posted by marz.at.play

Game sounds great but PvP obviously isn't on their priority list if it's still in development and he coudn't shed any more light on it (obviously he's got no idea himself) and end game seems to be dungeons, grinding....Zzzz boring.

 

Too bad sounds like a great game with terribad end game.

Comments like this always make me cringe... "End Game Content" is the worst idea to ever grace online games, no matter how successful they are.

Why's that. I for one play for the end game content. I've been playing GW for 7 years now because of the eng game Guild vs Guild battles. That's a great example of a great game with great end game content as far as I'm concerned.

Cringe all you like but my comment is valid.

How is making an instant lvl 20 character and rehashing PvP battles "end game content"?

It's a diversion, at best, and is about as boring as playing the same maps on CoD over and over is. True "endgame" is "metagame". Ask EVE or Mortal Online.

Originally posted by marz.at.play

Originally posted by Morv

Originally posted by marz.at.play

Game sounds great but PvP obviously isn't on their priority list if it's still in development and he coudn't shed any more light on it (obviously he's got no idea himself) and end game seems to be dungeons, grinding....Zzzz boring.

 

Too bad sounds like a great game with terribad end game.

Comments like this always make me cringe... "End Game Content" is the worst idea to ever grace online games, no matter how successful they are.

Why's that. I for one play for the end game content. I've been playing GW for 7 years now because of the eng game Guild vs Guild battles. That's a great example of a great game with great end game content as far as I'm concerned.

Cringe all you like but my comment is valid.

Except you don't need to level to 20 in Guild Wars to play GvG or any other pvp.  You might have to buy an unlock or grind some faction to unlock your skills, but certainly not end game.

------------------------------------------

Anyway, I like a lot of what I've heard about the game, except the hints that the best stuff will once again be locked behind raid sized content.  I can't express how un-exciting that has become.  I really hope they rethink that very tired and boring concept.  It doesn't keep more people playing anymore, at all.

I dont know very much about this game but i laugh like hell after the first question:

MMORPG: We saw a lot of the combat, but can you tell us a bit about the other more MMORPG-esque features the game has?

----------

Mark Hill: Besides RaiderZ’s action-focused combat system, another unique aspect is its unique boss battles. MMO veterans can expect these epic monsters to get much more up close and personal. They will pick you up, throw you, smash you, or even eat you. At higher levels, players will need to work together closely in coordinated parties to conquer the most challenging encounters. We’ll be talking more about how players can discover new bosses and monsters and see what it's like to use their own limbs to defeat them at E3!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For sure this is differents features from combat lol..

Lol it like hey man i saw a fraction of your garden it was nice there was a lot of blue flowers, can you tell me what other kind of thing we can see in your garden?

-

O yeah i have big blue flowers, little blue flowers and some unique blue flower who can eat you and throw you etc etc......

-

For the game that look cool but perfect world..

It sounds kind of like a cross between EQ style MMO and GW2 style MMO. I will have to keep my eye on this one to see how it pans out and if it suits me. If these two MMO's can create good weapon based skill systems this might make for a nice alternative combat system for a line of future MMO's.

While I definately like the item based skill system - I also like a more traditional skill system which you build which allows you to use certian weapons etc. Although I would like to see more class less systems and more general skill based systems where you can pick from a list of skills similar to perhaps Secret World(although I have not played Secret World yet) but something similar to it but perhaps different yet still.

In any case this sounds interesting.

Originally posted by marz.at.play

Game sounds great but PvP obviously isn't on their priority list if it's still in development and he coudn't shed any more light on it (obviously he's got no idea himself) and end game seems to be dungeons, grinding....Zzzz boring.

 

Too bad sounds like a great game with terribad end game.

Doesn't sound like my cup of tea either, but that doesn't mean it won't be someone elses.

---

Originally posted by Mackeh
Looks very carebear to me.

 

Don't know when devs will realise that unless you create a world that is dangerous i.e. you can be attacked by other players (Faction v faction) while you are questing or the game becomes boring and will no doubt fail.

---

Don't know when people will realize that different players have different tastes.

You wanna list out those failed MMOs without faction-based PvP? I'm pretty sure I could name a failed MMO with faction PvP for every single one. Might even be able to name two for each. Every failure of an MMO in recent years has had factions. Hell, it's hard enough to name a recent MMO without factions at all, failure or otherwise.

---

Originally posted by GTwander
It's a diversion, at best, and is about as boring as playing the same maps on CoD over and over is. True "endgame" is "metagame". Ask EVE or Mortal Online.

---

"If it's not a sandbox it's like CoD and sucks."

Please go.

This game is one of biggest surprises this year.

Can wait for beta :)

Originally posted by marz.at.play

Originally posted by Morv

Originally posted by marz.at.play

Game sounds great but PvP obviously isn't on their priority list if it's still in development and he coudn't shed any more light on it (obviously he's got no idea himself) and end game seems to be dungeons, grinding....Zzzz boring.

 

Too bad sounds like a great game with terribad end game.

Comments like this always make me cringe... "End Game Content" is the worst idea to ever grace online games, no matter how successful they are.

Why's that. I for one play for the end game content. I've been playing GW for 7 years now because of the eng game Guild vs Guild battles. That's a great example of a great game with great end game content as far as I'm concerned.

Cringe all you like but my comment is valid.

Play Monster Hunter then I will validate your comment. GVG is a grind wether you see it or not. Not every game is focused in PVP and nor should it be.

Though a game like Raiderz would sound fun with a more open-ended PvP, I just somehow feel a cash-shop with a pay to win strategy employed might raise the entry bar too high for new players that want to just test the waters.  

Maybe if some PvP was introduced that could combine the big monster/end-game raiding/PvP might entice players with promises of dangerous hunting grounds for rarer monsters.  You introduce mechanics for notoriety and fame and apply some sort of reward/punishment mechanic for playing.  I do have some doubts if that would work though.

Originally posted by Shroom_Mage

 

---

---

Originally posted by GTwander
It's a diversion, at best, and is about as boring as playing the same maps on CoD over and over is. True "endgame" is "metagame". Ask EVE or Mortal Online.

---

 

"If it's not a sandbox it's like CoD and sucks."

Please go.

So you're saying people *don't* get bored of playing the exact same maps/goals over and over again, regardless if it's a PvP battleground or Raid?

Wow... I guess all this talk about sucky endgame has been nothing more than teen angst and menstrual cramps.

This game looks cool, but I feel like it could benefit from a name change.

Solo player experience and low emphasis on PvP! Im in!

I've received an invite to try beta for this game.  Does it have tab targeting at all?

Originally posted by Grunim

I've received an invite to try beta for this game.  Does it have tab targeting at all?

How does a person get an invite when they don't even know the game mechanics uhhhhh shoot me plz.