| 229 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
blackthornn
Apprentice Member
Joined: 7/31/04
OMG I'm not temp banned again? WTF?? This day does end in Y right? |
5/02/12 12:05:10 PM#121
ok MikeB, that's your final warning. 3 day suspension from your own website for starting a flame war. Epic trolling for the win. :P
And seriously, after starting this, I think you owe me an appology for several banning incidents from Jul to Nov of '09 lol |
|
5/02/12 12:10:12 PM#122
Yeah if it was f2p i would definitely play it, because i don't pay monthly for single player/co-op games.
|
|
|
Prosti
Novice Member
Joined: 1/30/11
I feel so close to you right now.. It's like a force field. |
5/02/12 12:12:09 PM#123
Originally posted by black_isle Definately another reason why it would be better as a F2P or B2P. It's practically a single player/Co-Op game. No reason for me to pay 15$ a month for a game that I can just sit at home and play the old school Old Republic classics.
|
|
5/02/12 12:14:55 PM#124
No, we don't know subscriber numbers. And no xfire or torstatus only show server trends. So we don't really know how they are doing
|
|
|
Slampig
Elite Member
Joined: 12/29/03
Whatever you do, do NOT speak ill of Asheron's Call 2... |
5/02/12 12:17:06 PM#125
I don't see why there can't be both.
I played Guild Wars, much to my regret, while also maintaining subs to a few other games at the same time.
Give me a sub based payment method any day of the week. Or if you are going to go free-to-play, follow along Turbines footsteps, the LOtRO model is pretty nice if you are inclined to grind out all there is to grind. That Guild Wars 2 login screen knocked up my wife. Must be the second coming! |
|
5/02/12 12:23:45 PM#126
Originally posted by Eletheryl I'll explain it to you. Tor needed to hit a homerun, because of the money invested into it and the IP. It didn't. Tor is a big boat, but its sinking. "Oh it still has X number of subs", but how many has it lost? How far has the water risen? The population isn't going to get better than what it was when the game was released. You know how a moive with a strong IP will do well at first and even hold its own for a bit, but then falls quickly when word of mouth gets around about it and other big name moives are released? Same thing with an MMO.
It isn't the most successfull MMO, because its faling so fast. In fact you might say its the least successfull MMO. |
|
|
5/02/12 12:34:19 PM#127
[mod edit]
F2P = Massive chinese gold farming and bots. Because they have nothing to lose at that point. I see all the people bitching about server population on the boards but for the love of jesus do you really want a game where the server load is heavy because some gold farming company is paying kids for swtor credits? Some guy posted on 4/27 that if game update 1.3 didn't come out by 5/1 he would unsubscribe from the game, THAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH SWTOR. Impatient people who make unrealistic demands because they don't have a clue how a game is designed in the first place, holding the company hostage with crazy demands that lead to the company releasing updates before they are properly tested on the PTS. \ [mod edit]
|
|
|
5/02/12 12:51:36 PM#128
We've moved on to this stage already have we? That's okay. Next is acceptance so you're almost there :P 1. For god's sake mmo gamers, enough with the analogies. They're unnecessary and your comparisons are terrible, dissimilar, and illogical. 2. To posters feeling the need to state how f2p really isn't f2p: Players understand the concept. You aren't privy to some secret the rest are missing. You're embarrassing yourself. 3. Yes, Cpt. Obvious, we're not industry experts. Now run along and let the big people use the forums for their purpose. |
|
|
5/02/12 1:00:51 PM#129
Buy to play atleast. It's not like you are socializing in that game if you don't have friends playing it, i do have friend playing it since 1 month ago. It's not really worth a monthly subscription.
|
|
|
heartless
Novice Member
Joined: 1/05/04
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. -Carl Sagan |
5/02/12 1:06:32 PM#130
The game should have been B2P, like Guild Wars and Guild Wars 2. A subscription fee would be justifiable if SWTOR was an actual MMORPG but it's not. It's more of a single player game with a co-op element. Sure you see other players but there is really no need to play together and good luck finding a group for an instance. The only thing that keeps this game relevent is the Star Wars IP. SWG conveniently shut down a few months prior to SWTOR's release, so for the fans of the IP, SWTOR is pretty much the only option.
|
|
5/02/12 1:17:46 PM#131
At this point they might as well keep it as a subscription. They spent too much on it (and it wasn't even the full product they wanted it to be at launch) to make enough profit if it were B2P. The problem is that it is designed to be "completed"(1-3 characters to 50) in the short term and very little to keep them interested. F2P or subscription revenue will suffer because of that. |
|
|
5/02/12 2:15:53 PM#132
I dont believe this game coudl survive being f2p, EA wants money money money, they covet the wow money sadly this product isnt going to do it. I can see this game shutting down before going f2p ala tabula rasa style. "Hi folks swtor is shutting down, here's a free copy of the sims 1, have a good day"
GRIND DOES NOT EQUAL MAKING A GAME CHALLENGING!! YES I AM YELLING LOL |
|
|
5/02/12 2:21:04 PM#133
Id like to add also thatpeople are not impatient by demanding game improvements. They are taking subscription money and if peopel arent satisfied they shouldnt just keep paying those sub fees and hope it gets better. Dollars are just too hard to come by for most nowadays
GRIND DOES NOT EQUAL MAKING A GAME CHALLENGING!! YES I AM YELLING LOL |
|
|
5/02/12 2:33:58 PM#134
As I see it should they have released the game as B2P from the beginning instead. The game isn't really a massive multiplayer enough to justify a monthly fee and that is the core of the problem. But what they really should do now is not to go F2P, they must instead fix up the game, and I am talking about multiplayer PvE and PvP here. The game is a excellent sologame or a game you play with a few of your friends, but DDO already learnt the hard way that those things ain't enough to pull of monthly fees forever. And go F2P would be the easy thing to do but instead add more massive multiplayer content to the game is the right way to go instead. It is not a bad game at all but it don't have the MMO feeling over it. They need to fix that instead of changing the payment model before it is too late. They already have all the basics working so while it is a lot of work it is possible to fix it, and I have a feeling they would win a lot more in the long run that way. Bioware really did what they do best: a storybased game close to kotor you can play with your friends. The problem is that EA also did what they do best: which is charging as much money as they can. |
|
|
5/02/12 2:40:15 PM#135
BioWare had all the tools to make SWTOR fantastic. They didn't. I played for 4 months before quitting. Sure I expected there to be bugs at launch, even expected serious bugs. Bioware developers ignored the important aspects of the game, i.e. bosses actually working properly... and instead focused more on optional features that really had no impact on player happiness. Nothing could make me go back to SWTOR, nothing.
|
|
|
5/02/12 2:55:01 PM#136
LMAO!!!!
I think if the game is hurting then yes, change to F2P. The game is to good to allow to die. |
|
|
5/02/12 2:56:50 PM#137
Star Wars: The Old Republic is fine the way it is. In my honest opinion, it is the best MMORPG on the market today and I will be playing it for years to come. Its the game I always dreamed Star Wars Galaxies was going to be, but never was due to technology restrictions of the time. I am very happy with this game. I guess its like they say, "Haters gonna hate".
When we get back from where we are going, we will return to where we were. I know people there! |
|
|
5/02/12 3:02:10 PM#138
Originally posted by MikeB I agree with you there. With all the free MMOs out now it would likely greatly benefit TOR. It may very well bring in even more profit then they are bringing in now. Question is how dedicated are the Star Wars fans playing now? If enough have been sucked into the IP then TOR will likely never go F2P IMO. Time will tell. "I play Tera for the gameplay" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-2paFdRw_U |
|
|
5/02/12 3:04:58 PM#139
Lol no, every good game should be Sub based. Have you seen a super quality F2P MMORPG game yet that dosen't rely on P2W? I haven't.
Mike, we know you think everythings going to go free to play, and we know you like free to play for whatever reason, maybe you like asian things, but I want a great quality game with constant updates and a lot of staff to be able to take care of things when needed. Have you ever used Perfect world customer service? Horrible.
F2P is a fad that will fade. I and many others would rather pay a sub fee, instead of paying for extra bag space which we should get in the freaking first place. Remember SWG? You had 80 slots just in your bag at the start, and you had a bank on top of that.
Why do we want to make the MMO genre worse? That is what will happen if everything goes F2P. It will get worse, and less fun. Yea you might save some money, but you won't find a quality game with more than 8 bag slots ever. (-_-) |
|
|
5/02/12 3:21:11 PM#140
Pre-emptive spin for a future F2P announcement? Things must be worse than we thought. I won't touch a game that falls into the F2P ghetto.
___________________________ |
|