| 24 posts found | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Source: http://www.mmo-champion.com/content/2750?postid=16574095#comments_16574095 Soooooooooooooooo this looks awfully familiar I want to be the very best! Update - Almost forgot about those, added something about the Pet Battle Masters. Fight!
The battle is pretty simple, weaknesses and strengths are already implemented and if you pick the wrong type of pet you will get your ass kicked pretty fast. It ends whenever the enemy is defeated or captured.
|
|||||||
|
4/25/12 2:36:54 PM#2
Why would they be sued by Hasbro?
|
|||||||
Originally posted by Xiaoki I forgot about that. I edited the title. Blizzard stands to make a shit ton of money off of this. This would be equivalent to another company just using the Star Wars IP and characters and not giving money to Lucas.
There is no way this is not going to goto court. |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 2:41:20 PM#4
you should really read up on copyright laws, especially those that apply to video games. ninento couldnt sue if it wanted to. whoever owns digimon would sue nintendo if nintendo could sue in the first place. blizzard is the prince of copying games, 2nd only to zynga. ![]() |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 2:43:26 PM#5
Originally posted by Puremallace I don't think you can patent the concept like you're referring to. If that was the case, the MMO genre would of consumed itself already for using similar gameplay concepts. Nothing by name was directly lifted, just the concept, which I can't find patented anywhere. You must of never heard of Order and Chaos, haha. I'd say look into that before we further debate Blizzard going to court for using similar concepts in video games. No, no. Not right. Also, it's nothing similar to using Star Wars IP and character names and not paying rights to Lucas. Nothing was directly lifted from Nintendo other than a possible concept. There's nothing by name being borrowed, not the IP, not the characters, nothing but a concept.
|
|||||||
|
4/25/12 2:45:15 PM#6
i doubt blizzard lawyers wouldn't have sorted through this before they started the development |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 2:45:20 PM#7
Originally posted by Puremallace There are a ton of Pokemon ripoff monster/pet battle games out there. Blizzard didn't just steal from Pokemon at this point it's a game genre or style. There's nothing to sue about. I mean just look at that F2P Monster MMORPG always getting advertised in the blogs here. It's a BLATANT pokemon ripoff - the maps look exactly the same, names are the same, art style is the same, uses the same elements, etc. Anyway despite the similarities a lawsuit on Nintendo's part would probably just be a waste of time. Twitter: @Nephaerius |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 2:45:25 PM#8
Dear god... I thought there was going to be a different mechanic. Maybe something innovative and slightly different.. Played - M59, EQOA, EQ, EQ2, PS, SWG[Favorite], DAoC, UO, RS, MXO, CoH/CoV, TR, FFXI, FoM, WoW, Eve, Rift, SWTOR, TSW. |
|||||||
|
I just do not see Blizzard raking in so much money off of this and Nintendo just sitting back and being cool with it. |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 2:47:44 PM#10
Speaking of patents, isnt blizzard getting sued by worlds inc? They apparently own the patent for virtual worlds.
''/\/\'' Posted using Iphone bunni |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 2:48:32 PM#11
Originally posted by Puremallace And how exactly would Nintendo prove that Blizzard was "raking in so much money" off of this one aspect of a much larger game? I want a mmorpg where people have gone through misery, have gone through school stuff and actually have had sex even. -sagil |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 2:50:52 PM#12
Originally posted by Puremallace Why do you think Nintendo has any right to sue? I don't see the word Pokemon anywhere, I don't see of the characters from Pokemon, I don't see any of the names or common Pokemon related items like Pokeballs. The game play is similar to Pokemon, whoop-de-doo - every single game genre works like this. Basically you are suggesting that anyone who makes an RTS game where you can build a Barracks should be able to be sued by anyone who made an RTS game where you could build a Barracks before them. Monster/pet battles game types are in a ton of games at this point. It's not a Pokemon thing and they weren't even the first game to do it. Nintendo doesn't have a leg to stand on to sue anyone. Twitter: @Nephaerius |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 2:51:16 PM#13
Blizzard didn't sue the Movie Kung Fu Panda for ripping off it's Pandaren race and that was just as close to a blatent rip off as this is. The fact of the matter is I have seen people on this Forum talk about how they would love an MMO with Pet battles like Pokemon. Now Blizzard is doing it and who knows, maybe they will get sued. |
|||||||
|
rojo6934
Elite Member
Joined: 8/13/09
"It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver". - Niccolo Machiavelli |
4/25/12 2:51:33 PM#14
i wasnt planning on playing this battle pet system with pokemon style, but looking at this it actually looks interesting and i will try it out when MoP launches. Theres no reason for Nintendo to sue Blizzard for taking this idea of pokemon battle pets and twist it to fit in WoW. In fact, If Nintendo sues Blizzard for adding the poke battle idea to WoW, then Blizzard should sue every WoW clone out there for the same reason. IMO |
||||||
|
4/25/12 3:38:10 PM#15
Yep, no game can ever make animals fight because pokemon exists.
Shadow's Hand Guild The Secret World - Dragons Planetside 2 - Terran Republic Tera - Dragonfall Server |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 3:46:54 PM#16
Originally posted by Puremallace If Nintendo was allowed to sue blizzard, then wouldnt blizzard be allowed to in turn sue Trion for Rft being so heavily copied from WoW??
If you are going to create hate threads about other games, perhaps move out of your glass house before throwing stones |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 3:51:40 PM#17
Probably the same reason PopCap didn't sue them for stealing Plants vs. Zombies.
It will be a cold day in hell before Blizzard ever creates ANYTHING original. |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 3:52:28 PM#18
Given Blizzard's penchant for tip-of-the-hat easter eggs and such that pay tribute to great iconic gaming lore, I think this is consistent with that Blizzard flair. As to how they aren't getting pulled into litigation over this? I'm not lawyer, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were loopholes in use of intellectual property that allow Blizzard to implement these elements in this way.
More realistically? They're paying for the rights. It's Blizzard. |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 3:56:02 PM#19
Originally posted by AZHokie54 That's a pretty audacious statement. I'd ask for you to clarify what you're referring to, but I've been on these boards long enough to know that people are rarely speaking from a point of fact.
That's like saying Apple has never had an original idea. |
|||||||
|
4/25/12 4:06:47 PM#20
Originally posted by pags411 While Blizzard is very much like apple and takes existing ideas and maing them user friendly, what MMORPG had the dungeon finder system before WoW? Seems like a game changing innovation to me. |
|||||||