Reality check, some of the best MMO PvP that ever existed was in Dark Ages of Camelot.

DAOC didn't have open world PvP (not counting a  single FFA server)

Originally posted by Coldices
GW2 fans...only they have to make a new thread with an opinion on a topic that already exists.

Cash shop

that is all

Yeah.. there are current threads alread about this.

There being no world Pvp in DAoC doesn't take away from the fact that there are still people that want world Pvp, and that there are still people that don't like/want GW2 because it doesn't have world Pvp.

I don't see the point in this comparison.

Yeah and GW2 is still going to be carebear to the max. I'll play SWTOR before ever playing this craphole game with its carebear instance box pvp system. At least in SWTOR I can PvP without jumping into instance battlegrounds.

Originally posted by GamerFun

Yeah and GW2 is still going to be carebear to the max. I'll play SWTOR before ever playing this craphole game with its carebear instance box pvp system. At least in SWTOR I can PvP without jumping into instance battlegrounds.

So go play SWToR then if that's what you want. No one cares either way.

No need to go into the fact that GW2 also, in addition to the instanced PvP has open world PvP zones in the Mists (WvW), you've already made your decision not to play GW2 and I can respect that. It's a pity you feel the need to spread falsehoods about GW2 however.

Originally posted by Volkon

Originally posted by GamerFun

Yeah and GW2 is still going to be carebear to the max. I'll play SWTOR before ever playing this craphole game with its carebear instance box pvp system. At least in SWTOR I can PvP without jumping into instance battlegrounds.

So go play SWToR then if that's what you want. No one cares either way.

 

No need to go into the fact that GW2 also, in addition to the instanced PvP has open world PvP zones in the Mists (WvW), you've already made your decision not to play GW2 and I can respect that. It's a pity you feel the need to spread falsehoods about GW2 however.

Whatever floats your boat carebear.

Originally posted by GamerFun

Yeah and GW2 is still going to be carebear to the max. I'll play SWTOR before ever playing this craphole game with its carebear instance box pvp system. At least in SWTOR I can PvP without jumping into instance battlegrounds.

Have fun with swtor. If I wanted to play a shitty Star wars game I would rather play star wars kinect than Swtor.

Originally posted by caremuchless

 

Reality check, some of the best MMO PvP that ever existed was in Dark Ages of Camelot.

 

DAOC didn't have open world PvP (not counting a  single FFA server)

And those 2 FFA servers where only released more then 2 years after the initial release, they also made many people realise that they liked the RvR much more then the open world FFA.

Originally posted by GamerFun

Yeah and GW2 is still going to be carebear to the max. I'll play SWTOR before ever playing this craphole game with its carebear instance box pvp system. At least in SWTOR I can PvP without jumping into instance battlegrounds.

Your opinions are not important enough for their own topic, stick to posting in existing ones.

Originally posted by GamerFun

Yeah and GW2 is still going to be carebear to the max. I'll play SWTOR before ever playing this craphole game with its carebear instance box pvp system. At least in SWTOR I can PvP without jumping into instance battlegrounds.

1: World vs. World is not an "instanced battleground". The maps are enormous, and you can play in them without ever touching PvP or PvE. It is, effectively, a PvP server that you can enter and exit at will. 

2: How is instanced PvP "carebear"? Seriously, I have never understood this. Instanced matches make for balanced, tight team gameplay. Which is more competitive: a 5v5 CS match, or a 100v100 Battlefield map? If you prefer open world PvP, fine, but don't pretend that it's more balanced, competitive, or "hardcore" than instanced PvP. 

[edit]Just read the rest of your posts. I do not expect a reasonable answer from you, but I'll leave this post here nonetheless. 

Originally posted by GamerFun

Originally posted by Volkon

Originally posted by GamerFun

Yeah and GW2 is still going to be carebear to the max. I'll play SWTOR before ever playing this craphole game with its carebear instance box pvp system. At least in SWTOR I can PvP without jumping into instance battlegrounds.

So go play SWToR then if that's what you want. No one cares either way.

 

No need to go into the fact that GW2 also, in addition to the instanced PvP has open world PvP zones in the Mists (WvW), you've already made your decision not to play GW2 and I can respect that. It's a pity you feel the need to spread falsehoods about GW2 however.

Whatever floats your boat carebear.

They really should have an age limit to post-or at least separate forums for the adults.

Originally posted by GamerFun

Originally posted by Volkon

Originally posted by GamerFun

Yeah and GW2 is still going to be carebear to the max. I'll play SWTOR before ever playing this craphole game with its carebear instance box pvp system. At least in SWTOR I can PvP without jumping into instance battlegrounds.

So go play SWToR then if that's what you want. No one cares either way.

 

No need to go into the fact that GW2 also, in addition to the instanced PvP has open world PvP zones in the Mists (WvW), you've already made your decision not to play GW2 and I can respect that. It's a pity you feel the need to spread falsehoods about GW2 however.

Whatever floats your boat carebear.

Originally posted by GamerFun

Originally posted by Volkon

Originally posted by GamerFun

Yeah and GW2 is still going to be carebear to the max. I'll play SWTOR before ever playing this craphole game with its carebear instance box pvp system. At least in SWTOR I can PvP without jumping into instance battlegrounds.

So go play SWToR then if that's what you want. No one cares either way.

 

No need to go into the fact that GW2 also, in addition to the instanced PvP has open world PvP zones in the Mists (WvW), you've already made your decision not to play GW2 and I can respect that. It's a pity you feel the need to spread falsehoods about GW2 however.

Whatever floats your boat carebear.

 Thats rich.

Isnt there already a threat about this?

Originally posted by adam_nox

Your opinions are not important enough for their own topic, stick to posting in existing ones.

And your posting in this thread what other people have already posted in this thread.

Originally posted by Zaltark

Isnt there already a threat about this?

Not one that's about to become as interesting as this one.

Originally posted by Skyy_High

Originally posted by GamerFun

Yeah and GW2 is still going to be carebear to the max. I'll play SWTOR before ever playing this craphole game with its carebear instance box pvp system. At least in SWTOR I can PvP without jumping into instance battlegrounds.

1: World vs. World is not an "instanced battleground". The maps are enormous, and you can play in them without ever touching PvP or PvE. It is, effectively, a PvP server that you can enter and exit at will. 

2: How is instanced PvP "carebear"? Seriously, I have never understood this. Instanced matches make for balanced, tight team gameplay. Which is more competitive: a 5v5 CS match, or a 100v100 Battlefield map? If you prefer open world PvP, fine, but don't pretend that it's more balanced, competitive, or "hardcore" than instanced PvP. 

[edit]Just read the rest of your posts. I do not expect a reasonable answer from you, but I'll leave this post here nonetheless. 

I would like to note I will be playing GW2 for the main reason of the PvP.

1. WvWvW is instance PvP no matter how big the zone is it is zone all its own, hence a instance.

2. You answered your own question on how instance PvP is "carebear". The reason you listed are why it is consider that way. PvP doesn't need to be balanced and it is more about team tactics. Play a RvR game and you would understand how it works.