| 651 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
4/14/12 10:24:12 PM#421
Originally posted by Berikai If you played Aion within the last few hours and still believe Aion has better graphics, then I suggest seeing an eye doctor. Unless you are implying that you prefer Aion's art style, which is certainly a more reasonable stance. But no one with any sense can say that a game that has painted on textures covering flat surfaces is preferable to the graphics in a game like TERA. As for the GW2 vs. Aion thing, you obviously just skimmed over my post, because I never said you were comparing GW2 to Aion. I was pointing out that the audiences of the two games can be mutually exclusive. GW2 being successful doesn't mean that TERA won't, because they'll attract a different type of player. I didn't think that would be a difficult point to understand, but apparently I was wrong. And considering that the endgame content is where TERA will shine, I wouldn't worry too much about what the hardcores will do after 4 weeks. :) |
|
|
4/14/12 10:28:59 PM#422
Originally posted by Berikai Just so I'm not being unintertionally misleading the VG comment was said because of the rocky launch and my belief that, like Vanguard, is a great game that will now be discounted because of it's bad launch in Korea. TERA is an exploritory game in the sense that it's big and you don't have one set direction from start to finish but it's no Vanguard, I'd have to play more of TERA's world to say that. Just not worth my time anymore. |
|
|
4/14/12 10:53:53 PM#423
Will 2nd the What the talk, tera's graphics are stunning, don't deny it. "Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one ..." - Thomas Paine |
|
|
4/14/12 11:18:45 PM#424
Originally posted by Wraithone Well you have WoW.... which is about as casual and easy as a face book game lol. O ya FYI westerner like ganking more than Asian if you didn't know. I KTera the koreans don't OWPVP at all, they dislike it over there for some reason. Its here in the west where people are actively pking. Originally posted by Berikai A thing call PvP that most casual player don't understand what it means. It is a true mystry of life. Originally posted by Avarix I think you mean the entire country (America) trust me its not just gaming. And anyone who taken any ethnic study course would say the same. Originally posted by Jetrpg Actually White american (majorty) only have a postive view of asian population because we are consider the "model minorty" We work hard, keep to our self, and genearly don't mess with politics. Not going to get too deep as talking anything potlicial is very bad on this site even if you use it as examples so lets leave it at that. |
|
|
4/14/12 11:35:46 PM#425
This is a pretty big mischaracterization of GW2 and its players.
|
|
|
4/14/12 11:40:34 PM#426
Originally posted by Size-Twelve Just sayin' Edit: One thing I do like about TERA is that with the combat you actually "feel" like you hit something. There are two games I can think of that I would have loved had it not seemed like I was just swinging through air. Just not worth my time anymore. |
|
|
4/14/12 11:50:21 PM#427
Lol, yeah I kind of stuck my foot in my mouth there, but to clarify I wasn't calling Tera players basement dwellers. That was in reference to the great "hardcore" crowd who generally can't compete outside of numerical advantage. |
|
|
4/14/12 11:54:00 PM#428
Originally posted by rexzshadow Ok agian, lets reframe this in reality Tera is a new mmo, americans want any new mmo to come around so they can stop playing wow like they have been for years. But their hate or fear of asians (which has already been disclaimed infact agree is opposite) is keeping them from TRYING the game. Or could be they just think that Tera doesn't have je ne sais quoi that mmos need to be the next big thing. Which of these seems more acurate/realistic to you. "Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one ..." - Thomas Paine |
|
|
4/14/12 11:55:41 PM#429
Originally posted by Size-Twelve Hehe I know I was just being a smart-alic. You should watch the Warrior video a few threads down. That guy is funny and at about the 8:45 mark (I think) makes reference about his "three crystals instead of four", hilarious. Edit: Wow, it was father down than I thought: http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/346933/Pretty-entertaining-warrior-videoguide.html Just not worth my time anymore. |
|
|
4/15/12 12:34:48 AM#430
Originally posted by Castran TERAs pvp looks interesting but it also looks like a grind, and pandas dont help. All three games have similarities marking their generation, but Secret World will seriously lack PVP, which is a shame with its skill system. OF all things I think GW2 will triumph with immersion. |
|
|
4/15/12 12:38:15 AM#431
Originally posted by burdock2 they certainly spent a lot of time on those boob animations! that's what i call action! |
|
|
4/15/12 12:54:36 AM#432
Here we go again with how amazing this game looks. It just doesnt, it makes terrible use of color samples, textures, lighting bump mapping and spectral surfaces. Its overly bright and looks only slightly better then most F2P games pooping out of Koreas MMO shoot.. Also spell effects are rather terrible and sound effects are as bad as they get. Gameplay seems decent Ill give it that. People are mistaking design for graphical quality. I think people like the design of the game the "pretty" girls etc. But the actual envionments are washed out and 2 dimensional looking. Or people see one highly detailed NPC monster and go WOW look at that, this game looks amazing!!! You have to look at every part of a games graphics not just one or two things. |
|
|
4/15/12 12:54:59 AM#433
Sorry OP but I simply don't feel like TERA will be a sleeper hit. We already get very mixed reactions from gamers and press alike who had hands on experience - some who praise combat and look over the other conventional mmorpg systems while others simply don't care about the combat and look at the game as a whole. Mixed reactions is already a bad sign in my book. Maybe if it was much less hyped but with overwhelmingly positive reactions from players in general who tried it then ya, the game may certaintly be a sleeper hit. However, that is just not the case. Imo, the game certaintly won't be a hit but will definately survive and have its own niche. Specifically, for those that don't like great changes in their mmorpg but would instead, just want a more action orientated combat. Just want GW2. |
|
|
4/15/12 1:00:41 AM#434
Originally posted by Vaultar Or maybe they want to play a game where PVP and PVE aren't separated? not everyone likes to play carebear MMOs
|
|
|
4/15/12 1:08:07 AM#435
Originally posted by snapfusion Can you provide any proof of a F2P game with similar graphics? It is very colorful, shiny and bloomy but it does have very high resolution graphics. Games that go the more "realistic" route, which it sounds like you are more a fan of, tend to look dated a lot sooner than later. It was the "look" they were going for and style preference aside they did a good job. TERA does have great graphics "at every part of" it's look, the environments blend together very well. You can tell this pretty easily in a game by looking at what was placed in the gameworld and what is part of the gameworld. You might not like the look but they did a consistant job of making everything fit together. Just not worth my time anymore. |
|
|
4/15/12 1:14:43 AM#436
There is nothing innovative about Tera other then the gameplay. Ultimately it is still just a themepark MMO only they have yet to include important features in it like Battlegrounds and Raiding. If you are looking for a new MMO that is different I suggest steering clear, but the combat system may keep you occupied for a little while. I personally thought the combat system felt a little weak even as it was touted to be really awesome action gameplay. The combat feels "forced" and not very polished (rooting animations,ability delay,ect) almost as if it is trying to be a console game but falling short. I highly doubt it will be a sleeper hit, but it will have a niche audience for a little while before it ultimately goes F2P. |
|
|
4/15/12 1:17:51 AM#437
Originally posted by spaceport True, but a LOT do. I simply will not play games that are gankfests any more. I no longer find them entertaining. |
|
|
4/15/12 1:18:54 AM#438
Originally posted by spaceport While this may be true, the fact of the matter is that the only really successful MMOs outside of say, Eve, have seperated PvE and PvP. The MMORPGs that did not seperate them have never really had enough success to be really well off, let alone a "sleeper hit". MMOs have always been more PvE focused and seperating the PvP elements has been a neccessary evil in order to foster that. Exploration,progression,story, and feeling as though you have a purpose in a living online world is essentially the core of MMOs. PvP does have a place here but it is usually far less interesting as ultimately the PvP game does not change as drastically as the PvE game. What this means for the life of an MMO is that it will always be greatly extended upon with strong elements associated with the my formerly mentioned areas of importance. |
|
|
4/15/12 2:03:34 AM#439
Originally posted by snapfusion Could you provide examples of this through screenshots of what YOU consider terrible use of?
This *is* the UnrealEngine3 we're talking about here...
The length people will go through to discredit TERA in their own eyes. *sigh* L2P TERA combat: http://youtu.be/k_ZTX31fGtk |
|
|
4/15/12 2:09:06 AM#440
@Celcius
You are 100% correct on the points that make an MMO. Ironically enough this is why I'm excited for TERA. While its true that TERA has tons of quests, very basic quests for the most part, they are not required for progression. The main quest however does tell you what's going on in the gameworld and is good to do. There is a linear path from 1-20, unfortunately IMO, but there are forks and options after that to explore which is not always the case with themeparks. A huge draw for me is the abundance of group content outside of the instances. As far as purpose i think the freedoms given to you let you feel that if you want to. Oh, then there is the combat which keeps being brought up as it's only strength is really the icing on the cake. One thing that is working against TERA is that other than the combat it can be seen as offering nothing "new". While it's not trying to break molds it combines a lot of features from other games as well as offers features not seen in other games and is suprisingly deep. One important point is that there are separate PvP and PvE servers. Just not worth my time anymore. |
|