| 606 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
3/28/12 6:04:43 PM#81
Originally posted by NMStudio Not only that, but they can request your house, your car, who knows?! This is serious **** we are dealing with here.... |
|
|
3/28/12 6:06:10 PM#82
I do love it when people like the OP totally miss the point and try to make out one transaction is all it takes. |
|
|
3/28/12 6:10:53 PM#83
Originally posted by NMStudio You may want to take the advice of the guy you're quoting and actually do some research. You're view is just blatantly flawed. 1) You don't buy supply. You earn it from capturing enemy keeps. Ever seen that 'supply' yak in the PvP vids? That you're or the enemy's team taking supply back to their base. You can then go pickup 10 supply at a time to use it to help build / repair crap. Gems and gold do not enter into that at all. What does gold buy? Keep upgrades. That's it. 2) Noone is claiming that Anet is not trying to make a profit off this game. The fact that you seem to believe this is kinda laughable. More to the point, Anet has publicly stated that 'We want to make quality products, and B2P is our way of letting the player demonstrate to us whether or not they like our content'. If you look passed your blind hatred, you may find that such a statement isn't just marketting, it's a clever business model. Why? Because it does two things. It allows Anet to hold a good standing with it's community (thus generating a loyal fanbase, as well as increasing the chance that players will buy their products), it also gives Anet a very clear guage as to how people feel about their content. Subscriptions do none of this, we've just been conditioned to think that subs are necessary for MMOs to exist. The math just doesn't support that, though. ** Furthermore, point 2 is exactly why B2P works. I'm not sure this model would work if everyone tried to do it, but because Anet is the only one, it gives them an edge. Furthermore it gives them incentive to keep making quality products, which creates a positive feedback loop. If you look at the whole picture, this benefits not only Anet, but also the players as well. ** |
|
|
3/28/12 6:12:12 PM#84
Originally posted by Betakodo Non-gundams? You mean mobile suits? Also the pilot of the gundams are just mobile suit pilots without the gundams unless you're trying to refer to Newtype pilots. Which don't need gundams to be good pilots. Your weeafu is weak, pupil. |
|
|
3/28/12 6:12:43 PM#85
OK, let's break this down into what we know.
What we know.
|
|
|
3/28/12 6:12:51 PM#86
Originally posted by ChuvarHrama I laughed so hard, I almost spilled my drink in my hand. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns-IIn-DG-c Try to argue this please. Oh also if you quote me and it's to argue my point, if I don't respond it means I haven't been corrected by you and/or I haven't seen it. Remember I don't mind admitting I am in the wrong. Take care :D |
|
|
3/28/12 6:13:38 PM#87
Once again buying gems will not change the amount of gold in the economy of a server. You have to trade with another player who farmed gold just like everyone else.
If there is 10,000 gold in the economy and someone buys a gem and trades it to another player, there will still be 10,000 gold in the economy. There is no obvious server advantage for buying gems. Plain and simple, end of story. The server still has the same buying power when it comes to PvP, any other argument is speculation at best. |
|
|
3/28/12 6:14:29 PM#88
Originally posted by ComfyChair This ^, though all the screaming of 'the sky is falling!' is really getting old. Especially when the proof is sitting right there and people are just choosing not to look at it. I wonder what the next round of QQing from people who never previously posted in the GW2 threads will be about. Sylvari having too many leaves? Asura guardians being blatantly stolen from Mega Man? Who knows. Chances are it will be 'this is BS! I didn't get into CE beta, cause i didn't buy the game' or something along those lines. |
|
|
3/28/12 6:20:38 PM#89
Originally posted by aesperus Just proceed to not give a damn :) We've seen everything now, there's nothing that can actually surprise us and be the 'bad' thing. It is all good ;) This game is set to rocket up the PC all time sales chart. I'm betting it'll handily beat skyrim in first week sales. |
|
|
FlawSGI
Hard Core Member
Joined: 8/14/10
All of history is a lie. The truth depends on who does the listening, and who does the telling... |
3/28/12 6:27:10 PM#90
Originally posted by aesperus They really are running out of legs to stand on. A lot of the arguments lately have been far stretches. I will not tell someone else what to lke or dislike but come on. If you don't like the game then please quit trying to convince everyone else that the games a scam. Get down off that soapbox and put your efforts into learning about a game that is more to your liking. I think people have done a great job in this thread explaining why the OP and his ignorant argument is wrong. I am sure the system will not be perfect, it is going ot a bea player driven economy after all, but I think it may be a little too early to be crying doom and gloom because of the CS information. RIP Jimmy "The Rev" Sullivan and Paul Gray. |
|
3/28/12 6:28:15 PM#91
So now those that invest money are on even footing with those who invest time. So unfair. So unfair. /irony Sigh. |
|
|
3/28/12 6:30:48 PM#92
Originally posted by Kuppa They don't need to request anything. Someone will be willing to pay, it's just a matter of how much. |
|
|
3/28/12 6:31:30 PM#93
Originally posted by FlawSGI Just look at the OP sig and his posts on mmorpg.com... its so sad.... |
|
|
3/28/12 6:37:50 PM#94
The tripe people come up with, regarding GW2 and it's cash shop is hilarious. What? So now I have to spend £5 in order to compete in WvW. Well there goes £1's worth of siege equipment. |
|
|
3/28/12 6:40:10 PM#95
Thread was answered the moment someone mentioned Supply. Why is this still going? |
|
|
3/28/12 6:40:47 PM#96
Originally posted by romanator0 I have to kill others to get items in game. Oh great this is just a play2play game! |
|
Originally posted by ChuvarHrama Yeah, sad that people are willingly letting companies add f2p cash shop to a game they paid $60 for, or stuff that's already on the disc. I apparently stepped into pro-Arenanet territory though. For once, the fansites are more anti something. What's with the people assuming gems will never be traded for gold? Goodies in the cash shop make gems liquid, i.e they have value and will be traded. Lets do some algebra, assuming they're all equal in value because we're agruing that they ARE indeed liquid and not comparing value: Dollars = Gems = Gold Therefore: Dollars = Gold
|
|
|
3/28/12 6:44:38 PM#98
These people complaining do know that they don't have to buy or play GW2 if there are elements that they are so opposed to? |
|
|
3/28/12 6:45:22 PM#99
Originally posted by Betakodo I don't understand why you want Arenanet to go out of business (by way of their being no source of income for them after the box purchase). Do you think the game is just going to run on rainbows or something? Of course Gems will be traded for Gold. That's a given considering that it's a mechanic with the game. The point is though, what exactly can you do with your fortune? You're point of buying siege weapons is mute as you still require lots of supply. So what else do you have a problem with? |
|
|
3/28/12 6:46:08 PM#100
Originally posted by Betakodo Why do you care how someone wants to spend their money?
|
|