| 250 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
2/20/12 5:28:40 PM#181
Originally posted by DaSpack No offesnse, but that guy is obviously bias because he's upset its not the same game as the original GW1
|
|
|
2/20/12 5:43:12 PM#182
Originally posted by Genoknight Well. I was just browsing through this thread and am not really trying to say anything against or for GW2 other than I just find a few things extremely odd, which is that the game is in Alpha if it is supposed to launch 4 months from now. It ain't going to happen, that is for sure!! But back to what you say. You just read the start. read what he has to say about the technical aspects. The game lags like a mthrfcker for him also. In light of this I think it is mildly outrageous that the fanboi writer of the review here can go ad hominem on OP for stating something that is obvious to more than one person. the game seem to lag. Now why am I commenting on this at all. Well I have played AoC for years, and that game have been on and off bothered with lag. They have work on it for ages, and it have actually been quite hard to remove. So OP's concern is definitely valid as the issue at hand is quite hard to shake out of an MMO as well as it is quite gamebreaking. The Ultimate Breakdown |
|
|
2/20/12 5:46:07 PM#183
Originally posted by DaSpack And . . . then you watched the videos again after the high wore down. Re: SWTOR "Remember, remember - Kakk says 'December.'" |
|
|
2/20/12 6:03:46 PM#184
Just a couple bits of reflection after reading this thread, if there's lag.... who'd-a-thunk-it? It's freaking CB, alpha or whatever, there is bound to be lag at this stage. Ever heard of Debugging? That creates issues in and of itself. Alpha? I thought this was CB? That part has me confused. Unless they mean the game is in CB, and the server structure is in alpha? A-net has used the term CB many times recently.. Game-trashing: get used to it, it's only beginning, it will get worse, if you're getting thin-skinned about it now, you might as well leave the forums. You haven't seen **** yet.. Garret: nice of you to chime in and all, but telling users to get a life might not reflect well on this site, and since when did staff attack users for sensationalism? New to the forum section Garret?
For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson If you can't argue the point don't say anything at all. |
|
|
2/20/12 6:07:33 PM#185
Even if this game fails on an epic proportion, it will still have covered miles over other MMOs that have been released in the last 6 months to a year. "Never argue with a fool; onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." I need to take this advice more. |
|
|
2/20/12 6:09:02 PM#186
Video's I've watched are pretty lag free.
All the IGN.com videos run great.
The 45minute long video runs great.
I'm not seeing the point of this thread other than to get attention.
Oh and who said the game is to launch in June? I haven't seen Anet say that anywhere. The game has no launch date yet unless they just announced something this morning. |
|
Originally posted by garrett So your going to tell one of your customers (yes i am a customer because you receive income from advertisements, and you receive those advertisements because people, like me, visit your website.) to go get a life (personal insult, against your own site rules) because i post a legitimate concern i have for a game that i myself am looking forward too?? [Mod Edit]
Current game: MLB The Show Awaiting: Archeage past games: EQ, EQ2, DAOC, SWG VG, WAR, FFXI, FFXIV, GW, AoC, WoW, EVE, rift, DF, DCUO, Entropia, SWTOR. |
|
|
2/20/12 6:11:42 PM#188
Originally posted by DaSpack Listen, how they run this site is their problem. We all have an opinion about the standards this site holds and we all know that words like this would get a ban for normal users. I am not for censorship and mod edits on every post but I don't like double standards also. If I am wrong and the world pvp will run smoothly on my fairly good computer then I will gladly come back here and repent. |
|
|
2/20/12 6:11:53 PM#189
Originally posted by mrshroom89 you can say anything now .. but i am sure that you will play gw2 and enjoy it till gw3 comes out ! 100% |
|
|
2/20/12 6:12:58 PM#190
Originally posted by n3v3rriv3r It runs smoothly. It ran smoothly on my friend's computer (homemade PC), and my computer (a 2010 iMac Bootcamped to Windows.)
Re: SWTOR "Remember, remember - Kakk says 'December.'" |
|
|
2/20/12 6:14:50 PM#191
Originally posted by Distopia i saw more than one video where the reviewer said alpha. i think the WvW maps are still in an alpha stage. |
|
|
Zeroxin
Elite Member
Joined: 6/21/06
My words are not here to sway you,they are here to make you understand. |
2/20/12 6:16:41 PM#192
Originally posted by dbstylin34 It seems like the Kotaku guy was trying to record whilst the system specs were set to high which apparently makes your PC go into the crapping position. This is not a game. |
|
2/20/12 6:29:59 PM#193
Hey guys, lets stay on topic. Thanks! |
|
|
2/20/12 6:38:03 PM#194
Originally posted by garrett Lol Bit over the top don't ya think? Not saying I agree with him and his chicken little flair for the game but he does have a point. Well, if you take away the excessive embellishment on it. Wasn't there a writer that complained about the lag as well? Although he certainly gave Anet the benefit of the doubt what it would be like when it went live. From Kotaku, Kitkatu, or whatever the (bleep) that site is. I think I'm jealous. As much as I give you folks a hard time you never flame me :( Simply isn't fair. 1. For god's sake mmo gamers, enough with the analogies. They're unnecessary and your comparisons are terrible, dissimilar, and illogical. 2. To posters feeling the need to state how f2p really isn't f2p: Players understand the concept. You aren't privy to some secret the rest are missing. You're embarrassing yourself. 3. Yes, Cpt. Obvious, we're not industry experts. Now run along and let the big people use the forums for their purpose. |
|
|
2/20/12 6:39:46 PM#195
Originally posted by DaSpack [mod edit] The game isn't due out in June, it is due out in 2012. That gives ArenaNet ~9 months to hammer out performance issues if they deem it should take that long. The whole June date was perpetuated by fans(the logic is beta in March/April so a month after that a release) and dates that vendors THOUGHT the game MIGHT be out. It doesn't normally take 1 year to get through beta, I believe vanilla Wow had 7 months from beta start until launch. Warhammer had about 10 months. SWTOR had 12-14 months(iirc). So there is a range there. ArenaNet is also doing this differently than other MMO's. Other MMO's closed beta's were closer to Alpha testing, they weren't by any means feature complete. Warhammer especially had this issue as only parts of the game were accessible at any one time and they kept adding and retesting. This caused the beta testing to be bogged down by having to constantly retest and give bad results since everything that might impact gameplay wasn't there. ArenaNet is making sure that everything is there for testing so they have a complete picture. This cuts out a lot of time retesting due to missing elements. As for that reviewer, first off his computer is not great(see above for reasons) so his performance issues might just be on his end and or something that will be fixed before launch. Second, his major problem with WvW is that it's unorganized. He obviously has zero experience with RvR games. While at first things are unorganized zergs, structure will take hold. Guilds will form alliances and cooperate to succeed. Just a small example would be in Warhammer we would have 3 guilds cooperating together. We would siege a keep, have 1 guild guard the back entrance, 1 guild taking objectives/blocking a chokepoint. With so many things to do in WvW you can bet there will be teams to attack, defend, construct, ambush, etc. All I'm going to say is this. If you have some reviewers saying there are performance issues and others saying there aren't, it is likely it will be fixed. If there were performance issues for everyone, then you need to scared of the game being delayed. Since some people aren't having issues it shows they can get the needed performance for mass PvP, now they just need to figure out why some aren't doing so well. |
|
|
2/20/12 6:50:39 PM#196
Originally posted by Distopia The Beta is not alpha, its the server & client that are alpha. |
|
|
2/20/12 6:53:50 PM#197
Originally posted by sammyeli That makes sense to an extent, I've done many alpha's and beta's I've just never heard of the two not being mutually exclusive. For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson If you can't argue the point don't say anything at all. |
|
|
2/20/12 7:06:10 PM#198
Originally posted by DaSpack okay. so. this is how i read that. 1: he's complaining about a two day press alpha/beta being disorganized? his credibility takes a bump for being a mad person to expect otherwise. especially since it was for the press and thus people were just trying to experience as much of the game as possible. 2: he acknowledges that it's unoptimized, then spins around and complains that it doesn't work perfectly. okay, seriously? obviously a few fries short of a happy meal. another credibility bump. 3: he's comparing GW1's highly tactical, small scale pvp to mass all out, guns blazing, free-for-all, madhouse seige warfare? really? okay. i don't know what to say. i'm not going to keep making cracks about his sanity (because he is obviously sane as evidenced by the rest of the article), but the pvp section just makes no sense. |
|
|
2/20/12 7:08:26 PM#199
Originally posted by atticusbc it was a comparison piece. the guy is a huge gw1 fan. |
|
|
2/20/12 7:11:50 PM#200
Originally posted by brody71 that much is obvious. and yeah i edited out that part of my post 'cause it really sort of wanders at the end there. i dunno. i just can't accept his arguments. even if it is a matter of personal preference, his arguments in the pvp section specifically are just... bad. |
|