| 314 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
1/17/12 1:30:13 PM#81
It seems like this post is a little behind the times but I am glad mmorpg.com is contributing to shining light on this problem. SOPA and PIPA are short-sighted, terrible acts. Unfortunately, it's going to take a lot of work to convince Congress not to pass any of the related billls (regardless of what new names they come up with). Meltdown, you are pretty much right - any website with any sort of social community could be held liable and be essentially reduced to an IP number.
|
|
|
1/17/12 1:30:38 PM#82
Welp thanks all you folks that voted republican in November 2010 SOPA and PIPA are the results, along with them trying to kill unions, benefits, the middle class etc etc etc just another step backwards. And yes SOPA should be killed in all its forms and names. |
|
|
1/17/12 1:34:08 PM#83
Don't know how the forums separates these so responding in order. 1. In SOPA there is an amendment to stop payment and advertising revenues for these people. 99% of the firms that do this are American. By shutting these down foreign companies might start up to do this BUT foreign advertising markets have never been nearly as good as America's. As well very few countries would allow for it anyway... only America. 2. My little brother is studying Mandarin in China. He has access to almost any website that I do. But if he types in freedom suddenly he gets blocked. Of course they block out ideas. Freedom is largely a western ideology that is not shared by the remainder of the world. Everywhere East of Germany and South of America have practiced different forms of government and different forms of expression. Other parts of the world when they get freedom their countries split off into smaller countries and constantly make war with each other. 3. SOPA does not allow for companies to sue people for piracy. That law is already in effect and companies can sue pirates whenever they want. What the concern for SOPA is shutting down foreign hosting websites that allow for the piracy to occur. I will aliken the Internet to gun control. If you have no gun control anyone can have access to guns meaning that non-responsible gun owners (kids in schools) can shoot each other. If you have gun control that means only law enforcement, military and responsible people will have guns It is no surprise that the country that supports gun violence also supports child pornography and piracy. Website: http://www.thegameguru.me / YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/users/thetroublmaker |
|
|
Zekiah
Apprentice Member
Joined: 1/06/07
Hype (noun) |
1/17/12 1:34:35 PM#84
Originally posted by itgrowls Republican/Democrat is a false paradigm set up to keep people controlled and chained inside the proverbial box. The truth is, both sides are controlled by the same people who own the entire system. So let’s summarize a few effects of the left-right political divide: 1) ignites the political theater of the “left vs. right blame game”, creating false targets and enemies and dissipating potentially upsetting energies into harmless directions "Censorship is never over for those who have experienced it. It is a brand on the imagination that affects the individual who has suffered it, forever." - Noam Chomsky |
|
1/17/12 1:34:36 PM#85
As with everything, the Devil is in the details of implimentation and if the designers of the Bill aren't carefull about how they setup how the mechanisms work they can and will be used to abuse and bully people who are actualy engaging in completely legitimate activity. The DMCA has/had the same problem. The goal of protecting intellectual property rights online is a legitimate one. Allowing for mechanisms that can be EASLY used to prevent what are WELL ESTABLISHED and HISTORICALY SUPPORTED Fair Use exemptions to copyright law....and placing the burden of proof upon the accused rather then the accuser (which runs contrary to principles the US legal system is based on) is just plain wrong-headed. It's one thing to get a Court to issue an injuction to shutdown a site because some pirate is selling thousands of illegal copies of a work someone else worked hard to create. It's another thing to summarily shutdown a site because some idiot lawyer happaned to notice 1 file on it labled "Titanic" and couldn't be bothered to take the 15 seconds to check that it's actualy some kids history term paper on the historical event rather then a pirate trying to rip-off some crappy hollywood movie his clients own the rights for. |
|
|
1/17/12 1:35:23 PM#86
These dudes don´t want to restrict piracy, its just an excuse. They want to restrict our rights and opinions. Bunch of fascists, masters of crowd control. |
|
|
1/17/12 1:36:30 PM#87
Sorry for my immature analogy, but I do not think draining the ocean of water is a good idea to stop pirates. I can remember, back in the 1980-85, when me and my friends rented movies (and a movie-box) to watch movies. We had a guy (not saying it was me :P ) that copied those films using a simple cable and using 1 moviebox and the family VHS. Somehow they (The movie industry) actually fixed that at some point by making some sort of physical copy prevention system. So why can't they figure out something a little less far reaching than SOPA. I truly believe that there must be other paths they can go by besides actually trying to clog the tubes (CWIDT). I do not think that the internet in its present form is the problem and I strongly believe that some Industries (Movies and Music) were not intelligent enough to counter the copy issue and thus they are trying to force an awful law down on all of us.
|
|
|
1/17/12 1:39:26 PM#88
Looks like some people are quick to forget that it was the Clinton Whitehouse that gave use the oh-so-wonderfull-and-non-abused-because-it-came-from-my-side-of-the-aisle DMCA.
|
|
|
1/17/12 1:41:34 PM#89
Originally posted by ZX81Spectrum They do have ways to prevent people from copying/distrbuting games at least. It's called DRM and good luck getting the gaming community on board with that.
**edit** The point here (at least the government's view) is that it hurts the U.S. economy to essentially give away U.S. products by not protecting them and in effect hurting the economy. So instead of shipping CDs to Country-X for U.S. song-writers for $10-$20 a pop the music is being distributed for free and hurting U.S. companies...
That is a bit of devil's advocate, not saying I agree with the bills. It's sort of the right direction, but the wrong implementation. As someone else said, the ends do not justify the means. "They essentially want to say 'Correlation proves Causation' when it's just not true." - Sovrath |
|
|
1/17/12 1:50:00 PM#90
SOPA is dead on arrival.... |
|
|
Zekiah
Apprentice Member
Joined: 1/06/07
Hype (noun) |
1/17/12 1:50:05 PM#91
Originally posted by GrumpyMel2 It's exactly this kind of information exchange that the bill's sponsors and endorsers intend to silence. It has NOTHING to with piracy, it's about censorship and information control. Buzzwords, rhetoric and clever bill titles/language blind a lot of people to the truth. "Censorship is never over for those who have experienced it. It is a brand on the imagination that affects the individual who has suffered it, forever." - Noam Chomsky |
|
1/17/12 1:53:02 PM#92
Originally posted by gaeanprayer
I lived a LOT of years before there even was the internet. I can survive if they shut the thing down. Whatever regulations they decide on is what they decide on. I'm not going to turn an internet bill into a "righteous cause against what is destroying the very root of our society and my freedom" type thing. It's not that important to me. |
|
|
1/17/12 1:54:21 PM#93
I have to vehemently disagree with the last few posters. This is about corporations lobbying relentlessly in order to increase profit margins. This is a left-right issue as much as people want to put on tinfoil hats and pretend it's about anything more than profits and money. It's not. Never has been. Everything leads to money. Either for the masses or for the corporations. That's the eternal struggle. The fact that they are willing to go to any lengths shouldn't really be a surprise. And yes it's republicans who primarily support this legislation. |
|
|
1/17/12 1:59:31 PM#94
Originally posted by troublmaker First off, it is easy to get around DNS blocking, so it only effects the uninformed. At least understand what is in the bill before you go off the deep end and try to support it. The bill eliminates due process, With the current laws several sites have already been taken down without any method of appeal beyond filing suit against the government. The judges allowing this won't accept appeals. This just shouts the media companies being lazy and just want the government to do their dirty work. Besides everyone knows how government agencies work, they act before they have any facts to support them. Those sites taken down are mostly back up, but it took them almost a year to get them back up. This bill will make that almost impossible. Secondly, the bills puts the responsibility on monitoring on the website. Please explain how something like facebook, U-Tube, etc can even begin to monitor the millions of posts made every day. Right, they can't. That provision alone destroys the internet as we know it. Piracy is a bad thing and I am all for something that controls it. Neither of these two bills will do that. When a bill is sponsored by the media companies you can bet it is bad for everyone else. Their agenda is "we don't need to change" and "the world is out to get us". If you are for these bills then you completely do not understand what is in them. You might want to take some time and read up on them. There is a ton of information out there. |
|
|
1/17/12 2:03:45 PM#95
Great point. (Ohh and i love the word "Draconian".) Also go Blizzard for not being represented by these wankers claiming to represent "The whole gaming industry." |
|
|
1/17/12 2:09:47 PM#96
Speak out all you want, but that doesn't change the fact that half the population of this community openly supports EA. |
|
|
1/17/12 2:30:09 PM#97
Originally posted by Cambruin My sentiments match this almost exactly. Except for one thing. SOPA/PIPA won't really cause the impact the legislators intend. Instead of hampering off-shore piracy of movies and music (I've not seen gaming listed as a concern for these laws -- its all about movies, music and cosmetics), these will break a lot of internet security issues, by essentially enlisting the ISPs as the de facto enforcement agencies. In order to spot the problems, ISPs will be required to filter the content of all traffic they recieve and block the source. The real problem I have with SOPA/PIPA is that I don't want my ISP doing packet sniffing on everything that comes through them. Theie service is slow enough as is, without adding additional and unnecessary administration in the way. The way the legislation is written, the ISPs essentially have a free hand at blocking websites. All it would take is an overzealous ISP noticing that Jerk_001 posted 'Get yer pirated stuff here!', and all of a sudden, MMORPG.com disappears for a number of users. Even the current 'Conquer2: Invasion of Pirates' ad currently at the top of this page as I'm writing this reply could be misconstrued. Putting enforcement in the hands of ATT, the cable companies and other miscreants isn't my idea of providing a secure internet. Ultimately, this is simply bad legislation, and does not deserve to become law. Theft is wrong, but SOPA/PIPA doesn't address the problem. Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority. |
|
|
1/17/12 2:35:53 PM#98
The SOPA and PIPA bills is kinda like cutting your nose off to spite your face. |
|
|
1/17/12 2:39:23 PM#99
It's a corrupt system when less that 1% of a nations population can even get a new law looked at, much less passed. O wait, this is been going on foreverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! |
|
|
1/17/12 2:39:34 PM#100
Originally posted by Zekiah It's a free speech issue for sure. IF consumers want to say negative things about a product, bam, you can get shutdown. |
|