| 81 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
11/22/11 9:56:16 PM#41
Dear mmorpg... Why must you fuel the fire? This really isn't game related. It's stock related. Out come the trolls with the fresh feed in the trough...... You guys are almost encouraging trouble at this point..lol
|
|
|
11/22/11 10:14:19 PM#42
So something like that was really decided by 381 people? I mean that isn't exactly what I would consider even remotly a scientific poll. |
|
|
11/22/11 10:19:59 PM#43
Originally posted by Leviathonlx I think they decided it based on other factors, like the massive sub loss. The poll was just an extra . And yes I think its not scientific unless we know how the participants were selected.
Edit: And didn't picklebeast post this same thing? |
|
|
11/22/11 10:36:37 PM#44
Originally posted by marinrider If WoW is suffering "massive sub loss" then it should show up in their 10k. Are people aware that public companies publish revenue statements quarterly?
http://www.google.com/finance?q=ATVI&fstype=ii#
Hey look! No massive decline. Actually, pretty normal. A rise to a peak in 07, then a big dropoff corresponding to the massive recession, and since then a slow climb back up out of the gutter. Whaddaya know! Blizzards performance looks pretty much like most other companies performance given the economic conditions.
If WoW were bleeding subs by the *millions* do people really not comprehend that this would result in *clear* financial impact?
This idiot "survey" was *speculative*. It's a downgrade assuming they *will* lose subs. If they *already had* the stock would have already been punished.
None of this is rocket science, but MMO 'fans' and 'anti-fans' really are living in their own private delusions fully detached from any kind of reality. |
|
|
11/22/11 10:44:52 PM#45
Originally posted by mlambert890 Blizzard still makes $1B in revenue a year, but even on their most recent commercial they said they have 10 million subscribers. (Including Asia most likely). Which is 2 million less than the most recent major announcement of subs. It wouldnt result in an impact since they are no where near being unprofitable. Also, Blizz's stock also includes Activisions business, meaning CoD. That could be inflating it because if you look at the charts, even though CoD had major sales the stock hasnt really risen much at all. So something is balancing out these high cod sales. I dont think the negative weight from the WoW sub loss will show until its a lot "heavier" when WoW is around 8 million subs or less. WoW already has lost subs, I dont understand how you can deny that. Stock's dont reply to all news and they dont always reply at the time the news is out, not to mention the other factors inflating this stock. But yes, the survey wasn't well handled and shouldn't be used as "proof" of anything, but we will see in a year what WoW's sub numbers are at. If they are <10 million then the trend is confirmed. |
|
|
11/22/11 11:06:51 PM#46
|
|
|
11/23/11 12:01:24 AM#47
Welcome to the business cycle. Everyone moves from game to game. WoW toi EQ2, back to WoW, to Rift, back to WoW, to SWTOR, back to WoW... I see a pattern emerging... |
|
|
11/23/11 12:04:36 AM#48
Originally posted by Dracondis Except that EQ2 came out before WoW. |
|
|
11/23/11 12:44:49 AM#49
Its a fairly traditonal way of doing polling actually.
|
|
|
11/23/11 1:19:10 AM#50
Originally posted by alexmino The problem with this poll is that we don't know how the participants were selected. If its not random then its like choosing 381 people from a town in Texas and baseing your presidental predictions off of those results. |
|
|
BlackWatch
Apprentice Member
Joined: 11/01/06
WTB the option to play on 'mature' game servers. |
11/23/11 2:02:01 AM#51
The problem with this article... is that those that play and enjoy playing the game feel like they need to defend their game and their personal opinions. They often take this type of a post as a personal attack on perhaps their favorite pass-time and then the flaming begins.
As others have stated... we know that WoW (as a game) isn't what it used to be. In an effort to vastly improve the game, they messed with the recipe. Think of WoW as you would Coke. Cataclysm is 'New Coke' and WoW is 'Classic'. When is the last time you saw a bottle of 'New Coke'? If and when Blizzard decides to 'unscrew' their mess, they can bring the game back around. Doing so, however, will have its own set of consequences. Personally, I'm thankful that there are other games and many choices to choose from. While I don't want to be a game-hopper, if I hate what Blizz is doing right now, then I can go play SW:TOR or RIFT or eventually GW2 or Secret World.
|
|
11/23/11 2:07:06 AM#52
same old story...but there are good news! wow has a superb guild finder that will help you find a guild, when you return from SWTOR, so dont be afraid :) see you in azeroth as always... |
|
|
11/23/11 2:58:58 AM#53
when it rains, it pours
RIP Orc Choppa |
|
|
11/23/11 3:16:19 AM#54
to be honest i think it is pretty much dead on... WoW will not lift Acti-Bliz stocks again... That ship has sailed but this article does not take in to account things like D3 and what ever new smash hit Activision might be working on, and while i agree that the sample pool might be a bit small and to be honest it is very difficult to pick up random on-line gamers and still foiund a good amount of people who know/care what WoW is per defenition since online gaming is soo much more then MMORPGs. But all in all i think we will see a delcine of around thosenumbers before WoW levels out.
And the scary point is... It will still have twice or trice the numbers of the nearest competitor. This have been a good conversation |
|
|
11/23/11 4:03:42 AM#55
WoW just lost 1 more customer, hurry make a news post. |
|
|
11/23/11 4:09:54 AM#56
No..That us how you do a representative survey, 300 people is more than enough to read out trends and signs,..But no where does these measurements say they represents the truth :) |
|
|
11/23/11 4:37:01 AM#57
Even after an extensive break from wow (mmo's in general), part of me is still itching to go back (maybe it's ecsma ^^). Must......resist! |
|
|
11/23/11 4:50:15 AM#58
Some no name company bringing this up, yeah I really trust what they have to say lol. Oh don't let the fact they have ties to EA get in the way of anything lol
"The great thing about human language is that it prevents us from sticking to the matter at hand." |
|
|
11/23/11 4:59:04 AM#59
ROFL, your blind, the quality is fine. Just because you don't like something does not mean the quality is bad, they have lower graphics on purpose, which was smart, if they had it your way they would of had high end graphics, and have an AOC launch because everyone would need high end machines.
The graphics looks fine, the game play is fun, the end game is fun, and the story is great. The combat an animations are done properly, being in game design I have seen my far share of crap, and SWTOR is far from it. |
|
|
Reizla
Elite Member
Joined: 12/09/08
MMORPGs are no longer about the mass multi-user anymore *sadly* |
11/23/11 5:10:06 AM#60
Originally posted by Jerek_ Was about to say the same... These numbers are no representation of the 'general WoW population'. Though we all can agree that WoW might loose even more subs (with the coming of SWTOR and GW2) than the ~1.5M they lost last quarter, this survey is rather flawed. Lets just wait for the Q4 sub numbers of Blizzard early next year and see... Side note. I think SWTOR and GW2 are partly the reason for this declining WoW subscription numbers. The latest expansion and coming (panda) expansion have done a lot of damage to WoW as well... Demigoth's RPG adventures ~ My blog ASUS M4N72-E |