| 526 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
7/18/11 9:07:55 PM#221
How are you going to re-review the game before it gets any of its big patches that fix the game? You are trying to make this game fail and you rating for this game at the time being is unjust and unfair. |
|
|
7/18/11 9:08:44 PM#222
Originally posted by Magnum2103 |
|
|
7/18/11 9:15:33 PM#223
Originally posted by WSIMike It's an important patch that will (ostensibly) fix and improve things that need fixing and improving. It's an important step in the right direction. I'm just going ahead and requoting that because this really should be read a few more times...XD (,,,)=^__^=(,,,)Game Latte Vidcast |
|
|
7/18/11 9:18:53 PM#224
Lol, at least you got out of it with 14.99, I played beta..decided it was alright because I didn't get to far..bought the collectors edition because I liked it so much, and the visuals and ideas, then played for like 4 days and was like, wtf? 80 dollars gone. (-_-) |
|
|
7/18/11 9:20:24 PM#225
I just ran out and got my CE for 14 bucks. :-) Was very excited to see one in the area. For 14 bucks, just having a digipass makes it worth that much for me. |
|
|
7/18/11 9:25:24 PM#226
Originally posted by Cynthe I would be the first to agree with that but I have to argue that - why are we cutting SE a break on this when evry other game out would be ripped to pieces if its fans "just wait until the patch improves things"? Shouldn't the game have launched with this patch? Shouldn't the game have been in this supposed better state when it launched? When has it become okay for a game company to launch a sub-standard product only to say "we will fix it later" and all the sudden its ok? Or is the state of the genre such that this is okay and we are lemmings running off the cliff, chasing the next big thing, willing to pay for anything in any state, with only a promise that it will get better. I, for one, demand better and thinks a game should be in a finished and acceptable state when its launched. I do not wait for games to be fixed (games with the issues like FFXIV - somethings are acceptable and understandable). That is not being on a high-horse, that is simply demanding a quality service for the transaction involved. I do not care when the review should have ben posted, why its posted now, what patch is coming and how its supposedly going to make the game better. FFXIV launched poorly and the critical reception (across the board) has been luke-warm at best. MMORPG.com's review is just another review of a game that had potential and failed to live up to it....and that part remains true no matter when the review was written. |
|
|
7/18/11 9:30:09 PM#227
If you had followed the thread you'd know that we're not arguing wether the game deserves the score, I tink we all agree on that, we're arguing why it's coming NOW??? (,,,)=^__^=(,,,)Game Latte Vidcast |
|
|
7/18/11 9:31:09 PM#228
Originally posted by WSIMike Only my first paragraph was directed at you. I'm sorry if I used quotes and confused you. The rest of the post was directed at various other posts above. I have no good method to directly quote multiple posts here. They've come out and said it, yet there really hasn't been much in the way of improvements coming. Changes to the EXP system which make grinding much slower and boring (going from things that were tough to fight to two shotting doblyns for SP), addition of NMs which are uninteresting encounters, changes to crafting which made some professions more difficult to level. You use typical agruements like, "if it's too long to wait, then move on". I'm sorry, but if everyone moves on except SE's most zealous fanboys, and especially with new MMOs from major developers in the future on the horizon, FFXIV is doomed to fail before the game becomes a complete game, not the husk of a game it is now. I'm asking how long you fanboys are willing to wait before you accept the reality that the game will never improve to a state where it becomes the triple A quality game it was meant to be. Maybe it will survive on it's death throes by it's overly ardent fanbase, but it's a shame SE released the game in the state it is and I personally think they should scrap this money sink before it kills their company. I still think it's completely naive to think otherwise. They gave monthly updates and interviews with Tanaka in charge too. Do you really think Yoshi is going to somehow pull this game from the ashes like a Phoenix? I've already moved on from the game months ago, my posts are directed at the fanboys claiming this review isn't fair because a patch is coming (which many believe is a miracle patch, no I'm not talking directly at you here), just like the many other patches that came before it. If that were the case then you couldn't review any MMO until long after it was dead. |
|
|
7/18/11 9:40:15 PM#229
I hope she doesn't read these replies, because it won't change how bad of a game this was.
The patch won't do anything for it. Plain and simple. Waiting for it would have accomplished nothing except people saying "But the plans for the next patch are GREAT!" And if it's "So improved" already....lol |
|
|
7/18/11 9:41:36 PM#230
"You can't please everyone" - Edmund Burke (1729-1797) "You don't know what you got, 'til it's gone" - Ben Franklin (1706-1790) "Enjoy what you have, not what you expect them to be" - Richard Trench (1807-1886) |
|
|
7/18/11 9:41:57 PM#231
Any game that relies on miracles patches isnt good to start off... So no, even if they release 400 miracle patches the game will still suck at its core, because the problem is there, and the core of a game can't be changed without changing the game itself.. "Some of the less objective people tend to be close-minded though and basically disregard any possible shortcomings that gw2 could have." |
|
|
7/18/11 9:42:30 PM#232
Originally posted by Unlight The game has been out a year now and SE charges for it. How long is the review to be postponed before it's okay to evaluate it? People can take this review and compare it to post patch and see how it's been improved, but unless the upcoming patch is a miracle patch then it won't make that huge of a difference in the evaluation. For the rest of us (those who aren't hardcore FF fans) the review is valuable. I would point out that STO was recently reviewed in a failry harsh light, right before an upcoming patch, and people criticised the review in a similar manner. The patch hit, the game improved I guess, but not significantly for anyone to come point out that improvement. If anything there were a few that pointed out it was better that the game was reviewed before because the patch was buggy. Again, how long, how many patches, and how many updates must be issued before a game can be reviewed? The bottom line here is that the game is released and SE is collecting revenue. Anytime is a good time for a review at that point. There is no reason any released title shouldn't have a review published. |
|
|
7/18/11 9:42:49 PM#233
Originally posted by Elidien |
|
|
7/18/11 9:49:51 PM#234
yep i beta tested this game briefly and was shocked that yes they still managed to have a terrible UI, which considering how bad FFXI 's was that terribad. This game though is probably worse than FFXI which is almost amazing in and of itself botton line review is spot on , just walk away ...... |
|
|
7/18/11 10:06:04 PM#235
Originally posted by DarkVagabond I haven't logged in in quite some time, but this was exactly what I had to say. I beta'd, bought the CE and while I was disappointed, I still haven't given up hope on this game. Yeah, they rushed it out and it wasn't ready, but with the work they've put into it, it's come a long way. With 1.18, while I don't expect it to magically fix the game, it should certainly improve it A LOT. With all of the changes inc, I was a bit surprised to check the site today and finally see a review... Seriously? As a writer, why would you waste your time and write a review that's meaningless in such a short amount of time especially when the game has been out for so long now? Sure, they put a disclaimer at the beginning of the piece, but still, seriously? |
|
|
7/18/11 10:17:56 PM#236
Personally, I like the game. Hated beta, hated release, like it now. Plus, I'm excited for next weeks patch. Interface is fine now, I don't get current complaints. Steep learning curve though, and the game doesn't hold your hand.
|
|
|
7/18/11 10:18:27 PM#237
"Rumor has it that auto attack, and a serious overhaul of the combat system, is coming in the upcoming patch." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGmUoY7Gqzc&feature=player_embedded Cya credibility. |
|
|
7/18/11 10:20:20 PM#238
Plus, what is with you guys re-reviewing games right before a major patch? I don't get it. Core mechanics are all changing in a couple days. One would think you guys would keep track of these.things.
|
|
|
7/18/11 10:22:37 PM#239
Originally posted by kingotnw Stating things are rumours, that have been posted on the official site, is another great example they don't. |
|
|
7/18/11 10:26:34 PM#240
I have to wonder how bad a game has to be to get below a 5.0. There have been many conversations about how scores are skewed so heavily to the top of the rating system, and yet a game that isn't even worth 14.99 to the reviewer is getting 5.1 which, if the rating system had any sense of all, would mean there is just a tad bit more right than the wrong with the game. I know that is not the case sense most games barely get below a 7 and are considered terrible but geeze... 5.1 for pretty graphics and music? This is not my opinion, this is just me reading the review and wondering how the score and the review don't reflect each other. parrotpholk-Because we all know the miracle patch fairy shows up the night before release and sprinkles magic dust on the server to make it allllll better. |
|