Trending Games | Guild Wars 2 | Elder Scrolls Online | ArcheAge | TERA: Rising

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,645,738 Users Online:0
Games:687  Posts:6,083,343
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Deco Online Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Everquest Next: Landmark Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Lands of Hope: Phoenix Edition LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Project Blackout Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Puzzle Pirates Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian Space Heroes Universe Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Hammers End The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Total Domination Transformers Universe Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

General Discussion

General Discussion 

Religion & Politics  » The Casey Anthony Case.

9 Pages First « 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Search
180 posts found
  User Deleted
7/17/11 1:16:34 PM#101
Originally posted by C-B-M
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by C-B-M

That was a lengthy way of saying that if you don't agree with Ihmotepp you're a mullah.

 

Uh, no.

If you don't agree with my fiscal policy, that would not make you a Mullah.

What a relief!  Because your fiscal policy is pretty stupid, too.

Apparently this is Conservative-Based-Moroff's true face and favorite song.  The quoted post is a prime example that I am right.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woySeSNBL3o&feature=related

  Cleffy

Hard Core Member

Joined: 5/09/04
Posts: 5370

7/18/11 12:42:05 AM#102

I think the media circus around the case set a very dangerous environment for Casey Anthony.  Pretty much every media outlet has been trying their best to get this woman killed.  How a person can live with themselves by doing this is beyond me.  They obviously have no respect for the US legal system; and constantly air people talking about how she should be tried guilty and killed.  Maybe they could have convicted her if the Prosecutors scenario wasn't so ludicrous.  They didn't have a good case on murder, but they tried anyway and lost.

  Finwe

Novice Member

Joined: 7/15/03
Posts: 3112

All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

7/18/11 6:25:26 AM#103
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Vato26
Originally posted by C-B-M
Originally posted by Vato26

Rape baby...... ohh, your argument went up in flames.

Ha ha ha.  Look, Vato realized how retarded his argument was, so he immediately did the usual liberal thing and said "rape!"  Because we ALL know that rape babies are the reason 99.9% of women have abortions.  LOLZER.

I bet his mom smoked when she was pregnant.

Yet, you are generalizing on all pregnancy cases.  Thus, my point still stands and still destroys your Ultra-Conservative's grasp of taking away a woman's right to their own body.

They're infringing on another human beings right when they choose to abort.

 

So you have to choose.

I choose the woman's right to privacy over the rights of the fetus, in reasonable circumstances. FOr me, reasonable would be what was historically allowed during the founding of the US, abortion before the "quickening".

Also agree that christian conservatives and those on the far rights are hypocrites when it comes to supporting less government, and freedom;

Less government!

Unless it's about controlling a woman's body, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about the drug war, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about teaching Creationism in schools, then we want MORE government!

Ok. Quit trolling the christian right and stay on subject for one damn minute. It's obnoxious.

To the point of what is on hand.

There's a say, your freedom ends, where my nose begins. For you to choose the "Privacy" A.K.A. Convenience of women who do not understand responsibility, over the life of a human being, is despicable, and is the beginning to an anarchist societ when morality is flipped upside down.

 

A woman's right to choose is HER RESPONSIBLITY not yours.

She only has a right to choose when it involves only her. But it doesn't. It also involves the unborn child. So...

It's her womb, not yours.

You can do whatever you want with YOUR womb.

Roe v Wade was decided in 1973. I don't see how it started any anarchist society.

And more unborn children have been murdered in 38 years than the genocides by stalin or hitler combined.

Also...I said beginning. And it has shown. When people have no moral responsibility. Law means nothing.

 

Responsibility

: the quality or state of being responsible: as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : reliability, trustworthiness
2
: something for which one is responsible : burden responsibilities>

 

 

I don't see anything in there that gives you the right to control a womans womb. Its being responsible morally or legally. It's LEGAL to have an abortion.

So what if it's legal? Slavery has been legal. Controlled rape has been illegal. Genocide has been legal.

And people have to be responsible to THEIR  morals, not YOURS.

Anyone who doesn't consider murder immoral has no morals.

Making people responsible for YOUR morals?

Well, move to Iran. That's what they do with Sharia Law.

Uh. Are you completely obtuse? That's every country. The elite decide "the morals" of the many.

Abortion is illegal in Iran.

Maybe you'll like it there.

 

 

Seriously, I think you might be happier in Iran. It's a theocracy, and they control women. I think that's what you want.

It's not going to happen in the US, but it does exist in Iran.

rape not equal abortion.

murder not equal abortion.

Slavery not equal abortion.

No one is buying those retarded attempts to hide your real agenda, control of a woman's womb.

If you want to control something, why don't you worry about your penis?

If you want that control it DOES exist. In Iran. Iran controls women, they are not equal to men, and abortion is illegal.

I suggest you move there if that's the kind of society you want to live in.

 

This whole, "Move to iran" bit is tiresome and is a sign of a lazy attempt at debate.

Stating, "It's not going to happen in the US", is so laughable. Fact is, before 1973, it was happening in the U.S. Before the supreme court UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERTURNED, states right. Surprise!

Murder...Does equal abortion, it's the same damn thing.

 

And what is your obsession about a woman's womb? NO ONE CARES ABOUT A WOMANS WOMB! Except you...Because you seem RIDICULOUSLY obsessed with womens wombs.

Here. Let's close this argument with this quote.

"I was sitting in O.R.'s offices when I noticed a fetal development poster. The progression was so obvious, the eyes were so sweet. It hurt my heart, just looking at them. I ran outside and finally, it dawned on me. 'Norma', I said to myself, 'They're right'. I had worked with pregnant women for years. I had been through three pregnancies and deliveries myself. I should have known. Yet something in that poster made me lose my breath. I kept seeing the picture of that tiny, 10-week-old embryo, and I said to myself, that's a baby! It's as if blinders just fell off my eyes and I suddenly understood the truth — that's a baby!

I felt crushed under the truth of this realization. I had to face up to the awful reality. Abortion wasn't about 'products of conception'. It wasn't about 'missed periods'. It was about children being killed in their mother's wombs. All those years I was wrong. Signing that affidavit, I was wrong. Working in an abortion clinic, I was wrong. No more of this first trimester, second trimester, third trimester stuff. Abortion — at any point — was wrong. It was so clear. Painfully clear"

- Norma McCorvey

If you don't know who Norma McCorvey, she's more popularly known as Jane Roe.

Even the woman that in 1969 attemptedly lied to doctors in texas to try to get a legal abortion, and then was used as a pawn by Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, later in life recognized the error of her ways, and even attempted to get the same supreme court decision she was responsible for, overturned.

 

Really? You're going to make the retarded "fetus = child" statement? Get a clue.

If you think abortion = murder, I think you should move to Iran. It seems YOU"RE the one obsessed with a woman's womb, since you want control over it.

Why don't you just worry about controlling your penis?

They force their religion on people In Iran. You'd fit right in.

During the Founding of the United States, abortion was legal before the "quickening".

It was only later that abortion was made illegal. Rights in the US have eroded for quite some time.

Thank goodness we're leaving that stuff in the past and moving forward.

BTW, prohibition is also over. It's legal to drink alchohol now, just like it was when the US was founded. \

When people like you try to take away freedoms of Americans, I feel like it might have been better if you'd been aborted.

We'd all be better off.

But there's no test you can do to tell if someone is going to end up being a control freak, worried about controlling other people's lives, instead of tending to their own business.

 

 

 

Prove that a fetus doesnt = child and therefor doesn't equal murder.

I have this inclination that you can't, since all simple science proves you incorrect.

 
 
Children breathe without assistance, a fetus doesn't. That's why we have two different words, and not just one. Duh.
Done.

 

So by your logic...Anyone who has reliance on a breathing tube, should be allowed to die by the whims of whoever...

That's...Really nice. So, you admit it, you do endorse murder, yes?

Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe

And yes, when it comes to protecting the life of an innocent human being, I am a control freak.

 

Yep. You'd fit right in with the Mullahs in Iran. Rather than try to chage the US into Iran, why not just pack your bags and move to Iran where you can rejoice in a society that takes away freedom?

Is that your only argument? Are you so incapable of deep cognitive thought, you come back with repetitive uncreative strawman argument?

"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis

"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979

  Finwe

Novice Member

Joined: 7/15/03
Posts: 3112

All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

7/18/11 6:46:05 AM#104
Originally posted by Cleffy

I think the media circus around the case set a very dangerous environment for Casey Anthony.  Pretty much every media outlet has been trying their best to get this woman killed.  How a person can live with themselves by doing this is beyond me.  They obviously have no respect for the US legal system; and constantly air people talking about how she should be tried guilty and killed.  Maybe they could have convicted her if the Prosecutors scenario wasn't so ludicrous.  They didn't have a good case on murder, but they tried anyway and lost.

Duh?

Of course the american populace doesn't have faith in the legal system. Should they?

I've seen no reason as to why they should. It's a joke, a damn bad joke.

People are calling this OJ 2.0. And for good reason. Bitch is guilty. Someones going to kill her, and she'll deserve it.

"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis

"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979

  Ihmotepp

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 10/28/08
Posts: 14557

7/18/11 6:58:25 AM#105
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Vato26
Originally posted by C-B-M
Originally posted by Vato26

Rape baby...... ohh, your argument went up in flames.

Ha ha ha.  Look, Vato realized how retarded his argument was, so he immediately did the usual liberal thing and said "rape!"  Because we ALL know that rape babies are the reason 99.9% of women have abortions.  LOLZER.

I bet his mom smoked when she was pregnant.

Yet, you are generalizing on all pregnancy cases.  Thus, my point still stands and still destroys your Ultra-Conservative's grasp of taking away a woman's right to their own body.

They're infringing on another human beings right when they choose to abort.

 

So you have to choose.

I choose the woman's right to privacy over the rights of the fetus, in reasonable circumstances. FOr me, reasonable would be what was historically allowed during the founding of the US, abortion before the "quickening".

Also agree that christian conservatives and those on the far rights are hypocrites when it comes to supporting less government, and freedom;

Less government!

Unless it's about controlling a woman's body, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about the drug war, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about teaching Creationism in schools, then we want MORE government!

Ok. Quit trolling the christian right and stay on subject for one damn minute. It's obnoxious.

To the point of what is on hand.

There's a say, your freedom ends, where my nose begins. For you to choose the "Privacy" A.K.A. Convenience of women who do not understand responsibility, over the life of a human being, is despicable, and is the beginning to an anarchist societ when morality is flipped upside down.

 

A woman's right to choose is HER RESPONSIBLITY not yours.

She only has a right to choose when it involves only her. But it doesn't. It also involves the unborn child. So...

It's her womb, not yours.

You can do whatever you want with YOUR womb.

Roe v Wade was decided in 1973. I don't see how it started any anarchist society.

And more unborn children have been murdered in 38 years than the genocides by stalin or hitler combined.

Also...I said beginning. And it has shown. When people have no moral responsibility. Law means nothing.

 

Responsibility

: the quality or state of being responsible: as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : reliability, trustworthiness
2
: something for which one is responsible : burden responsibilities>

 

 

I don't see anything in there that gives you the right to control a womans womb. Its being responsible morally or legally. It's LEGAL to have an abortion.

So what if it's legal? Slavery has been legal. Controlled rape has been illegal. Genocide has been legal.

And people have to be responsible to THEIR  morals, not YOURS.

Anyone who doesn't consider murder immoral has no morals.

Making people responsible for YOUR morals?

Well, move to Iran. That's what they do with Sharia Law.

Uh. Are you completely obtuse? That's every country. The elite decide "the morals" of the many.

Abortion is illegal in Iran.

Maybe you'll like it there.

 

 

Seriously, I think you might be happier in Iran. It's a theocracy, and they control women. I think that's what you want.

It's not going to happen in the US, but it does exist in Iran.

rape not equal abortion.

murder not equal abortion.

Slavery not equal abortion.

No one is buying those retarded attempts to hide your real agenda, control of a woman's womb.

If you want to control something, why don't you worry about your penis?

If you want that control it DOES exist. In Iran. Iran controls women, they are not equal to men, and abortion is illegal.

I suggest you move there if that's the kind of society you want to live in.

 

This whole, "Move to iran" bit is tiresome and is a sign of a lazy attempt at debate.

Stating, "It's not going to happen in the US", is so laughable. Fact is, before 1973, it was happening in the U.S. Before the supreme court UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERTURNED, states right. Surprise!

Murder...Does equal abortion, it's the same damn thing.

 

And what is your obsession about a woman's womb? NO ONE CARES ABOUT A WOMANS WOMB! Except you...Because you seem RIDICULOUSLY obsessed with womens wombs.

Here. Let's close this argument with this quote.

"I was sitting in O.R.'s offices when I noticed a fetal development poster. The progression was so obvious, the eyes were so sweet. It hurt my heart, just looking at them. I ran outside and finally, it dawned on me. 'Norma', I said to myself, 'They're right'. I had worked with pregnant women for years. I had been through three pregnancies and deliveries myself. I should have known. Yet something in that poster made me lose my breath. I kept seeing the picture of that tiny, 10-week-old embryo, and I said to myself, that's a baby! It's as if blinders just fell off my eyes and I suddenly understood the truth — that's a baby!

I felt crushed under the truth of this realization. I had to face up to the awful reality. Abortion wasn't about 'products of conception'. It wasn't about 'missed periods'. It was about children being killed in their mother's wombs. All those years I was wrong. Signing that affidavit, I was wrong. Working in an abortion clinic, I was wrong. No more of this first trimester, second trimester, third trimester stuff. Abortion — at any point — was wrong. It was so clear. Painfully clear"

- Norma McCorvey

If you don't know who Norma McCorvey, she's more popularly known as Jane Roe.

Even the woman that in 1969 attemptedly lied to doctors in texas to try to get a legal abortion, and then was used as a pawn by Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, later in life recognized the error of her ways, and even attempted to get the same supreme court decision she was responsible for, overturned.

 

Really? You're going to make the retarded "fetus = child" statement? Get a clue.

If you think abortion = murder, I think you should move to Iran. It seems YOU"RE the one obsessed with a woman's womb, since you want control over it.

Why don't you just worry about controlling your penis?

They force their religion on people In Iran. You'd fit right in.

During the Founding of the United States, abortion was legal before the "quickening".

It was only later that abortion was made illegal. Rights in the US have eroded for quite some time.

Thank goodness we're leaving that stuff in the past and moving forward.

BTW, prohibition is also over. It's legal to drink alchohol now, just like it was when the US was founded. \

When people like you try to take away freedoms of Americans, I feel like it might have been better if you'd been aborted.

We'd all be better off.

But there's no test you can do to tell if someone is going to end up being a control freak, worried about controlling other people's lives, instead of tending to their own business.

 

 

 

Prove that a fetus doesnt = child and therefor doesn't equal murder.

I have this inclination that you can't, since all simple science proves you incorrect.

 
 
Children breathe without assistance, a fetus doesn't. That's why we have two different words, and not just one. Duh.
Done.

 

So by your logic...Anyone who has reliance on a breathing tube, should be allowed to die by the whims of whoever...

That's...Really nice. So, you admit it, you do endorse murder, yes?

Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe

And yes, when it comes to protecting the life of an innocent human being, I am a control freak.

 

Yep. You'd fit right in with the Mullahs in Iran. Rather than try to chage the US into Iran, why not just pack your bags and move to Iran where you can rejoice in a society that takes away freedom?

Is that your only argument? Are you so incapable of deep cognitive thought, you come back with repetitive uncreative strawman argument?

 

By my logic a fetus is not a baby. It's a silly semantic trick, switching "baby" for "fetus" used by those that can't accept that America is a free country.

I would support taking away a right for a woman to get an abortion, if whenever you force a woman to have a child, we castrate the man that impregnated her.

that would be control over body of both the man, and the woman.

If you'll take that deal, then we can agree to control people's bodies.

I doubt you'll take it.

It's MOSTLY men that want to stop abortion.

Why?

They can't be forced to have a child, since they can't get pregnant, and they want to control women.

it's like saying slavery is ok for black people, when you're white.

The law doesn't apply to you, so who cares?

When the law applies to men, suddenly they don't like it so much.

It's a very small risk.

You just don't have sex with a woman unless you ask her first if she wants to have your baby.

But if you don't do that, and get her pregnant, and she wants to abort, you can say no.

But you lose your testiticles.

Deal?

 

 

 

  User Deleted
7/18/11 9:12:56 AM#106
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Cleffy

I think the media circus around the case set a very dangerous environment for Casey Anthony.  Pretty much every media outlet has been trying their best to get this woman killed.  How a person can live with themselves by doing this is beyond me.  They obviously have no respect for the US legal system; and constantly air people talking about how she should be tried guilty and killed.  Maybe they could have convicted her if the Prosecutors scenario wasn't so ludicrous.  They didn't have a good case on murder, but they tried anyway and lost.

Duh?

Of course the american populace doesn't have faith in the legal system. Should they?

I've seen no reason as to why they should. It's a joke, a damn bad joke.

People are calling this OJ 2.0. And for good reason. Bitch is guilty. Someones going to kill her, and she'll deserve it.

"So, you admit it, you do endorse murder, yes?" - http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/post/4335872

 

So, you admit it.  You do, in fact, endorse murder.

  Cleffy

Hard Core Member

Joined: 5/09/04
Posts: 5370

7/18/11 11:11:12 AM#107

The US legal system is unique in several ways which just makes it a superior system.  First the trials are not determined by a standing judge, but by ordinary people.  This eliminates alot of potential corruption in the system.  Second its innocent until proven guilty instead of the other way around.  So this way people don't need to try and defend themselves from every false accusation thrown their way.  You also don't get problems like the American in Italy charged with murdering her friend while diving off the coast there.  She has to prove she is innocent.

This means the prosecutor needs more then just a story to get someone on murder.  The prosecuters story was rather outlandish and failed to make a proper connection between her, a murder weapon, a time of murder, a motive of murder, and clear evidence that points to all those lining up.

  Hazelle

Hard Core Member

Joined: 1/20/11
Posts: 762

7/18/11 11:35:52 AM#108
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Hazelle
Originally posted by Zindaihas

I've been trying to avoid coverage of this case wherever possible, so I cannot personally express shock at the outcome, but most of the analysts are in disbelief.  Was the evidence against her that strong?  If it was and she got away with murder, then you have to wonder about the competence of the average American juror.  The OJ trial was a fiasco and if this one was the same, it does not bode well for the American judical system.

 They had a bunch of circumstantial evidence and not one bit of direct evidence.

The decision was the correct one.

When you send somebody to prision for a crime you have to KNOW that they did it and not THINK that they did it; and when all you're presented with is circumstantial evidence there's always doubt.

 

You don' thave to "know". You can have doubts. There is also no problem convicting someone on circumstantial evidence alone.

Your statements are simply incorrect. In this case, there was not enough circumstantial evidence to overcome reasonable doubt.

 

Reasonable doubt is a standard of proof used in criminal trials. When a criminal defendant is prosecuted, the prosecutor must prove the defendant's guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.

If the jurors or judge have no doubt as to the defendant's guilt, or if their only doubts are unreasonable doubts, then the prosecutor has proven the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and the defendant should be pronounced guilty.

 If you kept what I said in it's context you could of skipped the lesson professor.

Without direct evidence there shouldn't even be a trial.

  Finwe

Novice Member

Joined: 7/15/03
Posts: 3112

All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

7/19/11 4:40:24 AM#109
Originally posted by Vato26
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Cleffy

I think the media circus around the case set a very dangerous environment for Casey Anthony.  Pretty much every media outlet has been trying their best to get this woman killed.  How a person can live with themselves by doing this is beyond me.  They obviously have no respect for the US legal system; and constantly air people talking about how she should be tried guilty and killed.  Maybe they could have convicted her if the Prosecutors scenario wasn't so ludicrous.  They didn't have a good case on murder, but they tried anyway and lost.

Duh?

Of course the american populace doesn't have faith in the legal system. Should they?

I've seen no reason as to why they should. It's a joke, a damn bad joke.

People are calling this OJ 2.0. And for good reason. Bitch is guilty. Someones going to kill her, and she'll deserve it.

"So, you admit it, you do endorse murder, yes?" - http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/post/4335872

 

So, you admit it.  You do, in fact, endorse murder.

Murder is the killing of the innocent, she is not innocent. She is guilty, And therefor, it is not murder. Justice, execution. Whatever you desire to call it. But no. Not murder.

"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis

"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979

  Finwe

Novice Member

Joined: 7/15/03
Posts: 3112

All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

7/19/11 4:49:46 AM#110
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Vato26
Originally posted by C-B-M
Originally posted by Vato26

Rape baby...... ohh, your argument went up in flames.

Ha ha ha.  Look, Vato realized how retarded his argument was, so he immediately did the usual liberal thing and said "rape!"  Because we ALL know that rape babies are the reason 99.9% of women have abortions.  LOLZER.

I bet his mom smoked when she was pregnant.

Yet, you are generalizing on all pregnancy cases.  Thus, my point still stands and still destroys your Ultra-Conservative's grasp of taking away a woman's right to their own body.

They're infringing on another human beings right when they choose to abort.

 

So you have to choose.

I choose the woman's right to privacy over the rights of the fetus, in reasonable circumstances. FOr me, reasonable would be what was historically allowed during the founding of the US, abortion before the "quickening".

Also agree that christian conservatives and those on the far rights are hypocrites when it comes to supporting less government, and freedom;

Less government!

Unless it's about controlling a woman's body, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about the drug war, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about teaching Creationism in schools, then we want MORE government!

Ok. Quit trolling the christian right and stay on subject for one damn minute. It's obnoxious.

To the point of what is on hand.

There's a say, your freedom ends, where my nose begins. For you to choose the "Privacy" A.K.A. Convenience of women who do not understand responsibility, over the life of a human being, is despicable, and is the beginning to an anarchist societ when morality is flipped upside down.

 

A woman's right to choose is HER RESPONSIBLITY not yours.

She only has a right to choose when it involves only her. But it doesn't. It also involves the unborn child. So...

It's her womb, not yours.

You can do whatever you want with YOUR womb.

Roe v Wade was decided in 1973. I don't see how it started any anarchist society.

And more unborn children have been murdered in 38 years than the genocides by stalin or hitler combined.

Also...I said beginning. And it has shown. When people have no moral responsibility. Law means nothing.

 

Responsibility

: the quality or state of being responsible: as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : reliability, trustworthiness
2
: something for which one is responsible : burden responsibilities>

 

 

I don't see anything in there that gives you the right to control a womans womb. Its being responsible morally or legally. It's LEGAL to have an abortion.

So what if it's legal? Slavery has been legal. Controlled rape has been illegal. Genocide has been legal.

And people have to be responsible to THEIR  morals, not YOURS.

Anyone who doesn't consider murder immoral has no morals.

Making people responsible for YOUR morals?

Well, move to Iran. That's what they do with Sharia Law.

Uh. Are you completely obtuse? That's every country. The elite decide "the morals" of the many.

Abortion is illegal in Iran.

Maybe you'll like it there.

 

 

Seriously, I think you might be happier in Iran. It's a theocracy, and they control women. I think that's what you want.

It's not going to happen in the US, but it does exist in Iran.

rape not equal abortion.

murder not equal abortion.

Slavery not equal abortion.

No one is buying those retarded attempts to hide your real agenda, control of a woman's womb.

If you want to control something, why don't you worry about your penis?

If you want that control it DOES exist. In Iran. Iran controls women, they are not equal to men, and abortion is illegal.

I suggest you move there if that's the kind of society you want to live in.

 

This whole, "Move to iran" bit is tiresome and is a sign of a lazy attempt at debate.

Stating, "It's not going to happen in the US", is so laughable. Fact is, before 1973, it was happening in the U.S. Before the supreme court UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERTURNED, states right. Surprise!

Murder...Does equal abortion, it's the same damn thing.

 

And what is your obsession about a woman's womb? NO ONE CARES ABOUT A WOMANS WOMB! Except you...Because you seem RIDICULOUSLY obsessed with womens wombs.

Here. Let's close this argument with this quote.

"I was sitting in O.R.'s offices when I noticed a fetal development poster. The progression was so obvious, the eyes were so sweet. It hurt my heart, just looking at them. I ran outside and finally, it dawned on me. 'Norma', I said to myself, 'They're right'. I had worked with pregnant women for years. I had been through three pregnancies and deliveries myself. I should have known. Yet something in that poster made me lose my breath. I kept seeing the picture of that tiny, 10-week-old embryo, and I said to myself, that's a baby! It's as if blinders just fell off my eyes and I suddenly understood the truth — that's a baby!

I felt crushed under the truth of this realization. I had to face up to the awful reality. Abortion wasn't about 'products of conception'. It wasn't about 'missed periods'. It was about children being killed in their mother's wombs. All those years I was wrong. Signing that affidavit, I was wrong. Working in an abortion clinic, I was wrong. No more of this first trimester, second trimester, third trimester stuff. Abortion — at any point — was wrong. It was so clear. Painfully clear"

- Norma McCorvey

If you don't know who Norma McCorvey, she's more popularly known as Jane Roe.

Even the woman that in 1969 attemptedly lied to doctors in texas to try to get a legal abortion, and then was used as a pawn by Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, later in life recognized the error of her ways, and even attempted to get the same supreme court decision she was responsible for, overturned.

 

Really? You're going to make the retarded "fetus = child" statement? Get a clue.

If you think abortion = murder, I think you should move to Iran. It seems YOU"RE the one obsessed with a woman's womb, since you want control over it.

Why don't you just worry about controlling your penis?

They force their religion on people In Iran. You'd fit right in.

During the Founding of the United States, abortion was legal before the "quickening".

It was only later that abortion was made illegal. Rights in the US have eroded for quite some time.

Thank goodness we're leaving that stuff in the past and moving forward.

BTW, prohibition is also over. It's legal to drink alchohol now, just like it was when the US was founded. \

When people like you try to take away freedoms of Americans, I feel like it might have been better if you'd been aborted.

We'd all be better off.

But there's no test you can do to tell if someone is going to end up being a control freak, worried about controlling other people's lives, instead of tending to their own business.

 

 

 

Prove that a fetus doesnt = child and therefor doesn't equal murder.

I have this inclination that you can't, since all simple science proves you incorrect.

 
 
Children breathe without assistance, a fetus doesn't. That's why we have two different words, and not just one. Duh.
Done.

 

So by your logic...Anyone who has reliance on a breathing tube, should be allowed to die by the whims of whoever...

That's...Really nice. So, you admit it, you do endorse murder, yes?

Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe

And yes, when it comes to protecting the life of an innocent human being, I am a control freak.

 

Yep. You'd fit right in with the Mullahs in Iran. Rather than try to chage the US into Iran, why not just pack your bags and move to Iran where you can rejoice in a society that takes away freedom?

Is that your only argument? Are you so incapable of deep cognitive thought, you come back with repetitive uncreative strawman argument?

 

By my logic a fetus is not a baby. It's a silly semantic trick, switching "baby" for "fetus" used by those that can't accept that America is a free country.

And when your logic has been shattered to bits, you go back to pointless opinion...So you lose on that regard.

I would support taking away a right for a woman to get an abortion, if whenever you force a woman to have a child, we castrate the man that impregnated her.

That has absolutely no relevancy and is a completely ignorant and asinine comparison.

that would be control over body of both the man, and the woman.

Restricting one being from harming another being is necessary at all times. If no harm is intended, no control is intended. Hence why unless the man is forcing the woman to have an abortion, no control over his body is necessary.

Courts have in fact decided that when a man kills a pregnant woman, it is double homocide...Hrmm...What an interesting concept that completely blows your asinine statements out of the water.

If you'll take that deal, then we can agree to control people's bodies.

I doubt you'll take it.

To make an accurate comparison. How about in the process after we castrate the man, we'll also perform a female castration, and cut out her ovaries. Deal? Then it'll be an equal comparison.

It's MOSTLY men that want to stop abortion.

That's complete bullshit. Every woman that I've ever discussed this with, is vehemently against abortion. Quit pulling assumptions out of your ass. It proves nothing except an inability to cohesively form a valid argument.

Why?

They can't be forced to have a child, since they can't get pregnant, and they want to control women.

it's like saying slavery is ok for black people, when you're white.

Really? That's an extremely poor analogy and has no comparitive power whatsoever.

The law doesn't apply to you, so who cares?

When a woman is raped and killed. Should we seek punishment? The law doesn't apply to us, so who cares.

When the law applies to men, suddenly they don't like it so much.

It's a very small risk.

You just don't have sex with a woman unless you ask her first if she wants to have your baby.

But if you don't do that, and get her pregnant, and she wants to abort, you can say no.

But you lose your testiticles.

Deal?

Uhm...If she doesn't want a child...Don't have sex. Simple enough. The end.

And the deal sounds fine...But only after we incinerate out her ovaries and perform a vaginal castration.

Deal?

Eye for an eye...

 

But oh wait...That doesn't work. Because you fail to live in a world of any type of logical base.

 

 

 

"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis

"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979

  Ihmotepp

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 10/28/08
Posts: 14557

7/19/11 7:23:18 AM#111
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Vato26
Originally posted by C-B-M
Originally posted by Vato26

Rape baby...... ohh, your argument went up in flames.

Ha ha ha.  Look, Vato realized how retarded his argument was, so he immediately did the usual liberal thing and said "rape!"  Because we ALL know that rape babies are the reason 99.9% of women have abortions.  LOLZER.

I bet his mom smoked when she was pregnant.

Yet, you are generalizing on all pregnancy cases.  Thus, my point still stands and still destroys your Ultra-Conservative's grasp of taking away a woman's right to their own body.

They're infringing on another human beings right when they choose to abort.

 

So you have to choose.

I choose the woman's right to privacy over the rights of the fetus, in reasonable circumstances. FOr me, reasonable would be what was historically allowed during the founding of the US, abortion before the "quickening".

Also agree that christian conservatives and those on the far rights are hypocrites when it comes to supporting less government, and freedom;

Less government!

Unless it's about controlling a woman's body, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about the drug war, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about teaching Creationism in schools, then we want MORE government!

Ok. Quit trolling the christian right and stay on subject for one damn minute. It's obnoxious.

To the point of what is on hand.

There's a say, your freedom ends, where my nose begins. For you to choose the "Privacy" A.K.A. Convenience of women who do not understand responsibility, over the life of a human being, is despicable, and is the beginning to an anarchist societ when morality is flipped upside down.

 

A woman's right to choose is HER RESPONSIBLITY not yours.

She only has a right to choose when it involves only her. But it doesn't. It also involves the unborn child. So...

It's her womb, not yours.

You can do whatever you want with YOUR womb.

Roe v Wade was decided in 1973. I don't see how it started any anarchist society.

And more unborn children have been murdered in 38 years than the genocides by stalin or hitler combined.

Also...I said beginning. And it has shown. When people have no moral responsibility. Law means nothing.

 

Responsibility

: the quality or state of being responsible: as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : reliability, trustworthiness
2
: something for which one is responsible : burden responsibilities>

 

 

I don't see anything in there that gives you the right to control a womans womb. Its being responsible morally or legally. It's LEGAL to have an abortion.

So what if it's legal? Slavery has been legal. Controlled rape has been illegal. Genocide has been legal.

And people have to be responsible to THEIR  morals, not YOURS.

Anyone who doesn't consider murder immoral has no morals.

Making people responsible for YOUR morals?

Well, move to Iran. That's what they do with Sharia Law.

Uh. Are you completely obtuse? That's every country. The elite decide "the morals" of the many.

Abortion is illegal in Iran.

Maybe you'll like it there.

 

 

Seriously, I think you might be happier in Iran. It's a theocracy, and they control women. I think that's what you want.

It's not going to happen in the US, but it does exist in Iran.

rape not equal abortion.

murder not equal abortion.

Slavery not equal abortion.

No one is buying those retarded attempts to hide your real agenda, control of a woman's womb.

If you want to control something, why don't you worry about your penis?

If you want that control it DOES exist. In Iran. Iran controls women, they are not equal to men, and abortion is illegal.

I suggest you move there if that's the kind of society you want to live in.

 

This whole, "Move to iran" bit is tiresome and is a sign of a lazy attempt at debate.

Stating, "It's not going to happen in the US", is so laughable. Fact is, before 1973, it was happening in the U.S. Before the supreme court UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERTURNED, states right. Surprise!

Murder...Does equal abortion, it's the same damn thing.

 

And what is your obsession about a woman's womb? NO ONE CARES ABOUT A WOMANS WOMB! Except you...Because you seem RIDICULOUSLY obsessed with womens wombs.

Here. Let's close this argument with this quote.

"I was sitting in O.R.'s offices when I noticed a fetal development poster. The progression was so obvious, the eyes were so sweet. It hurt my heart, just looking at them. I ran outside and finally, it dawned on me. 'Norma', I said to myself, 'They're right'. I had worked with pregnant women for years. I had been through three pregnancies and deliveries myself. I should have known. Yet something in that poster made me lose my breath. I kept seeing the picture of that tiny, 10-week-old embryo, and I said to myself, that's a baby! It's as if blinders just fell off my eyes and I suddenly understood the truth — that's a baby!

I felt crushed under the truth of this realization. I had to face up to the awful reality. Abortion wasn't about 'products of conception'. It wasn't about 'missed periods'. It was about children being killed in their mother's wombs. All those years I was wrong. Signing that affidavit, I was wrong. Working in an abortion clinic, I was wrong. No more of this first trimester, second trimester, third trimester stuff. Abortion — at any point — was wrong. It was so clear. Painfully clear"

- Norma McCorvey

If you don't know who Norma McCorvey, she's more popularly known as Jane Roe.

Even the woman that in 1969 attemptedly lied to doctors in texas to try to get a legal abortion, and then was used as a pawn by Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, later in life recognized the error of her ways, and even attempted to get the same supreme court decision she was responsible for, overturned.

 

Really? You're going to make the retarded "fetus = child" statement? Get a clue.

If you think abortion = murder, I think you should move to Iran. It seems YOU"RE the one obsessed with a woman's womb, since you want control over it.

Why don't you just worry about controlling your penis?

They force their religion on people In Iran. You'd fit right in.

During the Founding of the United States, abortion was legal before the "quickening".

It was only later that abortion was made illegal. Rights in the US have eroded for quite some time.

Thank goodness we're leaving that stuff in the past and moving forward.

BTW, prohibition is also over. It's legal to drink alchohol now, just like it was when the US was founded. \

When people like you try to take away freedoms of Americans, I feel like it might have been better if you'd been aborted.

We'd all be better off.

But there's no test you can do to tell if someone is going to end up being a control freak, worried about controlling other people's lives, instead of tending to their own business.

 

 

 

Prove that a fetus doesnt = child and therefor doesn't equal murder.

I have this inclination that you can't, since all simple science proves you incorrect.

 
 
Children breathe without assistance, a fetus doesn't. That's why we have two different words, and not just one. Duh.
Done.

 

So by your logic...Anyone who has reliance on a breathing tube, should be allowed to die by the whims of whoever...

That's...Really nice. So, you admit it, you do endorse murder, yes?

Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe

And yes, when it comes to protecting the life of an innocent human being, I am a control freak.

 

Yep. You'd fit right in with the Mullahs in Iran. Rather than try to chage the US into Iran, why not just pack your bags and move to Iran where you can rejoice in a society that takes away freedom?

Is that your only argument? Are you so incapable of deep cognitive thought, you come back with repetitive uncreative strawman argument?

 

By my logic a fetus is not a baby. It's a silly semantic trick, switching "baby" for "fetus" used by those that can't accept that America is a free country.

And when your logic has been shattered to bits, you go back to pointless opinion...So you lose on that regard.

I would support taking away a right for a woman to get an abortion, if whenever you force a woman to have a child, we castrate the man that impregnated her.

That has absolutely no relevancy and is a completely ignorant and asinine comparison.

that would be control over body of both the man, and the woman.

Restricting one being from harming another being is necessary at all times. If no harm is intended, no control is intended. Hence why unless the man is forcing the woman to have an abortion, no control over his body is necessary.

Courts have in fact decided that when a man kills a pregnant woman, it is double homocide...Hrmm...What an interesting concept that completely blows your asinine statements out of the water.

If you'll take that deal, then we can agree to control people's bodies.

I doubt you'll take it.

To make an accurate comparison. How about in the process after we castrate the man, we'll also perform a female castration, and cut out her ovaries. Deal? Then it'll be an equal comparison.

It's MOSTLY men that want to stop abortion.

That's complete bullshit. Every woman that I've ever discussed this with, is vehemently against abortion. Quit pulling assumptions out of your ass. It proves nothing except an inability to cohesively form a valid argument.

Why?

They can't be forced to have a child, since they can't get pregnant, and they want to control women.

it's like saying slavery is ok for black people, when you're white.

Really? That's an extremely poor analogy and has no comparitive power whatsoever.

The law doesn't apply to you, so who cares?

When a woman is raped and killed. Should we seek punishment? The law doesn't apply to us, so who cares.

When the law applies to men, suddenly they don't like it so much.

It's a very small risk.

You just don't have sex with a woman unless you ask her first if she wants to have your baby.

But if you don't do that, and get her pregnant, and she wants to abort, you can say no.

But you lose your testiticles.

Deal?

Uhm...If she doesn't want a child...Don't have sex. Simple enough. The end.

And the deal sounds fine...But only after we incinerate out her ovaries and perform a vaginal castration.

Deal?

Eye for an eye...

 

But oh wait...That doesn't work. Because you fail to live in a world of any type of logical base.

 

 

 

 

Lol.

So, when YOUR testicles are at risk, suddenly controlling people's bodies isn't such a good idea. 

When you're just going to control women, like the Taliban do, it's a great idea.

Thought so.

 

  Finwe

Novice Member

Joined: 7/15/03
Posts: 3112

All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

7/19/11 7:30:28 AM#112
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Vato26
Originally posted by C-B-M
Originally posted by Vato26

Rape baby...... ohh, your argument went up in flames.

Ha ha ha.  Look, Vato realized how retarded his argument was, so he immediately did the usual liberal thing and said "rape!"  Because we ALL know that rape babies are the reason 99.9% of women have abortions.  LOLZER.

I bet his mom smoked when she was pregnant.

Yet, you are generalizing on all pregnancy cases.  Thus, my point still stands and still destroys your Ultra-Conservative's grasp of taking away a woman's right to their own body.

They're infringing on another human beings right when they choose to abort.

 

So you have to choose.

I choose the woman's right to privacy over the rights of the fetus, in reasonable circumstances. FOr me, reasonable would be what was historically allowed during the founding of the US, abortion before the "quickening".

Also agree that christian conservatives and those on the far rights are hypocrites when it comes to supporting less government, and freedom;

Less government!

Unless it's about controlling a woman's body, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about the drug war, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about teaching Creationism in schools, then we want MORE government!

Ok. Quit trolling the christian right and stay on subject for one damn minute. It's obnoxious.

To the point of what is on hand.

There's a say, your freedom ends, where my nose begins. For you to choose the "Privacy" A.K.A. Convenience of women who do not understand responsibility, over the life of a human being, is despicable, and is the beginning to an anarchist societ when morality is flipped upside down.

 

A woman's right to choose is HER RESPONSIBLITY not yours.

She only has a right to choose when it involves only her. But it doesn't. It also involves the unborn child. So...

It's her womb, not yours.

You can do whatever you want with YOUR womb.

Roe v Wade was decided in 1973. I don't see how it started any anarchist society.

And more unborn children have been murdered in 38 years than the genocides by stalin or hitler combined.

Also...I said beginning. And it has shown. When people have no moral responsibility. Law means nothing.

 

Responsibility

: the quality or state of being responsible: as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : reliability, trustworthiness
2
: something for which one is responsible : burden responsibilities>

 

 

I don't see anything in there that gives you the right to control a womans womb. Its being responsible morally or legally. It's LEGAL to have an abortion.

So what if it's legal? Slavery has been legal. Controlled rape has been illegal. Genocide has been legal.

And people have to be responsible to THEIR  morals, not YOURS.

Anyone who doesn't consider murder immoral has no morals.

Making people responsible for YOUR morals?

Well, move to Iran. That's what they do with Sharia Law.

Uh. Are you completely obtuse? That's every country. The elite decide "the morals" of the many.

Abortion is illegal in Iran.

Maybe you'll like it there.

 

 

Seriously, I think you might be happier in Iran. It's a theocracy, and they control women. I think that's what you want.

It's not going to happen in the US, but it does exist in Iran.

rape not equal abortion.

murder not equal abortion.

Slavery not equal abortion.

No one is buying those retarded attempts to hide your real agenda, control of a woman's womb.

If you want to control something, why don't you worry about your penis?

If you want that control it DOES exist. In Iran. Iran controls women, they are not equal to men, and abortion is illegal.

I suggest you move there if that's the kind of society you want to live in.

 

This whole, "Move to iran" bit is tiresome and is a sign of a lazy attempt at debate.

Stating, "It's not going to happen in the US", is so laughable. Fact is, before 1973, it was happening in the U.S. Before the supreme court UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERTURNED, states right. Surprise!

Murder...Does equal abortion, it's the same damn thing.

 

And what is your obsession about a woman's womb? NO ONE CARES ABOUT A WOMANS WOMB! Except you...Because you seem RIDICULOUSLY obsessed with womens wombs.

Here. Let's close this argument with this quote.

"I was sitting in O.R.'s offices when I noticed a fetal development poster. The progression was so obvious, the eyes were so sweet. It hurt my heart, just looking at them. I ran outside and finally, it dawned on me. 'Norma', I said to myself, 'They're right'. I had worked with pregnant women for years. I had been through three pregnancies and deliveries myself. I should have known. Yet something in that poster made me lose my breath. I kept seeing the picture of that tiny, 10-week-old embryo, and I said to myself, that's a baby! It's as if blinders just fell off my eyes and I suddenly understood the truth — that's a baby!

I felt crushed under the truth of this realization. I had to face up to the awful reality. Abortion wasn't about 'products of conception'. It wasn't about 'missed periods'. It was about children being killed in their mother's wombs. All those years I was wrong. Signing that affidavit, I was wrong. Working in an abortion clinic, I was wrong. No more of this first trimester, second trimester, third trimester stuff. Abortion — at any point — was wrong. It was so clear. Painfully clear"

- Norma McCorvey

If you don't know who Norma McCorvey, she's more popularly known as Jane Roe.

Even the woman that in 1969 attemptedly lied to doctors in texas to try to get a legal abortion, and then was used as a pawn by Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, later in life recognized the error of her ways, and even attempted to get the same supreme court decision she was responsible for, overturned.

 

Really? You're going to make the retarded "fetus = child" statement? Get a clue.

If you think abortion = murder, I think you should move to Iran. It seems YOU"RE the one obsessed with a woman's womb, since you want control over it.

Why don't you just worry about controlling your penis?

They force their religion on people In Iran. You'd fit right in.

During the Founding of the United States, abortion was legal before the "quickening".

It was only later that abortion was made illegal. Rights in the US have eroded for quite some time.

Thank goodness we're leaving that stuff in the past and moving forward.

BTW, prohibition is also over. It's legal to drink alchohol now, just like it was when the US was founded. \

When people like you try to take away freedoms of Americans, I feel like it might have been better if you'd been aborted.

We'd all be better off.

But there's no test you can do to tell if someone is going to end up being a control freak, worried about controlling other people's lives, instead of tending to their own business.

 

 

 

Prove that a fetus doesnt = child and therefor doesn't equal murder.

I have this inclination that you can't, since all simple science proves you incorrect.

 
 
Children breathe without assistance, a fetus doesn't. That's why we have two different words, and not just one. Duh.
Done.

 

So by your logic...Anyone who has reliance on a breathing tube, should be allowed to die by the whims of whoever...

That's...Really nice. So, you admit it, you do endorse murder, yes?

Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe

And yes, when it comes to protecting the life of an innocent human being, I am a control freak.

 

Yep. You'd fit right in with the Mullahs in Iran. Rather than try to chage the US into Iran, why not just pack your bags and move to Iran where you can rejoice in a society that takes away freedom?

Is that your only argument? Are you so incapable of deep cognitive thought, you come back with repetitive uncreative strawman argument?

 

By my logic a fetus is not a baby. It's a silly semantic trick, switching "baby" for "fetus" used by those that can't accept that America is a free country.

And when your logic has been shattered to bits, you go back to pointless opinion...So you lose on that regard.

I would support taking away a right for a woman to get an abortion, if whenever you force a woman to have a child, we castrate the man that impregnated her.

That has absolutely no relevancy and is a completely ignorant and asinine comparison.

that would be control over body of both the man, and the woman.

Restricting one being from harming another being is necessary at all times. If no harm is intended, no control is intended. Hence why unless the man is forcing the woman to have an abortion, no control over his body is necessary.

Courts have in fact decided that when a man kills a pregnant woman, it is double homocide...Hrmm...What an interesting concept that completely blows your asinine statements out of the water.

If you'll take that deal, then we can agree to control people's bodies.

I doubt you'll take it.

To make an accurate comparison. How about in the process after we castrate the man, we'll also perform a female castration, and cut out her ovaries. Deal? Then it'll be an equal comparison.

It's MOSTLY men that want to stop abortion.

That's complete bullshit. Every woman that I've ever discussed this with, is vehemently against abortion. Quit pulling assumptions out of your ass. It proves nothing except an inability to cohesively form a valid argument.

Why?

They can't be forced to have a child, since they can't get pregnant, and they want to control women.

it's like saying slavery is ok for black people, when you're white.

Really? That's an extremely poor analogy and has no comparitive power whatsoever.

The law doesn't apply to you, so who cares?

When a woman is raped and killed. Should we seek punishment? The law doesn't apply to us, so who cares.

When the law applies to men, suddenly they don't like it so much.

It's a very small risk.

You just don't have sex with a woman unless you ask her first if she wants to have your baby.

But if you don't do that, and get her pregnant, and she wants to abort, you can say no.

But you lose your testiticles.

Deal?

Uhm...If she doesn't want a child...Don't have sex. Simple enough. The end.

And the deal sounds fine...But only after we incinerate out her ovaries and perform a vaginal castration.

Deal?

Eye for an eye...

 

But oh wait...That doesn't work. Because you fail to live in a world of any type of logical base.

 

 

 

 

Lol.

So, when YOUR testicles are at risk, suddenly controlling people's bodies isn't such a good idea. 

When you're just going to control women, like the Taliban do, it's a great idea.

Thought so.

 

Wow...Completely ignored EVERYTHING I said, and pulled out a strawman to boot.

You sir, are pathetic. It is better to concede, rather than for you to continually make an ass out of yourself.

"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis

"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979

  Ihmotepp

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 10/28/08
Posts: 14557

7/19/11 7:40:50 AM#113
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Vato26
Originally posted by C-B-M
Originally posted by Vato26

Rape baby...... ohh, your argument went up in flames.

Ha ha ha.  Look, Vato realized how retarded his argument was, so he immediately did the usual liberal thing and said "rape!"  Because we ALL know that rape babies are the reason 99.9% of women have abortions.  LOLZER.

I bet his mom smoked when she was pregnant.

Yet, you are generalizing on all pregnancy cases.  Thus, my point still stands and still destroys your Ultra-Conservative's grasp of taking away a woman's right to their own body.

They're infringing on another human beings right when they choose to abort.

 

So you have to choose.

I choose the woman's right to privacy over the rights of the fetus, in reasonable circumstances. FOr me, reasonable would be what was historically allowed during the founding of the US, abortion before the "quickening".

Also agree that christian conservatives and those on the far rights are hypocrites when it comes to supporting less government, and freedom;

Less government!

Unless it's about controlling a woman's body, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about the drug war, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about teaching Creationism in schools, then we want MORE government!

Ok. Quit trolling the christian right and stay on subject for one damn minute. It's obnoxious.

To the point of what is on hand.

There's a say, your freedom ends, where my nose begins. For you to choose the "Privacy" A.K.A. Convenience of women who do not understand responsibility, over the life of a human being, is despicable, and is the beginning to an anarchist societ when morality is flipped upside down.

 

A woman's right to choose is HER RESPONSIBLITY not yours.

She only has a right to choose when it involves only her. But it doesn't. It also involves the unborn child. So...

It's her womb, not yours.

You can do whatever you want with YOUR womb.

Roe v Wade was decided in 1973. I don't see how it started any anarchist society.

And more unborn children have been murdered in 38 years than the genocides by stalin or hitler combined.

Also...I said beginning. And it has shown. When people have no moral responsibility. Law means nothing.

 

Responsibility

: the quality or state of being responsible: as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : reliability, trustworthiness
2
: something for which one is responsible : burden responsibilities>

 

 

I don't see anything in there that gives you the right to control a womans womb. Its being responsible morally or legally. It's LEGAL to have an abortion.

So what if it's legal? Slavery has been legal. Controlled rape has been illegal. Genocide has been legal.

And people have to be responsible to THEIR  morals, not YOURS.

Anyone who doesn't consider murder immoral has no morals.

Making people responsible for YOUR morals?

Well, move to Iran. That's what they do with Sharia Law.

Uh. Are you completely obtuse? That's every country. The elite decide "the morals" of the many.

Abortion is illegal in Iran.

Maybe you'll like it there.

 

 

Seriously, I think you might be happier in Iran. It's a theocracy, and they control women. I think that's what you want.

It's not going to happen in the US, but it does exist in Iran.

rape not equal abortion.

murder not equal abortion.

Slavery not equal abortion.

No one is buying those retarded attempts to hide your real agenda, control of a woman's womb.

If you want to control something, why don't you worry about your penis?

If you want that control it DOES exist. In Iran. Iran controls women, they are not equal to men, and abortion is illegal.

I suggest you move there if that's the kind of society you want to live in.

 

This whole, "Move to iran" bit is tiresome and is a sign of a lazy attempt at debate.

Stating, "It's not going to happen in the US", is so laughable. Fact is, before 1973, it was happening in the U.S. Before the supreme court UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERTURNED, states right. Surprise!

Murder...Does equal abortion, it's the same damn thing.

 

And what is your obsession about a woman's womb? NO ONE CARES ABOUT A WOMANS WOMB! Except you...Because you seem RIDICULOUSLY obsessed with womens wombs.

Here. Let's close this argument with this quote.

"I was sitting in O.R.'s offices when I noticed a fetal development poster. The progression was so obvious, the eyes were so sweet. It hurt my heart, just looking at them. I ran outside and finally, it dawned on me. 'Norma', I said to myself, 'They're right'. I had worked with pregnant women for years. I had been through three pregnancies and deliveries myself. I should have known. Yet something in that poster made me lose my breath. I kept seeing the picture of that tiny, 10-week-old embryo, and I said to myself, that's a baby! It's as if blinders just fell off my eyes and I suddenly understood the truth — that's a baby!

I felt crushed under the truth of this realization. I had to face up to the awful reality. Abortion wasn't about 'products of conception'. It wasn't about 'missed periods'. It was about children being killed in their mother's wombs. All those years I was wrong. Signing that affidavit, I was wrong. Working in an abortion clinic, I was wrong. No more of this first trimester, second trimester, third trimester stuff. Abortion — at any point — was wrong. It was so clear. Painfully clear"

- Norma McCorvey

If you don't know who Norma McCorvey, she's more popularly known as Jane Roe.

Even the woman that in 1969 attemptedly lied to doctors in texas to try to get a legal abortion, and then was used as a pawn by Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, later in life recognized the error of her ways, and even attempted to get the same supreme court decision she was responsible for, overturned.

 

Really? You're going to make the retarded "fetus = child" statement? Get a clue.

If you think abortion = murder, I think you should move to Iran. It seems YOU"RE the one obsessed with a woman's womb, since you want control over it.

Why don't you just worry about controlling your penis?

They force their religion on people In Iran. You'd fit right in.

During the Founding of the United States, abortion was legal before the "quickening".

It was only later that abortion was made illegal. Rights in the US have eroded for quite some time.

Thank goodness we're leaving that stuff in the past and moving forward.

BTW, prohibition is also over. It's legal to drink alchohol now, just like it was when the US was founded. \

When people like you try to take away freedoms of Americans, I feel like it might have been better if you'd been aborted.

We'd all be better off.

But there's no test you can do to tell if someone is going to end up being a control freak, worried about controlling other people's lives, instead of tending to their own business.

 

 

 

Prove that a fetus doesnt = child and therefor doesn't equal murder.

I have this inclination that you can't, since all simple science proves you incorrect.

 
 
Children breathe without assistance, a fetus doesn't. That's why we have two different words, and not just one. Duh.
Done.

 

So by your logic...Anyone who has reliance on a breathing tube, should be allowed to die by the whims of whoever...

That's...Really nice. So, you admit it, you do endorse murder, yes?

Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe

And yes, when it comes to protecting the life of an innocent human being, I am a control freak.

 

Yep. You'd fit right in with the Mullahs in Iran. Rather than try to chage the US into Iran, why not just pack your bags and move to Iran where you can rejoice in a society that takes away freedom?

Is that your only argument? Are you so incapable of deep cognitive thought, you come back with repetitive uncreative strawman argument?

 

By my logic a fetus is not a baby. It's a silly semantic trick, switching "baby" for "fetus" used by those that can't accept that America is a free country.

And when your logic has been shattered to bits, you go back to pointless opinion...So you lose on that regard.

I would support taking away a right for a woman to get an abortion, if whenever you force a woman to have a child, we castrate the man that impregnated her.

That has absolutely no relevancy and is a completely ignorant and asinine comparison.

that would be control over body of both the man, and the woman.

Restricting one being from harming another being is necessary at all times. If no harm is intended, no control is intended. Hence why unless the man is forcing the woman to have an abortion, no control over his body is necessary.

Courts have in fact decided that when a man kills a pregnant woman, it is double homocide...Hrmm...What an interesting concept that completely blows your asinine statements out of the water.

If you'll take that deal, then we can agree to control people's bodies.

I doubt you'll take it.

To make an accurate comparison. How about in the process after we castrate the man, we'll also perform a female castration, and cut out her ovaries. Deal? Then it'll be an equal comparison.

It's MOSTLY men that want to stop abortion.

That's complete bullshit. Every woman that I've ever discussed this with, is vehemently against abortion. Quit pulling assumptions out of your ass. It proves nothing except an inability to cohesively form a valid argument.

Why?

They can't be forced to have a child, since they can't get pregnant, and they want to control women.

it's like saying slavery is ok for black people, when you're white.

Really? That's an extremely poor analogy and has no comparitive power whatsoever.

The law doesn't apply to you, so who cares?

When a woman is raped and killed. Should we seek punishment? The law doesn't apply to us, so who cares.

When the law applies to men, suddenly they don't like it so much.

It's a very small risk.

You just don't have sex with a woman unless you ask her first if she wants to have your baby.

But if you don't do that, and get her pregnant, and she wants to abort, you can say no.

But you lose your testiticles.

Deal?

Uhm...If she doesn't want a child...Don't have sex. Simple enough. The end.

And the deal sounds fine...But only after we incinerate out her ovaries and perform a vaginal castration.

Deal?

Eye for an eye...

 

But oh wait...That doesn't work. Because you fail to live in a world of any type of logical base.

 

 

 

 

Lol.

So, when YOUR testicles are at risk, suddenly controlling people's bodies isn't such a good idea. 

When you're just going to control women, like the Taliban do, it's a great idea.

Thought so.

 

Wow...Completely ignored EVERYTHING I said, and pulled out a strawman to boot.

You sir, are pathetic. It is better to concede, rather than for you to continually make an ass out of yourself.

 

No, I got it perfectly.

When it comes to controlling a woman's womb, you're all for it.

If you have to put your testicles on the line, suddenly controlling people's bodies doesn't sound like such a wonderful idea.

UNLESS, you get to mutliate a woman's vagina.

Yep, you'd fit right in with the Taliban.

  Finwe

Novice Member

Joined: 7/15/03
Posts: 3112

All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

7/19/11 7:57:08 AM#114
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Vato26
Originally posted by C-B-M
Originally posted by Vato26

Rape baby...... ohh, your argument went up in flames.

Ha ha ha.  Look, Vato realized how retarded his argument was, so he immediately did the usual liberal thing and said "rape!"  Because we ALL know that rape babies are the reason 99.9% of women have abortions.  LOLZER.

I bet his mom smoked when she was pregnant.

Yet, you are generalizing on all pregnancy cases.  Thus, my point still stands and still destroys your Ultra-Conservative's grasp of taking away a woman's right to their own body.

They're infringing on another human beings right when they choose to abort.

 

So you have to choose.

I choose the woman's right to privacy over the rights of the fetus, in reasonable circumstances. FOr me, reasonable would be what was historically allowed during the founding of the US, abortion before the "quickening".

Also agree that christian conservatives and those on the far rights are hypocrites when it comes to supporting less government, and freedom;

Less government!

Unless it's about controlling a woman's body, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about the drug war, then we want MORE government!

Less government!

Unless it's about teaching Creationism in schools, then we want MORE government!

Ok. Quit trolling the christian right and stay on subject for one damn minute. It's obnoxious.

To the point of what is on hand.

There's a say, your freedom ends, where my nose begins. For you to choose the "Privacy" A.K.A. Convenience of women who do not understand responsibility, over the life of a human being, is despicable, and is the beginning to an anarchist societ when morality is flipped upside down.

 

A woman's right to choose is HER RESPONSIBLITY not yours.

She only has a right to choose when it involves only her. But it doesn't. It also involves the unborn child. So...

It's her womb, not yours.

You can do whatever you want with YOUR womb.

Roe v Wade was decided in 1973. I don't see how it started any anarchist society.

And more unborn children have been murdered in 38 years than the genocides by stalin or hitler combined.

Also...I said beginning. And it has shown. When people have no moral responsibility. Law means nothing.

 

Responsibility

: the quality or state of being responsible: as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : reliability, trustworthiness
2
: something for which one is responsible : burden responsibilities>

 

 

I don't see anything in there that gives you the right to control a womans womb. Its being responsible morally or legally. It's LEGAL to have an abortion.

So what if it's legal? Slavery has been legal. Controlled rape has been illegal. Genocide has been legal.

And people have to be responsible to THEIR  morals, not YOURS.

Anyone who doesn't consider murder immoral has no morals.

Making people responsible for YOUR morals?

Well, move to Iran. That's what they do with Sharia Law.

Uh. Are you completely obtuse? That's every country. The elite decide "the morals" of the many.

Abortion is illegal in Iran.

Maybe you'll like it there.

 

 

Seriously, I think you might be happier in Iran. It's a theocracy, and they control women. I think that's what you want.

It's not going to happen in the US, but it does exist in Iran.

rape not equal abortion.

murder not equal abortion.

Slavery not equal abortion.

No one is buying those retarded attempts to hide your real agenda, control of a woman's womb.

If you want to control something, why don't you worry about your penis?

If you want that control it DOES exist. In Iran. Iran controls women, they are not equal to men, and abortion is illegal.

I suggest you move there if that's the kind of society you want to live in.

 

This whole, "Move to iran" bit is tiresome and is a sign of a lazy attempt at debate.

Stating, "It's not going to happen in the US", is so laughable. Fact is, before 1973, it was happening in the U.S. Before the supreme court UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERTURNED, states right. Surprise!

Murder...Does equal abortion, it's the same damn thing.

 

And what is your obsession about a woman's womb? NO ONE CARES ABOUT A WOMANS WOMB! Except you...Because you seem RIDICULOUSLY obsessed with womens wombs.

Here. Let's close this argument with this quote.

"I was sitting in O.R.'s offices when I noticed a fetal development poster. The progression was so obvious, the eyes were so sweet. It hurt my heart, just looking at them. I ran outside and finally, it dawned on me. 'Norma', I said to myself, 'They're right'. I had worked with pregnant women for years. I had been through three pregnancies and deliveries myself. I should have known. Yet something in that poster made me lose my breath. I kept seeing the picture of that tiny, 10-week-old embryo, and I said to myself, that's a baby! It's as if blinders just fell off my eyes and I suddenly understood the truth — that's a baby!

I felt crushed under the truth of this realization. I had to face up to the awful reality. Abortion wasn't about 'products of conception'. It wasn't about 'missed periods'. It was about children being killed in their mother's wombs. All those years I was wrong. Signing that affidavit, I was wrong. Working in an abortion clinic, I was wrong. No more of this first trimester, second trimester, third trimester stuff. Abortion — at any point — was wrong. It was so clear. Painfully clear"

- Norma McCorvey

If you don't know who Norma McCorvey, she's more popularly known as Jane Roe.

Even the woman that in 1969 attemptedly lied to doctors in texas to try to get a legal abortion, and then was used as a pawn by Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, later in life recognized the error of her ways, and even attempted to get the same supreme court decision she was responsible for, overturned.

 

Really? You're going to make the retarded "fetus = child" statement? Get a clue.

If you think abortion = murder, I think you should move to Iran. It seems YOU"RE the one obsessed with a woman's womb, since you want control over it.

Why don't you just worry about controlling your penis?

They force their religion on people In Iran. You'd fit right in.

During the Founding of the United States, abortion was legal before the "quickening".

It was only later that abortion was made illegal. Rights in the US have eroded for quite some time.

Thank goodness we're leaving that stuff in the past and moving forward.

BTW, prohibition is also over. It's legal to drink alchohol now, just like it was when the US was founded. \

When people like you try to take away freedoms of Americans, I feel like it might have been better if you'd been aborted.

We'd all be better off.

But there's no test you can do to tell if someone is going to end up being a control freak, worried about controlling other people's lives, instead of tending to their own business.

 

 

 

Prove that a fetus doesnt = child and therefor doesn't equal murder.

I have this inclination that you can't, since all simple science proves you incorrect.

 
 
Children breathe without assistance, a fetus doesn't. That's why we have two different words, and not just one. Duh.
Done.

 

So by your logic...Anyone who has reliance on a breathing tube, should be allowed to die by the whims of whoever...

That's...Really nice. So, you admit it, you do endorse murder, yes?

Originally posted by Ihmotepp
Originally posted by Finwe

And yes, when it comes to protecting the life of an innocent human being, I am a control freak.

 

Yep. You'd fit right in with the Mullahs in Iran. Rather than try to chage the US into Iran, why not just pack your bags and move to Iran where you can rejoice in a society that takes away freedom?

Is that your only argument? Are you so incapable of deep cognitive thought, you come back with repetitive uncreative strawman argument?

 

By my logic a fetus is not a baby. It's a silly semantic trick, switching "baby" for "fetus" used by those that can't accept that America is a free country.

And when your logic has been shattered to bits, you go back to pointless opinion...So you lose on that regard.

I would support taking away a right for a woman to get an abortion, if whenever you force a woman to have a child, we castrate the man that impregnated her.

That has absolutely no relevancy and is a completely ignorant and asinine comparison.

that would be control over body of both the man, and the woman.

Restricting one being from harming another being is necessary at all times. If no harm is intended, no control is intended. Hence why unless the man is forcing the woman to have an abortion, no control over his body is necessary.

Courts have in fact decided that when a man kills a pregnant woman, it is double homocide...Hrmm...What an interesting concept that completely blows your asinine statements out of the water.

If you'll take that deal, then we can agree to control people's bodies.

I doubt you'll take it.

To make an accurate comparison. How about in the process after we castrate the man, we'll also perform a female castration, and cut out her ovaries. Deal? Then it'll be an equal comparison.

It's MOSTLY men that want to stop abortion.

That's complete bullshit. Every woman that I've ever discussed this with, is vehemently against abortion. Quit pulling assumptions out of your ass. It proves nothing except an inability to cohesively form a valid argument.

Why?

They can't be forced to have a child, since they can't get pregnant, and they want to control women.

it's like saying slavery is ok for black people, when you're white.

Really? That's an extremely poor analogy and has no comparitive power whatsoever.

The law doesn't apply to you, so who cares?

When a woman is raped and killed. Should we seek punishment? The law doesn't apply to us, so who cares.

When the law applies to men, suddenly they don't like it so much.

It's a very small risk.

You just don't have sex with a woman unless you ask her first if she wants to have your baby.

But if you don't do that, and get her pregnant, and she wants to abort, you can say no.

But you lose your testiticles.

Deal?

Uhm...If she doesn't want a child...Don't have sex. Simple enough. The end.

And the deal sounds fine...But only after we incinerate out her ovaries and perform a vaginal castration.

Deal?

Eye for an eye...

 

But oh wait...That doesn't work. Because you fail to live in a world of any type of logical base.

 

 

 

 

Lol.

So, when YOUR testicles are at risk, suddenly controlling people's bodies isn't such a good idea. 

When you're just going to control women, like the Taliban do, it's a great idea.

Thought so.

 

Wow...Completely ignored EVERYTHING I said, and pulled out a strawman to boot.

You sir, are pathetic. It is better to concede, rather than for you to continually make an ass out of yourself.

 

No, I got it perfectly.

When it comes to controlling a woman's womb, you're all for it.

If you have to put your testicles on the line, suddenly controlling people's bodies doesn't sound like such a wonderful idea.

UNLESS, you get to mutliate a woman's vagina.

Yep, you'd fit right in with the Taliban.

You really can't argue without using a strawman, can you?

There's no point in even debating with you.

You ignore all logical points. You repeat the same gibberish after it's been proven to be completely nonsensical and ridiculous, and your idea of morality is that for the righteous to want to prevent the taking of human life, they must in the process have their genitals mutilated, unless the murderer is allowed to do as pleased and there must be no reprecussions for their actions.

I don't believe many people are, but I genuinely think you are a borderline psychotic, sick, and evil human being. You are so lost in the insanity of your own mind you couldn't tell a duck from a whale.

"The greatest trick the devil played on humanity in the 20th century was convincing them that he didn't exist." (Paraphrasing) C.S. Lewis

"If a mother can kill her own child, what is left before I kill you and you kill me?" -Mother Teresa when talking about abortion after accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979

  C-B-M

Novice Member

Joined: 5/03/11
Posts: 2661

7/19/11 8:12:09 AM#115

Ihmotepp's arguments on abortion are pretty inane.  All he ever says is that the man's testicles should be chopped off, which he thinks is a killer argument.  So here's how it works for Ihmotepp:

1) Guys shouldn't have a say in abortion (unless they agree with it) because it's not their body.

2) But now that we all agree that it is the woman's body, she doesn't have to be responsible for it.

3) In fact, if she does get pregnant, it's actually the man's fault and his responsibility.

 

Ihmotepp is basically a castrated liberal male.

  User Deleted
7/19/11 8:56:16 AM#116
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Vato26
Originally posted by Finwe
Originally posted by Cleffy

I think the media circus around the case set a very dangerous environment for Casey Anthony.  Pretty much every media outlet has been trying their best to get this woman killed.  How a person can live with themselves by doing this is beyond me.  They obviously have no respect for the US legal system; and constantly air people talking about how she should be tried guilty and killed.  Maybe they could have convicted her if the Prosecutors scenario wasn't so ludicrous.  They didn't have a good case on murder, but they tried anyway and lost.

Duh?

Of course the american populace doesn't have faith in the legal system. Should they?

I've seen no reason as to why they should. It's a joke, a damn bad joke.

People are calling this OJ 2.0. And for good reason. Bitch is guilty. Someones going to kill her, and she'll deserve it.

"So, you admit it, you do endorse murder, yes?" - http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/post/4335872

 

So, you admit it.  You do, in fact, endorse murder.

Murder is the killing of the innocent, she is not innocent. She is guilty, And therefor, it is not murder. Justice, execution. Whatever you desire to call it. But no. Not murder.

A judge and jury says otherwise.  Your opinion on her "guilt" or "innocence" is completely meaningless.  Unless you are trying to insinuate that YOUR beliefs on justice outweigh what the courts rule.  Which, if you are, then I will laugh my ass off if you are arrested, tried, and found guilty, because you will be crying at nights that you were "innocent" and it would mean jack shit.

Again, she is innocent under law and you are praising others to kill her.  Thus, you are endorsing murder.  That is a FACT.

  generals3

Novice Member

Joined: 11/22/04
Posts: 3306

7/19/11 9:11:49 AM#117

Why do almost every topics end up being about abortion... I think we all know each others position on that issue by now , no?

But heh, i guess reading/repeating the same over and over again even in topics not directly related to it never gets old? (i'm NOT targeting anyone in particular)

Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt.
Among those who dislike oppression are many who like to oppress.

  C-B-M

Novice Member

Joined: 5/03/11
Posts: 2661

7/19/11 10:08:07 AM#118
Originally posted by generals3

Why do almost every topics end up being about abortion... I think we all know each others position on that issue by now , no?

But heh, i guess reading/repeating the same over and over again even in topics not directly related to it never gets old? (i'm NOT targeting anyone in particular)

Most likely because abortion is a hot social issue and also it is illustrative of how both sides of the political spectrum view the Constitution.  The left "interprets" its views and the right, well, we actually read the Constitution.  ;)

  User Deleted
7/19/11 10:12:18 AM#119
Originally posted by C-B-M
Originally posted by generals3

Why do almost every topics end up being about abortion... I think we all know each others position on that issue by now , no?

But heh, i guess reading/repeating the same over and over again even in topics not directly related to it never gets old? (i'm NOT targeting anyone in particular)

Most likely because abortion is a hot social issue and also it is illustrative of how both sides of the political spectrum view the Constitution.  The left "interprets" its views and the right, well, we actually read the Constitution.  ;)

That's pure bullshit.  But, coming from you, that's nothing new.

  C-B-M

Novice Member

Joined: 5/03/11
Posts: 2661

7/19/11 10:17:20 AM#120

OK, since you say so.  :)

9 Pages First « 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Search