Originally posted by Kreedz

Lets put it this way: I'm planning on making a Mech game... and I want boob physics in it.

 

I will call them Thermal Inertia Tactical Shields.

If you were to put boob physics in a mech game, doesn't that mean they dont move at all under all that armor?

I find it quite disturbing and pathetic that over 56% (at this time) NEEDS this.

Originally posted by BTrayaL

I find it quite disturbing and pathetic that over 56% (at this time) NEEDS this.

Don't forget most of the rest don't mind, it's ok with them either way.

Less than 10% really don't want it.

They always say sex sells thats why so many games specially the korean games have sexy chicks on the boxes or adds with nice boobs.

But nude will not realy be implemented as long countrys like US go crazy over some nipple they see. Maybe Holland(100% will not be any problem) and some scandinavian countrys maybe?, aloud nude in games but rest of the world is not ready yet for nakedness ingame hehe

Look at all the nude mods for elder scrolls and dragon age origin, there si a def market for this.

Most of the female character in games are already oversexed, so the answer to this was an easy no. I don't really understand why men act like this is such a great thing? If I want to lust after someone, it's called dating. Games are for relax-time fun.

Originally posted by dreamscaper

Most of the female character in games are already oversexed, so the answer to this was an easy no. I don't really understand why men act like this is such a great thing? If I want to lust after someone, it's called dating. Games are for relax-time fun.

Sounds like you're confusing a pleasing to look at video game, with  real life.

Would you like to play a game where all the characters look like giant turds?

Why not? If you want to see nice looking people you can go on a date right?

Simple Answer: Hell no!, I'd be happy if they did away with boobs in video games all together, Im here to play video games not look at chicks.

Originally posted by Dalgor

Simple Answer: Hell no!, I'd be happy if they did away with boobs in video games all together, Im here to play video games not look at chicks.

So you want a sort of "Elizabethean theater" game, where it's ALL men. Got it.

Nah I think hot female characters should be a must so that atleast in video games women are out of the kitchen.

I would ideally like physics on everything in a game to improve the immersion and realistic nature of the game - at least to the point where it does not cripple modern video cards and restrict the game to only those with "uber" computers.

That said, if I am prioritizing between improving cloak and hair physics and "boob" physics, the latter is the least important to me.

Not saying thats what I want, but I would be perfectly fine with that. Females in video games have boobs, or lumps on their chest, thats enough of a distinction, they dont need bouncing or any of that other crap{mod edit} This kinda stuff is just a waste of game resources and is generally only in games that know they dont compete in other areas so are just going for the cheap interest of sexuality. 

Does it make money? yes, because most gamers these days arnt accualy looking for a game to play but just something to entertain them and boobs tends to do that. Pretty much the reason Themepark games are so big, they arnt challenging, dont require alot of brain work, dont get your blood pumping or adrenaline going( except for Pvp, which is again why we see it being so huge in themeparks because thats the only thing that does that in those games ), but they are entertaining to the masses.

I can't believe this is actually offensive to some people?...

There just breast. If your swinging a sword and running around with big breast, they move. Stop acting so prude about it.

If I also want there to be gravity in games, destructible environments, a weather system with breezes indepedently traveling around, trees swaying in this wind, hair movement, and cloth movement, belly jiggling if its a husky gentleman, *insert anything that would come with an intense physics engine*, that means I should go die?... Really ridiculous.

As to why people would want this, well Idk. Why would you want there to be good graphics? It's probably much of the same reason. Having movement in the world makes the world look better and more animated. Hair movement, cloth movement, ect.

When I play fighting gams liek the op linked, and the girls breast move around like crazy, I don't even notice them, I notice there overall effect to the visuals when added on top of the moving clothing,hair,armour, which is to make the game more visual and animated.

They said there was life on Mars once, but no more. I know why. No boob physics...

Theres a reason I added or go for a walk and watch some girl jogging, because it was a joke lol. People on here like to read things much too literal and thats their own issue.

The fact of the matter is, game resources dont need to be wasted on something that has no practical value in the video game, namely almost every video game out.

You wanna make a game where you get more xp the more the boobs bounce, then by all means they should have great physics and graphics and all that other good stuff. But in a RPG, where there is no persuation, its has absolutely zero practicality. Sorry if some of you thought I was having really strong feelings about it there but I really dont lol, its just something I've watched happening to the gaming industry for years, adding more and more vanity stuff that has no practical value to cover up all the stuff their games are lacking, such as depth.

Originally posted by Dalgor

You wanna make a game where you get more xp the more the boobs bounce, then by all means they should have great physics and graphics and all that other good stuff. But in a RPG, where there is no persuation, its has absolutely zero practicality. Sorry if some of you thought I was having really strong feelings about it there but I really dont lol, its just something I've watched happening to the gaming industry for years, adding more and more vanity stuff that has no practical value to cover up all the stuff their games are lacking, such as depth.

You know, anything beyond a box that flashes words like 'Attacking' and 'Using fire spell' on it for your avatar is 'zero practicality'.

Some people like their avatars to have an appearance a little more interesting and accurate than a giant box with words on it.

Just saying.

Originally posted by jadedlevir

I can't believe this is actually offensive to some people?...

There just breast. If your swinging a sword and running around with big breast, they move. Stop acting so prude about it.

Not offensive, just a waste of effort that could be better spent improving areas of the game. The sheer amount of jiggle that some of these games add is downright uncomfortable to watch. It's not about being prudish, it's about being practical. If I'm swinging a sword around the last thing I want is my boobs smacking me in the face.

Originally posted by jadedlevir

I can't believe this is actually offensive to some people?...

There just breast. If your swinging a sword and running around with big breast, they move. Stop acting so prude about it.

If I also want there to be gravity in games, destructible environments, a weather system with breezes indepedently traveling around, trees swaying in this wind, hair movement, and cloth movement, belly jiggling if its a husky gentleman, *insert anything that would come with an intense physics engine*, that means I should go die?... Really ridiculous.

As to why people would want this, well Idk. Why would you want there to be good graphics? It's probably much of the same reason. Having movement in the world makes the world look better and more animated. Hair movement, cloth movement, ect.

When I play fighting gams liek the op linked, and the girls breast move around like crazy, I don't even notice them, I notice there overall effect to the visuals when added on top of the moving clothing,hair,armour, which is to make the game more visual and animated.

I don't find it offensive just pointless. I also feel such a subject attracts those of an immature mindset. The practicle purposes of boob physics are nill. Aside from some tween getting his jollies, who is really going to pay attention to such a feature? It's something you'd notice say oh that's neat and move on, again it serves no practicle purpose.

Originally posted by dreamscaper

Originally posted by jadedlevir

I can't believe this is actually offensive to some people?...

There just breast. If your swinging a sword and running around with big breast, they move. Stop acting so prude about it.

 

Not offensive, just a waste of effort that could be better spent improving areas of the game. The sheer amount of jiggle that some of these games add is downright uncomfortable to watch. It's not about being prudish, it's about being practical. If I'm swinging a sword around the last thing I want is my boobs smacking me in the face.

Theyre usually animated using a physics engine like HavoK, It's literally a 2 minutes job to give the vertices on a mesh some weight...the only time you'd spend more time on it is if you wanted to get the perfect 'jiggle' factor.

In the end, we are all animals, and boobs are like the feathers of a peecock to us, Theyre nice to look at and are used to attract the opposite sex.

As someone else said, better computing power would be served to have hair/clothes/armor physics.

Whomever has boobs as a priority in an RPG should really get laid.

Taking this question seriously...

I don't think this feature would have any impact on whether I would buy an MMORPG or not, I would be completely indifferent.  Boob jiggle isn't something I look for in an MMORPG, but I'm not really offended by it either.

The only way it would bother me is if the developer implemented it poorly and we see things like steel plated armored breasts "jiggling."