| 115 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
6/24/11 12:05:33 PM#21
Because the internal newsletter that was used for brainstorming is entirely set in stone and is the word of god and can NEVER change. Heavens forbid a company where hundreds of people WORK want to make money to pay there employees and finance future projects. |
|
|
Ceridith
Novice Member
Joined: 11/24/09
The more you hype an upcoming game in your mind, the more it will fail to meet your expectations. |
6/24/11 12:10:49 PM#22
Originally posted by MMO.Maverick It's because of an internal document that was leaked, which CCP admitted was real. Basically the document gave strong tones of CCP viewing customers as little more than money to be harvested, and their plans to add more invasive micro transactions to the measure of actual ships, equipment and potentially even faction standing... which would kind of undermind the whole 'player sandbox' point to the game. http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/06/22/rumour-leaked-document-shows-ccps-microtransaction-plans/ |
|
6/24/11 12:11:52 PM#23
This was a very interesting read. This concept of a mutual relation, growing together, company and client, it's nice. Too bad CCP ruined it, at least for some people. In a selfish way, i don't feel guilty anymore for not playing the all-sandboxy-glory of MMOs, Eve. |
|
|
Ceridith
Novice Member
Joined: 11/24/09
The more you hype an upcoming game in your mind, the more it will fail to meet your expectations. |
6/24/11 12:14:59 PM#24
Originally posted by Thomas2006 For a lot of people, the fact that CCP is even entertaining the idea is enough reason to worry. The game's roots are based in being a sandbox where players set the factions and game economy, and some of the 'planned' MT runs in direct conflict with this. If CCP is even considering adding invasive MT, enough to formally document it, then it brings CCP's future goals into question. |
|
6/24/11 12:18:13 PM#25
It's great until the eighth paragraph, where he starts sounding like an elitist twat. Shame. |
|
Originally posted by Thomas2006 You missed the orange part and went all dramatic. I have nothing against companies making a profit. But yeah, I hope the following quotes are not set in stone, (but they sure don't read like bits of a brainstorm session, they are more like statements; the decision makers informing the rest of the CCP employees): WoD: "...there are three main areas that virtual goods sales will focus on in the game: cosmetics, items of convenience and items of power." "One other service we're looking at is selling faction standings. We want to offer convenience" "Not all virtual purchases will focus on customization, some will simply be new items, ammunition, ships, etc. that can be purchased outright." "Thus we will not and cannot focus on virtual sales only within the Incarna evironment, nor build that evironment around such sales, rather we will effect a universal strategy of micro-sales throughout the EVe experience." |
|
|
6/24/11 12:29:31 PM#27
Originally posted by Ceridith Yes, but is it game update that's set in stone or are they just exploring possible ventures? I mean, isn't it a bit early to conclude the worst even before things are even presented as real updates? After all, it seems that CCP has been doing some great updates over all those years, enough to provide a compelling game, if they really were so bad as some now seem to make them to be, they wouldn't have been able to make such fun improvements to the already engaging gameplay over the years, right?
To use an analogy, it sounds to me like as if irl your partner was talking about someone at her/his work enthusiastically, and people act like their partner has already committed adultery and having an affair. The ACTUAL size of MMORPG worlds: a comparison list between MMO's |
|
|
6/24/11 12:29:35 PM#28
I thought that was very well done. I particularly enjoyed: "Our relationship had always been about mutual benefits but at least it had the semblance of commitment. No longer.
"I agree that "unimaginable complexity" is absurd, but so is comparing a single player game to an mmo. It's like comparing masturbation to sex, they are similar in some respects, but really are not comparable." -jimdandy26 |
|
|
6/24/11 12:30:31 PM#29
Two things. Firstly, yes, that is their planning. As they confirmed, that is exactly their planning. They even already set it in motion and executed it. Secondly, the economics are questionable at best. The validity of destabilizing the only income source of a 600 employee corporation has been so thoroughly questioned in fact, that people are leaving the ship. You know, quite a few people who play Eve do have a good idea of economics. Some of them have their own company in real life. They are horrified by what CCP is doing. |
|
|
Squal'Zell
Novice Member
Joined: 10/09/04
"Next time i log in SWG ill probably see elves and druids" |
6/24/11 12:30:45 PM#30
Originally posted by DarkPony those 4 paragraphs should never be metioned in any kind of MMO (themepark or and specially sandbox) wether its brainstorming or actual decisions. and what scares me the most is this "rather we will effect a universal strategy of micro-sales throughout the EVe experience." basically saying, on top of your monthly sub, it will be universal that you will spend more on micro sales to access the real eve experience. 15$ will only let you log in to play we need more money from you. |
|
6/24/11 12:37:54 PM#31
Originally posted by MMO.Maverick Currently it is just some cosmetic items that nobody really cares about in the long run. Players might like to bitch about it, but they don't really give a crap about anything that doesn't affect their performance in space. Give it a few weeks and they'll find something more realistic to cry about. That something being the RMTing of battleships, which itself probably won't be as big a deal after (if) it is worked in. Eve players seem to forget that many people who take shortcuts to obtain items that they don't have to work for (even if they have the SP to properly pilot it in this case) tend to be less attached to said items, and therefore less cautious with them. All I see is a temporary upsurge in trust fund frat kid types that will likely only end up burning through an excessive amount of RM to the point that they start to affect their ability to maintain a subscription. They wouldn't have an impact on the game world in the long run, and CCP benefits from their economic failure. Problem solves itself. |
|
|
6/24/11 12:40:58 PM#32
I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that all of this heavy MT use is the result of PLEX in Eve being a big money success. You know, because players take advantage of its convinience. |
|
|
6/24/11 12:50:14 PM#33
Originally posted by MMO.Maverick Maverick, CCP started this whole shebang with the assurance that only vanity items would be sold in the cash shop. We now know that CCP had every intention to not follow through with what they had said, and that they actually had plans to sell a hell of a lot more in the cash shop, including ships, equipment, ammunition etc. It's by no means too early to come to negative conclusions. Sitting at idle on the edge with an ignorant air of optimism is not going to help the situation. That will only reinforce to CCP that they can actually get away with this BS. As to your analogy, not even close. She's already got her hand around his fun pole and she aint lookin' back. CCP can no longer be trusted. "I agree that "unimaginable complexity" is absurd, but so is comparing a single player game to an mmo. It's like comparing masturbation to sex, they are similar in some respects, but really are not comparable." -jimdandy26 |
|
|
6/24/11 12:52:29 PM#34
The guy proved his point about the morons invading the game with the first few responses to his goodbye post in regards to his use of RP and the credit card being cancelled, the twits couldn't grasp his meaning and thought literally, and thus gave him a hard time for it, shows the total lack of class and intelligience we see these days in social games. However a classic way to leave a game behind that has disappointed a customer with it's changing market values.
|
|
|
Ceridith
Novice Member
Joined: 11/24/09
The more you hype an upcoming game in your mind, the more it will fail to meet your expectations. |
6/24/11 12:53:48 PM#35
Originally posted by MMO.Maverick To further your anology, it's more close to one's partner was talking enthusiasticly about a co-worker, and then openly saying they've been considering leaving their partner for the co-worker because they have more money. The fact that CCP is even considering what they are, enough to officially document it, is what's raising alarm bells. Usually if someone is even considering doing something that would be considered drastic, even if they don't go through with it, is typically a reflection of something being seriously amiss. |
|
6/24/11 1:07:07 PM#36
Actually, just a year ago CCP was vocal about there never being any MT ever in their subscription based cash cow. |
|
|
6/24/11 1:26:42 PM#37
Originally posted by batolemaeus That's a good point. I had forgotten about that. "I agree that "unimaginable complexity" is absurd, but so is comparing a single player game to an mmo. It's like comparing masturbation to sex, they are similar in some respects, but really are not comparable." -jimdandy26 |
|
|
6/24/11 1:29:50 PM#38
Once I see in the patch notes that they are doing this then I will quit. Until then I will not worry about it. If anyone did read the entire thing it said that the items that he is proposing is HIS OWN OPINION. Note that it is ONE PERSON'S OPINION. Not CCP as a whole, just one employee. Until CCP says yes this is what we have planned then yes I will not be playing EVE Online anymore. Since these micro transactions will mess up the economy and cause other problems. Vanity items I don't care about, I saw the prices and shrugged but I don't need those items so it does not effect me. I can see why some people are upset over the prices because they might like those items for their character and the items are over priced. CCP gave a reason to doing it and I understand, but those prices need to be taken down a bit to actually be worth buying. Games playing: Lotro,Fallen Earth,Star Trek Online. |
|
|
6/24/11 1:31:02 PM#39
Wondering if some new people didn't take over at CCP or something in the past year. Just hard to believe the devs of old would pull such a huge swerve suddenly. |
|
|
6/24/11 1:46:53 PM#40
Originally posted by Cecropia Originally posted by Cecropia Sorry, but it's actually this kind of attitude of intolerance and quickdraw generalising conclusions that makes me dislike and have no respect at all for sandbox fans, at least for those who show such attitude of which there are enough around.
To use that letter writer's own example: if it had been true love and dedication, they wouldn't be on the verge of leaving at the first sign of real trouble in the relationship as that letter writer intends to do.
Originally posted by gundamwing This sounds to me like the more sensible approach, the 'let's hear the 2 sides of the story' before the auto-concluding begins. If it was truly what CCP intended to do, then you'll see it automatically in one of the updates. Furthermore, it sounds to me that it's a matter of waiting what the company as a whole has to say about it all. The ACTUAL size of MMORPG worlds: a comparison list between MMO's |
|