| 143 posts found | |
|---|---|
Originally posted by Renoaku its the other away around. Those who do play it tend to like it. Those who haven't played and post negative repetitive posts tend to have not played it. |
|
|
6/19/11 7:59:04 PM#62
Pointless E3 awards mean nothing. Number of subs after the first 30 days means a whole lot more. |
|
|
6/19/11 8:04:08 PM#63
Haters vs fanboys vs neutrals vs trolls, the battlefield of Internetz. Four faction PVP action, who needs a MMORPG. Ultimate sandbox experience, start with absolutely nothing and achieve absolutely nothing. Change your font to annoying sizes, add provocative images, nearly limitless text field to argue with your opponent. Quote to prevent enemy ninja edits or edit the quote to humiliate them. RP support you ask? We fully support RP, you just have to use your imagination, absolutely nothing else is needed! Challenging end bosses; moderators, admins and experienced trolls. For hardcore mode post pornographic images and see how long you survive; permanent death! Today this is all yours for the price of your sanity and social life outside of Internet. Remember your flame protection, brothers and sisters! |
|
|
Ceridith
Novice Member
Joined: 11/24/09
The more you hype an upcoming game in your mind, the more it will fail to meet your expectations. |
6/19/11 9:06:43 PM#64
I don't know what's more ridiculous, awards given out for how well a developer can hype their upcoming game at an expo, or that people use the awards as 'proof' of the quality of an upcoming game. |
|
6/19/11 9:30:10 PM#65
Originally posted by dinams The point is that no group is homogenous, you'll have some fans who said that 'awards mean nothing' and other fans who don't share that opinion. Me, for example, I don't care for awards that are given for a convention by some site for games that haven't been launched yet, I often don't even care for awards that are given for 'best of the year' by this or that site. I mean, it isn't like the Oscar awards (which I find also a joke) or Hugo awards or Olympic awards or such.
Although I do agree with the reason of the OP for posting it.
Originally posted by Razanka I kind of agree, let's see how all these games are doing when they have been released.
Originally posted by Bygh Hehe, yep, forum debating especially in the SWTOR forumsection of this site is kinda like 'Tarren Mill' style forum PvP You can even choose your race and class archetypes (white knight, hate crusader, basher, troll, diplomat, etc) and skill trees (reason and logic, flaming, ridiculisation, sensationalism and hyperboles, hard facts), so it kinda has some MMO mechanics as well.
Anyway, what boggles me most is how polarized debates often are, it seems that a lot of people have an unwillingness or lack of capability to see and understand viewpoints that aren't theirs: fans often adhere to only the positive arguments and criticize or deny the negative arguments, while haters/critics often tunnelvision focus only on the negative arguments that say bad things about a game while adamantly refusing to acknowledge or see the positive arguments. Polarisation ftw. Funny, in a way, and sad in another. The ACTUAL size of MMORPG worlds: a comparison list between MMO's |
|
|
Raventree
Elite Member
Joined: 5/12/10
It is a double pleasure to gank the ganker. |
6/19/11 9:41:25 PM#66
While I generally agree that pre-release awards don't mean much, it does at least indicate that the game is getting a lot of positive attention and Bioware and EA are building up a good amount of anticipation. What I don't understand is how some people have already built up such a rabid dislike for the game that they have to keep bashing it at every chance they get. I mean, it isn't even OUT yet, people! I have noticed that many of them suggest that SWToR is going to be crap and so you should wait for Guild Wars 2. It may be that everyone on these forums realizes that SWToR is going to be huge and so a few from the GW2 crowd feel threatened and the uncontrollable need to try to spew hate at what will be it's biggest competition for the next big thing. It could also be that some people are just very negative by nature and can't stop being haters. I personally would be happy if both SWToR and Guild Wars 2 are both huge successes. I am a gamer and the more fantstic and successful games they churn out the better. If you don't like the themepark style games no one is going to force you to play them, so settle down and ease up on the hate. Bioware has said from the beginning that this is what they are making and they are going to follow most of the tried and true conventions. If you want a sandbox you are going to need to keep looking. Currently playing: |
|
Nethermancer
Novice Member
Joined: 3/17/10
"I tell you, we are here on Earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you different" |
6/19/11 9:48:15 PM#67
I gave no real attention to SWTOR until E3. And i have to say it looks great. I love the idea of having minions and while flying in space look slike a mini game it still looks fun as hell. Waiting to see if they are going to try and suck me dry of all my money before i decide if i want to play. Playing: EVE online and TL2 |
|
6/19/11 10:02:50 PM#68
Many people act as if 100% of the gaming community will go to a game based on any thing another will say. If a game looks good then its ok to invest your own personal money. SWTOR is a game that ill buy no matter of other opinions. If im the only person playing thats fine by me. |
|
|
6/19/11 10:14:38 PM#69
lol someone really just threw out nazis as an arguement. Sweet.
As to the awards, meh. If the game was out and getting awards, great. But I'm not all that worried about awards before hand. |
|
|
6/20/11 1:46:51 AM#70
Originally posted by SlothnChunk However, if I designed and visualized the best mmorpg ever created and hired "a third party company" to create it, it would still be my best ever created mmorpg that would not exist without me. Not that I care about awards or awards for trailers, but it sure was epic and fun to watch, and it was there because of Bioware and TOR. |
|
|
6/20/11 1:51:39 AM#71
Originally posted by Ojass I have 10 bucks you will be playing it day one lol |
|
|
6/20/11 1:57:41 AM#72
I'm wondering if TOR did not win any awards that the same people saying these awards mean nothing would be the same pople laughing that TOR did not win anything? |
|
|
6/20/11 2:10:52 AM#73
Originally posted by Ojass Waaay too much effort for someone who doesnt care. This is the funny thing about ppl in general who are suppose to not care about SWtor at all. "I'm not a hater honest, I just dont care for it, it doesnt do it for me". Yet here they are spending more time in SWtor forum than ANY fanboi I've seen constantly pushing SWtor and bioware down. I get it, hype is just that, hype. SWtor can never live up to it thats for sure. But this is just silly. |
|
|
6/20/11 2:16:52 AM#74
Originally posted by Raventree This just goes to show people know what to expect from TOR for the most part. Which has some people raging already, mainly those sick of the WOW model or those who do not like themeparks in general. I guess you could say the suspension of disbelief is no longer suspended, which is not the case with GW2 or TSW. These two games still have the luxury of giving way to the imagination of what they will be, rather than the reality of it. Regardless of this people who are raging will still pick up the game for whatever reason. We'll still get to hear how much they hate themeparks or WOW-like games come launch. I'm sure they'll all be saying it's the fanboi's fault, they were lead to believe the game was something more. Bioware lied etc.. etc... For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson If you can't argue the point don't say anything at all. |
|
|
6/20/11 2:29:18 AM#75
Originally posted by Malickie Idd this. Having already made my mind up months ago I still bought the game to still be eligible for SWtor bashing even after release. Here's my objective review.... Without a doubt we'll see those. |
|
|
6/20/11 2:38:47 AM#76
Originally posted by ormstungaOriginally posted by MalickieOriginally posted by Raventree Malickie is right and the really bad thing these people do not see how pathetic they are. Fact is we have absolutely no idea how good or bad this game will be until after it goes live and we can play it. When people blindly attack something like this it just makes them look immature. At least with the fanboys though, you don't feel such the need to take a shower after reading the garbage the haters are spewing out. Keep in mind that goes for most any game though and in some cases it is worse for games that have already been released. Personally, I highly doubt I'll be reading any forums for a long while after SWTOR releases, but then again, I am a fan of BioWare's stories. "If half of what you tell me is a lie, how can I believe any of it?" |
|
|
6/20/11 2:51:38 AM#77
Originally posted by Ojass http://www.blogcdn.com/www.urlesque.com/media/2010/05/1272938115936.jpg |
|
|
6/20/11 2:54:38 AM#78
This is realy funny , I just read similiar thread http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/318624/E3-2011-awards-nominations.html on TERA forums ... :D There is quite a few BEST MMO OF E3 awards too. Awards from press means nothing and say nothing about game direction. Press is here to sell you the game not to give often harsh truth. |
|
|
6/20/11 2:56:12 AM#79
i wanna make a statement. awards are awards. does not mean squat intil game actually comes out. Look what happen to warhammer fantasy online. they won tons of awards when game was not out. it became utter fail. |
|
|
BlackWatch
Apprentice Member
Joined: 11/01/06
WTB the option to play on 'mature' game servers. |
6/20/11 2:56:13 AM#80
I love how these games get awards before they are even released. It's complete BS to do this. This is like extending credit to someone that hasn't held a job yet. Sure, you have seen their high school and college diploma's... but what will they do in the real world? What happens when they aren't graded on a curve? The harsh, cruel world filled with millions of critics. The earliest a game should be able to receive an award would be 90+ days after launch. Let players play it and let sub numbers begin to solidify.... then hand out some awards. All of this hype moves boxes, but it also places the credibility of the award providers in serious jeopardy. Again... 'game of the year' should NEVER belong to a game that hasn't been released yet.
|