| 49 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
2/14/11 7:01:41 AM#21
Originally posted by Tardcore You mean this years versions of Mortal Online and Darkfall, the great saviors of the MMORPG world, hahahah. More like the next 2 "hardcore" "sadbox" games that will be released in an alpha state and will fail so badly people will not even care about them now or ever. You guys that keep buying unfinished games that are 2 years from beta are the ones killing the industry by paying thieves that release games not even 50% of the way done. Rift is a game that is polished already and ready to play. The Devs should be congratulated for releasing someting in a "finished" state that is fully playable and enjoyable from day 1. |
|
|
2/14/11 7:08:14 AM#22
Originally posted by khameleon That is a lot of assuming on your part.Unless you've played both games mentioned for an appropriate time your just as guilty of prejudging a game base don yoru own bias as people who say "Rift is gonna fail because it's nto different enough and/or a thempark". |
|
|
2/14/11 7:11:28 AM#23
Originally posted by khameleon I played both Rift and Xyson in beta, for an equal amount of time, and I found Xyson quite refreshing, and a nice change of pace from the same old. My money went there. Is it as polished as Rift? Nope, but I found it a lot more entertaining. Does it need more work? Yup. But it brings some of the online world feeling back for me. Is it for everyone? definetly not. But then again, either is Rift. |
|
|
2/14/11 7:13:17 AM#24
Rift is the best themepark available on the market today. It brings two aspects that have been sorely missed in this sub genre since Wow was introduced. A flexible class system and group play outside of instances. Sadly that simply isn't enough for someone like me. But it is a step in the right direction.
Ultima ONline (3 Years) |
|
|
2/14/11 7:21:31 AM#25
God there are alot of threads like theese.
It's easy really, "fun" is subjective, if you don't like Rift don't play it, and if you do like it play it.
I'm personally going to play it, I don't and can't judge a game on a beta, let's take your favourite game and imagine how much you would never discover if you played it on a limited content beta for a weekend, it does not give any real room to fully judge a game.
For all we know, the endgame in Rift could be the best ever seen in the "oldschool" mmo department, or it could suck bigtime, one thing is for sure though, I can't rely on other people's judgement to decide wether I would find it fun or not.
All in all I can't remember any mmo I enjoyed, where the first few days were the highlight of the game, and I don't expect Rift to be any different. I will pick up SWTOR when it comes out and probably stick to that, unless the endgame in Rift is amazing, I guess I'm personally getting abit sick of elves, fireballs and all the d&d inspired mmo's. |
|
|
2/14/11 7:29:11 AM#26
Originally posted by Fibbin 8 if ya want one on each faction. |
|
|
2/14/11 7:37:36 AM#27
Originally posted by Drakynn I have tried Xsyon and it is not a game, not even an alpha game yet. For anyone that is interested you can get a realistic view of what the game is from this post: http://www.mmorpg.com/gamelist.cfm/game/514/view/forums/thread/307188/Xsyon-player-since-april-2010-a-friendly-warning.html Buying Xsyon is like buying a car from a company with $100 in their pocket and where the car has no wheels, no engine and is just the body and interior where you can turn the steerin wheel and dream about how nice this car would be if it was ever finished and if the makers ever had enough money to make their vision come true. That game will never be finished, it is like many other indie/sandbox projects that rip people off for their vision and ideas. They cannot realistically make a full game and are just making money off desperate gamers looking for sandbox gameplay. They know how easily these people fall for these games by looking at how people waited 6-7 years on forums for darkfal saying it would be the almighty game of the century, then it turned out to be a flop. Then mortal cae around, same people fall for it again and spend money no an alpha project. Go spend money on it, you wil never have a real game there even if you ait 5 years. RIFT is a polished GAME already even in beta. It is not a sandbox, it is not going to let you raise land and have all the freedom of a sandbox, but it is a finished project, ready for release and the developers have put in a lot of work and delivered something to gamers that is rarely done in this industry,. A game that is ready to enjoy from day 1. |
|
|
2/14/11 7:43:59 AM#28
As polished as Rift is, it isn t a fun game for everyone. Who cares if it s great from day 1 as far as polish goes. If you re not having fun then whats the point. I can t justify paying any money for it, as it is right now. |
|
Originally posted by khameleon Just because for the long term it isn't expensive doesn't mean it is good. I would pay for something 10x more if it was 10x more fun to play. Poor logic you have going over there. |
|
|
2/14/11 8:23:12 AM#30
Originally posted by grunt187 8 is irrelevant. Only 4 is. Somebody playing on the Guardian side is not going to notice somebody making an alt on Defiant side. It's not relevant to my speculation that the low/mid-end content will be desolated earlier than other MMOs because of that. Not to mention if somebody wants to create a Defiant character, they will most likely create just 1 which is their favorite build from the opposite side The fact you can create 4 on each side doesn't solve that problem. You see other games has 7 or 8 classes pr faction (WAR has 12?) greatly increasing the reasons to create alts. You see when you have a main character you spend the majority of the time on then having 1 or 3 other toons to divide your time on. You are going to end up levelling them all up past a certain point a lot faster than if you had a reason to play 6 or 7 alts.
Obviously not everybody creates 6 or 7 alts in a MMO but the altoholics will. In Rift you have less of a reason to create one. I'll give you an example. I like making alts. But i don't like playing Warriors or Clerics. I prefer casters and rogues. That means I only have to create 2 characters. A rogue and a mage.
Because of that I do fear that people playing the game won't mingle with new players. That the game will be top heavy with no need to create alts to play with new players. Sure you can make alts to try out new racials, new looks and new races but lets be honest. The % of people creating cloned classes because they want a different look is pretty small to the point where it doesn't matter
It may or may not become an issue but I can easily see it happen with the current system. A good fix for it would be to limit the freedom a bit. Only allow X amount of souls pr calling like 4 |
|
|
2/14/11 8:31:12 AM#31
Originally posted by Fibbin He does have a point about Altaholics,ther eis a sizeable faction of players who enjoy making characters and trying different class specs with them.Rift at this stage isn't gonna satisfy that demogrpahic for long.That demographic is one of the only ones that a game like Champions Online serveres better. |
|
|
2/14/11 8:44:10 AM#32
I see this game as being the game to play, FOR THE MOMENT, if you're just flat out sick of the MMO world you're currently playing in. If you can't not have at least one MMO to play at any given time, and you're sick to death of Azeroth/Middle Earth/EQ, etc., then this is the next game to play for a while as you wait for the next big thing to come along. |
|
|
2/14/11 8:53:31 AM#33
im on the fence on this. Never thought I would see a game where I couldnt make my mind up right away. I got 1 more beta to push me to either side.
Theres ALOT of cool single player games coming out until SWTOR and GW2 however....
|
|
|
2/14/11 9:52:06 AM#34
Originally posted by Calibanvov Yeah, thinking the same here.
|
|
|
Tardcore
Hard Core Member
Joined: 9/13/09
"A strange game. The only winning move is not to post." |
2/14/11 1:24:48 PM#35
Originally posted by khameleon Totally agree on Earthrise, not so sure about Xsyon. I'm not playing nor was my intent to support either game. I was simply pointing out that these and other gaming forums always seem to go quiet for few days when a new game has been released.
I saw a guy wearing a t-shirt that read "I'm with Stupid" . . . he was alone. Dark Pony for Pope. |
|
2/14/11 1:59:40 PM#36
Originally posted by SaintViktor This is classic MMO Burnout ^^^ Everyone is looking for the game that originally captured them, but you will never get that experience again. Sorry - we are all in the same boat with that. |
|
|
2/15/11 2:03:26 AM#37
I leveled to 48 in beta, only because I had a partner. Beyond level 20 you will need a group or at least a good partner.. The journey was enjoyable, but nothing better than most MMOs you will play. It certainly isn't ground breaking, in my opinion. I'm looking forward to other games. |
|
|
2/15/11 2:14:38 AM#38
Originally posted by Brynn Are we still talking about Rift? Are you an alpha tester? 35 was very much soloable (rifts groups excluded of course). |
|
|
2/15/11 2:30:21 AM#39
Originally posted by Brynn Thats funny considering the level cap was just increased to 42 this beta so are you sure your playing rift |
|
|
2/15/11 2:33:00 AM#40
The news of a possible implementation of a cross server auto tool put me back on the fense. I'll still play the first month, anything beyond that though is up in the air. |
|