Trending Games | Elder Scrolls Online | Albion Online | World of Warcraft | WildStar

  Network:  FPSguru RTSguru
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist Jump to Random Game
Members:2,737,148 Users Online:0
Games:714  Posts:6,176,503
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum
A-C
2029 Online 2112: Revolution 2Moons 4Story 8BitMMO 9 Dragons A Mystical Land A Tale in the Desert III A3 ACE Online ARGO Online Aberoth Absolute Force Online Absolute Terror Achaea Adellion Aerrevan Aetolia, the Midnight Age Age of Armor Age of Conan Age of Empires Online Age of Mourning Age of Wulin Age of Wushu Aida Arenas Aika Aion Albion Online Alganon All Points Bulletin (APB) Allods Online Altis Gates Amazing World Anarchy Online Ancients of Fasaria Andromeda 5 Angels Online Anime Trumps Anmynor Anno Online Applo Arcane Hearts Arcane Legends ArchLord ArcheAge Archeblade Archlord X Asda 2 Asda Story Ashen Empires Asheron's Call Asheron's Call 2 Astera Online Astonia III Astro Empires Astro Lords: Oort CLoud Asura Force Atlantica Online Atriarch Aura Kingdom Aurora Blade Auto Assault Avatar Star Battle Dawn Battle Dawn Galaxies Battle for Graxia Battle of 3 Kingdoms Battle of the Immortals Battlecruiser Online Battlestar Galactica Online Battlestar Reloaded Beyond Protocol Black Aftermath Black Desert Black Gold Black Prophecy Black Prophecy Tactics: Nexus Conflict Blacklight Retribution Blade & Soul Blade Hunter Blade Wars Blazing Throne Bless Blitz 1941 Blood and Jade Bloodlines Champions Bounty Bay Online Brain Storm Brawl Busters. Brick-Force Bright Shadow Bullet Run Business Tycoon Online CTRacer Cabal Online Caesary Call of Camelot Call of Gods Call of Thrones Camelot Unchained Canaan Online Cardmon Hero Cartoon Universe CasinoRPG Castle Empire Castlot Celtic Heroes Champions Online Champions of Regnum Chaos Online Chrono Tales Citadel of Sorcery CitiesXL Citizen Zero City of Decay City of Heroes City of Steam City of Transformers City of Villains Civilization Online Clan Lord Clash of Clans Cloud Nine Club Penguin Colony of War Command & Conquer: Tiberium Alliances Company of Heroes Online Conquer Online Conquer Online 3 Continent of the Ninth (C9) Core Blaze Core Exiles Corum Online Craft of Gods Crimecraft Crimelife 2 Cronous Crota II Crusaders of Solaris Cultures Online Cyber Monster 2 Céiron Wars
D-F
D&D Online DC Universe DK Online DOTA DOTA 2 DUST 514 DV8: Exile Dalethaan Dance Groove Online Dark Age of Camelot Dark Ages Dark Legends Dark Orbit Dark Relic: Prelude Dark Solstice Dark and Light DarkEden Online DarkSpace Darkblood Online Darkest Dungeon Darkfall Darkfall: Unholy Wars Darkwind: War on Wheels Das Tal Dawn of Fantasy Dawntide DayZ Dead Earth Dead Frontier Deco Online Deepworld Defiance Deicide Online Dekaron Demons at the Horizon Desert Operations Destiny Diablo 3 Diamonin Digimon Battle Dino Storm Disciple Divergence Divina Divine Souls Dofus Dominus Online Dragon Ball Online Dragon Born Online Dragon Crusade Dragon Empires Dragon Eternity Dragon Nest Dragon Oath Dragon Pals Dragon Raja Dragon's Call Dragon's Call II Dragon's Prophet DragonSky DragonSoul Dragona Dragonica Dragons and Titans Dream of Mirror Online Dreamland Online Dreamlords: The Reawakening Drift City Duels Dungeon Blitz Dungeon Fighter Online Dungeon Overlord Dungeon Party Dungeon Rampage Dungeon Runners Dynastica Dynasty Warriors Online Dynasty of the Magi EIN (Epicus Incognitus) EVE Online Earth Eternal Earth and Beyond Earthrise Eclipse War Ecol Tactics Online Eden Eternal Edge of Space Einherjar - The Viking's Blood Elder Scrolls Online Eldevin Elf Online Elite: Dangerous Embers of Caerus Emil Chronicle Online Empire Empire & State Empire Craft Empire Universe 3 EmpireQuest Empires of Galldon End of Nations Endless Ages Endless Blue Moon Online Endless Online Entropia Universe EpicDuel Erebus: Travia Reborn Eredan Eternal Blade Eternal Lands Eternal Saga Ether Fields Ether Saga Online Eudemons Online EuroGangster EverEmber Online EverQuest Next EverQuest Online Adventures Evernight Everquest Everquest II Evony Exarch Exorace F.E.A.R. Online Face of Mankind Fairyland Online Fall of Rome Fallen Earth Fallen Sword Fallout Online Family Guy Online Fantage Fantasy Earth Zero Fantasy Realm Online Fantasy Tales Online Fantasy Worlds: Rhynn Faunasphere Faxion Online Ferentus Ferion Fiesta Online Final Fantasy XI Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn Firefall Fists of Fu Florensia Flyff Football Manager Live Football Superstars Force of Arms Forge Forsaken World Fortnite Fortuna Forum for Discussion of Everlight Freaky Creatures Free Realms Freesky Online Freeworld Fung Wan Online Furcadia Fury Fusion Fall
G-L
GalaXseeds Galactic Command Online Game of Thrones: Seven Kingdoms Gameglobe Gate To Heavens Gates of Andaron Gatheryn Gauntlet Gekkeiju Online Ghost Online Ghost Recon Online Gladiatus Glitch Global Agenda Global Soccer Gloria Victis Glory of Gods GoGoRacer Goal Line Blitz Gods and Heroes GodsWar Online Golemizer Golf Star GoonZu Online Graal Kingdoms Granado Espada Online Grand Chase Grand Fantasia Grepolis Grimlands Guild Wars Guild Wars 2 Guild Wars Factions Guild Wars Nightfall H1Z1 Habbo Hotel Hailan Rising HaloSphere2 Haven & Hearth Hawken Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft Helbreath Hellgate Hellgate: London Hello Kitty Online Hero Online Hero Zero Hero's Journey Hero: 108 Online HeroSmash Heroes & Generals Heroes in the Sky Heroes of Bestia Heroes of Gaia Heroes of Might and Magic Online Heroes of Thessalonica Heroes of Three Kingdoms Heroes of the Storm Hex Holic Online Hostile Space Hunter Blade Huxley Illutia Illyriad Immortals USA Imperator Imperian Inferno Legend Infestation: Survivor Stories Infinite Crisis Infinity Infinity Iris Online Iron Grip: Marauders Irth Worlds Island Forge Islands of War Istaria: Chronicles of the Gifted Jade Dynasty Jagged Alliance Online Juggernaut Jumpgate Jumpgate Evolution KAL Online Kakele Online Kaos War Karos Online Kartuga Kicks Online King of Kings 3 Kingdom Heroes Kingdom Under Fire II Kingdom of Drakkar Kingory Kings and Legends Kings of the Realm KingsRoad Kitsu Saga Kiwarriors Knight Age Knight Online Knights of Dream City Kothuria Kung Foo! Kunlun Online L.A.W. LEGO Universe La Tale Land of Chaos Online Landmark Lands of Hope: Phoenix Edition LastChaos League of Angels League of Legends - Clash of Fates Legend of Edda: Vengeance Legend of Golden Plume Legend of Katha Legend of Mir 2 Legend of Mir 3 Legendary Champions Lego Minifigures Online Life is Feudal Light of Nova Lime Odyssey Line of Defense Lineage Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance Lineage II Linkrealms Loong Online Lord of the Rings Online Lords Online Lost Saga Lucent Heart Lunia Lusternia: Age of Ascension Luvinia World
M-Q
MU Online Mabinogi Maestia: Rise of Keledus MagiKnights Magic Barrage Magic World Online Manga Fighter MapleStory Martial Heroes Marvel Heroes Marvel Super Hero Squad Online Marvel: Avengers Alliance MechWarrior Online Megaten Meridian 59 : Evolution Merlin MetalMercs Metaplace Metin 2 MicroVolts Midkemia Online Might & Magic Heroes: Kingdoms MilMo Minecraft Mini Fighter Minions of Mirth Ministry of War Monato Esprit Monkey King Online Monkey Quest Monster & Me Monster Madness Online MonsterMMORPG Moonlight Online: Tales of Eternal Blood Mordavia Mortal Online Mourning My Lands Myst Online: URU Live Myth Angels Online Myth War Myth War 2 Mytheon Mythic Saga Mythos N.E.O Online NIDA Online Nadirim Naviage: The Power of Capital Navy Field Need for Speed World Nemexia Neo's Land NeoSteam Neocron Nether Neverwinter Nexus: The Kingdom Of The Winds NinjaTrick NosTale Novus Aeterno Oberin Odin Quest Odyssey RPG Ogre Island Omerta 3 Online Boxing Manager Onverse Order & Chaos Online Order of Magic Original Blood Origins Return Origins of Malu Orion's Belt Otherland Forums OverSoul Overkings Oz Online Oz World Pandora Saga Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Panzar Parabellum Parallel Kingdom Parfait Station Path of Exile Pathfinder Online Perfect World Perpetuum Online Phantasy Star Online 2 Phantasy Star Universe Phoenix Dynasty Online Phylon Pi Story Picaroon Pirate Galaxy Pirate Storm Pirate101 PirateKing Online Pirates of the Burning Sea Pirates of the Caribbean Online Pixie Hollow Planeshift Planet Arkadia Planet Calypso PlanetSide 2 Planetside Planets³ Playboy Manager Pocket Legends Pockie Ninja Pockie Pirates Pockie Saints PoxNora Prime World Prime: Battle for Dominus Priston Tale Priston Tale II Prius Online Project Blackout Project Powder Project Titan Forums Project Wiki Puzzle Pirates Quickhit Football
R-S
R2 Online RAN Online RF Online ROSE Online Rage of 3 Kingdoms Ragnarok Online Ragnarok Online II RaiderZ Rakion Rappelz RappelzSEA Ravenmarch Realm Fighter Realm of the Mad God Realm of the Titans Realms Online Reclamation Red Stone Red War: Edem's Curse Regnum Online Remnant Knights Renaissance Repulse Requiem: Memento Mori Rift RiotZone Rise Rise of Dragonian Era Rise of Empire Rise of the Tycoon Rising of King Risk Your Life Rivality Rockfree Rohan: Blood Feud Role Play Worlds Roll n Rock Roma Victor Romadoria Rosh Online Roto X Rubies of Eventide Ruin Online Rumble Fighter Runes of Magic Runescape Rust Rusty Hearts Ryzom S4 League SAGA SD Gundam Capsule Fighter Online SMITE SUN Sagramore Salem SaySayGirls Scarlet Blade Scions of Fate Seal Online: Evolution Second Life Secret of the Solstice Seed Serenia Fantasy Seven Seas Saga Seven Souls Online Sevencore Shadow of Legend Shadowbane Shadowrun Online Shaiya Shards Online Shattered Galaxy Sho Online Shot Online Shroud of the Avatar SideQuest Siege on Stars Sigonyth: Desert Eternity Silkroad Online Skyblade Skyforge SmashMuck Champions Smoo Online Soldier Front Soul Master Soul Order Online Soul of Guardian Space Heroes Universe Sparta: War of Empires Spellcasters Sphere Spiral Knights Spirit Tales Splash Fighters Squad Wars Star Citizen Star Sonata 2 Star Stable Star Supremacy Star Trek Online Star Trek: Infinite Space Star Wars Galaxies Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures Star Wars: The Old Republic StarQuest Online Stargate Worlds Starlight Story Starpires State of Decay SteelWar Online Stone Age 2 Stormfall: Age of War Storybricks Stronghold Kingdoms Sudden Attack Supremacy 1914 Supreme Destiny Sword Girls Sword of Destiny: Rise of Aions SwordX Swords of Heavens Swordsman
T-Z
TERA TS Online Tabula Rasa Tactica Online Tales Runner Tales of Fantasy Tales of Pirates Tales of Pirates II Tales of Solaris Talisman Online Tamer Saga Tank Ace Tantra Online Tatsumaki: Land at War Terra Militaris TerraWorld Online Thang Online The 4th Coming The Agency The Aurora World The Black Watchmen The Chronicle The Chronicles of Spellborn The Crew The Division The Hammers End The Legend of Ares The Lost Titans The Matrix Online The Mighty Quest for Epic Loot The Missing Ink The Mummy Online The Myth of Soma The Pride of Taern The Realm Online The Repopulation The Secret World The Sims Online The Strategems The West Theralon There Therian Saga Thrones of Chaos Tibia Tibia Micro Edition Tiger Knight Titan Siege Titans of Time Toontown Online Top Speed Topia Online Torchlight Total Domination Transformers Universe Traveller AR Travia Online Travian Trials of Ascension Tribal Hero Tribal Wars Tribes Universe Trickster Online Trove Troy Online True Fantasy Live Online Turf Battles Twelve Sky Twelve Sky 2 Twilight War Tynon U.B. Funkeys UFO Online URDEAD Online Ultima Forever: Quest for the Avatar Ultima Online Ultima X: Odyssey Ultimate Naruto Ultimate Soccer Boss Uncharted Waters Online Undercover 2: Merc Wars Underlight Unification Wars Universe Online Utopia Valkyrie Sky Vampire Lord Online Vanguard: Saga of Heroes Vanquish Space Vector City Racers Vendetta Online Victory - Age of Racing Vindictus Virtonomics Vis Gladius Visions of Zosimos VoidExpanse Voyage Century Online W.E.L.L. Online WAR (Warhammer Online) WAR2 Glory WYD Global Wakfu War Thunder War of 2012 War of Angels War of Legends War of Mercenaries War of Thrones War of the Immortals WarFlow Waren Story Wargame1942 Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade Warhammer 40K: Dark Millennium Online Warhammer Online: Wrath of Heroes Warkeepers Warrior Epic Wartune WebLords Wild West Online WildStar Wind of Luck WindSlayer 2 Wings of Destiny Wish Wizard101 Wizardry Online Wizards and Champions Wonder King Wonderland Online World Golf Tour World of Battles World of Darkness World of Heroes World of Kung Fu World of Pirates World of Speed World of Tanks World of Tanks Generals World of Warcraft World of Warplanes World of Warships World of the Living Dead WorldAlpha Wurm Online Xenocell Xiah Xsyon Xulu YS Online Yitien ZU Online Zentia Zero Online Zero Online: The Andromeda Crisis Zodiac Online Zombies Ate My Pizza eRepublik

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

General Discussion

General Discussion 

The Pub at MMORPG.COM  » The 'Group Play vs Solo Play in an MMO' Thread

105 Pages First « 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 » Last Search
2099 posts found
  SpliceMain

Novice Member

Joined: 7/15/10
Posts: 14

10/31/10 8:10:51 AM#761
I played WoW for over 3 years.  I took 5 toons to 70.  I enjoyed it.  These characters could support one another via crafting.  Of course, I had to farm the mats either to use myself or to sell in the AH. But guess what would happen (often) when I went out to farm drops from mobs?  One single player with a raid or pvp geared toon could clear an area faster than I could take down a mob or 2!  We were both 70s but the gear discrepancy was enormous.  Maybe these players need the gear in PVP or raid instances.  I don’t care if they do or don’t.  But they don’t need it in the world at large any more than the group-centric players say that I do.  Yet there they were, grossly out performing me while competing for materials.  So yeah, I needed the best gear in order to compete while farming. 
 
I reject the notion that a solo player getting the best gear insults or cheapens the “achievements” of raiders.  The “reward” for raiding is the raid content itself!  Do it for the fun!  So what if I get great gear by other means?  How does that affect a raider’s experience?  It doesn’t. 
 
I talked about players I called “loot conscripts” back in July.  No one has discussed my assertion that it is a desire to recruit and retain these “loot conscripts” by guilds that constitutes the primary reason for keeping the best gear unavailable to solo players.  The loot conscripts wouldn’t raid if they didn’t have to in order to get the gear they want.  They might elect to go solo instead, thereby reducing the bodies needed to fill raid slots.  The guild leaders might enjoy the content for its own sake ( the best of all reasons for raiding) but can’t rely on finding enough others willing put up with the tedium and trouble inherent in raids without the allure of exclusive loot.  To wit. exclusive loot helps to coerce players into playing a style they otherwise might abandon.  How bankrupt is that?   Fess up, you grouping field marshal types!  Admit that you rely on loot conscripts! Admit that without exclusive loot you fear that your favorite playstyle is doomed!      
 
I don’t think raiding is doomed by great loot for solo players.  Solo and group players seldom encounter one another in the world.  No one on my old server would have been injured at all if I could have made or purchased the best gear. 
  UsualSuspect

Elite Member

Joined: 11/01/04
Posts: 1212

11/01/10 3:16:23 AM#762
Originally posted by SpliceMain
I played WoW for over 3 years.  I took 5 toons to 70.  I enjoyed it.  These characters could support one another via crafting.  Of course, I had to farm the mats either to use myself or to sell in the AH. But guess what would happen (often) when I went out to farm drops from mobs?  One single player with a raid or pvp geared toon could clear an area faster than I could take down a mob or 2!  We were both 70s but the gear discrepancy was enormous.  Maybe these players need the gear in PVP or raid instances.  I don’t care if they do or don’t.  But they don’t need it in the world at large any more than the group-centric players say that I do.  Yet there they were, grossly out performing me while competing for materials.  So yeah, I needed the best gear in order to compete while farming. 
 
I reject the notion that a solo player getting the best gear insults or cheapens the “achievements” of raiders.  The “reward” for raiding is the raid content itself!  Do it for the fun!  So what if I get great gear by other means?  How does that affect a raider’s experience?  It doesn’t. 

Aww, that's a sad story. The person who had taken the effort to gather 20 other people and had fought challenges you won't even bother attempting is better than you? Wow, who would have thought it.. It's like an unemployed person whining because that rich dude has a Ferarri and he doesn't. We should all be given a Ferarri, it wouldn't cheapen that rich dudes achievements, no, the reward should be the work he did! Why shouldn't I get a Ferarri while on unemployment benefits?

This is one of the main things I see from soloers, considering the posts all along this thread, they're inherently selfish. Groupers want to help their fellow players to gather gear and experience. Soloers want it all for themselves, and if they can't get it for themselves then they'll just whine, "Whyyyy?!".

  SwampRob

Novice Member

Joined: 9/05/07
Posts: 1009

11/01/10 8:56:24 AM#763
Originally posted by UsualSuspect

This is one of the main things I see from soloers, considering the posts all along this thread, they're inherently selfish. Groupers want to help their fellow players to gather gear and experience. Soloers want it all for themselves, and if they can't get it for themselves then they'll just whine, "Whyyyy?!".

Oh, please.    Groupers want to help their fellow players?       The majority of groupers only group up because the game requires them to do so to get the gear they want.    These people don't care about what their fellow players get, they group solely as a means to an end.   Do you honestly believe otherwise?

Also, since you're pro-grouping and grouping currently offers the best endgame rewards, OF COURSE you want the status quo to continue, because it benefits your playstyle the most.    But soloers are selfish?

Look, as I stated in another post:    At endgame, groupers get progressively more difficult content resulting in progressively better rewards.     That's all most soloers want.   Progressive content that rewards their playstyle in the same way.   

And the real kicker is that most games let them do that until the endgame, and then forces them to become groupers to continue to get the same treatment.      Soloers want their playstyle to be treated and rewarded equally to groupers, where most groupers want their playstyle to be rewarded with superior loot.     But, soloers are the ones being selfish, right?

*Sorry about the large font, my eyes aren't what they used to be.

  User Deleted
11/01/10 9:06:33 AM#764
Originally posted by UsualSuspect
Originally posted by SpliceMain
I played WoW for over 3 years.  I took 5 toons to 70.  I enjoyed it.  These characters could support one another via crafting.  Of course, I had to farm the mats either to use myself or to sell in the AH. But guess what would happen (often) when I went out to farm drops from mobs?  One single player with a raid or pvp geared toon could clear an area faster than I could take down a mob or 2!  We were both 70s but the gear discrepancy was enormous.  Maybe these players need the gear in PVP or raid instances.  I don’t care if they do or don’t.  But they don’t need it in the world at large any more than the group-centric players say that I do.  Yet there they were, grossly out performing me while competing for materials.  So yeah, I needed the best gear in order to compete while farming. 
 
I reject the notion that a solo player getting the best gear insults or cheapens the “achievements” of raiders.  The “reward” for raiding is the raid content itself!  Do it for the fun!  So what if I get great gear by other means?  How does that affect a raider’s experience?  It doesn’t. 

Aww, that's a sad story. The person who had taken the effort to gather 20 other people and had fought challenges you won't even bother attempting is better than you? Wow, who would have thought it.. It's like an unemployed person whining because that rich dude has a Ferarri and he doesn't. We should all be given a Ferarri, it wouldn't cheapen that rich dudes achievements, no, the reward should be the work he did! Why shouldn't I get a Ferarri while on unemployment benefits?

This is one of the main things I see from soloers, considering the posts all along this thread, they're inherently selfish. Groupers want to help their fellow players to gather gear and experience. Soloers want it all for themselves, and if they can't get it for themselves then they'll just whine, "Whyyyy?!".

 These are the type of generalizations that start flame wars but I'm not going to bite on this one myself.  I am a "soloer" and I take offense at the implication that I am that way because I am a selfish player as much as I take offense in the implication that people who group for raid content do it to help each other, they do it to help themselves to the fat loot that isn't attainable solo.

I enjoy grouping in setting that I like to play in which is generally in the more faster paced solo contentm, I may spend five hours in one session but I loathe to spend that five hours in one setting or dungeon nothing more nothing less.

Using LOTRO as an example I recently entered Mirkwood for the first time (as I have enjoyed the game so much I didn't rush to it) and during the first two quest hubs I moved along at a thouroughly brisk pace to move further inland and at both of the first two hubs I went through I encountered a few lower level players that I saw were on the way to try and tackle the content I just had went through, knowing the difficulty they would encounter I offered to group up with them to help them out.  As I moed along slicing through the enemies we faced they finally noticed I was not interacting with any of the quest objects to ask "do you not have this quest" and my response was "no I just got done with these but seeing as how I was level 61 when I started them I knew the trouble you might face soloing this".  I've made a couple of friends for life now, and that doesn't sound like selfishness to me.

  UsualSuspect

Elite Member

Joined: 11/01/04
Posts: 1212

11/01/10 1:20:43 PM#765
Originally posted by SwampRob

Oh, please.    Groupers want to help their fellow players?       The majority of groupers only group up because the game requires them to do so to get the gear they want.    These people don't care about what their fellow players get, they group solely as a means to an end.   Do you honestly believe otherwise?

Also, since you're pro-grouping and grouping currently offers the best endgame rewards, OF COURSE you want the status quo to continue, because it benefits your playstyle the most.    But soloers are selfish?

Look, as I stated in another post:    At endgame, groupers get progressively more difficult content resulting in progressively better rewards.     That's all most soloers want.   Progressive content that rewards their playstyle in the same way.   

And the real kicker is that most games let them do that until the endgame, and then forces them to become groupers to continue to get the same treatment.      Soloers want their playstyle to be treated and rewarded equally to groupers, where most groupers want their playstyle to be rewarded with superior loot.     But, soloers are the ones being selfish, right?

I'll agree with you, in the more recent games, pretty much anything from WoW onwards, grouping only occurs so people can get what they want. The reason for that is purely because of the massive amount of solo content that these games have now - you can solo from 1 to MAX without ever even looking at another player. So of course, when it comes to grouping most people are going to see it as frustrating or a means to an end, nothing more, because they've spent the entire game on their own up unitl that point.

Soloing, and more importantly content that allows soloing for almost the entire game, kills communities stone dead. When you look back at a game like EverQuest that almost required grouping all through the game, you'll see that people enjoy grouping with others, offer help in dungeons or quests for no other reason than to help someone out, selfish only appeared with the rise of soloers.

So are groupers really selfish? Groupers want to keep group content because they see how it makes an impact on the community of a game. If you have no community in an MMO then it's a purely shallow experience as the gameplay is never as good as a single player game. It's the people that make it great.

  UsualSuspect

Elite Member

Joined: 11/01/04
Posts: 1212

11/01/10 1:23:14 PM#766
Originally posted by jaxsundane

Using LOTRO as an example I recently entered Mirkwood for the first time (as I have enjoyed the game so much I didn't rush to it) and during the first two quest hubs I moved along at a thouroughly brisk pace to move further inland and at both of the first two hubs I went through I encountered a few lower level players that I saw were on the way to try and tackle the content I just had went through, knowing the difficulty they would encounter I offered to group up with them to help them out.  As I moed along slicing through the enemies we faced they finally noticed I was not interacting with any of the quest objects to ask "do you not have this quest" and my response was "no I just got done with these but seeing as how I was level 61 when I started them I knew the trouble you might face soloing this".  I've made a couple of friends for life now, and that doesn't sound like selfishness to me.

I fail to see your point. So you're a soloer but when you did decide to group and help out some people, you made a couple of friends 'for life'. If you were soloing the entire time you wouldn't have met or teamed with these people, but because you grouped friendships have formed and you had a good time.

I fail to see how this means soloing is the better option?

  mmogawd

Apprentice Member

Joined: 10/18/10
Posts: 763

<Insert Witty Remark Here>

11/01/10 1:25:01 PM#767
Originally posted by UsualSuspect
Originally posted by jaxsundane

Using LOTRO as an example I recently entered Mirkwood for the first time (as I have enjoyed the game so much I didn't rush to it) and during the first two quest hubs I moved along at a thouroughly brisk pace to move further inland and at both of the first two hubs I went through I encountered a few lower level players that I saw were on the way to try and tackle the content I just had went through, knowing the difficulty they would encounter I offered to group up with them to help them out.  As I moed along slicing through the enemies we faced they finally noticed I was not interacting with any of the quest objects to ask "do you not have this quest" and my response was "no I just got done with these but seeing as how I was level 61 when I started them I knew the trouble you might face soloing this".  I've made a couple of friends for life now, and that doesn't sound like selfishness to me.

I fail to see your point. So you're a soloer but when you did decide to group and help out some people, you made a couple of friends 'for life'. If you were soloing the entire time you wouldn't have met or teamed with these people, but because you grouped friendships have formed and you had a good time.

I fail to see how this means soloing is the better option?

I think his point is that he grouped up BY CHOICE, and made friends for life.  He didn't group up because he was forced to in order to get some shiny piece of armor.

This is a recurring point that is made in this thread that is ignored by "groupers".

  Gutlard

Apprentice Member

Joined: 10/20/10
Posts: 38

11/01/10 1:32:13 PM#768

Nah, I like the thread I posted in better....

 

Gutlard Out!

What, me worry?

  UsualSuspect

Elite Member

Joined: 11/01/04
Posts: 1212

11/01/10 1:35:51 PM#769
Originally posted by mmogawd

I think his point is that he grouped up BY CHOICE, and made friends for life.  He didn't group up because he was forced to in order to get some shiny piece of armor.

This is a recurring point that is made in this thread that is ignored by "groupers".

If the argument against grouping is that it's purely there to gather gear, then sure, I'll agree with you, it sucks. The point is, it should never be about that, MMO's should not be soloable from start to end with a little bit of grouping for extra equipment. I don't know about the rest of the pro-groupers but that, to me, sounds awful. Grouping should be a part of the game as a whole, so people get used to the idea of working together, be it for a little experience or to finish quests. Let the community grow through interaction with your fellow players, not through global chat about the latest X-Box game and how great Chuck Norris is.

I think the large majority of pro-soloers started their MMO lives with World of Warcraft, and if that's true then I can truly understand the bitterness against grouping. MMO's from WoW onwards have been plain awful when it comes to integrating grouping, I haven't found one worth a damn (except a few golden moments in LOTRO) since EverQuest.

  SpliceMain

Novice Member

Joined: 7/15/10
Posts: 14

11/01/10 1:38:08 PM#770
Usual Suspect, you should know better than to rely on the old, worn out arguments that compare a game to Real Life.  This is a GAME!  It can be fair, unlike life, which manifestly is not.  We all pay the same money to play.  Still RL isn’t such a good example for you.  In your analogy, you assume the Ferrari owner worked hard to earn the car when he might as easily have inherited the money.   Deserving property has no bearing on possessing it in RL, so why should solo players pass some sort of “deserving test” to have good gear in a game? 
 
In an early post someone said grouping was like running a marathon.  He made the argument for solo play not against it!  A marathon is a solo activity.  It might be more fun in the presence of other runners but one need not  group to do it.  The Boston Marathon sounds like solo players in an MMO to me!        
   
Groupers already get all the content.  I concede that group content must be different.  You go to the trouble of getting the group together to do the content!  If this seems like work to you then do something else that is more like play!  Don’t complain to us solo players that your preferred play style is a job.  A game should not reward suffering.  There should be no suffering.  It should be fun all the time.  If you enjoy the guild managing and the attendant workload then stop being a martyr about it.  If getting a group together is troublesome don’t do it.  We solo players know grouping can be a pain.  Stop making groups out to be worthy of some sort of Red Badge of Courage.    
 
Why does a solo player getting great gear offend you, US?  You don’t seem like a loot conscript yourself.  Do you rely on loot conscripts to fill your groups?  Do you fear that they would not help you play if they could solo their way to good gear?  Reducing the available pool of gear seekers is the only downside to a group centric player that I can imagine.  Or is it not enough to get all of the content?  Perhaps you believe “It is not enough that I succeed.  Others must fail”.  This attitude may serve as a balm for those who, like you, choose to endure the hassle of grouping but still need to feel “special” about it.
  
Swamp Rob, we are on the same page.   “ At endgame, groupers get progressively more difficult content resulting in progressively better rewards.     That's all most soloers want.   Progressive content that rewards their playstyle in the same way. “  Amen, brother!   
 
And jaxsundane, I have helped plenty of people the very same way in LotRO.  Sometimes I ride around with exactly that intention.   Selfish!?  There was nothing in it for me except the knowledge that I had helped someone else.      
  UsualSuspect

Elite Member

Joined: 11/01/04
Posts: 1212

11/01/10 3:15:37 PM#771
Originally posted by SpliceMain 
   
Groupers already get all the content.  I concede that group content must be different.  You go to the trouble of getting the group together to do the content!  If this seems like work to you then do something else that is more like play!  Don’t complain to us solo players that your preferred play style is a job.  A game should not reward suffering.  There should be no suffering.  It should be fun all the time.  If you enjoy the guild managing and the attendant workload then stop being a martyr about it.  If getting a group together is troublesome don’t do it.  We solo players know grouping can be a pain.  Stop making groups out to be worthy of some sort of Red Badge of Courage.    

Hey, who, what now?! Groupers get a tiny piece of content in Modern MMO's, the entire levelling stage can be soloed in just about every MMO developed from WoW onwards. The only bit of grouping we get is at the end game, which is usually maybe a dozen raids repeated until the next expansion comes out. So the soloers get 50+ levels of content, the groupers get a dozen or so encounters. Wow, yeah, I can see how they get all the content.

 

Originally posted by SpliceMain
Why does a solo player getting great gear offend you, US?  You don’t seem like a loot conscript yourself.  Do you rely on loot conscripts to fill your groups?  Do you fear that they would not help you play if they could solo their way to good gear?  Reducing the available pool of gear seekers is the only downside to a group centric player that I can imagine.  Or is it not enough to get all of the content?  Perhaps you believe “It is not enough that I succeed.  Others must fail”.  This attitude may serve as a balm for those who, like you, choose to endure the hassle of grouping but still need to feel “special” about it.   

It doesn't offend me that solo players might get the same or equivalent equipment that raiders can get. However, I do think the game as a whole would suffer for it. The gear is basically a carrot on a stick - no, it's not the best design, but it makes sense. A Dragon, for example, would have had many great Knights with powerful equipment trying to kill it, and the more it's fought and won, the bigger the treasure horde it sleeps on. Thus when you kill the dragon, you get a great piece of loot.

As I was saying, gear is a carrot on a stick, it's there to entice people forward. Why take the time and effort to gather 20+ people to battle a Dragon when you can pop over to your favorite crafter and get better? People need incentives. I mean, soloers have the same thing, they level up through the game then hit the level cap, don't want to raid, so quit or restart with a new toon. Why? Because they've run out of incentives to continue. Raids are a way of challenging multiple people while at the same time allowing them to better their characters through more powerful equipment. You'll find that most raids only have a limited number of drops, never enough to cover the total number of players that attended. Why? Because then you have the incentive of trying again next time.

Like I said, it's not the best design, but it works. It keeps people playing and it keeps people interested because they want to get that awesome looking sword with flames all over it, or whatever else it might be. Now turn that into a solo experience and what do you have? A few hours of content at best. If a soloer can go along, beat the top content alone, then get the best equipment from it (or from any other channel), then again they've quickly run out of incentives and quit or restart. All you've done is add a few more hours of content after the levelling game is over. Boost them up to the level of raids and you've got a few hours of content that can last for weeks or even months before you get what you need from them.

I've run into this sort of problem with a game in the past, Lord of the Rings Online. I was loving that game but eventually I ran out of content. There were no more quests for me to complete and the raids offered nothing I needed, so there was no incentive to keep playing. I could pay monthly to log in, chat to some guildies and maybe help a few people with quests, but why would I want to pay to do that? Restarting wasn't an option due to the way the game was built - follow the quest line up to the end. I'd already done it twice.

This is the reason MMO's are designed the way they are, with groups, raids and 'carrot on a stick' content. It's to keep people playing. If that content was entirely soloable then it would come to an end very quickly, there's only so much content that can be developed before you run out of things to do. At that point it would basically be a single player game in a multiplayer environment, you would play through it, get the best stuff, beat the boss, then the credits would roll.

  SpliceMain

Novice Member

Joined: 7/15/10
Posts: 14

11/01/10 7:42:06 PM#772
Yes indeed, players who like to group can do all of the instances in a game like WoW.  They occur throughout the leveling process, not just at end game.  There are many instances.  All content all the time.  That’s what a raider gets to do and I’m cool with it.     
 
“Why take the time and effort to gather 20+ people to battle a Dragon when you can pop over to your favorite crafter and get better?”  How about, because it’s fun to take down the Dragon!  You could get a special moniker for killing him.  There could be a world announcement.  And you would know that players like me will never kill him or maybe even see him!  That surely has some appeal, right?  Still not special enough?   OK, your big sword award could glow a different color than mine.  I might need to kill a hundred lesser dragons by myself over several months to get a similar sword but it would appear mundane compared to your mighty Big Cahuna Dragon sword!  Sounds fair to me.    
  
Why should loot be the primary incentive?  That paradigm is rotten.  You say it’s not the best design but that it works.  Not for me it doesn’t!  Loot has not and never will entice me to raid like a second job.  Or run instances with knuckleheads.  The content should be incentive enough.  Otherwise, aren’t you saying that grouping relies on loot to work?  If it isn’t enough fun then it needs amending.  I agree that end game raiding will extent the playtime of raiders.   PvP extends the playing time of PvPers.  Neither extends the playing time for solo players though. Daily quests can I guess for a while.  But even then the rewards are never so good as end game raiding will yield.  Sooner or later we all reach the end and must begin an alt or quit.  This is true whether solo players can get the best loot or not.  I played for 3 years leveling alts.  Where was my incentive?  It was never loot!  It wasn’t even crafting because the best mats and plans were, you guessed it, in an instance somewhere!  Getting 5 toons to 70 took way more than just a few hours.  I played because I enjoyed the content.  It was a different game playing new classes.   
 
You want a prize for killing the big dragon in a raid?  You’re right, there should be one.  A title or some such thing.  And a big sword too.  All kinds of unique looking loot.  I got no problem with any of that.
 
I should be able to get comparable gear, however.  Different but similar.  Not weaker.  Less prestigious, perhaps.  Equally useful.  If that means that fewer folks will raid, so be it.  This is a game.  In the end, guilds and groups would be stronger without the loot conscripts sulking along just hoping for a rare drop.
 
For the record, I played LotRO for 8 months before hanging it up.  Like you, US, I ran out of content.  That was OK though.  When enough new content gets introduced I’ll go back for a while.  I never felt like a second class citizen gear-wise, either.       
  UsualSuspect

Elite Member

Joined: 11/01/04
Posts: 1212

11/02/10 2:25:08 AM#773
Originally posted by SpliceMain 
Why should loot be the primary incentive?  That paradigm is rotten.  You say it’s not the best design but that it works.  Not for me it doesn’t!  Loot has not and never will entice me to raid like a second job.  Or run instances with knuckleheads.  The content should be incentive enough.  Otherwise, aren’t you saying that grouping relies on loot to work?  If it isn’t enough fun then it needs amending.  I agree that end game raiding will extent the playtime of raiders.   PvP extends the playing time of PvPers.  Neither extends the playing time for solo players though. Daily quests can I guess for a while.  But even then the rewards are never so good as end game raiding will yield.  Sooner or later we all reach the end and must begin an alt or quit.  This is true whether solo players can get the best loot or not.  I played for 3 years leveling alts.  Where was my incentive?  It was never loot!  It wasn’t even crafting because the best mats and plans were, you guessed it, in an instance somewhere!  Getting 5 toons to 70 took way more than just a few hours.  I played because I enjoyed the content.  It was a different game playing new classes.

I agree with you, it isn't the best design, but that's the way MMO's have been designed and will likely be that way for a while to come. The thing is, people like to be awarded for their efforts, that's the way it is in life and it's mirrored in MMO's - take the time and effort to battle through a two hour dungeon full of trash mobs then spend a week working out how to kill a boss mob to be awarded a random drop for one of your 20-30 raid team. Wouldn't you like to be awarded something cool for doing that? Why should one person be awarded a similar reward for doing something alone and, very likely, without a sliver of the risk involved?

That's how it's viewed and I tend to agree that bigger dangers should reap bigger rewards. If not loot then what? At the end of the day, the reward should put them above someone who has never done the encounter or the risk just wouldn't have been worth it.

I'm like you, however, that the content is incentive enough. I used to play a Monk in EverQuest and before later expansions came along, Monk loot was an incredibly rare thing. But I didn't care as I was having a blast. I was usually the puller for the raid, going out, annoying mobs that would likely splat me in two or three hits, and running them back to the raid where everyone would pounce on them. I even ended up pulling a place called Trakanons Cave, which was notoriously difficult, and wrote a strat for it on a Monk website.

For others though, there will always be an incentive to do things for rewards. That's just how people are, especially more recently where people are becoming more greedy and selfish. Content alone just isn't enough, and for some people never has been. Grouping doesn't rely on loot to work though, what it does rely on is the game making it a more viable option.

If there isn't that carrot-on-a-stick then people will always go the path of least resistance to get where they need to be. If grouping isn't part of the core design of a game and soloing is the easier option then people will solo. I've done it myself, I love grouping but in most MMO's there really isn't a need to - either that or the way the game is developed just doesn't make grouping easy. LOTRO for example, could be soloed all the way except for a few side quests such as the Great Barrow. If you wanted to group up for other things then you had to find someone who was on the exact same quest as you, but as quests flew past so quickly that was a task in itself. So rather than bother looking for people for something you didn't need them for anyway, you'd just solo until you got to the Great Barrow, for example, then gather up for that.

On the flip side, EverQuest made content a lot more difficult so grouping was almost a requirement, with only a few classes being able to solo well enough to bother. This got people together more often, usually you'd see the same people day after day, you'd make friends easily, find out who the good and bad players were, travel around together, so grouping just became a natural thing. It wasn't forced, it was just the way things were, and it was fun. I guess that's why to me raiding didn't need loot, it was just a natural progression from grouping with 5 people to grouping with 50.

  RelapsE28

Novice Member

Joined: 10/30/10
Posts: 13

get rich or die try'in

11/02/10 9:26:48 AM#774

Group play vs solo play? Well both are great in mmo's so there should be a balance between the two.  If there is to much group play, solo players will have a hard time playing the game and completing the quests/missions.  However, if there is to much solo play, players can't have the thrill of doing quests/missions together.  Therefore, a mmo should have equal amount of solo and group play.

?RelapsE?

  Benj4min

Novice Member

Joined: 11/01/10
Posts: 19

11/02/10 12:26:06 PM#775

As much as people like to play "solo" I dont see the fun in it.

Why play an online game if you dont play with other people?

The first person to anwser that gets a virtual cookie!

As much as I prefer to play in groups does not mean others shouldnt play on their own. Its up to them at the end of the day I guess.

  SwampRob

Novice Member

Joined: 9/05/07
Posts: 1009

11/02/10 3:00:15 PM#776
Originally posted by Benj4min

As much as people like to play "solo" I dont see the fun in it.

Why play an online game if you dont play with other people?

The first person to anwser that gets a virtual cookie!

As much as I prefer to play in groups does not mean others shouldnt play on their own. Its up to them at the end of the day I guess.

People are still asking this question?

When you play online, are you in a group every moment?

Single player games and MMOs are very different.     For example, you don't see many SP games with crafting.    You see none with auction houses.     MMOs are larger, and continuous.      Single player games tend to have an ending, where MMOs never really end.    Chatting or trading with others are forms of interaction.    Heck, seeing another player or three run by, even if I don't say a word to them, makes the game feel different, by knowing those are real people and not npcs.

The m in mMo means multiplayer, as in many players at the same time.   It does not mean grouping.

One of the problems with the popularity of Wow is that many people now see that as the definition of an MMO.   When Wow was being developed, Blizzard hired longtime EQ players, specifically well-known guild leaders, to come in and help design their game.   Since they were already avid raiders, raiding naturally got the sweetest part of the deal in Wow's loot mechanisms, as well as the most challenging content.

This does not mean that is the way MMOs should or must be, just one way they can be.    What many soloers on here want is an MMO that gives out that challenging content and sweet rewards to all styles of play, instead of withholding the best of both for just one style.

*Sorry about the large font, my eyes aren't what they used to be.

  User Deleted
11/02/10 3:25:27 PM#777

Soloing is inferior in almost all regards. Finding group that will do what you want,when you want, at whatever pace you want, at the skill level you posses and not diluting the rewards is the issue and becomes worse every day. That is why we solo.

Btw, grouping will go stronger again, when we embrace leeching. Leeching is the point of society. So, do you leech?

  Spasticolon

Novice Member

Joined: 6/24/09
Posts: 182

11/10/10 9:28:04 AM#778

Perhaps a solution? On creation of your character you can decide if you want Solo, or Group play, that locks your character into a slot. You can interact, chat, use AH, trade, and all that community stuff, but when it comes time to a Dungeon or Raid the solo character is assigned an NPC squad that follows direction and goes at the pace of the player, and the group character has to hunt for PuG's or use the Guild for Raids to make up the numbers. Both share equally in the content, Solo characters dont have to worry about looing for raids or groups, they have a selection of mercenaries at their disposal, and group characters still get to raid.

Basically everything else works the same except for grouping. At character creation you allocate your preference and your character will stay this way. Would that work?

  Cephus404

Elite Member

Joined: 2/27/08
Posts: 3598

11/11/10 9:53:37 AM#779
Originally posted by Spasticolon

Perhaps a solution? On creation of your character you can decide if you want Solo, or Group play, that locks your character into a slot. You can interact, chat, use AH, trade, and all that community stuff, but when it comes time to a Dungeon or Raid the solo character is assigned an NPC squad that follows direction and goes at the pace of the player, and the group character has to hunt for PuG's or use the Guild for Raids to make up the numbers. Both share equally in the content, Solo characters dont have to worry about looing for raids or groups, they have a selection of mercenaries at their disposal, and group characters still get to raid.

Basically everything else works the same except for grouping. At character creation you allocate your preference and your character will stay this way. Would that work?

In other words, Guild Wars.

Played: UO, EQ, WoW, DDO, SWG, AO, CoH, EvE, TR, AoC, GW, GA, Aion, Allods, lots more
Relatively Recently (Re)Played: HL2 (all), Halo (PC, all), Batman:AA; AC, ME, BS, DA, FO3, DS, Doom (all), LFD1&2, KOTOR, Portal 1&2, Blink, Elder Scrolls (all), lots more
Now Playing: None
Hope: None

  Spasticolon

Novice Member

Joined: 6/24/09
Posts: 182

11/12/10 8:27:59 AM#780
Originally posted by Cephus404

In other words, Guild Wars.

Basically yeah, if both sides are happy with this kind of mechanic being implemented, yeah. The costing of Mercenaries will have to be different though, perhaps a Solo Character gains special Tokens/goodwill with Mercenary groups and can hire from them by taking the mercs along on the run, they can roll on equipment that the PC cannot use, and the PC can roll on them as well, so as to give the solo player a chance at getting some extra coin, but not giving an entire dungeons worth of loot to one person with NPC's vs a group of PC's. Not rolling, or being able to inspect a Merc and telling him to wear the new piece grants bonus points with that mercenary group (Multiple factions may be a horrible timesink to grind), perhaps instead with more Rep with them, you gain access to better mercs as a permium client, you gain rep by using their services, taking them on runs, the coin is split between the NPC's and the PC evenly so that takes care of payment, and any extra loot the PC can choose to roll for, or prompt the NPC to equip the gear for brownie points.

I am getting ahead of myself here. First, would a mechanic like that be suitable for both camps here, Pro-Solo and Pro-Group?

105 Pages First « 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 » Last Search