| 206 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
9/29/10 2:26:19 PM#21
True, it's all just forum play in the end, nothing to be taken that serious About APB, yeah, that's another thing, I'm amazed how quickly MMO games are discarded and abandoned by both gamers and/or companies compared to the early years of MMO's. I've played AoC for a long time and had great fun even while many considered it a fail, and APB from what I've seen must have had the best character customisation tool I've seen in MMO's, their player content generation, the tattoos and prints, was genius. A shame that it got cut off so fast, same as with a Tabula Rasa, or a Vanguard being held on intensive care by SOE and nothing more than that. The ACTUAL size of MMORPG worlds: a comparison list between MMO's |
|
Originally posted by aovannor Your post is sort of what led me to my initial post. I'll be curious to know at some point when we look back how the hype and forums affect everyone's forums posts 3 months after the game is released. I'm speaking about the high hype of GW2 as well and whether when all is said and done it will follow the same fate as Aion, Vanguard, Warhammer, and AOC (which again I think is not a bad game, it just lost my interest). I'm working on a program that will have the magical ability to connect negative posters here to your in game characters in The Old Republic to see who really decided to play after all and how long you really stay with the game lol. |
|
|
9/29/10 2:49:17 PM#23
I've been syaing this for a long time, that this website, at times, seems like 4Chan. There are more negative nay sayers on this site then there are reasonable and objective posters. Unfortnately there is really no other website that offers the depth of mmo information and discussion like mmorpg.com. It's just a shame that there is so much hate sometimes here. It's probably a result of dissapointment over recent mmo releases, which has disnfranchised many gamers. I'm looking forward to SW:TOR. The only criticism, or praise, I'll take to heart is when I can try it for myself. Rely on yourself and your experience, and not nay sayers. |
|
|
9/29/10 2:50:42 PM#24
Every game on this site gets negativity wether it is a good mmo or bad mmo. I think TOR getting some negativity on this site has no effect on how successful it will be or not. |
|
|
9/29/10 2:53:23 PM#25
Originally posted by SnarlingWolf They should copy this, place it in a size 72 Font and stick it dead center of the main site page. For This game, That game or next months game, this is 100% truth. |
|
|
9/29/10 2:56:51 PM#26
Every new announced MMO with hype surrounding it ALWAYS attracts the trolls no matter what.. People have their own definition of the "perfect" MMORPG in their eyes.. And If the MMO they are following doesn't meet up to their expectations, then thats when they begin to bash it and bash those who seem to like how it's shaping up.. It's always been like this...
Now, personally I feel this game sounds more of a glorified single player RPG with multiple player elements or options if you will.. In my personal opinion, that bums me out a bit.. I, like many other people looking for a true sandbox style MMORPG, don't agree with how the mechanics seem to be turning out.. I'm a veteran of true sandbox style MMORPG's, and that's what I personally want to see TOR become.. I want the freedom of doing what I want, when I want, and how I want to go about doing it! I do NOT want to feel as If the game is holding me by the hand guiding me on what's supposed to be my adventurous quest.. I do not want that. If I wanted to play a "structured" RPG, I have a PS3 and I'll go buy Final fantasy 13! Then you have the hardcore fans out there that love bioware games and most of which aren't even that much into traditional sandbox MMO's who bash those for wanting TOR to be a more traditional sandbox MMORPG simply because that's not what they want, LOL.. These fans aren't true mmorpg gamers.. So, this is why you have quite a bit of people on here hating on TOR.. Those that defend Bioware are simply those that don't want to see TOR become a traditional sandbox MMORPG, period..
Oh, then you have those who are just in denial about what the game is truly about. These people are clueless and most of them state what they believe TOR will be based on what other people say and not doing their own research to figure out the truth for themselves, lol. These people are the true trolls. :) Rallithon Oakthornn |
|
|
9/29/10 3:05:02 PM#27
Originally posted by ZenoLoc Really good. We are at point 7 I guess. A honest review of SW:TOR 6/10 (Danny Wojcicki) <--- link fixed |
|
|
9/29/10 3:24:28 PM#28
Originally posted by oakthornn Those two statements don't go together. But this post is an example of negative in a good way. You have an opinion, share it and explain what you would like the add in a bash for good masure. It is not hate post. I like that. And I agree that BW fans will like the class story arc that will be close to a SPG. Minus the save and re-chose if you make a mistake. As a MMO, your choice is final, no going back without re-rolling. I don't agree that the sandbox style MMORPG is the only true MMO. It may be to you and others, but the masses say different. Both styles are viable MMO's in their own way. Just with a different following. And on the last part, there will be open worlds to explore. It was said that you could see a mountain in the distance and be able to go there. Then once there, the devs want to make sure you are rewarded for exploring with content. (Not proven yet with in game footage, just from a dev at E3). “How many people long for that "past, simpler, and better world," I wonder, without ever recognizing the truth that perhaps it was they who were simpler and better, and not the world about them?” |
|
|
Kyleran
Elite Member
Joined: 9/13/06
A simple truth-"What people want and what is good for an mmo is not always the same thing"-mrw0lf |
9/29/10 3:30:09 PM#29
Trolls are imaginary creatures found in fantasy based games, however on these forums there are many people who enjoy posting negative viewpoints, which I consider in the category of "discussion". But if you're seeing trolls everywhere, I must be mistaken. As someone else said, any press is good press and this game really doesn't need any more hype, the entire MMORPG world is pretty much watching for this one. "Just because you aren't paying doesn't mean it's not PTW." - Amaranthar |
|
9/29/10 3:30:32 PM#30
Who is really the blame for the negativity, the game itself or the gamer. I see a new trend in mmo gaming that is some what disappointing. I guess it has alot to do with crossover gamers that were consolers and jumped on the WOW bandwagon and now we have this hybid console/mmo gamer type. We all know to well that consoler gamers will buy every new game that hits the stores and will play them and move on. Pure mmo gamers on the other hand want to live in that virtual world creating and maximizing their toon everday and forever. With that being said, this new gamer like's to create and maximize, but just doesn't have the patience to play the game for a long time. They burn through all the content until max level and then get's bored and moves on to another game. This duality they have is what makes sites like this one get filled with alot of negative posts being made about games that have come out and the new games that are coming out in the future. People that can't find something truly intersting about this game or others will never be satisfied. This holds true not only for gaming but life in general. If i am gong to buy a new car and out of all the car makers have narrowed it down to an American car that is a Chevy. There is my interest, i am surely not gonna go and bash Ford or Dodge or the foreign car makers because of my choice. This is how it should be when looking into a new mmo. Find one that your interested in, read up on all the information that has been given about it and make a sound judgement on wheither you want to purchase and play it. No need for any negativity. |
|
|
9/29/10 3:34:43 PM#31
lol this site is sooo chock full of negativity and bad Karma ... anyone that takes anything seriously on this site needs their head examined. Its simple really I. Wait for game to come out and try it youself 2. Then make your own mind up.
there ya go not rocket science is it . |
|
|
9/29/10 4:04:35 PM#32
Originally posted by SnarlingWolf Ha he. Nicely put. This ^^ |
|
|
9/29/10 4:46:19 PM#33
Originally posted by agaga I'm glad someone took the effort to clear this up in a well written form. Thumbs up +1 |
|
|
maskedweasel
Tipster
Joined: 9/24/07
"Kids, try imagining how far the universe extends! Keep thinking about it until you go insane." |
9/29/10 4:58:54 PM#34
Originally posted by SanHor What snarlingwolf presumes "realistic expectations" means is open to interpretation. Each person comes on this site with their own views and opinions based on their own experiences. Being realistic and being pessimistic are two very different things, and very few on this site realize the difference.
I believe SnarlingWolfs last line is correct. There is a severe lack of realistic expectations on this site. I would like to take it a step further and say there is a SEVERE lack of realistic criticism on this site. In the end, this is a game, not a way of life. |
|
9/29/10 7:12:49 PM#35
Originally posted by oakthornn Now here's where it goes wrong. I put it very simply: SWTOR isn't a sandbox MMORPG, and no matter how much people complain or rant, it never will be. It's also not a singleplayer game, unless you count EQ2, WoW, LotrO and Aion to be singleplayer games too. SW:TOR will be a themepark MMORPG with maybe, maybe, a few sandbox elements (ie exploration). But don't kid yourself: SW:TOR will not be a 'traditional' sandbox MMORPG, and Bioware never pretended that it would be.
Originally posted by SnarlingWolf Interesting scenario you sketched. A onesided and incomplete one though, with quite some false assumptions: 1. You presume that all negativity is merely 'realistic expectations'. It is not, there's sensible criticism here and there, sure, and besides that ther's a whole lot of unrealistic expectations, ranting, venting, misinformed and uninformed drawing of conclusions, trolling by people that like another game and trashtalking by people who've alrdy made up their mind how fail a game in their eyes will be. That's the 'real' reality.
2. You assume that all fans are just buying blindly into all the hype, abandon all common sense and realism. That's totally biased and not true. The group of fans are as diverse as the sceptics, ranging from reasonable to the extremes of fully onesided bias (ie 'fanbois' and 'haters').
3. You assume that the critics are always realistic and right in all their criticisms and that fans are always wrong, disappointed and the victim of their hype. This too is a false assumption. This trend of overhype followed by disappointment hasn't been always present since the time of UO or so, no, it is something merely of the last few years.
Now why am I saying that your view is very black & white and a skewed view of reality? Because I'm a representative of the group of gamers that don't fall into the extreme ends of either blind fanboism or biased cynicism/hatred. I'm one of those MMO gamers that a) didn't fall for any hype, b) based on the info available had built realistic expectations of a game so was never disilliusioned when I started playing it, therefor c) had immense fun when I played those MMO games that by others were deemed utter fail as AoC, Aion and CO, and when I didn't enjoy them as much anymore d) I left them and moved on without regrets or a grudge against the companies that made them.
And there's a large group of fans and gamers that work like that, from a base of common sense and realism, perceiving good AND bad aspects of a game without prejudging or quick-judging regarding a game that hasn't even come out yet. They're only often not as vocal as the posters with the more extremist viewpoints towards either fanboism or cynicism/hatred. It's all about managing your expectations and using some common sense and reason.
Regarding criticism: some cases are worth to fight for and push hard and raise your voices loud and often, like realistic lightsabre hilts, a change of the name 'Wizard', or PvP and free flight in space combat, or a hardware mouse option in FFXIV or being able to walk in GW2. Stated on the right forums those complaints can make a difference. Other cases are merely ranting and venting and unrealistic, like wishing for SW:TOR to have certain sandbox/SWG features where Bioware has clearly chosen another design path. In those last cases there are really only 2 options: accept them for what the game is, or just move away if you can't accept the vision how the designers intend the game in the end to be. The ACTUAL size of MMORPG worlds: a comparison list between MMO's |
|
Originally posted by oakthornn
Thanks for the feedback. Your post was fine except for this paragraph. Who is to say what a true MMORPG Gamer is? I dont think sandbox=true mmorpg gamer. There may be good sandbox games and there may be good more themepark oriented games. Generally speaking, if the game is classified as an MMO and people are interacting with others in some type of way, then they are an MMORPG gamer in my book. |
|
|
9/29/10 7:20:32 PM#37
What the collective community on mmorpg.com may think about the game will have little to do with whether or not the game is successful, but I think many people will be surprised at how much they actually enjoy the game once they actually try it. I say this, in part, because everyone's expectations are so low. |
|
|
9/29/10 7:28:51 PM#38
The game will do fine regardless of what is said on these forums. Starwars fans will gobble this up i'm sure. Long term survivability depends on how interesting the game is on top of server stability. Archlinux ftw |
|
|
9/29/10 7:32:22 PM#39
Originally posted by SuperXero89 ^This is what I expect also. Populous: http://www.gdcvault.com/play/1014633/Classic-Game-Postmortem |
|
|
9/30/10 1:55:12 AM#40
The reponses from the BioWare blindys is typical. If this game was top of the hype list none here would have a problem. The fact remains that most on these forums are mmorpg gamers who are not BioWare blindys or Star War fanatics.
Most are gamers who just want a good mmorpg after all the crap that has ben released. SWTOR is not that mmorpg most are looking for, it really is showing us nothing right now. It's the same old dribble from the devs and the same boring vids for the last two years. Story story story, so freking what, we get it, swtor has a story lol.
Go to the GW2 forums on this site and their is no problem, the devs have more than shown us what the game is about and their is more to come. BioWare have no clue about the mmorpg community, they think we are the same as their wide eyed fanbase who will buy the game even if it's a pile of stinking poo.
BioWare are deluded if they think the mmorpg gamer will buy their game because it's Bioware. If you go to all the major gaming sites that cover mmorpg you will see that SWTOR is not the mmorpg that is being talked about. Even the gaming reporters are bored with the same crap that bioware keeps showing us.
Blame your beloved BioWare for this, they may think they are number one in the single player market but in the mmorpg market they are a newbie who have proven nothing at all. Someone at their offices obviously does not know how to promote their game in this market. If you want a site that constanly kisses bioware ass even when they are wrong then head on over to swtor.com.
|
|