| 71 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
7/30/10 7:59:05 AM#21
About the smartest thing in that bunch of stuff are the weekly episodes. The current content flies by so quickly you can get it done with your free month. By trickling content out, you might manage to keep people who are satisfied with an hour of content a week. That wouldn't be me, but still... Smart move. STO is still substandard compared to most other major MMO offerings, but I give them credit for knowing the best way to keep subs with a minimal amount of work. |
|
|
7/30/10 8:07:31 AM#22
Opinion is neither right or wrong, it's is a personal view, attitude, or appraisal. Likewise, just because the OP has a different viewpoint and you don't see eye-to-eye, does not make him a troll. And as for the whole topic it can be summed up with one video clip. Yes, it can be polished, but that doesn't change the fact that in our "opinion" it is what it is. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rax27_ZIVM |
|
|
7/30/10 11:47:40 AM#23
Originally posted by Silverdagger
You are right, mostly it depends on personal view. Hardly to tell whether it's right or wrong if you do not consider it from both sides. Play Free Flash Game ONline |
|
|
i understand people who like the game being upset, but honestly, explain why all the stuff i highlighted red should not have been in the game at launch. almost all of it is to do with basic content that everyone knows sto is far beyond sub-standard on. as to it being opinion yes it is... it is a lot of peoples opinion. in fact it is the vast majority of peoples opinion. http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/285860/Will-you-ever-buy-another-Cryptic-game.html http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/276296/would-u-buy-another-cryptic-game.html
cdf can come here and scream hater all they like, it wont change the fact that sto is a bad, half finished game. IF THE ONLY DEFENCE FOR CRITICISM OF A GAME IS CALLING SOMEONE A TROLL OR HATER, THAT SAYS A LOT ABOUT THE QUALITY OF THE GAME |
|
|
7/30/10 2:22:24 PM#25
There is no 'should'. That simply makes no sense. MMO as many software development projects is never ending process.
There is no line of what 'should' be in game or not. All your 'should' comes from your expectations while the reality is much simpler - Do you purchase and subscribe or not? The numbers speaks clearly. The game got enough people interested to keep the servers and development running. It is those people who matters, not the haters and trolls filling up polls you linked. Cryptic makes profit thus they must be doing something right and the game can't be that bad... You find the game bad, don't you like it? Ok, move on...
|
|
|
7/30/10 3:41:35 PM#26
Originally posted by Gdemami
You've hit the nail on the head. Obsessive haters are amusing. They bash the game for being short on systems or content, then they bash the game for adding systems and content. No matter what Cryptic does, the trolls will come pouring out like rats to tell everyone how "bad" it is. This forum has been particularly comical in that regard. Cryptic has been steadily improving this game. The retrospective post by Stahl is proof. For the people who still play the game, it's very good news. For some reason, that really threatens/frightens some people. Hell hath no fury like an MMORPG player scorned. |
|
|
7/30/10 3:54:14 PM#27
While I am not a huge fan of STO because it feels heartless they certainly seem to have been busting their hump, especially when compared to a ton of other games. What one player feels should have been in at launch and what Cryptic released are two completely different things.... So, you felt that klingons should have been pve, well now you have your wish. At least cryptic, apparently, is willing and able to work with the playerbase to make STO a good game. All of the borg stuff was coming soon, it was never (as far as I can recall) part of the launch stuff. If the NEW missions and content had been in at release, then they wouldn't be new and additional content then. Also, if they had had all of that content in at launch and didnt add it all in over the last 6 months my bet is you'd be complaining that not enough has been added to the game. I'm not gonna go through the whole post and address the op's highlighting ability, it seems to me that STO is on a good path and I for one may have to resub. Looks like they are making progress and it looks like they have done a crap ton of work in a short period of time. |
|
|
7/30/10 4:06:20 PM#28
Originally posted by Rohn In red. |
|
|
7/30/10 4:30:26 PM#29
Looks go so far. I'm looking forward to the upcoming changes too. I don't see anything worth bitching about there but plenty to look forward to. |
|
Originally posted by Rohn IF THE ONLY DEFENCE FOR CRITICISM OF A GAME IS CALLING SOMEONE A TROLL OR HATER, THAT SAYS A LOT ABOUT THE QUALITY OF THE GAME |
|
|
7/30/10 6:07:41 PM#31
Originally posted by artemisentr4 I agree. I figure on giving it another shot this winter if the updates continue. |
|
|
7/30/10 6:17:52 PM#32
And that's the whole point and I would need to repeat the same again. The game can't be finished, it is up to each to decide whether the game is worthy, not you. You an not exchanging any information about the game but your own emo rage only. In other words, you're trolling. Yeah, 'some people just don't get it'. |
|
Originally posted by Gdemami no mmo can be finished(short of being turned off), we all know that. your avoiding the the point that this mmo doesnt meet the basic requirements (of most people) to be considered release ready.(klingons not finished, pathetic crafting system, bad ground combat, lack of content, insulting cryptic staff, extremely repetitive,small map... etc etc.) next part is hypothetical tell you what, send me your address and ill mail you my mmo cod for 500$. of course i will expect you to pay a monthly fee and im not actually letting anyone play it for another 50 years, but as you point out, its up to the maker of the mmo to decide if its ready for release. if you choose to buy this mmo, i expect you to not tell others about my business practices if you find them shady or lacking. i havent decided what i will be charging monthly yet... let me get back to you on that.
edit: there will be a cash shop for items, so let me know if theres anything you want. i will be making the cash shop first and filling it with stuff youve asked for before working on the game. i plan on listening to my customers so your input is important! and as ive stated before, if all you have to say in defence of the game is that other people are haters, quite obviously theres not much positive to say. IF THE ONLY DEFENCE FOR CRITICISM OF A GAME IS CALLING SOMEONE A TROLL OR HATER, THAT SAYS A LOT ABOUT THE QUALITY OF THE GAME |
|
|
7/30/10 9:11:30 PM#34
Originally posted by raistalin69 I think "the most people" is argueable. Even if you are right about it, still as a niche game does not need to appeal to "most people". "Most people" play wow and asian f2p, so probably we all should go there. |
|
|
7/30/10 9:17:30 PM#35
Originally posted by Archeminos Need to remember just because you like something, doesn't mean everyone else does, infant. Don't wanna hear the bad truth? Stick to the official forums. Don't like that people can say what they feel about the game here? Leave. Easy enough choice, even for you. -Letting Derek Smart work on your game is like letting Osama bin Laden work in the White House. Something will burn.- |
|
Originally posted by gandales point taken. i agree sto is a niche game, problem with that is by taking on the title "STAR TREK" you are marketing it to a large group that rightfully has certain expectations. when i bought star trek online i expected a game with some depth to it (sort of like the various tv series and movies had),not just a 80's grinder video game with better graphics. exploration would kind of be expected in a star trek game, unless it is marketed as a combat simulator (ie bridge commander). As an mmo, one reasonably expects a functional crafting system. as you say "most people" is arguable, i submit that the many bad reviews, polls on this site and the overall mostly negative posts here very strongly support this. allthough the official sto forums are more positive, that is due in part to heavy editing and deleting by moderators on that site (rightfully so, they can do what they want on their forums) and the same complaints found here are or were once on that site, which also supports this view. you are most certainly correct that as a niche game sto does not need to appeal to most people, it does however need to gain subscriptions rather than bleed them like a hemophiliac after being shot. the few successful niche games still on the market all have one thing in common, they started small and continued to grow. sto might do this, but currently is quickly headed in the opposite direction currently. simply put if subs were still above 100k and growing cryptic would be useing this to market the game. and no thank you, not interested in wow or most F2P games, allthough there are many F2P that are signifigantly better than sto. theres also better "niche" games, eve and fallen earth come to mind. IF THE ONLY DEFENCE FOR CRITICISM OF A GAME IS CALLING SOMEONE A TROLL OR HATER, THAT SAYS A LOT ABOUT THE QUALITY OF THE GAME |
|
|
7/31/10 9:35:01 AM#37
It's convenient that when a game tanks some people have "it's a niche market game" to throw up there as if it's some kind of saving grace. People are trying to put the cart before the horse now, but it doesn't apply. |
|
|
7/31/10 10:22:17 AM#38
Originally posted by Hagonbok Could you elaborate a bit more? STO is a sci-fi mmo, which is already a kind of niche market itself. However, going a bit further the game is oriented to casual and relaxing gaming, which is not necesarily right or good for masses.
I know this is news for some people but there is a universe of players outside these forums that are not examining every detail of a game or make a mmo a huge part of their lives, people that expending $15 a month is neglectable in their budget. I am not saying that STO is a success but I could hardly call it a failure when I see many people enjoy it. Regrettable, I am not one of those people and I am not playing STO but some of my friends play it and they are happy with it. |
|
|
7/31/10 10:56:24 AM#39
Originally posted by gandales You really are comical in your desperate attempts to defend this game. Do you really think they got the rights to make a ST mmo to create a "niche market game"? Are you serious? Give your sad little head a shake.
You can flog that BS as much as you like, but there's enough of us left from the beginning (and I mean from the very first day Cryptic announced their effort and opened their site) that'll just keep giving you your much needed reality checks. Neither you, nor Cryptic, is going to get away with changing history there you wannabe McFly.
It is a failure because not only is it's population tanking steadily, but it failed to deliver on pretty much everything they stated would be in the game at release, and they continue to fail in adding anything substantial to the game coming on six months after release. |
|
|
7/31/10 1:27:48 PM#40
Originally posted by Hagonbok The rights were bought by Cryptic/Atari as far as I know and ST IP owners haven't said anything yet. Anyway, i won't go further into this discussion since it looks it affects people emotions. I concede whatever you were saying and I encourage you to vent and criticize. |
|