| 258 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
7/26/10 10:59:42 PM#201
Originally posted by jisaacs1207 First day. You're already wrong. The game is a success. "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice." ~Greys Law |
|
|
7/26/10 11:04:14 PM#202
Again blizzard is able to use it's base of ignorant fanboys to sell a product. SC2 came out 5 years ago, it was called Dawn of War... |
|
|
Wrender
 Apprentice Member
Joined: 2/03/04
The truth shall set you free! |
7/26/10 11:06:06 PM#203
yes indeed I can't wait! MMO market is so lame these days leave it to Blizzard to beatem all with an RTS! |
|
7/26/10 11:08:14 PM#204
Originally posted by Sauronas Maybe I'm confused this is a Diff company and SC2 looks way better and plays way better. Dawn of War was the SC clone. Nice try though. |
|
|
Wrender
Apprentice Member
Joined: 2/03/04
The truth shall set you free! |
7/26/10 11:08:57 PM#205
Originally posted by Chr1sc OMG Starcraft was the greatest fps game ever! until now SC2 will rein! |
|
7/26/10 11:12:05 PM#206
Originally posted by Serenes ROFL again a fanboy with no grasp on history or the genre... |
|
|
7/26/10 11:14:01 PM#207
Originally posted by Sauronas I know SC1 came before any of the Dawn of Wars... Its not hard to use google try it sometime. I would love too listen too your story on how dawn of war somehow leaped from 2004 too 1997 (before SC1). Does it hurt too bad that your game came second and is played by way fewer people? If you are refering too the board game Warhammer 40k yes it came first... but this is a Video game thread not a stupid little board game thread. |
|
|
7/26/10 11:21:27 PM#208
Originally posted by Sauronas Dawn of War? Isn't that that game that faded into obscurity years ago and had a horrible sequel that killed any chance for another? I's ok not to like a game but when you have to resort to calling people names you've stepped over into trolling. SC2 would have been a success if the only place you could buy it was in Seoul, South Korea. Yeah it's that popular. "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice." ~Greys Law |
|
|
7/26/10 11:28:56 PM#209
Originally posted by Sauronas Fixed it for you.
So you dont like this game and call people fanboys. Good for you. Maybe next time you can be something other than a generic troll, and actually try to come up with better insults.
Calling one a "fanboy" for liking a game or company is really getting stale guys. Lets try and do something new.. ya know.. really get the blood boiling. |
|
|
7/26/10 11:31:09 PM#210
|
|
|
7/26/10 11:33:32 PM#211
Nope, won't effect me. Don't play RTS, I tried WC and never finished that one, that was enough for me to never touch that genre again. And they basically all are the same from command and conqueer to SC. For some reason I just don't enjoy them. |
|
|
7/26/10 11:35:06 PM#212
Is it just me or I'm the only one so incredible tired of all these RTS games? Startcraft 2 looks like any other generic RTS game, might have better looking intro but.. meh.. RTS games have basicly been the same since Dune 2. |
|
|
7/26/10 11:46:45 PM#213
Originally posted by mCalvert Strategic zoom doesn't make those games better. SC2 offers fast paced, actio orientated gameplay where as Supreme Commander is a much more drawn out experience. |
|
|
7/27/10 1:12:34 AM#214
Originally posted by Cacaphony I agree. "Ass kisser" works much better than fanboi. -Letting Derek Smart work on your game is like letting Osama bin Laden work in the White House. Something will burn.- |
|
|
7/27/10 3:20:11 AM#215
Originally posted by Hrothmund Yea your comment is true if you want to play the real time rush gamestyle. I personally prefer the real time strategic playstyle myself.
Is it just me or do zerg rushes seen a bit boring? Another great example of Moore's Law. Give people access to that much space (developers and users alike) and they'll find uses for it that you can never imagine. "640K ought to be enough for anybody" - Bill Gates 1981 |
|
|
7/27/10 3:25:40 AM#216
Originally posted by HYPERI0N I found supcom to be all about building the biggest army rather than the right kind of army - never felt in control of my units as they kinda just flew around doing their own thing, I like RTS games where just a few units can turn the tied of a battle I get that in SC1/2 never got that in supcom. Not saying supcom is bad, it's just not my thing and I never found it strategic.
|
|
|
7/27/10 3:36:32 AM#217
Originally posted by expresso You are right a lot of supcom 1 players did this....they were my favourate opponents as they were fun to beat. Afterall whats the use of a superheavy experimental when a few well positioned bait defences and a tac nuke worked very well. Another great example of Moore's Law. Give people access to that much space (developers and users alike) and they'll find uses for it that you can never imagine. "640K ought to be enough for anybody" - Bill Gates 1981 |
|
|
7/27/10 3:59:52 AM#218
The only RTS series I can stomach these days is the Total War franchise. I'm sure Sc2 will do quite well in the coming months, though I never really saw the appeal in any of Blizzards RTS games. That may have more to do with how I feel Blizz ripped off the WAR Ip as well as 40k than the actual game itself though. For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson If you can't argue the point don't say anything at all. |
|
|
7/27/10 7:59:10 AM#219
Originally posted by Serenes Dawn of war is in NO way a rip off of sc. Obviously you never played dow so you obviously wouldn't know wtf I'm talking about when it comes to the mechanics used in sc 2. You're not old enough or smart enough to understand what real RTS vets are talking about so go back to the battle.net forums with the rest of the retards. |
|
|
7/27/10 8:44:55 AM#220
Originally posted by warmaster670 So there goes spammers for a week. 
|
|
Meh.
Friends: vgchartz.com
Not a member? You can still subscribe to our newsletters and daily updates here!
May 19, 2013 7:33 AM
- Page Created in 1.794 seconds -
