| 715 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
2/19/10 11:17:11 AM#221
Originally posted by WisebutCruel
It pains me to say it ( mainly becasue I would have phrased it differntly) but you summed it up quit well. Remember when a person could ask a question in a general chatt then receive an answer or advice instead of 15 minutes of rude comments. Magic is impressive, but now Minsc leads! Swords for everyone! |
|
|
2/19/10 11:23:11 AM#222
Originally posted by SnarlingWolf
This isn't alwasy the case though. During EQII closed beta SOE had a decent AI in fro the mobs to start with. You could fight a group and have the NPC leader order his troops to get priest or the enchanter and such. based on the DEvs preception as to what the killign order should be ( very similar to who you would kill in pvp) , They would then concentrate on killing that player first. Unfortunatly, some players screamed about this feature and they tuned it down. Magic is impressive, but now Minsc leads! Swords for everyone! |
|
|
r3zs1ckn3ss
Apprentice Member
Joined: 10/27/09
Yes I have mental issues. And yes I take meds for it. |
2/19/10 12:08:22 PM#223
My answer.........."Hell no!!!! It needs to have a balance of everything. ESPECIALLY PvP. If someone wants a PvE, they can just get a gaming console and buy an RPG because it doesn't make any difference whether you're online or not at that point. Only sissies complain about having to deal with PvP. Intel i5 2500k CPU |
|
2/19/10 12:52:38 PM#224
Actually, it's called "Final Fantasy XI" and it's been one of the most successful MMORPGs after World of Warcraft (yes, it beat out EQ, although most people don't realize it). |
|
|
2/19/10 12:54:42 PM#225
If the PvE was awesome and the game was awesome, sure. Playing: Star Wars: The Old Republic Waiting For: Guild Wars 2, sort of. |
|
|
2/19/10 1:05:06 PM#226
It depends on the quality of PvE. Most games out today have horrible PvE so they need a bit of PvP to keep things exciting.
I enjoyed playing EQ for 5+ years on a PvE server. Now any game I play must have PvP simply because the PvE is not challenging and not fun. www.agonysend.org |
|
|
2/19/10 1:07:51 PM#227
Originally posted by Murashu
not true I found the PVE in DDO both challenging and fun......gotta slow down and pay attention
There are times when one must ask themselves is it my passion that truly frightens you? Or your own? |
|
|
2/19/10 1:14:39 PM#228
I don't tend to enjoy PVP all that much, to be frank. Oh I love PVE and teaming up with other players, but the competitive factor just isn't my bag. So if there was an MMO that was heavily predicated on PVE, and with little or no PVP involved, and which had stellar elements otherwise, I would be thrilled to give it a go. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
|
|
2/19/10 2:14:18 PM#229
Originally posted by graggok
not true I found the PVE in DDO both challenging and fun......gotta slow down and pay attention
I played DDO for about 2 months and just couldnt get into it. Since it eventually went F2P I assume the majority of players didnt enjoy it either. I'm not a fan of instancing nor small scale PvE which is all DDO had when I played it. If they had some open world dungeons and 40-60 man raids that were challenging like the old EQ raids then I might consider it fun. www.agonysend.org |
|
|
2/19/10 2:30:30 PM#230
Originally posted by popinjay
|
|
|
2/19/10 2:50:06 PM#231
Lets be honest here. most of the games that you see with PVP in, it mostly geared towards end content. That not to say there none any eariler, but most game set a truely low end level. Kudos to games like WOW, who do continously up the level rate, and give newer stuff to do. However it still remains, half the PVP that is in games is there cos you hit the end level barrier and really, what else is there to do? (normally I go back and do achievements that I havent done) You could start a new char but let face it, sometimes going through the same old levels can be less appealing, and for some of the things you want to do, game mechanics sometimes make it hard, or maybe even the time you play. Wanted a particular item that was part of a group quest and in the end had to just give up cos you just couldnt get that group together? Yeah sometimes your lucky and can get a group together or even people in your guild to help. Anarchy online by funcom, had a great approach. yeah it had pvp. but it had something like 200 odd levels that you could do just doing PVE stuff (and believe me, it does take a damn long time). To those who argue that just too long to level up to end level I say, Why? Why do you need to get to end level that quick? To look like a peacock? To proudly strut your stuff in the main town? Personally I loved that long levelling cos it took so damn long to level one char, that quite frankly I forgotten most of the starter stuff. Would I play an all PVE game? Yeah sure I probably would. But would I always stay? That Im not too sure on. There are days when I do feel the need, when I had a bad day, to find someone and pound their char into the ground. When I do feel a flush of achievement when I beaten someone of equal level and gearage. But then, I do love those days, when I managed to help out my guild mates in their missions, gathered stuff for the guild that will help others in the guild. Do crafting and help out a player who would like some stuff, but cos he is a causual player, He cant possibly get those stuff, unless he lucky and gets it one of the rare times. In short, there is always gonna be a need for pure PVP mmo, PVE-PVP mmo, and Im just shocked really, that there isnt a noteworthy Pure PVE mmo out there. Final Fantasy has been mentioned, but I remember my old console days with Final Fantasy too fondly, that I just probably wouldnt find it as appealing as a MMO. but that just me. |
|
|
2/19/10 3:13:31 PM#232
Yes. Happily. Guild Wars 2 is my religion |
|
|
2/19/10 3:18:19 PM#233
Considering my favorite MMO and the one I enjoyed the most was FFXI and it was 99% PvE? Yes I would. My belief is this, MMORPGs are for PvE content. If you want pvp go play a fps or something. |
|
|
2/19/10 3:20:29 PM#234
To have good PVP ya need to get cheaters, botters, and hackers out. A good PVE game can create a big variety of ineresting and diffcult scenarious to conquer, where many mmorpg pvp games just turn into a zerg fest, high lvl ganks low lvl , end gear ganks casual gear. So i would totaly play full PVE. ____________________ AC2,AO,D&L,Lotro,VsoH,SWG,Uo,HGL,Drunners,CoH,GW,Potbs,PWI |
|
|
2/19/10 3:23:35 PM#235
Originally posted by Yellowman26
For all intent and purposes, LOTRO is a pure pve game. The pvp portion is completely separate and has nothing to do with the rest of the game. I would also add vanguard to that mix as well even with its issues. |
|
|
2/19/10 3:24:39 PM#236
Yes!
|
|
|
2/19/10 6:59:09 PM#237
So in the end, its still all player vs player (PvP) because its players killing other players.. no matter how many. Instead of small team ganking like in other games, you have zerg ganking. No difference.
As to the majority, I don't think I said the majority are this way or that way. I think if you read carefully, I pretty much state what type of PvP player that is I described. I did not say that's the majority, however, that is the majority of ones I have seen acting that way. I think enough people have seen hardcore PvPers to understand what the underlying attitude of them in game is. I sure hope this isn't a case where someone tried on a shoe and it fit nicely. :)
|
|
|
2/19/10 7:14:30 PM#238
2. I spoke nothing about "all MMOs". I won't go any further with rebuttals until we get this part straight because you've started your post off on the wrong foot with a faulty premise here.
C. Got offended somehow and then went on the defensive. p.s. Goldbuying in a PvE game isn't an issue, friend. If another PvEer buys gold, that does nothing to affect my ACTUAL gameplay. Nor does it inhibit what I personally am able to do as I am fighting mobs; not people. But really quick to address a quick point as a side; in a PvP game, goldbuying is a gamekiller. Why? I hope you don't really need me to explain to you why it's an issue in that game and not PvE. |
|
|
2/19/10 7:21:48 PM#239
Originally posted by popinjay Gold-buying in any type of game can have negative impacts on the economy, even PvE.
www.agonysend.org |
|
|
2/19/10 7:29:09 PM#240
Originally posted by popinjay
You are correct, I did misread what you wrote. I do find it funny that you added Option B. That I misread and "still posted on an inaccurate rebuttal based on that misreading, knowingly. That to me screams of cynicism on your part, which is why I can see you have the attitude towards pvp'rs that you do. If you didn't possess any cynicism you wouldn't even have thought to put that down as an option. Just a thought. And yea, of course I get defensive, because I love pvp and at the same time, I don't corpse camp, don't trash talk, love helping people out in pvp and pve whenever I have the time. I love playing support characters that round out a group, but every anti-pvp'r in the world exaggerates one segment of the pvp population as to being the norm. Also, goldbuying being an issue that affects your gameplay wasn't the point. The point was, pve'rs and pvp'rs alike buy gold. There are cheaters in both areas. Goldbuying in a game is actually not a game killer in a pvp game. People could buy gold and PL in DaoC on the open market, didn't affect me. All goldbuying does is drive up prices of items making me work longer to get them. Sure it sucks and I don't like it, but it's not going to actually change the gameplay or my ability to compete. (Unless you're talking about timed spawns on bosses with lockout timers -which is a horrible and stupid game mechanic that should never exist) |
|