| 113 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
2/09/10 10:28:35 AM#101
If you're paying a monthly fee, you shouldn't be nickel and dimed for features that should be included in a Star Trek game. I play STO and enjoy it, but I refuse to pay to create a Federation Klingon or a Ferengi. You want to put sunglasses or costumes in a store that's fine, but not major races from the lore that should be included from the start. |
|
|
eduty
Apprentice Member
Joined: 10/23/07
A good man is not one that is free from mistakes, but one that corrects them. |
2/09/10 10:29:16 AM#102
Disclaimer: Purchased the basic box and paying $15 for a sub. Played about 8-10 hours so far. Have no intention to purchase "cosmetic" content from the in-game store. Mirco-transactions mean options. As long as you do not need the game store items to play the game, it is not double-dipping. You, as the consumer, have a choice to invest in the additional content. If you don't, it's no different than playing a game without purchasing the latest paid expansion. As a casual gamer, I would actually prefer to pay just for what I want out of the game than pay the cost of a boxed expansion that includes content in which I have no interest. Other things I'm okay with in the store are: extra character slots, additional sections of space, a special chain quest that centered on a favorite aspect of the IP (an epic campaign against the Borg, getting stuck on the holodeck, etc.). Maybe I don't mind paying for these things because an extra $5 doesn't seem like such a big financial dent. I've been playing STO since its public launch and actually enjoy the instanced content. For all the individuals griping that it's not a true MMO, I recognize that it's different. It's in space. There are no elves. But, I do find myself playing with other players probably every other instanced system. I actually built up a rather nice community of reliable friends to trek with in the first two days, something that did not happen in WoW or EvE. |
|
2/09/10 10:30:50 AM#103
The thing I love most about this situation is that you all can do something about it. Don't buy or play the game if you don't like it. |
|
|
2/09/10 10:58:35 AM#104
Originally posted by kartool
And why not? And who said they should be included with the game? Is that what you are used and expect to happen here to perhaps?
|
|
|
2/09/10 11:16:35 AM#105
I lost interest in STO in closed beta because it looked and played too much like Champions Online in Space (CO is a good game, don't get me wrong -- it's just not for me). The eStore is fine, IMO. A perfect way for Cryptic to make money off the Want-It-Now Generation. Besides it's optional "looks" for sale, everything there is available in game rather easily. I predict STO will do just fine, especially with Trekkies, though. |
|
|
2/09/10 11:38:24 AM#106
Originally posted by MMO_Doubter I don't. Not one tiny bit. Not after all the warnings we gave them. I hate that Cryptic is going to make money from them, though.
Your fail comment, failed. |
|
|
2/09/10 11:45:03 AM#107
We are the Fanbois. Put on your blinders and surrender your whines. We will add your niche and gaming distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile. |
|
|
2/09/10 11:57:54 AM#108
Originally posted by jiveturkey12
How the hell do you manage to compare, paying extra money for already exsisting game code, to buying a collectors edition of a game? Im in no way saying developers dont make money off collectors editions, but its not shady. You know what your getting when you spend the extra money on the collectors edition and most 95% of cases, it contains a physical object that is limited, not an in game item (They do have them, but thats not what the bulk of the money is going towards). Plus Vet Rewards? What are you talking about? Thats a small incentive to play the game longer, most of the time they are nothing more than a painting or a shield, not a full race or class. Seriously am I missing something here?
Your fail comment, failed. |
|
|
2/09/10 12:20:11 PM#109
Originally posted by r3zs1ckn3ss
Yeah man so even when we are unemployed we can afford to play an mmo. What kind of quality you think that gets us? Nothing in this world is free we get what we pay for. And if we pay a little then we get low quality. If we pay more we get better quality simple.
|
|
|
sh4dowst4lkr
Apprentice Member
Joined: 2/23/07
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors but we borrow it from our children. By Some Guy. |
2/10/10 4:34:37 AM#110
Originally posted by Airwren
Haha sticky that, yeah disappointed, not really surprised so many companies screwing over their loyal clients, Infinity Ward with no dedicated servers, STO with this crap, and I wait in anticipation to see how blizzard with screw over yet another group of gamers with starcraft 2 |
|
2/10/10 2:16:13 PM#111
Originally posted by Distiler
QFT If the game was f2p, then sure doing something like this is fine. Some of the diehard trekkies were annoyed how Cryptic butchered the lore. Now, they are annoying those gamers that were "on the fence" on whether they were going to buy STO or not. Strange, Cryptic did so well with CoH but since they struck on on their own they fumbled both Champions Online and now Star Trek Online. Maybe those people that stayed with NCSoft were the developers that knew what they were doing? |
|
|
2/12/10 10:18:24 PM#112
After I Beta tested on CO I knew this game would suck as well. cryptics name is in the dirt lower than NCSOFT --for now lol. Sorry for all teh suckers that paid for this game but I sincerely hope you find fun in the game somehow. I also am a sucker for I purchases AION and totally felt ripped off but I did learn not to jump the gun and pre order anymore because it just isn't smart nowadays. Beta test FTW !! That's All! GRIND DOES NOT EQUAL MAKING A GAME CHALLENGING!! YES I AM YELLING LOL |
|
|
2/14/10 6:39:09 AM#113
To all the STO buyers: "They say jump, you say "how high?"
|
|