| 55 posts found | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1/03/10 6:32:30 AM#41
"The reality is that the cash shop games are fairer. Because in the p2p games there are innocent and/or naive people who think the game is fair play, whereas in a game like Rohan, for example, everyone knows about the cash shop and so everyone has the same chances. Another advantage with the Rohan shop is that you don't need to spend any real cash to get the goods as you can convert your ingame items/gold for items from the shop. Furthermore, thanks to the people who purchase you can play for free" That is about the most nonsense I have seen in a post in a while. Just to set you straight, most p2p games at upper levels don't depend on how rich you are to how successful you are in pvp. That is a given in f2p games. As to the Rohan shop, sure there are some that can play the game and spend very little in the cash shop, but 99% of us don't have that kind of time to put into a game to achieve that. As I have said before, the f2p games are a misnomer, none are free if your intention is to be competitive. The problem with the f2p games is that many end up spending far more than they would in any p2p. |
|||
|
1/03/10 12:41:39 PM#42
5.7 is a generous rating. This game doesn't deserve it. But aside the gameplay which is somewhat playable until 40-ish level (playable as any other Korean cash cow MMO), the service is pathetic. No one cares what you say, need ingame and you are perfectly ignored. I don't know how is it today, but I remember when I was playing it, forums were crowded with angry people who eventually quit the game. I tried it one last time about 6 months ago... starting areas were empty (only bots and gold sellers), and other areas were poorly inhabited, even with bots. Maybe only thing I enjoyed in this game was that upgrading and that's it. If you never played Rohan, you don't have to, since it's piece of junk :D Oh yeah, if you're cash shop junkie you'll love this game. It's made just for you and your money :) Service loves people who buy and don't talk too much. Point: STFU, buy items and... then quit the game. |
|||
|
1/03/10 3:59:54 PM#43
Another Korean published MMO, another bad review. I guess I'll try this...again (technically, I did play something like this) |
|||
|
1/03/10 10:01:35 PM#44
Rohan is by far the most expensive to compete Free 2 play mmo I have played. and I have played quite a few.
Sword of the new world 12 Sky 2 2 Moons Talisman online Perfect world Atlantica Runes of Magic Requiem Bloodymare to name a few of them. The item mall in this game is 100% what every F2P critic fears the most. An over powered, gear selling, unbalanced over priced, item mall that has a huge factor in who gets to enjoy the game and who does not. I wouldn't even say its possible to compete without the item mall let alone win. Most F2P games make you spend money later on in the game if you want to compete, Rohan said no however they make you spend money at lower levels if you don't want to be shark bait. And more on top of that if you want to compete. |
|||
|
1/04/10 3:20:49 AM#45
What Calintz333 said is the reality in most F2P games, but it just does not seem to sink in with some people. Some F2P have decent cash shops now but what about next year? Perfect World is a prime example of a F2P game that used to have a decent cash shop then became a cash cow for the game. If you play a F2P game you are taking a risk, that it will end up costing you an arm and a leg, or that you will have to put up with being a player pauper noob. Why bother to take a risk like that? |
|||
|
Yamota
Elite Member
Joined: 10/05/03
Money in politics is the root of all political evil. It is corruption at it's worst. |
1/04/10 3:32:08 AM#46
Originally posted by Mannish
I agree. I dont understand how grinding pointless quests are more fun than grinding mobs or doing some dungeons. Now if the quests impacted the world somehow then yes, but they dont, so whats the difference? WoW = cancer of MMORPGs. |
||
|
1/04/10 9:25:33 AM#47
Originally posted by Ozmodan
If you don't have time and dedication to put into a game, you shouldn't be able to be competitive in it. I hate when every random mig-mug scrub has the best available equipment. |
|||
|
1/04/10 9:44:32 AM#48
PvP game with an item mall containing stuff that gives players an edge. That's just a recipe for a crap sandwich sans the bread. But at least there's another PvP game out there. |
|||
|
1/05/10 7:54:34 PM#49
Yeah, the gameplay is actually very much like Lineage 2.
And about there not being that much low levels in the game, I guess that's one of the negetive side effects of the exchange market. When you introduce a new friend to play along-side your "group", people who you regularly play with in Rohan, you can all put some RPs together, your friend put some r/l cash in, and get a character that can play alongside you. It has it's advantages and disadvantages, I quite like the concept.
Because of the Exchange Market (yes, i'm on about it again), it depends. Depends on your playtime and your knowledge of how to manipulate the market, and what to do to make big RP on there. _________ |
|||
|
1/06/10 12:19:06 AM#50
I've never understood what so great about PvP (aside from the skill needed when people were fighting each other) and the level grind. I always wanted a more PvE type of environment (the hardcore can bite me, I don't care).
"In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule." Neitzsche |
|||
|
1/06/10 12:26:20 AM#51
I've never understood what all the fuss with PvP is. I've tried it, didn't do it too badly, but I've always loved the PvE more. I need a more immersive environment where people are trying to help each other, instead of trying to backstab each other. Let the hardcore bite me, I don't care.
"In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule." Neitzsche |
|||
|
1/06/10 2:13:22 PM#52
Poor writer could have saved a load of time by simply reading the same review I read back in 2008. The author of that article seemed to better address the complaints I have seen in this thread. For instance, he said the music is nice (like many in this thread) but the sound effects are lame (like the MMORPG reviewer). I have not played the game, though, so I cannot say if either is an accurate review. Geeked for FFXIV |
|||
|
1/06/10 5:14:12 PM#53
Basically de-lvling an item is about how much money you are willing to spend. say you want to get 10 levels off of something, it's not about "shit, hope I don't end up increasing its level", it's about "shit, hope this doesn't cost me TOO much". Sometimes you can spend tens of millions trying to take the bastard level down, and other times you'll get lucky and do it after only a couple mill. Also, if an item has had 15 levels taken off it, there's a chance of destroying the peice opon failure. And the further below 15 you go, the higher that chance. Only the very hardcore de-lvlers go below 15, most don't even dare.
And I think TenTonHammers rating is pretty fair too. EDIT: Let me also add that it's a shame they didn't include "Item combining" in their review. This is a brilliant feature in my opinion, shame they didn't. _________ |
|||
|
1/06/10 7:07:55 PM#54
Awesome response, Adam1902. I wonder if those inaccuracies are errors by the author or things that have changed in the game since November 2008? It doesn't matter. It sounds as though someone should hire you to review the game! Geeked for FFXIV |
|||
|
1/08/10 3:42:50 PM#55
Originally posted by Pugla Cheers! :) 99% of reviews I've read about games that I've actually played (as in, played for a number of months / years) have pissed me off a little bit one way or another. Thanks for the compliment though :) _________ |
|||