| 84 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
11/17/09 5:07:48 PM#21
Vato26, you can still be Gay we are not stoping you from being gay. we are just stoping our Tax money from going to pay for it. we are stoping or not saying we think its a good thing that you are gay. Marriage is - a legally recognized relationship, established by a civil or religious ceremony, well one its not established by the people seeing that most of people in the US do not think its right. yet most of the people in the US are ok with you being Gay. as long as we do not have to pay for it or support you in your action.
www.DigitalMindz.com |
|
Originally posted by DeadDOG
So you also against any other type of marriage? |
|
|
11/17/09 5:15:39 PM#23
Originally posted by DeadDOG
That about sums up my view on that. If you want to get mud on your helmet knock yourself out just don't take my dime to do it. Next question do you every wonder why someone from Holland is so exicited about children not loving their country when it is not his? The boy has every right not to say the pledge, and I am rather excited about the fact he had enough balls to stand up for what his parents believe in. Now if only we had enough Americans like this little boy to take true responsibility and stop leading us down this unsustainable path we are on. |
|
Originally posted by Aetius73
That about sums up my view on that. If you want to get mud on your helmet knock yourself out just don't take my dime to do it. Next question do you every wonder why someone from Holland is so exicited about children not loving their country when it is not his? The boy has every right not to say the pledge, and I am rather excited about the fact he had enough balls to stand up for what his parents believe in. Now if only we had enough Americans like this little boy to take true responsibility and stop leading us down this unsustainable path we are on.
I think we should further analyze this. Everyone, bring the tin foil hats. It's conspiracy time! |
|
|
11/17/09 5:24:00 PM#25
Originally posted by Gameloading
So you also against any other type of marriage?
its the people of the state to make that choice. Federal government should not be in evolved. My tax money paid to the federal government should not be used for things that are against my 1st amendment protected rights. If a state wants to have a vote on if they want to support and pay for Gay marriage then let the state do that. IF one can not support there family why are they asking we the Tax payer to do it?
www.DigitalMindz.com |
|
Originally posted by DeadDOG
its the people of the state to make that choice. Federal government should not be in evolved. My tax money paid to the federal government should not be used for things that are against my 1st amendment protected rights. If a state wants to have a vote on if they want to support and pay for Gay marriage then let the state do that. IF one can not support there family why are they asking we the Tax payer to do it? So you're saying that it's alright for a majority to demand support from a minority, but not the other way around? Also, you make it sound as if moving out of a state is so easy. It's not, people have lives there. Jobs, Homes, possibly family and friends. |
|
|
11/17/09 5:28:41 PM#27
IF one can not support there family why are they asking we the Tax payer to do it? why force us to do something? if you want to be Gay you have that Right. But YOU do not Have the RIGHT TO FORCE me to PAY FOR IT.
www.DigitalMindz.com |
|
|
11/17/09 5:31:23 PM#28
Originally posted by Gameloading
I think we should further analyze this. Everyone, bring the tin foil hats. It's conspiracy time! Sound like struck a nerve. |
|
Originally posted by Aetius73
I think we should further analyze this. Everyone, bring the tin foil hats. It's conspiracy time! Sound like struck a nerve.
Yes that must be it. It couldn't possibly be that i was pointing out the utter ridiculousness of that part of your post. At DeadDog: that's a fine position but you didn't answer the question. If you don't want to pay for gay marriage, why should homosexuals and/or those against marriage in general be forced to pay for straigth marriages? |
|
|
11/17/09 5:59:33 PM#30
Originally posted by Gameloading
its the people of the state to make that choice. Federal government should not be in evolved. My tax money paid to the federal government should not be used for things that are against my 1st amendment protected rights. If a state wants to have a vote on if they want to support and pay for Gay marriage then let the state do that. IF one can not support there family why are they asking we the Tax payer to do it? So you're saying that it's alright for a majority to demand support from a minority, but not the other way around? Also, you make it sound as if moving out of a state is so easy. It's not, people have lives there. Jobs, Homes, possibly family and friends.
Majority, minority this are words deviding people in to groups. you think of your self as the minority? are you rich and paying 80% of the taxes? that would make your a minority paying for the majority, but you support that.
www.DigitalMindz.com |
|
|
upallnight
Apprentice Member
Joined: 1/08/06
I make my friends all laugh and smile, and never want to hate! |
11/17/09 6:25:24 PM#31
Originally posted by DeadDOG I'm a religious person. And my church does not preach that homosexuality is wrong. So why do you think it's okay for the federal government to say one religion is correct over another? -------------------------------------- |
|
upallnight
Apprentice Member
Joined: 1/08/06
I make my friends all laugh and smile, and never want to hate! |
11/17/09 6:27:20 PM#32
Originally posted by DeadDOG My church performs gay marriages. My church believes that we are doing so with God's blessing. Now, about that federal government recognizing one religion over another thing... -------------------------------------- |
|
11/17/09 6:45:14 PM#33
Originally posted by DeadDOG
|
|
|
11/17/09 6:52:20 PM#34
Originally posted by DeadDOG
|
|
|
11/17/09 8:03:25 PM#35
Originally posted by upallnight I'm a religious person. And my church does not preach that homosexuality is wrong. So why do you think it's okay for the federal government to say one religion is correct over another? I have never said our Government said one religion is correct over another. but the people know what is correct. a Gay person has the same rights as a single heterosexual. I am an American. And I do not feel our government should be forcing us to pay for anything that is against our 1st Amendment rights. if you do not want to support or pay for marrage of a male and female. by all means put an end to it. At this time with our deficit being so high. Its time our Government cut all of the spending it can.
a Gay person has the same rights as a single heterosexual.
www.DigitalMindz.com |
|
|
11/17/09 8:11:16 PM#36
Our founding fathers would be proud. Whether influenced by his parents or not, it takes balls to stand up to a teacher IN ARKANSAS of all places and stand up for what believe in. When i was 10, i could have never done this. Great respect for him.
Btw, for all you idiots that say he has to recite it, look up Minersville School District v. Gobitis |
|
|
11/17/09 8:20:00 PM#37
Originally posted by Vato26
look who is calling people name and such hate coming from such a person. i have not forced you to pay for marriage. yet you attack me for this. i told you that you can be Gay if you want to. yet you want to force me to say with my Voice and my Vote that i think what you are doing is right, when i do not agree with it. you tell me to STFU when i try to show you why i disagree with supporting you. see what happens when our government gives One hand out, everyone gets in line for it, everyone clames to be part of the group or not part of the group but should be part of the group.
www.DigitalMindz.com |
|
|
KarlRove
Novice Member
Joined: 12/14/07
the person who wrote "honesty is the best policy" was a democrat |
11/17/09 9:05:07 PM#38
I blame Obama! That rainbows and lollipops campaign he ran brought the gaywads out of the woodwork! If this kids gay he'll be bagging tons of ass in 5 years. If he's not he won't get laid until he's 30. Either way Obama is to blame for his promiscuity or the lack thereof! TORT REFORM: I am in favor of "settlement panels". Easy for the judge to look at a "best practice" settlement per offense. Who needs litigation when we can save time and money by cutting out the middle man through "comparative effectiveness"? |
|
11/17/09 9:24:07 PM#39
Smart freakin' kid. Questioning authority, too. Nice. |
|
|
11/17/09 9:50:25 PM#40
Originally posted by Briansho Quite an immature response. My point was that no child thinks for himself. Children base their "values" upon their parents teachings.
You're right! This kids parents need to start bringing him to a nice church. He needs Jesus in his life to fully understand our pledge! You seem to think I am all gung ho against this kid. I'm merely pointing out the obvious that it wasn't the kids decision, but his parents. Grow up. By the way, I don't agree with you that the relevant market here is health care. You're not regulating health care. You're regulating insurance. It's the insurance market that you're addressing and you're saying that some people who are not in it must be in it, and that's -- that's different from regulating in any manner commerce that already exists out there. - Scalia |
|