I've also read multiple responses by people that there is nothing about being a homosexual that is good, nobody would ever choose to be a homosexual, and if it were possible, homosexuals would rather be straight. These are things said by you very pro-anarchists here. With this being identified, I believe then that our new concern should be how do we best cure this disease in order to provide homosexual people with the correct life path and allow them to be happy like the rest of us... or perhaps I read what you said wrong.

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

I've also read multiple responses by people that there is nothing about being a homosexual that is good, nobody would ever choose to be a homosexual, and if it were possible, homosexuals would rather be straight. These are things said by you very pro-anarchists here. With this being identified, I believe then that our new concern should be how do we best cure this disease in order to provide homosexual people with the correct life path and allow them to be happy like the rest of us... or perhaps I read what you said wrong.

Buddy, you just opened up one of the biggest can of worms I have ever seen.  LOL

Good Luck.

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

I've also read multiple responses by people that there is nothing about being a homosexual that is good, nobody would ever choose to be a homosexual, and if it were possible, homosexuals would rather be straight. These are things said by you very pro-anarchists here. With this being identified, I believe then that our new concern should be how do we best cure this disease in order to provide homosexual people with the correct life path and allow them to be happy like the rest of us... or perhaps I read what you said wrong.

You are absolutely right, we should transfer all gays into camps, along with the elderly, muslim, communists, liberals and people with IQ's below 120 to cure them all once and for all and march to our utopia.

Originally posted by outfctrl

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

I've also read multiple responses by people that there is nothing about being a homosexual that is good, nobody would ever choose to be a homosexual, and if it were possible, homosexuals would rather be straight. These are things said by you very pro-anarchists here. With this being identified, I believe then that our new concern should be how do we best cure this disease in order to provide homosexual people with the correct life path and allow them to be happy like the rest of us... or perhaps I read what you said wrong.

Buddy, you just opened up one of the biggest can of worms I have ever seen.  LOL

Good Luck.

Got to hand it to you.. this made me laugh hard.

Originally posted by outfctrl

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

I've also read multiple responses by people that there is nothing about being a homosexual that is good, nobody would ever choose to be a homosexual, and if it were possible, homosexuals would rather be straight. These are things said by you very pro-anarchists here. With this being identified, I believe then that our new concern should be how do we best cure this disease in order to provide homosexual people with the correct life path and allow them to be happy like the rest of us... or perhaps I read what you said wrong.

Buddy, you just opened up one of the biggest can of worms I have ever seen.  LOL

Good Luck.

That's okay. This one was a half-troll to be honest. :P

Originally posted by Tymoris

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

I've also read multiple responses by people that there is nothing about being a homosexual that is good, nobody would ever choose to be a homosexual, and if it were possible, homosexuals would rather be straight. These are things said by you very pro-anarchists here. With this being identified, I believe then that our new concern should be how do we best cure this disease in order to provide homosexual people with the correct life path and allow them to be happy like the rest of us... or perhaps I read what you said wrong.

You are absolutely right, we should transfer all gays into camps, along with the elderly, muslim, communists, liberals and people with IQ's below 120 to cure them all once and for all and march to our utopia.

What if you are an elderly gay muslim communist who is borderline retarded?

Originally posted by Dekron

Originally posted by Tymoris

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

I've also read multiple responses by people that there is nothing about being a homosexual that is good, nobody would ever choose to be a homosexual, and if it were possible, homosexuals would rather be straight. These are things said by you very pro-anarchists here. With this being identified, I believe then that our new concern should be how do we best cure this disease in order to provide homosexual people with the correct life path and allow them to be happy like the rest of us... or perhaps I read what you said wrong.

You are absolutely right, we should transfer all gays into camps, along with the elderly, muslim, communists, liberals and people with IQ's below 120 to cure them all once and for all and march to our utopia.

What if you are an elderly gay muslim communist who is borderline retarded?

You can be content that you aren't a disgusting liberal ;)

Originally posted by outfctrl

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

I've also read multiple responses by people that there is nothing about being a homosexual that is good, nobody would ever choose to be a homosexual, and if it were possible, homosexuals would rather be straight. These are things said by you very pro-anarchists here. With this being identified, I believe then that our new concern should be how do we best cure this disease in order to provide homosexual people with the correct life path and allow them to be happy like the rest of us... or perhaps I read what you said wrong.

Buddy, you just opened up one of the biggest can of worms I have ever seen.  LOL

Good Luck.

And it looks like you and he are on the same side.  Does the word "eugenics" matter here?  

Also btw, you can talk about how me putting my penis inside a vagina is being "natural" all you want.  But I promise you that nothing in the whole world could ever make that feel "natural" or desirable to me.  I find it about as disgusting as you would find giving a b.j. to someone. 
So, please, don't try to implicate what's natural for other people without consulting them first.   

I mean, seriously, it's YUCK!  And yes, I have tried it.   

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

Originally posted by Dekron

Originally posted by Tymoris

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

I've also read multiple responses by people that there is nothing about being a homosexual that is good, nobody would ever choose to be a homosexual, and if it were possible, homosexuals would rather be straight. These are things said by you very pro-anarchists here. With this being identified, I believe then that our new concern should be how do we best cure this disease in order to provide homosexual people with the correct life path and allow them to be happy like the rest of us... or perhaps I read what you said wrong.

You are absolutely right, we should transfer all gays into camps, along with the elderly, muslim, communists, liberals and people with IQ's below 120 to cure them all once and for all and march to our utopia.

What if you are an elderly gay muslim communist who is borderline retarded?

 

You can be content that you aren't a disgusting liberal ;)

 

Holy shit! That made me laugh. That was too funny. 

You gain +500 humor xp.

Originally posted by upallnight

Also btw, you can talk about how me putting my penis inside a vagina is being "natural" all you want.  But I promise you that nothing in the whole world could ever make that feel "natural" or desirable to me.

What about in her pooper?

Originally posted by Dekron

Originally posted by upallnight

Also btw, you can talk about how me putting my penis inside a vagina is being "natural" all you want.  But I promise you that nothing in the whole world could ever make that feel "natural" or desirable to me.

What about in her pooper?

It's that whole "her" thing.

However, that dancing banana sure gets me hot. 

Originally posted by Dekron

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

Originally posted by Dekron

Originally posted by Tymoris

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

I've also read multiple responses by people that there is nothing about being a homosexual that is good, nobody would ever choose to be a homosexual, and if it were possible, homosexuals would rather be straight. These are things said by you very pro-anarchists here. With this being identified, I believe then that our new concern should be how do we best cure this disease in order to provide homosexual people with the correct life path and allow them to be happy like the rest of us... or perhaps I read what you said wrong.

You are absolutely right, we should transfer all gays into camps, along with the elderly, muslim, communists, liberals and people with IQ's below 120 to cure them all once and for all and march to our utopia.

What if you are an elderly gay muslim communist who is borderline retarded?

 

You can be content that you aren't a disgusting liberal ;)

 

Holy shit! That made me laugh. That was too funny. 

You gain +500 humor xp.

lol indeed

Originally posted by outfctrl

This is really getting old.  The people of the US do not want this, but it still comes up on the ballot to vote on. 

Give it a rest already.

 Domestic Partnership is fine, but not Marriage.

20 years ago the vote would not of been as close as 53% - why should they give up now?  They're winning.

Originally posted by upallnight

Originally posted by Dekron

Originally posted by upallnight

Also btw, you can talk about how me putting my penis inside a vagina is being "natural" all you want.  But I promise you that nothing in the whole world could ever make that feel "natural" or desirable to me.

What about in her pooper?

It's that whole "her" thing.

However, that dancing banana sure gets me hot. 

Yeah! You like that don't you?

Originally posted by Ekibiogami

Originally posted by upallnight

Originally posted by Dekron

Originally posted by upallnight

Also btw, you can talk about how me putting my penis inside a vagina is being "natural" all you want.  But I promise you that nothing in the whole world could ever make that feel "natural" or desirable to me.

What about in her pooper?

It's that whole "her" thing.

However, that dancing banana sure gets me hot. 

 

Yeah! You like that don't you?

Oh, goodness. 

Originally posted by outfctrl

Originally posted by Gameloading

What you're doing is pretty much using the just because argument.
imagine if we all started to introduce laws limiting other peoples freedom and just use just because as an argument.
What if a law was introduced that says you can't mow your lawn, just because?

I don't know if gay marriage will be accepted all across the US in our lifetime. I think it will considering there are already states accepting it.

Saying a group of people should not be allowed to get married is a huge violation of their freedom. If you want to cut on somebodies freedom like that, you better come up with a convincing argument.

What is so terrible about gay marriage that we should put a ban on it?

Well, another point.

Obama defends DOMA in federal court. Says banning gay marriage is good for the federal budget. Invokes incest and marrying children.

 

What did you expect? Supporting gay marriage is political suicide as a president in the US. The US is very far behind other nations from a social aspect.
 

Originally posted by Gameloading

The US is very far behind other nations from a social aspect.

It's amazing of your arrogance in that simple statement. I can easily turn the tables and state the US is so far ahead other nations from a social aspect.

And you always speak of arrogant Americans - nice hypocrisy there.

Originally posted by Dekron

Originally posted by Gameloading

The US is very far behind other nations from a social aspect.

It's amazing of your arrogance in that simple statement. I can easily turn the tables and state the US is so far ahead other nations from a social aspect.

And you always speak of arrogant Americans - nice hypocrisy there.

 

His arrogance is a direct result of his ignorance. He is what we might call a "child of the NGE." To learn more and gain a deeper understanding would involve "too much reading."

Originally posted by Gameloading

Originally posted by outfctrl

Originally posted by Gameloading

What you're doing is pretty much using the just because argument.
imagine if we all started to introduce laws limiting other peoples freedom and just use just because as an argument.
What if a law was introduced that says you can't mow your lawn, just because?

I don't know if gay marriage will be accepted all across the US in our lifetime. I think it will considering there are already states accepting it.

Saying a group of people should not be allowed to get married is a huge violation of their freedom. If you want to cut on somebodies freedom like that, you better come up with a convincing argument.

What is so terrible about gay marriage that we should put a ban on it?

Well, another point.

Obama defends DOMA in federal court. Says banning gay marriage is good for the federal budget. Invokes incest and marrying children.

 

What did you expect? Supporting gay marriage is political suicide as a president in the US. The US is very far behind other nations from a social aspect.
 

I don't understand where the morals and social barriers come in with people like you. What reason do I have to believe that you're not just an anarchist who would agree with the statement "everybody should be able to do whatever they want to do, be whoever they want to be, love whoever they want to love, and nobody should stand in their way at all"?

zchmrkenhoff, why didn't you tell us that you write editorials for The Oninion?

Originally posted by Jimmy_Scythe

zchmrkenhoff, why didn't you tell us that you write editorials for The Oninion?

I'm not a cliche.

Originally posted by Dekron

Originally posted by Gameloading

The US is very far behind other nations from a social aspect.

It's amazing of your arrogance in that simple statement. I can easily turn the tables and state the US is so far ahead other nations from a social aspect.

And you always speak of arrogant Americans - nice hypocrisy there.

 

Why am I arrogant for simply pointing out that the US is behind other nations from a social aspect? Loads of people criticize other nations all the time, yourself included, but that's okay as long as it's not the US? 

I always speak arrogant of Americans? That's not true and you know it. I'm dissapointed in you Dekron, I'd expect lies to make somebody look bad ffrom someone like Fishermage, but not from you.

There is significantly more gay hate in the US than many other western nations.

Originally posted by zchmrkenhoff

Originally posted by Gameloading

Originally posted by outfctrl

Originally posted by Gameloading

What you're doing is pretty much using the just because argument.
imagine if we all started to introduce laws limiting other peoples freedom and just use just because as an argument.
What if a law was introduced that says you can't mow your lawn, just because?

I don't know if gay marriage will be accepted all across the US in our lifetime. I think it will considering there are already states accepting it.

Saying a group of people should not be allowed to get married is a huge violation of their freedom. If you want to cut on somebodies freedom like that, you better come up with a convincing argument.

What is so terrible about gay marriage that we should put a ban on it?

Well, another point.

Obama defends DOMA in federal court. Says banning gay marriage is good for the federal budget. Invokes incest and marrying children.

 

What did you expect? Supporting gay marriage is political suicide as a president in the US. The US is very far behind other nations from a social aspect.
 

 

I don't understand where the morals and social barriers come in with people like you. What reason do I have to believe that you're not just an anarchist who would agree with the statement "everybody should be able to do whatever they want to do, be whoever they want to be, love whoever they want to love, and nobody should stand in their way at all"?

Believing people should be able to do what they want within reason are not the views of only an anarchist.

You continue to use strawman logic. Desperately trying to uphold your view that homosexuality is a choice despite the fact organizations which treated homosexuality as something can be changed have terrible trackrecord and this view is rejected by the APA.

You're unable to argue why homosexuality is wrong or gay marriage should be banned with any logical evidence.

Xenophobia. Typical. People are afraid of what they don't know. The ads that were used in Maine ratcheted up that fear X1000.

Originally posted by Gameloading

Except there is no hard evidence that confirms playing with girls make a boy gay. These are all old silly prejudices that are being made fun of in sitcoms.
You might be introduced to your political upbringing, but you gain info from lots of other sources of information as well.
This isn't the case with homosexuality. In fact, society strongly encourages relationships between a man and a woman. When was the last time you have seen a gay couple in a children cartoon? I can't think of a single one. Yet these kids still grow up to be homosexuals.

The idea that homosexuality is a conscious choice is ridiculous. There is no benefit to being gay. Just take a look at all the discrimination in the western world, nevermind the middle east.

I think the reason why you think homosexuality is a choice is because you want homosexuality to be a choice. You dislike homosexuality, but since you don't want to be bigot you have convinced yourself that some people made immoral decisions.
It's one of the biggest reasons why the US is so far behind other from a social perspective

Closet human governemnt ruling over others is the ultimate aim of where this lies.

I can't accept that and you won't be able to sneak it past me.

You strip away natural, Creator, given rights whenever you determine humans had to be "programmed the determined science way".

You explain free will/choice as envinronmental variables, cells, and genes. You're changing the wording in order to pass down the scientific ruling but were still explaining free will, before the definition warped, even if one can't see it.

Anyway how does this effect abortion in the pro-choice community? You won't be able to call it that any longer.

(Even though I think right to life collides with reproductive rights)

What about homosexual women that go on to find husbands, forgoing the same sex, and start a family? You're going to tell me they were bi-sexual all this time with a straight face? Why weren't they pursuing both sexes? They were "programmed" your determined way and should be doing just that.

Science doesn't gain a gold medal for trying to supplant the so called "worse other side". You've become worse than what is hostilely percieved against.

You can keep that in your country but in the US I hope we don't subsribe to a numbered majority rule by scientists or a left leaning idealogy. It's not what our checks & balances are about nor the spirit of our Declaration of Independence. We have free will to determine our choices. Gay marraige or not.

You still depend upon a numbered majority, evidenced by your multiple science fields trying to explain/rule our lives previously discussed between us, while beliefs don't require such to be accepted in those believing as Christians and us Catholics are still around.

P.S. My unbringing is pure leftist idealogy. I've broken 27/32 years of being leftist and now have made my own choice to pursue a pseudo-Republican/Idependent conservative political line of thought. Key word: choice

Also since when the heck do choices have to reward benefits for attainment? Some people choose something because they like it or it's right. Ah more rewording changes to fit benefit into liking. Ah okay.