| 710 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Yamota
Elite Member
Joined: 10/05/03
Money in politics is the root of all political evil. It is corruption at it's worst. |
11/06/09 3:49:43 AM#326
Originally posted by Eben
And what is anyone going to do about it? Absolutely. Nothing. Or...stop playing MMOs? Best of luck to ya. The rantings of people that are not only addicted to a genre of games, but when not gaming, must sit on forums discussing those games...they know when they got someone hooked. And if someone isn't subscribed, and complaining about it...why would Blizzard care about non-customers? Well I would say that posting on a major MMORPG site and stating your opinion that this is a bad thing and that you need to stay away from MMORPG that does it I would say is doing something. Creating a discussion can be more powerful than people think... And what I am trying to say is, for you current and future WoW customers, think about what you are doing. Are you sure you want to support a company that made 2 billion profit last year but still are pushing for RMTs on their already subscription based models? At some moment you as a customer needs to say No. And by quit supporting those companies is certainly a good way of saying No. |
|
11/06/09 3:50:14 AM#327
Originally posted by Ruyn
NO. Corporations DO have a *responsibility* to make the best profits possible. That inherently includes decisions that can impact the long term bottom line. Those that rant and rave about appeals to emotion like "greed" either have an ideological agenda, or are terribly ignorant of how business systems and markets operate in the real world. No one is being forced to purchase those *vanity* pets. They are simply being made available to those who *choose* to purchase them. The hysteria of those raving about this trivial issue would be wildly funny, if it wasn't so pathetic.
No shit Sherlock. Yes Corporations have a responsibility to make profits. That's usually done by making a good game. Since WoW has long neglected that basic side of the equation we now see this. First vanity pets, second epic gear. It's all good in the name of the almighty corporation making an honest buck. Until you realize that you have a playerbase based on a subscription based principal. Not a Sub + RMT. So it's all fine and dandy now. Go buy your pets to your hearts content all while paying your monthly sub fee. Just know that me and a lot of others in this thread know it will not stop there. So you maybe win the argument at this very moment, but mark my words, you and every supporter in this thread is going to be named in the future when the real change goes live. It will be a hallow victory though since the genre, as we know it, will be lost.
Oh, woe is me! The very sky is falling...All is LOST!... Or perhaps not. Do you guys have any idea how silly some of you are sounding? I've long said that the only real threat to WoW is Blizzard itself. But given the hysterics that some have engaged in, do you really think they are going to sell weapons and armor? I seriously doubt it. |
|
|
Yamota
Elite Member
Joined: 10/05/03
Money in politics is the root of all political evil. It is corruption at it's worst. |
11/06/09 3:51:42 AM#328
Originally posted by MMO_Doubter He didn't write it for his audience. He wrote it for his clients. Gaming sites don't serve their members. Unless they are paying members.
Nonsense. Gaming sites, like MMORPG.COM, live on ads. But if noone visit their sites (that is us members and other non members) then they wont be getting any ads. Think one step ahead please... |
|
11/06/09 3:52:43 AM#329
Originally posted by TsukieU
Yes, I noticed that myself. Fiendishly clever that Jon is |
|
|
Yamota
Elite Member
Joined: 10/05/03
Money in politics is the root of all political evil. It is corruption at it's worst. |
11/06/09 3:52:46 AM#330
Originally posted by Wraithone
Then our "hysterics" is working then is it not? |
|
11/06/09 3:56:14 AM#331
Originally posted by Wraithone Will you quit if they do, or will you defend that as well? "" Voice acting isn't an RPG element....it's just a production value." - grumpymel2 |
|
|
11/06/09 3:56:43 AM#332
Originally posted by Yamota
Then our "hysterics" is working then is it not?
At providing entertainment to the rest of us? Certainly. |
|
|
11/06/09 3:57:09 AM#333
Originally posted by MMO_Doubter ...and you getting upset about it prevents that somehow? You see, I can understand people getting upset about the 500-pound gorilla changing his behaviour. It scares us that the game we enjoyed is going to hell, and might take most if not all, other MMOs with it. I don't understand why people who don't mind the RMTs are getting upset. Unless they have a financial interest in how these games perform.
First I do not love a game, I played it, its just another game, like basketball, or grilling at the backyard. Its off time activities. WoW is a product by a company, if they change their pricing I examine it and see if I need to shop for alternates. Much like new cars on sale, or new pricing/discounts. Fact is, most likely it does not affect me, and I will not worry about the world coming to an end. I am just annoyed at the wisdom of the big doomsayer, magnifying trivial incidents to world war status. Frankly, the moment I shut down this browser and head out, nothing discussed here will be left in my brain. All forgotten, same for WoW. The moment I log out of WoW or any game, its end of a session. The moment I finish my bodybuilding I go for a shower, and its over. Ciao. Logging off browser. |
|
|
11/06/09 3:58:44 AM#334
Originally posted by MMO_Doubter Will you quit if they do, or will you defend that as well?
If they start selling weapons and armor? Sure. But I suspect pigs will fly long before then. |
|
|
11/06/09 3:59:38 AM#335
Originally posted by Yamota Good point. There was a big stink about the cash shop in CO. I know - I was in the middle of it. The only game-affecting item for sale so far is the retcon (respec). If such a big stink hadn't been made, there might well be more such items for sale. PR works both ways. Aion removed Game Guard from the release version (well, de-activated it, really). After a big stink on the boards about it. "" Voice acting isn't an RPG element....it's just a production value." - grumpymel2 |
|
|
Wizardry
Apprentice Member
Joined: 8/27/04
Remove quests,bosses and trigger them back in is called Dynamic events now?lol..i think not. |
11/06/09 4:02:28 AM#336
Originally posted by lisubab
Umm sorry young gamer,they follow SOE's move like sheep,why do you think we pay subscription fees?What do you think Blizzard has been doing with WOW all these years?they have been copying/following EQ.WOW would have 100% been a F2P game if not for them seeing how SOE pulled it off with EQ. Blizzard is afraid of their own shadow,that is why they put Starcraft on/off so many times,i guess it took multi billions before they got brave enough to follow through,even still it is just a spin off of SC1,no creativity.The only following that is done is gamers following the crowd to play WOW. When i see Blizzard make a move that shows they have some balls of their own,i will be the first to let you know.It would not surprise me one bit after the success of Free Realms ,Blizzard tries to copy it and bring out their own childrens mmo game. Blizzard is maybe the ONLY large money making developer without a decent game engine?Epic games has 75 employees and has arguably the best game engine today.Square Enix just made their new game engine,heck even SOE updated Everquest 2.I believe it was Runescape that did the graphic over haul??Geesh even that real life themed game did a brilliant engine over haul,somebody posted it in these forums about 3 weeks ago.Geesh almost every single F2P game has a better engine than Warcrafts.Your results are limited by the game engine and the results truly show. Trust me ,Blizzard does VERY little LEADING in the game industry,they are still a small follower with a lot of money.Heck there has shown to be more aggressive developers that have left Blizzard than what Blizzard is pulling off. There is no WOW to copy/follow,WOW is EQ1.5,they are all following SOE's leads.Remember all that SOE hate/bashing over RMT??/lmao was there ANY doubt Blizzard was following ??I think it is about time Blizzard quit hiding behind SOE and take some steps of their own,i mean they have the money,they are grown men..i think. http://www.youtube.com/user/Napolianboo#p/u/15/rCYLLQCNc1w |
|
11/06/09 4:02:53 AM#337
Originally posted by Wraithone He could have gotten big traffic by trashing the RMT shop, too. "" Voice acting isn't an RPG element....it's just a production value." - grumpymel2 |
|
|
11/06/09 4:04:05 AM#338
Originally posted by egotrip
Lol. The entire idea of an MMO is we pay money for basically nothing in return then fairly mindless entertainment.... |
|
|
11/06/09 4:08:27 AM#339
Originally posted by Uronksur Unlike a movie, or cable TV, or going to a football game. MMOs provide more intellectual stimulation than any of those. "" Voice acting isn't an RPG element....it's just a production value." - grumpymel2 |
|
|
11/06/09 4:17:27 AM#340
Originally posted by MMO_Doubter He could have gotten big traffic by trashing the RMT shop, too.
No doubt. One must be well rounded. ^^ |
|
|
11/06/09 4:39:03 AM#341
If I thought change came out of the blue and had no precedents I would have the views of Mr Wood. But I do not, and predicting the future based on the present and past is what humans do. If you think it will stop at fluff I hope you are right but I think you are being naïve. |
|
|
11/06/09 4:40:18 AM#342
Excellent article, and very well put. The cinema analagy was a great way of illustrating your point. Look on the brightside, at least you don't have to go to Blizzcon to get your 'special' pet anymore :) Common sense is not a Sixth sense |
|
|
11/06/09 5:10:28 AM#343
I agree with the article. Blizzard isn't really doing anything new. Buying TCG cards to get an ingame mount is the same idea. But I do think that the uproar will stem (if any was planned) any unnerving microtransaction ideas. Champions Online is a game that completely turned me away because of that fact. When I have to pay real money to respec my character in WoW, then I will worry. =P |
|
|
11/06/09 5:17:18 AM#344
There is no way I'm reading 13 pages, sorry... but... For me this whole discussion revolves around the reasons. Why move to an itemshop scheme at all? I know This is not what Bliz are doing, but the article accuses everyone of over-reacting, but I just don't see why there is a need to change the sub scheme at all. The most commonly used excuse is "because it makes things even, some people playing 2 hours a wekk pay the same as those playing over 50", I'm sorry (and please excuse the quote - thanks Rob) 'but the level of naivety required to beleive this is rarely seen outside of 70's porn films'. I'm supposed to beleive that the board of a company gives 2 shits about being fair to players, who are already paying them? Yeah I can see that meeting now - CEO "The thing is I think we are chargeing these people too much, they are giving us just too much money, we should work out a way to reduce their payment". Itemshops/malls are just a way to make more money out of the players, it works exactly the same way as actual shops, it relies on people being thick and not noticing how much they spend to fleece them out of more of their cash than a static monthly sub currently does. Having said that then, why have the pet shop? In this case they are still going to be charging a sub so it's a straight out revenue stream, well Bliz is a company it's function is to generate income. But think about it, basically they are adding content in a game that poeple bought and pay a subscription to and then they are charging for that content. Does that seem right to anyone? Sorry, but imo pick one payment plan or another, don't have them all that's just taking the piss. And to say this content is just fluff is ignorance, 95% of the game is fluff, it's about character progression and escapism not how much money you want to dump into your hobby. It's a slippery slope and imo this is already way too far down it. Having said all that I don't and never will play WoW, so my opinion is completely null and void I guess. ----- |
|
|
11/06/09 5:29:19 AM#345
Giving part of their newly discovered way of milking the cow to charity is only an attempt to prevent the loss of goodwill, but comes accross as cynical and causes them to loose even more goodwill. For some this may even be an eye-opener. Blizzard is no saint. |
|
|
11/06/09 5:34:20 AM#346
Glad to see that wow makes mmorpg.com users blood boil. It shows that most of us are former wow-junkies (or current) that has a huge grudge against the game :) Comon guys, is this really so bad? |
|
|
zeifertstc
Novice Member
Joined: 1/01/09
"Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most" ~ Ozzy Osbourne |
11/06/09 5:40:15 AM#347
When I saw this article I had some thoughts and then I saw that there were 35 pages of comments in reply. I'm not about to sit through and read all 35 pages of it so forgive my ignorance if the points I'm about to cover have already been discussed. Much of what I think goes right along with mrwolf who posted before me. You paid for the box and you're paying a subscription fee, the front of the box says "xx Million Copies sold" or something to that effect (I've lost my box since I bought it and the cardboard disc holders don't say it (I just checked)). Now, if you multiply that $15 per month per player by the number of years the game has been out, I'm sure the amount of revenue generated has been more than enough to pay the development team, maintain upkeep of all game servers and helped the development team to put together subsequent expansion packs many times over. So why the need to use an item mall as an excuse to give money to charity? Are to think that Blizzard isn't making enough money to maintain itself, it's servers, it's staff and it's other projects off of sales of their products (which are quite numerous especially with Diablo III rolling out)? If they feel strongly about the charity, why not just place a tag on boxes that states that a purchase of this game and subsequent payments of already existing subscription fees will, in part, go to x charity? I'm sorry, but it does seem to me that they (Blizzard) might have a genuine care for the charity but they are going about it all the wrong way. In effect, by creating an item mall containing any items whatsoever (vanity or progression) was an excuse to generate more work for developers, requiring more money to pay them, for no real purpose at all. It also would make the player without the extra cash to spend look rather heartless if they could not summon one of these cuddly pals from the item mall that is supposed to be there for charity. In essence, it creates a smokescreen effect. "If you want money to go to this charity, you'll buy the pet, if you don't, then you don't care and YOUR friends will see that you don't care." In my honest opinion, it seems to be more of an uncaring company trying to look innocent. Pretty cool signature, yes? |
|
11/06/09 5:40:48 AM#348
Originally posted by Conavar
Oh, I'm sure they will still have those, too. "" Voice acting isn't an RPG element....it's just a production value." - grumpymel2 |
|
|
outfctrl
Hard Core Member
Joined: 11/16/03
American by Birth |
11/06/09 5:40:57 AM#349
HEy all, give Blizzard a break, after all, they only have 10-12 million subscribers. They are getting low on cash. I swear, have a heart for this poor company. Give more!! "I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly." |
|
11/06/09 5:47:23 AM#350
Originally posted by Ruyn
QFE, im not an eloquent man but this puts my thoughts on the "vanity items" excuse quite nicely |
|