Game Databases: AllodsDB Network Sites: GamerTube.com
Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist
Games:354  Guilds:2,156
Members:1,178,552  Online:0
Guests:0  Posts:3,325,867
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

6 posts found
  Astralglide

Hard Core Member

Joined: 9/03/07
Posts: 543

"Nothing says combat instancing like cleavage, nipples, and leather"
-Sanya Weathers, 2009

 
11/02/09 4:40:52 PM#1

 Ponico made an interesting comment recently: "Before World of Warcraft incredible subscriptions, 300K customer was pretty good. I still think that when an MMO gets around 300K+ users, it's still a fairly decent success."

 

Which brings me to wonder- in terms based just on active subscribers, "What is a success?" Comparing every game to World  of Warcraft is not only unfair, but redundant. It is the same to me as using Hitler in a debate about something other than genocide or Facism.  MMO's were successful before the Blizzard Behemoth and they will be successful after the game has gone.  How many subs does it take to properly populate servers and stimulate proper pvp/rvr balance, auctionhouse economy, etc? We need to stop using WoW as a measure of success if we, as a community, want to encourage more innovation within our chosen hobby.

A witty saying proves nothing.
-Voltaire

  Khalathwyr

Elite Member

Joined: 6/02/04
Posts: 2063

Google is your friend.

11/02/09 4:44:26 PM#2

The number of subscribers that puts the game in a place where it is making money for the company. For some companies that's 250K, for others, like Icarus with fallen Earth, that's 50K.

Course, the web gurus will want to try toss numbers around like they know it all. But it comes down to the dollars and cents. As soon as subscriptions income > game maintenance costs and steady profit is earned, success.

  Ruyn

Novice Member

Joined: 12/09/08
Posts: 1086

11/02/09 4:44:52 PM#3

A successful MMORPG, from a player perspective, is a game that has a full server.  That's it, that's all.

  SgtFrog

Hard Core Member

Joined: 6/17/08
Posts: 3608

Keroro platoon!!!

11/02/09 4:50:05 PM#4

It really depends on how much it cost to make that mmorpg and to keep it afloat.

  fyerwall

Advanced Member

Joined: 6/01/04
Posts: 1815

11/02/09 4:59:03 PM#5

Success in an MMO?

The game is still running.

Failure in an MMO?

Game doesnt make it past year 1.

Success based on subscription numbers?

All depends upon the company. Some companies can be a success with 20k-50k concurrent subs, while others may aim for a higher number. Take EVE and Fallen Earth for example. They only host one world (the game server you play on - not the multiple servers it is made up of) and have all the players there. This cuts dwn on the overall cost of running the game (imagine having that same world replicated 20 times... thats 20 times the hardware required, 20 times the support personel needed, etc).

There are 3 types of people in the world.
1.) Those who make things happen
2.) Those who watch things happen
3.) And those who wonder "What the %#*& just happened?!"

  Netzoko

Guide

Joined: 7/05/07
Posts: 1197

11/02/09 5:02:41 PM#6

Success = Positive subscription change over time.

Having 1 million subs at release, then 300k 6 months later isn't success.  Starting with 10k and moving up to 400k over years is. EVE and WoW are successes, games that release and die off within a year or  two (lots of these: WAR, aoc, potbs) are not successes to me.

-------------------------