| 63 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
Big BUMP.
MMORPG.com has listed Travian
Ok MMORPG.com Get listing I tried playing Real Life but the graphics sucked, the community was annoying too. |
|
|
xpowderx
Advanced Member
Joined: 10/09/05
Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. |
10/24/09 11:34:17 PM#52
Originally posted by Gyrus Nodiatis, which is more along the fantasy genre of mmorpg is not listed either. I enjoy Nodiatis personally. Very fun game! Success is your proof; |
|
Well - they should list it now. Travian sets the bar pretty bloody low. I tried playing Real Life but the graphics sucked, the community was annoying too. |
|
|
10/24/09 11:46:59 PM#54
Everyday I walk through the university library and see at least one or two people on the school computers playing the farm facebook game. Its way too popular to be a mmorpg, sorry guys. Play as your favorite retro characters: www.cnd-online.net and read my blog: creatingaworld.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
johnmatthais
Tipster
Joined: 4/28/07
Maybe if I'm going to have my Xfire profile up, I should start using Xfire... |
10/24/09 11:54:28 PM#55
Hell, Clan Wars is listed, why not list Farm Town? |
|
10/25/09 12:06:39 AM#56
Originally posted by Gyrus Travian isn't even an RPG. Hopefully that's the "bar" you're talking about and not the Quality bar (because apart from "Rich Get Richer" to the extreme, Travian is a well-designed game.) Not that I have a problem with MMORPG.com listing non-RPGs (let's start getting some MMOFPS and MMORTSes mentioned!) Also, I approve of the excessive forum necromancy happening lately. Nothing motivates forum admins to implement anti-necromancy measures better than a bunch of expired threads constantly being dug up out of their graves. (: |
|
Originally posted by Axehilt Travian isn't even an RPG. Hopefully that's the "bar" you're talking about and not the Quality bar (because apart from "Rich Get Richer" to the extreme, Travian is a well-designed game.) That's what I thought too... then I played it. Try it. It has some serious design flaws - like the fact that there are game elements you cannot counter. It is also possible to get 'crop locked' which means there is no move possible at all. Also, I approve of the excessive forum necromancy happening lately. Nothing motivates forum admins to implement anti-necromancy measures better than a bunch of expired threads constantly being dug up out of their graves. (: I am the OP. I birthed it. So as my mother used to say "I brought you into this world and so I can take you out!" No necromancy - born again.
I tried playing Real Life but the graphics sucked, the community was annoying too. |
|
|
10/25/09 12:44:32 AM#58
All I know is I played it a month or so (~3 years ago) and didn't experience that at all. Sounds like you're nitpicking a very narrow fail condition. |
|
Originally posted by Axehilt A game breaking issue (Ie an issue that brings game play to a complete halt from which you cannot continue) is not a 'narrow fail condition'. Have a look at the official forums where players are advised to 'delete your account and start again' in response to game play. I know you Axehilt, know a bit about game design? Would you ever accept that in a game you designed?
They could address the issue... but to do so they would have to undermine the 'Plus' accounts - which they won't do. They would rather have the money rather than a good game. I think even the Devs know the gravy train will end so they are milking it until then.
I tried playing Real Life but the graphics sucked, the community was annoying too. |
|
|
10/25/09 1:11:50 AM#60
Originally posted by johnmatthais
Oh hell, why don't they list all text base games,and board games and Classic games,flight sims games,even MUD games..And for the grand cake even throw in some Trivia/Puzzle,Card games to...For the Special bonus.Why not add Vegas games,Nudity games as well?As for the special features; add FPS Games,and all browser base games,Sports and Strategy..
|
|
|
10/25/09 1:44:48 AM#61
Originally posted by Gyrus A game breaking issue (Ie an issue that brings game play to a complete halt from which you cannot continue) is not a 'narrow fail condition'. Have a look at the official forums where players are advised to 'delete your account and start again' in response to game play. I know you Axehilt, know a bit about game design? Would you ever accept that in a game you designed? They could address the issue... but to do so they would have to undermine the 'Plus' accounts - which they won't do. They would rather have the money rather than a good game. I think even the Devs know the gravy train will end so they are milking it until then. Well that's the "rich get richer to the extreme" that I mentioned earlier. It's not an ideal game by any stretch, and the 1 month I put into it is all it's getting. But it's a fun formula despite that. Otherwise I wouldn't keep getting suckered into the same formula game after game. Chronologically:
Every single game there has the "rich get richer" problem to the extreme. Big fish eating smaller fish in a persistent world always nosedives eventually because eventually only one guild (or nation or whatever the game calls them) will be king. And all the other players will suffer inevitable defeat. So yeah, that's the critical chink in these games' armor. But despite each new game thumping me in the end, I keep coming back for each new iteration. Overall they dish out enough fun to be worthwhile. I still feel compelled to go back and try Astrowars a 3rd time. Had to cut it short last time because I was moving IRL. That last game had one of the more balanced wars I've ever had in these types of games. Plenty of vicious fighting. Trying to resist the urge though, the game ate up a lot of time ;) |
|
|
10/25/09 5:53:42 PM#62
Farm Teens |
|
|
8/25/10 2:42:57 AM#63
I have to say i found this thread rather intriguing in the fact that i agree with both sides of the argument made.
One Yes it is a mmo, a RPG well considering you make a avatar that represents you and that in general you could call all of facebook a rpg makes me agree with that too. I however think one thing you guys did not think about is the fact that when mmorpg was created there wasnt other types of mmos out there so face it we are in the age of mmorts games coming out. With that said here is my simple definition of a MMO. A game that is Made To Be Multiplayer Only or where multiplayer is the Main mode of gameplay.
So heres all the invalid arguments i saw: 3d, um there are tons of 2d games listed? and i do mean tons. Flash or browser based. what the hell is wrong with that? and what about Java? hmm? Should you rule out runescape[ i honestly hate the game] because that game has had hundreds of thousands of players at one time or another.]
Tech advances, um... sometimes i still prefer snes games to new games simply because the old games are unique and not all trying to look "real" sorry but i came to the realization that what i disliked about newer games is they all freaking look the same now and its amazingly dull. |
|