Originally posted by Fishermage

Okay, obviously Moo has had his butt sufficiently kicked. This hijack has exhausted itself.

   Come on. So far I've asked you to test my knowledge of economics and you've backed out (of course you're not willing to let me test yours, or anything else for that matter). You claim I've never taken economics, so you must know the material well yourself, so why back out? 

You claim that you know better than scientists, yet you don't say what your education is or what you do for a living. You only argue opinion and then selectively eliminate anything you could have missed to the point where you DEMAND that the person find counterexamples in black and white. You ignore most of what people post, even if it refutes your argument and continue to demand more evidence when you've provided none yourself.

  All of that makes YOU the troll, since any person who has taken economics and understood all of the concepts would take glee at the opportunity to test somebody else he thinks is posing, or have his own knowledge tested for that matter.

  Here is an example: 

   Show me that there has been a religious person who independently proved everything any atheist has ever done in mathematics; if you can't provide me with such a person, then it is clear that religious people are horrible at mathematics and far worse than atheists.

Originally posted by Sabiancym

Originally posted by Fishermage

Okay, obviously Moo has had his butt sufficiently kicked. This hijack has exhausted itself.

 

Only you would be arrogant enough to claim victory when arguing opinions.  Something where no "victor" can be determined.

Actually, every debate in human history has been people arguing over opinions. Victory or loss can be determined in any debate; sorry your education is so sparse that you simply do not understand this basic notion.

Your ignorance never ceases to amaze me. The arrogant one is you that you actually think a person CAN'T win an argument, and then you use that ignorant, yet smug statement as a basis for attacking another person. Where in hell did you learn this idiocy? is this what they teach people in government schools now?

And you have the audacity to make the claim that you are superior intellectually because you are an atheist. Amazing.

Originally posted by //\\//\\oo

Originally posted by Fishermage

Okay, obviously Moo has had his butt sufficiently kicked. This hijack has exhausted itself.

 

   Come on. So far I've asked you to test my knowledge of economics and you've backed out (of course you're not willing to let me test yours, or anything else for that matter). You claim I've never taken economics, so you must know the material well yourself, so why back out? 

You claim that you know better than scientists, yet you don't say what your education is or what you do for a living. You only argue opinion and then selectively eliminate anything you could have missed to the point where you DEMAND that the person find counterexamples in black and white. You ignore most of what people post, even if it refutes your argument and continue to demand more evidence when you've provided none yourself.

  All of that makes YOU the troll, since any person who has taken economics and understood all of the concepts would take glee at the opportunity to test somebody else he thinks is posing, or have his own knowledge tested for that matter.

  Here is an example: 

   Show me that there has been a religious person who independently proved everything any atheist has ever done in mathematics; if you can't provide me with such a person, then it is clear that religious people are horrible at mathematics and far worse than atheists.

 

 

 

 

We are discussing something in a given context, and you keep shifting, evading and jumping that context every time I beat you on any point. Now you are playing  the same game in a new way. I will continue to kick your butt each time we argue on every subject where we disagree -- that is how I will show your ignorance and lack of cogent thought.

Now you are simply proving it yourself with this immature behavior of yours, which sorry, I will not indulge you.

If you want to be tested, go to school. If you want to test others, teach. I am here to discuss subjects and ideas, not play games -- if you here for a different purpose than me, that's your problem not mine.

Originally posted by Fishermage

 

We are discussing something in a given context, and you keep shifting, evading and jumping that context every time I beat you on any point. Now you are playing  the same game in a new way. I will continue to kick your butt each time we argue on every subject where we disagree -- that is how I will show your ignorance and lack of cogent thought.

Now you are simply proving it yourself with this immature behavior of yours, which sorry, I will not indulge you.

If you want to be tested, go to school. If you want to test others, teach. I am here to discuss subjects and ideas, not play games -- if you here for a different purpose than me, that's your problem not mine.

 

  You're the only one evading here. I've answered and addressed every point you've made: You made the first "shift in context" when you suddenly changed social contribution to philosophical contribution, but that's OK, because you're allowed to do anything you want and nobody else is.

  You still haven't provided me with a theist who can prove the aforementioned, so all theists must be horrible at mathematics. Since aptitude at mathematics is a measure of intelligence all theists are stupid. So you're not only ignorant, but stupid.

  That is how your arguments work.

  As for the testing and teaching: Alright, instead of testing your knowledge and being tested, why not discuss something entirely within the realm of quantitative economics? 

  You choose the topic, but it has to be within that field, or else it shouldn't be discussed; things that formal drift away from opinions and actually rely on knowledge and aptitude, so you could show everybody how ignorant I am and how sage you are.

Originally posted by //\\//\\oo

Originally posted by Fishermage

 

We are discussing something in a given context, and you keep shifting, evading and jumping that context every time I beat you on any point. Now you are playing  the same game in a new way. I will continue to kick your butt each time we argue on every subject where we disagree -- that is how I will show your ignorance and lack of cogent thought.

Now you are simply proving it yourself with this immature behavior of yours, which sorry, I will not indulge you.

If you want to be tested, go to school. If you want to test others, teach. I am here to discuss subjects and ideas, not play games -- if you here for a different purpose than me, that's your problem not mine.

 

 

  You're the only one evading here. I've answered and addressed every point you've made: You made the first "shift in context" when you suddenly changed social contribution to philosophical contribution, but that's OK, because you're allowed to do anything you want and nobody else is.

  You still haven't provided me with a theist who can prove the aforementioned, so all theists must be horrible at mathematics. Since aptitude at mathematics is a measure of intelligence all theists are stupid. So you're not only ignorant, but stupid.

  That is how your arguments work.

  As for the testing and teaching: Alright, instead of testing your knowledge and being tested, why not discuss something entirely within the realm of quantitative economics? 

  You choose the topic, but it has to be within that field, or else it shouldn't be discussed; things that formal drift away from opinions and actually rely on knowledge and aptitude, so you could show everybody how ignorant I am and how sage you are.

 

Once again you show that reading comprehension issue. I am not into playing contests with people, I am here for a different purpose than you. For me it is not about competition -- for me, it is the subject and the ideas that matter. This is how we adults behave.

As I said in the other thread, until next time.

Originally posted by Fishermage

 

 

Once again you show that reading comprehension issue. I am not into playing contests with people, I am here for a different purpose than you. For me it is not about competition -- for me, it is the subject and the ideas that matter. This is how we adults behave.

As I said in the other thread, until next time.

   You can't back up anything you claimed about me being ignorant? So it was all rhetoric to get me riled up? Good job.

   You might know nothing, but at least you're good at trolling. There will be no next time, because you've been exposed.

Originally posted by //\\//\\oo

Originally posted by Fishermage

 

 

Once again you show that reading comprehension issue. I am not into playing contests with people, I am here for a different purpose than you. For me it is not about competition -- for me, it is the subject and the ideas that matter. This is how we adults behave.

As I said in the other thread, until next time.

 

   You can't back up anything you claimed about me being ignorant? So it was all rhetoric to get me riled up? Good job.

   You might know nothing, but at least you're good at trolling. There will be no next time, because you've been exposed.

 

Again, the reading comprehension problem. I called you ignorant AFTER you showed yourself to be. I dont have to "back up" a statement made based upon an observation of prior behavior.

I didn't even care to get you riled up -- I wanted to discuss an issue, as with the other thread, Your own immaturity got the better of you. Take care.

Wow the people that post here are amazing, but not in a good way.

Originally posted by Scalebane

Wow the people that post here are amazing, but not in a good way.

Agreed.

Originally posted by Fishermage

Originally posted by Scalebane

Wow the people that post here are amazing, but not in a good way.

 

Agreed.

  Agreed. I'll put them on block where they belong, since all they do is insult people and back out when their knowledge is really on trial.

Originally posted by //\\//\\oo

Originally posted by Fishermage

Originally posted by Scalebane

Wow the people that post here are amazing, but not in a good way.

 

Agreed.

 

  Agreed. I'll put them on block where they belong, since all they do is insult people and back out when their knowledge is really on trial.

 

Or when all they do is evade and change the subject when someone kicks their butt in a debate. Then when they are called on it get all upset and turn it into a silly little childish competition.

link

How to destroy both the moslem world and the "heretic and liberal" Western Civilization that sends out its accursed "missionaries,"

1. First cause a war to be declared by the West (US and Britain) against "terrorism" which has no end in sight. Thus causing 911 with the CIA and then blame Masonic Islamic Terrorist Network built by my CIA and Rockefeller financed and developed oil bonanza---Saudi Arabia. Mission accomplished.

2. Then restore the surplus flow of heroin by removing the suniTaliban (which was created through the CIA and Pakis.) Then move into Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein, allowing the US to capture one of his doubles. According to an Iraqi officer, Hussein loaded two tractor trailers of dollars and euros on to an American C-141, then drove his limo onto the plane after which it took off and disappeared into the skyline. Mission accomplished.

3. Begin the systematic destruction of as many moslems and mosques as possible using roving CIA teams inciting hatred on both sides. Cause outrages against the moslems of the south, using American GIs raping Iraqi women, photographing the crime and then posting it on the internet further citing moslem fury against the West; also spread disease via immunizations and radioactive toxins among the American GIs further weakening the American military in preparation for my Sino-Soviet-Moslem invasion of the West. Mission accomplished.

4. In preparation for my Sino-Soviet-Moslem invasion, use scalar weapons involving weather modification, causing hurricanes in American, devastating select cities thereby weakening the West's will to resist. And with deliberate non-intervention and other injustices perpetrated by federal, state and local agencies, further sow the seeds for race war between Whites and Blacks, while occupying the people with non-news (Jackson, Simpson, Bryant---Black on White crimes---and any other case [Scott Peterson, Stephanie Hollowood]) that could be used to occupy the attention of the viewers. More hurricanes are in the making and the South will be further "softened" for invasion from which Cuba, now occupied by the Chinese and hosted by Fidel Castro, will be the staging base---with the full cooperation of the CIA and American Military Intelligence. Mission being accomplished.

5. Knowing that the American people will be beginning to denounce the war and even concluding that 911 was an inside job (never believing that Director of Central Intelligence, Knight of Malta and CFR member George J. Tenet oversaw the crime,) I would remove Tenet blaming him for the "incompetence" demonstrated in preventing the "attack." This will save face for obedient Skull and Bones servant, pres George W. Bush, whose father and grandfather served the Order most wonderfully. This will also save Jesuit Georgetown-educated Tenet from future prosecution by controlling the Attorney General, the Justice Department and the FBI. Mission accomplished.

6. In order to justify a war in Yisrael for the destruction of the Jerusalem mosques, use Masonic Jewish anti-Torah Zionists to incite more hatred between Yisrael's Arabs and Jews, while depriving the Jews of their land given to them by G and the British Mandate at the end of WWI. This will be the "Roadmap to War" policy shoved down the throats by the CFR-controlled devotee to the Archbishop of New York City, and Pres BH Obama. Now war in Yisrael is a certainty. In order to blame the US for the destruction of the Jerusalem mosques build a huge American Army base in Yisrael from which the Americans could operate during the coming war in Yisrael, American troops moving in from Iraq. Meanwhile at the moment increase US troops in Iraq through a coming catastrophic event and thus a mandatory draft. Mission About to be Accomplished.

7. In order to increase US troops in Iraq, which troops will then invade Iran, Syria, Jordan and Saudi Arabia (as was told by an aged former Marine and suspected Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor), use the CIA controlled Military Intelligence to detonate five to ten dirty atomic bombs as the book Endrun (or Endgame written by two American Generals) so describes. This will strike at the very heart of the proud, profligate and fat Americans so as to incite the people to adopt a total war footing which CFR trustees will fully implement; blame Iran for the detonations justifying the invasion of that nation; or, blame North Korea thereby beginning the war in the East in killing millions of Chinese as China will be aiding North Korea. In preparation for an American defeat, move all American aircraft carriers out of the Pacific and into the Persian gulf. Dispatch "boomers," or American nuclear subs, into the Pacific since only a few of us know that there is no such thing as Airborne Nuclear War. Yes, the subs are disarmed of any potential nuclear threat. When this becomes known, he who as the largest and most disciplined army will have the upperhand. This of course will be the Chinese Communists commanded by Chinese Jesuits. Mission about to be accomplished.

8. With America fighting a two-front war which cannot be won, control the top military commanders in the field and in the intelligence services of BOTH SIDES through high-level Freemasonry and the Knights of Malta. This will insure America's defeat; any General that will not obey commands in the name of patriotism will be eliminated as was American General George Patton and Russian General Andri Vlasov during WWII. Ah, the Order accomplished so much then "for the greater glory of gods!"

9. After using China to sweep the Pacfic Rim of all "heretics and liberals" as was done during WWII with the Japanese Army, then attack Australia and New Zealand as those idiots have abandoned private gun ownership in the name of the goodness of man and the honesty of government! Those nations of white apostate Protestants are sitting ducks in the middle of the South Pacific with no relief possible from either British nor US fleets. The shedding of the blood of the heretic, whats not to love!

10. With the beloved Chinese navy coupled with the Japanese Navy sweep the Pacific, attack Hawaii and eliminate all but a few of the native Oriential Hawaiians. They hate Americans and will help the invading Chinese and Soviet navy. At the same time bring in hundreds of thousands of Chinese and Soviet troops through the underground tunnel linking Russia and Alaska. By the time mongol forces reach the Coast of California with LA in flames, attackers will be arriving in the North killing many heretic Canadian Protestants in British Columbia and Alberta. They will not touch Roman Catholic Quebec as she will be under the protection of the invading Roman Catholic European forces along with Roman Catholic New England.

The Jesuit Superior General's scenario will unfold along these lines. The next event will be a terrorist event involving preplaced dirty bombs in the US. Biologicals may also be used as the CIA has spent years in developing these toxins. The movie The Satan Bug produced over thirty years ago is somewhat of a forewarning to the event. A two-fromt war will ensue; armies will destroy the mosques of Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem with the secret aid of the Black Pope's Islamic Terrorist Network; troops will be betrayed and massacred as were three German armies by Hitler in the East; then will come the end with our invasion, partition and occupation for at least fifty to one hundred years if the Lord gezeus tarries.

Other sources say 1 in 5.

Get your sources straight. NEWB!!!!!!!

SHAZAM!!!!!!!!!

FUCKING PWNED BIATCH!!!!!!!!!

ENZYTE STYLE!!!!!!!