| 132 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
stayontarget
Novice Member
Joined: 10/04/08
Girlfriends come and go but Epic battles are Soulbound |
Originally posted by Zorndorf Not really but hay if it makes you feel better by all means keep shouting that "song and dance". |
Originally posted by coffee
wow that makes no sense.. why would anyone make undead hunters, tauren paladins/priests, and dwarf shamans even possible. Not to mention that goblins get to be hunters while gnomes can not? WTF
|
|
Originally posted by Home15
Agreed. There is as much bad as good. |
|
Originally posted by CuddlyBunny Human hunters make sense; so undead hunters (which are basically just dead human hunters) make as much sense; though I'd be interested to see if undead hunters can feed bits of themselves to their pets in times of dire need. Dwarf shamans make sense too; there's already the wildhammer clan of dwarves that are shamanistic and given that the dwarves evolved from the earthen (as seen in WotLK) it's easy to see them as a shamanistic "tied-to-the-earth" sort of race. From what I hear, tauren paladins and priests don't get their power from "the light", but rather through the worship of a sun god who bestows the same sort of abilities on them as traditional paladin/priests get. It's a bit of a stretch for me, 'cos I don't know much about the tauren belief system. Goblin Hunters; well the goblins have always been described as being deceptively strong and physical considering their size whereas the gnomes have always been more grounded in the cerebral/magical arts. It's far more of a stretch for me to consider goblins as mages and warlocks rather than as hunters. |
|
Originally posted by left4shaman
Heh, sorry bud but I won't be resubbing. I quit after TBC and haven't looked back. |
|
Originally posted by Drakkhen
Heh, sorry bud but I won't be resubbing. I quit after TBC and haven't looked back.
Clearly not read the info at all. It is not a question of looking or coming back. This is WOW 2 and you will walk around in another Azeroth... Look Zorndorf lost a star again. ;)) The inconvenient linked truth hurts on mmorpg.com |
|
Originally posted by Zorndorf
Clearly not read the info at all. It is not a question of looking or coming back. This is WOW 2 and you will walk around in another Azeroth...
WOW 2 would be a new skill system, less auto targeting, new graphics engine(not just a fresh coat of paint. cough-Lich-cough)... Be excited. Your game got a refresh, and they are killing the "love-fest" that sprouted between Horde and Alliance. It's not revolutionary, and it's NOT WoW2. There won't be a WoW 2. deal. |
|
Originally posted by Zorndorf But it will still be the same game. This expansion mostly looks like a huge pallete swap. Only reason they didn't open ALL the classes to ALL the races - so they can do that final step in the next expansion? |
|
|
How is this expansion any less generic than the previous two released? |
|
|
Phasing is a new tier of gameplay for me, looking forward Cataclysm, but I've never played WoW in a hardcore way, so I'm nowhere near a burnout or a addiction recovery or even a "must hate my ex" syndrom with WoW, so I just randomly sub when I feel like it, though I'm not even on WOTK yet. |
|
Originally posted by Dhaeman
It's more generic. Less creative. |
|
|
I think the only people that are excited by the new expansion would have been excited no matter what the expansion content. |
|
|
Kyleran
Elite Member
Joined: 9/13/06
"In EVE, no one gives a damn about a fair fight." - chafin |
While I'm mildly curious about how the old world will be redone, can't seen it holding my interest for long because at its core, its just more of the same. If you enjoy how it plays now, then you'll keep enjoying it. I walked away quite a while ago and I'm looking forward to something new, and not continuing down the same road.
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon EVE Cult member since May 2007 Regarding EVE: "To be honest, I think God himself created this game." - Shek Regarding new players in EVE: "Think of yourself as a child released into a park full of pedophiles..." - Eleazaros |
Originally posted by Kyleran
This If I'm not playing anything when this expansion comes out I'll probably get it, otherwise I'll pass on it. |
|
Originally posted by Drakkhen
Heh, sorry bud but I won't be resubbing. I quit after TBC and haven't looked back.
i'm asking myself what this guy is doing on this forum posting on this thread o.O |
|
|
You know what would be new, creative and exciting? Some new server types. I would reroll immediately to play on a player economy server where everything is player crafted, and mobs only drop materials and money. You would have to add some crafting options to cover what can't be made now, but it would be much more immersive. You know what would be fun? A series of world-changing events like the AQ opening was. |
|
Originally posted by left4shaman
I think releasing them at the same time might be counter productive for blizzard. In that, I mean why bother? Blizzard currently holds the reigns in terms of player numbers, and they are quite committed players .They enjoy their game, they feel a connection to their guilds, they play religiously, and they are enjoying the experience. I don't see where TOR has a place in this discussion. WoW, like it or not, is a solid game. Right, not my game, but a solid game nonetheless. Yes, there will be a bleed to Bio's game, but there have been many bleeds in the last few years including, well, everything. AoC, Warhammer, EQ2 (in improved state), Lotro, blah...and a few of them are considered successful, and seriously, from old numbers standpoint are successful. What needs to be clarified, there is no competition for WoW in the western market. Yet, there are successful games to be played, EQ2 and Eve to reiterate. Bioware's project, in my humble opinion, is going to operate separate of Blizzard, which will continue to dominate in the sub war. For now, and probably 5 years from now, that war has been lost in NA and EU. I mean, the friend that likely introduces you to this genre is probably playing a blizzard game... Played (more than a month): SWG, Second Life, Tabula Rasa, Lineage 2, Everquest 2, EvE, MxO, Ryzom. Tried: WoW, Shadowbane, Anarchy Online, Everquest, WWII Online, Planetside Beta: Lotro, Tabula Rasa, WAR. |
|
|
It's the same game; they're just adding new content. That's what expansion packs do. The core gameplay isn't changing, and people who don't like WoW won't suddenly start liking it.New MMOs will be competitive as long as they introduce new mechanics instead of trying to copy the WoW/EQ model. |
|
|
Well, I personally think SWTOR could really take MMOGs to the next level if done right. And Star Wars as a franchise dwarfs WOW. The new Guild Wars 2 trailer has gotten me far more excited than what I've seen for Catylcysm.
|
|
Aw so they resub for a month and then its same old shit and they quit.
But now? Meh. Its old hat. By the way Guild Leveling, just another thing they stole from Warhammer among many.
|
|
Originally posted by logangregor I bet they do a better job with it, like they did with siege combat and queue from anywhere BGs. Nothing wrong with copying good ideas. WoW would not even be a game without that principle. Anyway, yeah, it's just more of the same. |
|
|
Mazin
Apprentice Member
Joined: 5/10/09
It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and I'm all outta gum. |
Originally posted by MMO_Doubter
I think AQ opening was one of the best things they did right in the game. It brings the WoW community together closer doing shit like that. |
No reason to stop now. Btw siege combat came DAOC and not from warhammer. |
|
Originally posted by Mazin Yes. It really was amazing. |
|
|
Depends what mmos we are talking about. If we're talking Guild Wars 2 and The Old Republic absolutely not. If' we're talking everyone else but those 2 then yeah I would say so. |
|