| 81 posts found | |
|---|---|
Originally posted by Phry
That's what I don't like about TOR.. Bioware claims its a mmorpg, but all I see is your typical platform structured single player rpg with "some" online content thrown in just to make the people pay 15 dollars a month.. That's not an MMORPG.. I was hoping TOR would be a real MMORPG where thousands of people interact with one another within the game world. I enjoy quests and a nice storyline, but If I wanted to play a structured story driven RPG, I sure as heck wouldn't pay 15 dollars a month to do so. I don't mind TOR being very story driven and quest oriented, but some of the things I've heard about the actual gameplay causes me to raise my eyebrow in worry. Such as, the majority of the game can be completed solo, but some of the quests require a "few" friends to complete.. Now, I don't know what few means, but I surely hope this isn't going to be like a diablo mmog where u can do everything by yourself but If u wanna hang out with friends, it's your choice but not necessary. To me and many veteran MMORPGamers that's not what we call a true MMO.. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to hate on TOR, in fact, I hope it will be a masterpiece. And I wish it will become the savior of the MMO genre. But, as of now the game sounds like a 90% single player RPG with very few EQ, WoW, DAOC, etc MMO features. That's not enough to make me pay to play.. Hope I'm wrong. Rallithon Oakthornn |
|
Originally posted by oakthornn So far, it seems to me that TOR is trying to follow a Lotro approach where almost all the contents can be soloed, but some required grouping. In lotro, there is both instance and free zone with mobs. The instance allows for better quest design, while the free zone are better to give a sense of "this is a real world filled with people". Lotro is story based and it works relativaly well too, although the story is the same for everybody, while TOR will have a different story for "everyone"...
|
|
|
Revthought
Apprentice Member
Joined: 6/30/08
"What is a rebel? A man who says no." -Camus |
Originally posted by Rydeson
good post there.. /clap I would love to find a good sandbox game. I had hopes that SWG was going to be it, but that fell thru.. It didn't take long before all the errors, bugs and poor designs showed up.. The problem you have with a true sandbox is that the devs have to keep up with the everchanging world.. As with real life, sandboxes changes day after day, and the SWG devs did not have the grey matter to handle it.. Sandboxes require a shit load of manpower to keep it running.. In addition to keeping up with changes in the current game, sandboxes need add on changes as well.. This means adding new content, trades items, personal belongs and maybe even geographical changes.. Without change, any sandbox will become boring in time.. I seriously doubt you'll ever find a true sandbox game anytime soon.. It just cost too much to design and upkeep.. Dare I bring this thread full circle? The best sandbox game on the market, and in my estimation one of the best games ever made, is eve online.
Try it.
|
|
I did , and hated it.. I couldn't even make it past the 14 day free trial.. /delete Eve |
|
Exactly, So it may just be a SWG except with better graphics, nothing fancy. |
|
|
Why would Bioware come out with an Eve styled game? That's crazy talk. "Um... I want the new Bungie game to be like Hello Kitty Island" wtf? |
|