| 58 posts found | |
|---|---|
Originally posted by gamerman98
Lol, then you need to revisit your definition, and stop being so guilible that you actually believe what comes out of the mouth of a public relations guy like Tasos. |
|
Originally posted by hoopty
Then it would be false advertisement.That could mean massive law suites if people dont get there money back.
It isn't false advertisement because information on these features being removed is readily available to anyone that has done the minimum amount of research. It's stated in several interviews what was removed and why. In dev journals, in Dev posts on the official forums etc etc etc. As long as the information is available it isn't false advertisement. AoC managed to avoid this by posting DX10 wasn't going to be in like 1 day before launch. Aventurines info about what has been removed has been available for a very long time lol, some of it for years. |
|
|
You can't deny what he said though. Most games that advertise features on their game box HAVE them. Played: Best thread ever: |
|
Originally posted by GrayGhost79
If it was removed, why is it still on the site? People shouldn't have to hunt and peck through all developer journals and dev posts in a forum to find out that the features listed on the OFFICIAL site of the game have been removed. I can't see how anyone can logically think this is acceptable. Your whole defense is that someone should read every piece of information on the game EXCEPT the OFFICIAL SITE? How does that make any sense? |
|
Originally posted by veritas_X
Lol, then you need to revisit your definition, and stop being so guilible that you actually believe what comes out of the mouth of a public relations guy like Tasos.
If Tasos is in public relations then he should find a diferent job. You don't see me dismanteling bombs do you? |
|
No offense:
|
|
Originally posted by Dakirn
If it was removed, why is it still on the site? People shouldn't have to hunt and peck through all developer journals and dev posts in a forum to find out that the features listed on the OFFICIAL site of the game have been removed. I can't see how anyone can logically think this is acceptable. Your whole defense is that someone should read every piece of information on the game EXCEPT the OFFICIAL SITE? How does that make any sense?
Agreed 100%. Played: Best thread ever: |
|
Originally posted by GrayGhost79 Another Fail post is another Fail post. Look, if your not going to research MMO's it's probably best not to play them. Faq's are regularly outdated and fast. Not only that but what is initially planned to be in is never everything that will be in. Some things get cut, others get added. It's the nature of the beast. If you truly want to limit your dissapointment from an MMO, keep up to date on it. In this case you did not and it shows.
Edited to add: I too was in beta, my forum name is GrayGhost79 there.
I like this format of discussion. Makes things easy to address
*edit for everyone else* I'm white and orange, he's yellow. Official FAQ is green. |
|
Originally posted by Gamer1221 Responces are in Orange. You posted alot of opinions, falsehoods, or misleading statments. I dont disagree that some really cool features did not make it in though. |
|
Originally posted by Dakirn
If it was removed, why is it still on the site? People shouldn't have to hunt and peck through all developer journals and dev posts in a forum to find out that the features listed on the OFFICIAL site of the game have been removed. I can't see how anyone can logically think this is acceptable. Your whole defense is that someone should read every piece of information on the game EXCEPT the OFFICIAL SITE? How does that make any sense?
It doesn't make any sense. But the religous fanbois have run out of excuses. GrayGhost79 said that features mentioned by the OP were removed over a year ago, yet one of the most recent interviews end last year Tasos kept mentioning them and bragging about it. But hey.... I already said it in another post. The average short term memory of a fanboi is comparable to a Butterfly. When www met dot , they then stumbled upon Secret Society , wich happened to be a Guild , wich in turn told dot about the net . |
|
|
Outdated.
|
|
Originally posted by lakers4eva
If Tasos is in public relations then he should find a diferent job. You don't see me dismanteling bombs do you?
That may be, but its not really relevant to what was being discussed. My point was that if you believe anything that a PR person says, you are an idiot. A PR person's job is bullshit people and convince them to buy their product regardless of its quality or necessity. All of these people claiming that Tasos 'promised' this feature and Aventurine 'promised' that feature really need to wake up. |
|
|
corpusc
Apprentice Member
Joined: 7/25/03
contact me if you are seriously interested in |
how can you have no problems targetting in Quake and CS, but DO have problems targetting in DF? The End |
Originally posted by GrayGhost79
The stuff being complained about was removed long long ago and we were told they were. If you guys wish me to start posting Dev quotes and there sources I am more than willing since I have some time to kill. There is much of it to be found here, in the Dev journals, Interviews, and even posts they made on the Official forums. The official forums are down at the moment, atleast not accessible, so I can not grab those but there are plenty others quotes and sources readily avaliable.
Who was told? There is "features" section on official website. I dont give a shit about official or unofficial forums period. |
|
Originally posted by veritas_X
If Tasos is in public relations then he should find a diferent job. You don't see me dismanteling bombs do you?
That may be, but its not really relevant to what was being discussed. My point was that if you believe anything that a PR person says, you are an idiot. A PR person's job is bullshit people and convince them to buy their product regardless of its quality or necessity. All of these people claiming that Tasos 'promised' this feature and Aventurine 'promised' that feature really need to wake up.
I don't believe PR people, and I already knew the website was bullshit, but the fact remains that there are probably quite a few people who paid money for this game after reading the feature list, and will log in or explore the forums further to find out that they aren't getting what they paid for. It's one thing for a fan site to have inaccurate information, but for the main web site not to be updated on the supposed Release Date... How can they even call that a release? |
|
Originally posted by Gamer1221
That may be, but its not really relevant to what was being discussed. My point was that if you believe anything that a PR person says, you are an idiot. A PR person's job is bullshit people and convince them to buy their product regardless of its quality or necessity. All of these people claiming that Tasos 'promised' this feature and Aventurine 'promised' that feature really need to wake up.
I don't believe PR people, and I already knew the website was bullshit, but the fact remains that there are probably quite a few people who paid money for this game after reading the feature list, and will log in or explore the forums further to find out that they aren't getting what they paid for. It's one thing for a fan site to have inaccurate information, but for the main web site not to be updated on the supposed Release Date... How can they even call that a release?
I agree with you man, their website smacks of amateurism, as does their billing system and the general lack of polish surrounding their product. That said, no one is forced to hand over their money. I paid them with the expectation that it would probably be a waste of fifty bucks, and so far I was right. The difference between me and all the folks whining and complaining that they were lied to is that I expected it, and it was an acceptable risk of a small amount of money for possibly finding some long-term enjoyment. The phrase 'buyer beware' applies here. People need to accept responsibility for their actions (even though I know this isn't currently in vogue, particularly in America). People that bought Darkfall with the expectation that it would be a smooth launch and would feature everything Tasos ever talked about are fricking idiots, end of story. Hopefully they will wise up and learn from their mistake. Don't trust game developers; play a demo and make up your own mind, or suffer the consequences.
|
|
Originally posted by Gamer1221
I like this format of discussion. Makes things easy to address
*edit for everyone else* I'm white and orange, he's yellow. Official FAQ is green.
And the reason I say it is a fail post is because you keep saying they have lied. Plenty of information is out there stating what has been removed. They have not lied or broken any promise. What they did do was Fail utterly at keeping there main page updated. Thats it, if the other information wasn't available then yes you could say they lied or broke there promise if you wanted because we are simply left with that information as all there is. That isn't the case, so no this does not validate your point that Aventurine has failed to keep there promises since all you have managed to point out is that they Failed to keep there main page updated, which we all agree with.
So Harp on the fact they fail at updating there site. Quit trying to convence people they failed to keep there promises with the above when I can easily show your statement to be false. |
|
|
As several other people have said, if they removed these features over a year ago, sometime during that year, they could not remove them from the feature list on the OFFICIAL site? This is, indeed, false advertising. The official feature list on the company website is supposed to be far more reliable than an off-the-top-of-the-head answer on some interview on a fansite. It is a blatant lie to list all these features as being in-game with no intention of launching with them.
Yes, other games have cut features before, but they never advertised those features as still being in-game on their website. What Adventurine did here would be comparable to Turbine still showing the old MEO website yet launching LOTRO. The two games have little in common, just like the game Adventurine launched has little in common with the one on their website. |
|
Originally posted by Taram
Unless you and others have trouble reading, you will notice I agree they need to update the Faq and there main site in general. It's asinine for it to be so outdated. I will say again since so many have missed this...........
I agree that it's asinine that they haven't updated there Faq or main site.
The problem is the OP's point isn't Valid because he's saying AV has lied and not filled any of there promises and gives examples. While the whole time he himself knows the Faq isn't updated and Aventurine has indeed stated these features would not be in long before now. So he uses the fact that he himself knows that the Faq and main site are not updated to try and prove a point he knows is a lie. Thats what I don't agree with.
The features Aventurine has said would be in, are in fact in. No feature said to be in is not in with the exception of player houses and those are on the back burner with prestiege classes and an Aquatic race. The sad thing is even player housing is in to a degree, they modified it to be part of the clan system lol.
|
|
|
This thread brings up a great point. If enough people wanted to do so this sort of false or out-dated advertising could result in a class action suit. This is actually WORSE than what Funcom did. Tecmo Bowl. |
|
Originally posted by GrayGhost79 See, here's where we disagree... When you say "Aventurine has said", I equate that to what's on their official feature list. As a company, and as an entity, that, to me, defines what they "have said". Player housing really isn't in man, we both know that. Apparently, you can't even design your city, it's just a pre-designed plot that you spend money to build on. |
|
Originally posted by Gamer1221 See, here's where we disagree... When you say "Aventurine has said", I equate that to what's on their official feature list. As a company, and as an entity, that, to me, defines what they "have said". Player housing really isn't in man, we both know that. Apparently, you can't even design your city, it's just a pre-designed plot that you spend money to build on.
See where you lost this whole thing at was when you said you knew about the correct information and knew that these things have been stated to be out already. When I say Aventurine has said I am reffering to the interviews, Dev journals and posts on the official forums by the Devs which you have admitted to reading.
You and I agree the Web site needs to be updated, you have unwittingly admitted to knowing about the other information, which negates your whole Aventurine Lied to me thread. Live with it and be more careful in your debates in the future. You can not admit to reading something officialy posted by Aventurine, then say it doesn't mean antyhing even though it is more recent......................... Point is, you've proved what many of us already knew and agreed on. The Faw needs an update because me and you and many others have seen the information from Aventurine that contradicts it ourselves. Now deny that lol. Good luck though.
If you wish to start a thread about how Aventurines main page and Faq needs an update I won't disagree or bother it. But what you attempted to do here just begged for a response.
Yes, Aventurine needs to update there Faq and main page. No, Aventurine hasn't lied about the features in game, as you yourself have admitted to reading the information they have posted about it being cut.
So good luck with w/e your trying to do here lol. |
|
|
TheHoweller
Novice Member
Joined: 7/16/08
Grinding is the worst idea ever integrated into a game... I would much rather have fun. |
Yeah...I'm just so glad I didn't pre-order. Aventurine really dropped the ball on this release, at least from what I've read. I will say I agree with you, Ghost. I feel that if you're going to release a game, and charge for it...The website sponsoring that game "should" be updated with the game's current features. There's just absolutely no excuse for Aventurine doing what they did. I really doubt that many people pre-ordered Darkfall thinking that they'd receive a game with the FAQ's promised features...But it's still ethically wrong. I feel an open beta should have been done before this shoddy release...Hell, ask for donations. The last thing Aventurine should have done was gone back on their word of "no pre-orders, we'll do an open-beta"...But whatever, I've always said it, it's their game...They can fuck it up if they want. I personally think Darkfall will bomb in the end and prove itself to be nothing more than most F2P MMOs...I could be wrong, but I won't stupidly find out by handing them 50 bucks. ------------------------------- |
|
It was said once before, but if you don't take pride in your own web-site (which is the face of your company), it says a lot about Aventurine's State of the Game and business practices... and level of compentency!
Not to mention, it is very misleading..!
____________________________ |
|
|
The fact is, if they cant update a website, what makes you think they can update code with any reasonable amount of skill? Not being able to delete lines of html to update their website before launch, to coincide with what is currently available, is epic fail. |
|