Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist
Games:397  Guilds:1,999
Members:1,143,288  Online:0
Guests:0  Posts:3,116,669
<a href="http://www.gameads.com/" target=_blank>Game Ads</a> banner requires iframes.
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

44 posts found
Vynt

Hard Core Member

Joined: 9/19/04
Posts: 286

1/09/09 4:52:05 PM#26

I like having classes in a game. There tends to be more variety. Like in daoc, there were many classes.  You choose what type of character you want, like fighter, mage, etc, then can specialize further like a spiritmaster or runemaster. Then as that spiritmaster, you can further specialize how you want your character to progress. Usually there are a few or so common builds, but there is variety. Then you have all those classes with all those different builds.

In a skill based game, you end up having less different builds because certain things are clearly better. Your creativity isn't squashed in a class game, you just choose what you want to do earlier. I often find skill based to be more boring, especially if it has pvp. If it is only pve, well, people end up focusing on what they like anyway, which is what you do when you pick a class to begin with, lol.

I never lacked for choices in daoc because I was palying what I wanted to play. Same thing in other games like eq for me.

toddze

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/02/08
Posts: 981

1/09/09 4:57:10 PM#27

I like any class systerm that allows you to change classes and level up multiple classes on 1 character. I extremly hate having to level ALT'S.

Waiting for: Final Fantasy XIV
Now Playing: COD4:MW2 (bye bye stars)
Worst MMO: Age of Conan
Favorite MMO: FFXI

Bladin

Novice Member

Joined: 9/01/03
Posts: 1091

1/09/09 5:26:12 PM#28
Originally posted by Abrahmm

The best class system is no class system. Skill based is infinitely better.

sure if you like making a class wannabe with a bunch of generic skills.

WoW is actually fairly decent when it comes to classes.  Since after all a Druid alone has more abilities to use and choose from then the entire choices from UO.

 

People may not remember it, but i think asherons call 2 had a fairly wonderful setup for classes, basically you had a bunch of talent trees and each was a class for your race. 

Guild wars is also a fairly solid class based game.

theJPK

Novice Member

Joined: 6/20/08
Posts: 77

"Be all, end all."

1/09/09 5:31:07 PM#29

Guild Wars no doubt, there were spefic and diverse classes. You could just about predict what each class would do in each situation and try to counter it, this introduces skill into the game. Not like in WoW where one class always has the advantage over anouther.  I think Guild Wars was able to make it so great was because you are always grouped whether it is with NPC's or players. This gave room for example a monk to heal even when they're alone.

__________________________
Played:WoW, Darkfall, Warhammer, Shadowbane, Anarchy Online, Last Chaos, Runescape, Maplestory(bad), Planeshift
Loved: Guild Wars, Eve, Darkfall
Playing:(none)
Waiting for: I don't know

Zindaihas

Elite Member

Joined: 5/07/06
Posts: 3052

'If you put govt in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 yrs there'd be a shortage of sand'~M. Friedman

1/09/09 5:46:07 PM#30
Originally posted by Abrahmm

The best class system is no class system. Skill based is infinitely better.


 

You can still have a class based system that uses skill advancement.  That's the best combination.

"If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking." ~ George S Patton

John.A.Zoid

Novice Member

Joined: 10/08/08
Posts: 1525

1/09/09 5:48:11 PM#31
Originally posted by Zindaihas
Originally posted by Abrahmm

The best class system is no class system. Skill based is infinitely better.


 

You can still have a class based system that uses skill advancement.  That's the best combination.


 

Like SWG where you had the professions and could pick and choose the skills in each profession.

Ihmotepp

Spotlight Poster

Joined: 10/28/08
Posts: 3986

1/09/09 5:49:46 PM#32

I liked the system in Knights of the Old Republic.

http://swforums.bioware.com/viewtopic.html?topic=360675&forum=26

Fennris

Apprentice Member

Joined: 2/04/07
Posts: 150

1/09/09 7:46:47 PM#33

I prefer classless games.  There has only been one MMO that I have played like that (AC1) and the execution was very poorly thought out.   Even so, I prefered it to that of every other MMO I have played.  

Dragonrealms has a good system as well where classes define what you 'should' focus on but they don't necessarily limit your preferences - most of the game revolved around a set of skills that that any could learn but each class learned a particular set faster than the others.  Each class also had a set of abilities/spells peculiar to them but anyone could be cool in a variety of ways if they spent time at it.

The funny thing about WoW and its system is that currently, by far the most successful and probably popular classes are the ones that can do everything (tank/heal/dps) depending on build and situation.  And they've opened many of the formerly narrowly defined classes to be able to perform in more than one way.  No character is forced to be 'just' a healer or just a tank, for example. 

I suspect that there will be other classless games soon.

Cik_Asalin

Hard Core Member

Joined: 8/29/04
Posts: 928

1/09/09 10:19:56 PM#34
Originally posted by Fennris

I suspect that there will be other classless games soon.

There will be.  Darkfall will be a very player-driven and game-play style influenced classless game, but skill-based.

tupodawg999

Apprentice Member

Joined: 12/10/08
Posts: 279

1/09/09 10:48:43 PM#35

If it's a fantasy game I think there's an RPG / Lore type design element in this choice as well. Do you want tank mages or not? If you want the wizard players to be pointy hatted and squishy then I think you have to split your skill-based system into at least two pieces.

I think my favourite system would probably be a mixture--a small number of very generic classes like fighter, mage, priest, rogue, scout but then give these classes a very open skill tree that gives you a lot of freedom to build them in different ways.

eburn

Advanced Member

Joined: 3/18/06
Posts: 129

Kill''em, burn''em.

1/09/09 10:51:15 PM#36

 The best class system, is no class system.

But it's hard to concept.

http://chat.shattered-realms.com/cgi/shards.cgi

Vetarnias

Apprentice Member

Joined: 1/13/08
Posts: 532

1/10/09 12:52:00 AM#37
Originally posted by Abrahmm

The best class system is no class system.

 

 

"If you experience performance issues playing Limousine Online, please update your chauffeurs."

Ascension08

Novice Member

Joined: 3/12/08
Posts: 2009

"Silence is golden, duct tape is silver, but the White Border of Darkfall rules over all!"

1/10/09 12:54:44 AM#38

Runescape because you could easily switch from being an archer, to a warrior, to a mage, and they had that Trinity thing going where melee was weak against magic, ranged was weak against melee, and magic was weak against ranged.

--------------------------------------
A human and an Elf get captured by Skaven. The rat-men are getting ready to shoot the first hostage with Dwarf-made guns when he yells, "Earthquake!" The naturally nervous Skaven run and hide from the imaginary threat. He escapes. The Skaven regroup and bring out the Elf. Being very smart, the Elf has figured out what to do. When the Skaven get ready to shoot, the Elf, in order to scare them, yells, "Fire!"

Order of the White Border.

Quizzical

Novice Member

Joined: 12/11/08
Posts: 1456

1/10/09 1:07:27 AM#39

There are three key features of a good class system.

1.  Classes should add replay value.  This is really the whole point of a class system.  If you play through the game as one class, and then play through it again as a different class, you should get a meaningfully different experience.

Put another way, if you play as one class, and use tactics that were designed with a different class in mind, the result should be a disaster.  (Think of a healer trying to tank in a lot of games.)   This should happen no matter which two classes are chosen.  If for some pairs of classes, it doesn't work that way, the classes are too similar, and one of them should be nixed.

2.  There should be no unwanted classes.  All classes should be useful, even if not mandatory, nearly everywhere.  Something is seriously wrong if you can play a class that makes it so that half of the time, no one wants to group with you solely because of your class.

3.  It shouldn't be possible to permanently gimp yourself.  If you put points into specializing particular areas of a class, you'd better be able to rearrange those points if you later learn that you chose poorly.  This is equally important in a "skill-based" system without classes.

 

SignusM

Hard Core Member

Joined: 5/07/06
Posts: 1882

1/10/09 1:14:54 AM#40

EQ, DAoC, and Vanguard had the best classes I have ever seen. EQ because they were the first, DAoC because of variety, originality, and RvR prowess, and Vanguard classes were successors to EQ classes. 

Hellscream07

Apprentice Member

Joined: 4/01/05
Posts: 35

1/10/09 1:54:51 AM#41

I'd say GW. Pretty flexible, allows you to build your very own build, has specific skills per profession and allows you to easily change build. SB also has a great class system. It allows for a huge customization.

Wow class system is not so bad. Sure, each class is very active and fun to play, but I honestly dislike the talent system. It really locks the flexibilty on you character: if you want to do a Holy Priest, you might pick some talents over others, sure, but you'll end up with most of the talents and skills as any other Holy Priest. And the fact that you've got several classes being able of healing/DPS/tank makes you 1 more of the crowd, kind of makes you lose the sense of "uniqueness".

I personally love a skill systemover class system. However, the problem is how to balance it correctly: in most games, there will be usually some builds and choice of skills that will work better than others. Thus, having a mix of class and skills usually ends up working for the better

safwd

Apprentice Member

Joined: 4/23/06
Posts: 881

"Dovie`andi se tovya sagain"

"I`m a farmer, a gambler and I`m here to take over your army"

1/10/09 1:59:05 AM#42
Originally posted by Abrahmm

The best class system is no class system. Skill based is infinitely better.


 

Opinion much?

Here, i will do it to, You are wrong.

Skill systems are the best for those people that feel they should be able to do everything, like wear full plate, use a 2H Sword, do full heals and shoot fireballs out of their asses.

safwd

Apprentice Member

Joined: 4/23/06
Posts: 881

"Dovie`andi se tovya sagain"

"I`m a farmer, a gambler and I`m here to take over your army"

1/10/09 2:02:46 AM#43

First of all to have a good class system you have to throw out the whole balance term. Classes do not have to be balanced but every class should have a use or specialty.
 

Also the best class systems are skill based, like EQ was. You were not able to build all the skills in your class so you actually had to think and make decissions. And no going to some NPC and resetting when you figured out you gimped yourself, you just started over or lived with it.

EQ had a fantastic class system. I thought they did everything well except for perhaps the Ranger, it was really hard being a Ranger because you were so unloved.
Vanguard falls under here also because it was pretty similar.

DAOC had a pretty good class system also.

FreddyNoNose

Elite Member

Joined: 8/06/05
Posts: 1141

1/10/09 2:07:15 AM#44

Coh is the best.

2 Pages « 1 2 Search