Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist
Games:397  Guilds:2,001
Members:1,143,683  Online:0
Guests:0  Posts:3,117,490
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

Runes of Magic

Runes of Magic 

General Discussion  » Runes of Magic - My Review

2 Pages « 1 2 Search
35 posts found
frostbytey

Novice Member

Joined: 7/08/08
Posts: 11

 
1/05/09 8:35:32 PM#26
Originally posted by Frostbite05

xp is no longer better than vista.....

 

Either your the dumbest person in the world....Or your a major drug dealer testing his products before he sells them >.>

onefromanother Xfire Miniprofile
Netbuddy

Novice Member

Joined: 7/15/08
Posts: 16

1/05/09 8:43:40 PM#27

Im running XP, no issues at all

Anywayz, tested the game last night. I was really surprised, its extremely polished, ive yet to find a bug of any sort. Actually the only hard part was getting my account sorted, because the registration button in the client links to the wrong site I think...

Its very much a WoW clone, but with a few nice tweaks...Its extremely easy of course, the duel class idea looks interesting, and I just made a visit to Varanas and that was nice.

Seems to be plenty of crafting skills available, can get a little house, decent spread of quests, although there all pretty much the same fedex style quests.

It seems to be high on features right from the start.

For F2P, its really quite awesome - just dont expect anything revolutionary.

abistar

Novice Member

Joined: 3/16/07
Posts: 74

Do not pee on my boot and tell me it is raining.

1/06/09 9:54:17 AM#28

I am running Vista 64 BIT without a problem, and been running all these f2p games on it for more than a year now without any issues at all, you may want to check your pc for malware and latest software updates for your components. As of the actual game (what the post is supposed to be about) seems pretty descent for what it is, it is in Open Beta stage as of now yes, but by far one of the best OB f2p that I have experienced, I have not come across any issues performance wise,bugs,server problems, maybe because when I play the game, I actually play it to enjoy it, not play it to find immediate flaws and then come troll on game forums.

Pietorro Xfire Miniprofile
tigris67

Smart-Alek

Joined: 9/18/05
Posts: 1768

"You know what happened to the man that got everything he ever wanted? He lived happily ever after"

1/06/09 1:35:56 PM#29
Originally posted by abistar

I am running Vista 64 BIT without a problem, and been running all these f2p games on it for more than a year now without any issues at all, you may want to check your pc for malware and latest software updates for your components. As of the actual game (what the post is supposed to be about) seems pretty descent for what it is, it is in Open Beta stage as of now yes, but by far one of the best OB f2p that I have experienced, I have not come across any issues performance wise,bugs,server problems, maybe because when I play the game, I actually play it to enjoy it, not play it to find immediate flaws and then come troll on game forums.

 

But still keep in mind...A company hosts a beta with the intent on finding bugs and fixing things, its not meant for pure enjoyment which is what we've come to think it is nowadays.

Hi! My name is paper. Nerf scissors, rock is fine.
EQ nostalgist if thats a word =P
MMORPG = Mostly Men Online Roleplaying Girls

http://www.hardtdesigns.com

Lienhart

Advanced Member

Joined: 5/21/07
Posts: 59

1/07/09 7:13:24 AM#30

Hey OP, here's a direct insult, you're stupid and a liar.

First off, your computer does suck. You're 2 generations behind on your GPU and 3 generations (or 4 if you count the new cores) for your CPU, not to mention it's an AMD which took a year or two to catch up with the Q6600; and even then overclocking it was not stable until they fixed the cores.

Secondly, repeat after me, an ATI 3650 does NOT have 3g of RAM. Your dxdiag is either

A. Broken
B. You doctored the screenshot

Also, again, repeat after me, you do NOT have 8160MB of RAM. RAM numbers follow a certain multiple, and since you do not know what that multiple is I will not tell you because I'd be teaching you to lie better.

And finally your computer, once again, sucks. Make sure you say it to the mirror too.

Half of us on these boards are running at least 3.3-4.0ghz quad-cores. The GPUs vary, but I'm personally running at GTX280. RAM varies from 2g to 18g.

..

.

.

.

.

One more thing, your monitor sucks. Who the hell plays at 1024 res these days? 

xcalibur

Novice Member

Joined: 2/01/04
Posts: 410

Leave me alone.

1/07/09 3:40:12 PM#31
Originally posted by Lienhart

Hey OP, here's a direct insult, you're stupid and a liar.

First off, your computer does suck. You're 2 generations behind on your GPU and 3 generations (or 4 if you count the new cores) for your CPU, not to mention it's an AMD which took a year or two to catch up with the Q6600; and even then overclocking it was not stable until they fixed the cores.

Secondly, repeat after me, an ATI 3650 does NOT have 3g of RAM. Your dxdiag is either

A. Broken
B. You doctored the screenshot

Also, again, repeat after me, you do NOT have 8160MB of RAM. RAM numbers follow a certain multiple, and since you do not know what that multiple is I will not tell you because I'd be teaching you to lie better.

And finally your computer, once again, sucks. Make sure you say it to the mirror too.

Half of us on these boards are running at least 3.3-4.0ghz quad-cores. The GPUs vary, but I'm personally running at GTX280. RAM varies from 2g to 18g.

..

.

.

.

.

One more thing, your monitor sucks. Who the hell plays at 1024 res these days? 

 

More than likely his video ram number is including all of the available system ram that can be used as shared memory.

Darsat

Novice Member

Joined: 5/26/06
Posts: 17

1/07/09 5:52:33 PM#32

Hi OP. You sound like a good person with a decent heart, just dont do reviews. Thanks.

gitawego

Advanced Member

Joined: 3/14/04
Posts: 167

1/09/09 5:56:47 PM#33
Originally posted by Darsat

Hi OP. You sound like a good person with a decent heart, just dont do reviews. Thanks.

your post do really make me laugh, hehe

Kaelaien

Novice Member

Joined: 4/11/04
Posts: 35

1/11/09 11:17:01 AM#34

I have played this game for a bit over a week and enjoy it very much.  The game runs fairly well and much better then most other games in beta.  Just about every game that is in beta is never complete and does not run well.  I have played a lot of games in beta and as i said this one runs better then most.

They are fixing issues every week.  I would suggest you play the game yourself and make your own opinion up, nothing to lose its free.

JMadisonIV

Advanced Member

Joined: 5/07/06
Posts: 285

Better at doing whatever it is Wolverine does.

1/11/09 5:41:23 PM#35

I don't have a supercomputer like everyone else here seems to:

Processor:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz
 

Memory:
1790MB RAM
 

Video Card:
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS 512mb

 

that's my rig. oh, and I'm on XP.

 

I've been able to play RoM with very little problem.


 

2 Pages « 1 2 Search