| 78 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
10/02/08 4:50:03 PM#21
Am I the only one who see this as a possitive ending for MMORPGs? With Blizzard owning these bot creators, people will think twice now before trying to create cheating tools, hopefuly it will apply to more games. |
|
|
10/02/08 5:07:53 PM#22
Well, the one thing we have learned for sure is: Botting benefits lawyers. |
|
|
10/02/08 6:04:10 PM#23
"Good for Blizzard. hahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha Good idea - but I *HIGHLY* doubt it. How long did this law suit take? couple YEARS? yeah... cheaters aren't even going to BLINK about this and they're going to go about thier business. |
|
|
10/02/08 6:17:10 PM#24
Originally posted by romne You sir, win the idiot of the thread award |
|
|
10/02/08 7:37:38 PM#25
I am not one for the big posts and I really do not care who I piss off at any time of the day and I definatly do not want to be sleeping with Blizzard as no matter the fact they are still just a big gaming company and in the long haul really don't show much compassion for the small player or solo enthusiast, BUT, In all my years of gaming I have finally lived to see the day when a gaming company stood up and took the fight to the source and for once didint put full blame on the players that use the software they went to the actual person who was selling it and took it out on them.
Too bad the other gaming companies didin't do the same over the years, might have caused more of the legit players to have stayed playing and not get ran over by new players decked out in gear and items some people worked hard and felt acomplished to get. |
|
|
10/02/08 8:19:08 PM#26
good luck collecting $6 million. let alone a few thousand if that. _________________ |
|
|
10/02/08 8:42:18 PM#27
|
|
|
10/02/08 9:56:31 PM#28
Great victory for the gaming community.
Way to go, Blizzard!! |
|
|
Mithrandolir
Hard Core Member
Joined: 2/28/05
Our doubts are traitors and make us lose the good we oft' might win, by fearing to attempt |
10/02/08 10:56:24 PM#29
not a huge fan of WoW but this deserves a hefty |
|
10/02/08 10:59:09 PM#30
Nice to see people who try to make money off of others success go down hard. |
|
|
10/03/08 4:11:32 AM#31
In the land of Predators,the lion does not fear the jackals... |
|
|
10/03/08 7:13:52 AM#32
Originally posted by romne
This is VERY close to being the most idiotic post I have ever seen on a gaming forum. WHY...please explain this to me...WHY do you buy a game for entertainment and then have someone or someTHING else play it FOR you? People who feel a "need" to bot their way through MMORPGs, need to find a different genre of game to play, IF they even enjoy playing games at ALL. If you just want to "play the end game," then play Warhammer....the other MMOs are NOT going to miss your lazy a$$. (On the other hand...I DARE you to go get a bot to do your RvR in WAR. Mythic will clamp down on you so fast, your stupid little head will spin.) President of The Marvelously Meowhead Fan Club |
|
|
10/03/08 10:13:39 AM#33
If you think questing is grinding, you should try to find something else to do with your spare time. Grats to Blizzard. |
|
|
10/03/08 11:54:56 AM#34
Originally posted by Suplyndmnd
The arguments and judgment left the value of the goods in the game un-addressed. As it should have. In fact, MDY’s case even states that the tool is only meant as a means to advance to 70 more easily and quickly, and that it discourages customers of the tool to use it as a gold-farming device. Blizzard’s stance did not reference the cash value of anything within the game system. It referenced only the imbalance of play experience when Glider is introduced into the equation for some players. Their arguments stated that the presence of Glider impeded Blizzard’s ability to balance that gameplay experience equally among all paying gamers, and that it provided a means for Glider users to absorb an unintended and unfair amount of game resources (both material and system resources). It further argued that there are lasting negative impacts in-game for the use of bot programs if left unchecked, not the least of which being the destabilization of the in-game economy.
This is not a secondary market case. Period.
-Feyshtey- |
|
|
10/03/08 12:18:12 PM#35
Originally posted by xaldraxius
False. The two of you really don't understand the situation, or you're grasping at straws trying to justify knowingly cheating. The whole purpose in paying to play a game is to enjoy the journey and the challenge. There are millions of players who don't have such fragile ego's that they feel as though they suck or have failed if they don't have gear or levels as good as anyone else who plays. There are millions who dont even belong to guilds, rarely or never raid, and actually -read- the quests to enjoy the story behind them. These people could care less if you have 10 level 70 characters in full epics and never will. These people play the game, get the levels and gear and gold as they come, and are perfectly satisfied when they complete their personal goals without regard to how many other goals you've completed for yourself. The only impact you have on their gameplay at all, is when they are attempting to do quests or gather tradeskill components for their own use or for sale in the auction house with legitimate means, and they cant because there are botters monopolizing content. And the cost of the goods in the AH works both ways. Anyone who actually understood supply and demand would know that... Yes, the cost of the goods in the AH are lower because the botters introduce so much of it into the economy. Yes, that means that more casual legitimate players can more easily purchase those goods in the AH. But it also means that when a legitimate player earns those goods as they were intended to be earned in the game, they can't sell them for anywhere close to what they otherwise could because the botters have already flooded the market. The botters have -artificially- imbalanced the laws of supply and demand and a direct result is an imbalance in the in-game economy. So instead of selling stacks of ore, or leather, or potions, or pieces of gear for high prices in order to pay some of the high prices from merchants for things like epic flying mounts, those legitimate players are now farming for -much- longer to earn the same money. Do you think they feel as though they have been helped? Clearly the answer is no. But nice try geniuses.
-Feyshtey- |
|
|
10/03/08 12:58:51 PM#36
Like it or not, the EULA is an agreement between the company who made the game and those who play. Laws are put into place to ensure there are no violations of the agreement between parties. Although I'm grateful to Blizzard for bringing up the case, I'm more grateful for the court enforcing the law. "IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH ALL OF THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT, YOU MUST CLICK "REJECT." The Game includes two components: (a) the software program along with any accompanying materials or documentation (collectively, the "Program"), and (b) Blizzard’s proprietary World of Warcraft online service (the "Service"). "Ownership. "You agree that you will not (i) modify or cause to be modified any files that are a part of the Program or the Service; (ii) create or use cheats, bots, "mods", and/or hacks, or any other third-party software designed to modify the World of Warcraft experience; " I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE FOREGOING TERMS OF USE AGREEMENT AND AGREE THAT MY USE OF THE PROGRAM AND/OR THE SERVICE IS AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF MY AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS TERMS OF USE AGREEMENT. Copyright 2006 Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved." http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/legal/termsofuse.html I honestly don't know what's unclear about the above quotes. http://www.allaboutgod.com/ |
|
|
10/03/08 1:26:32 PM#37
While I think this was the right decision based on current law, I am concerned about the precident for the future. The fact that Blizzard was able to get another judge to support their copyright in regards to RAM is disturbing. Anyhow, upholding a EULA in court is going to become a bad thing for gamers in my opinion. Essentially, if enough EULAs get upheld, they are going to get to the point where "game may change during the course of gameplay" means that a producer / developer can do anything to a game without your having any recourse whatsoever. Just drop over to the SWG Vets forum and see what I mean. |
|
|
10/03/08 1:57:06 PM#38
Originally posted by romne
|
|
|
10/03/08 2:00:40 PM#39
Originally posted by daeandor
This isn't a case of a game company using the EULA to justify doing whatever they wany. This is a case of a company using the EULA to protect their product from 3rd party actions that do have a negative impact not only on the players of the game, but the companies resources to operate the game. I understand your fear, but I don't think it is anywhere close to what you are making it out to be.
|
|
|
10/03/08 2:47:03 PM#40
Originally posted by daeandor
This is an unrealistic view of a pretty simple situation. The EULA is first and foremost a contractual agreement between parties. If you don't like the terms outlined within it, dont sign it. As for the hysteria, a contract cannot be enforced d by any court if it is found to violate your rights. You cannot sign away your rights in any contract, no matter how stupid you are in signing the contract without reading it. The contract, or more specifically the parts of the contract that are found to voilate your rights, become void. So if the big mean computer game company is really out to screw you, they're going ot have to be more creative than to outline their intent in the EULA for you ...
-Feyshtey- |
|