Login:  Password:   Remember?  
Show Quick Gamelist
Games:398  Guilds:2,011
Members:1,147,938  Online:0
Guests:0  Posts:3,127,739
<a href="http://www.gameads.com/" target=_blank>Game Ads</a> banner requires iframes.
Recent forum postsRSS
Active threads
Cloud view
List all forums
General Forums
Developers Corner General Discussion
Popular Game Forums
Click a status to find game forum
Game Forums
Click a letter to find game forum

MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

83 posts found
Zeroxin

Elite Member

Joined: 6/21/06
Posts: 315

My words are not here to sway you,they are here to make you understand.

8/14/08 5:24:22 AM#51

 

Originally posted by DigitalGamer

 

Originally posted by Exar_Kun

We still want Star Ship INTERIORS and Player / Guild Owned Ships!!!

1) REAL Player owned / Guild owned Ships.

I would assume this is a given.. Player owned anyways.

Yep definitely a given seeing as players are captains from the get-go.

2) Ships we can walk around and interact from within.

This has all ready been comfirmed from what i have read.

Definitely confirmed.

3) Ships with a BRIDGE, SICKBAY, CREW QUATERS, MAIN ENGINEERING, MESS HALL / SOCIAL AREA.

Not sure about the specifics but like i said confirmed.

4) We should be able to walk around and go from one area to the next almost seemlessly.

The more graphically intense a game is the more complex the world around you is this will get hard. I can see them doing an entire "level" seamlessly but an entire Starship on the scale of the Enterprise or Voyager.. with dozens of levels and 100's of detail and interactive rooms? Im thinking no but thanks for playing.

5) These Ships should have both a PC crew aswell as a NPC crew.

Novel idea until you attempt it. As has been previously said, this is not impossible to do. But it would be suicidal to make ships player operated.

The first time you log on and cant do anything because your "friends" arent on to help you.. you will quit and say "this game sucks!" SWG was not based on this they added these ships as a "bonus" but nothing forced you to use these and pretty much no one did after the inital "wow this is cool" died out.

It would require far to much work for something that in "theory" would be cool but is simply not feasable. Cryptic is not going to "risk" that the players population will be sufficent and organized enough to field these ships, so spending the dev time into is not worth it. Maybe an expansion far down the line.. as a "oh what the hell" kind of thing. 

You know i've played GW and they had PC teams down BUT sometimes PC teams can be so disorganized its amazing to the point where an NPC team would pwn you. I thinks its better they left this to "we'll add it down the line" type of thing.

6) Crew  should have a profession: SCIENCE, DOCTOR, HELM, TACTICAL, ENGINEERING, COMMAND.

Again refer to the above post. who would actually want to play a game about starship exploration and combat and spend their whole playing time in Engineering. Again sounds good but is never going to work.

You can actually play as different professions but you will still be the captain of your ship. I think your proffession would be more prominent in the away team but you being the captain of youur ship still stands.

7) AWAY TEAM professions: SCI-EXPLORATION, SECURITY, MEDIC, CONSTRUCTION

I have heard nothing of away team professions but i would think they would have them if not its a run a gun kinda thing. I assume 80% of the game will be ala EVE. Space exploration and fighting.

No I think it more of a 60:40 thing because it's on planets you get to recruit new NPCs onto your ship and discover new resources, civilizations, trade etc etc.

8) Full on GALAXIES to Explore. With both WARP and REALTIME travel.

You have to stay close to canon here, and again from what i have seen and read it will be ala EVE space type situation.

They said it would be semi realistic with wormholes (in the case of eve Warp gates or jump gates) and warp factors to shorten the journey.

9) Full Planets to Explore and Fight over

Again ground game will obviously take a backseat to the scale of the space game. This is Star Trek the space aspect of the game will have to be solid, immersive, action packed, and replayable. Although they have confirmed multiple worlds and ground content. I would think they would not hang themselves by going to far and creating a huge ground game and a huge space game. More bugs, balance problems and things to go wrong. Most companies cant even get one huge game correct.

10) Guild run Space Stations with commerce, defense, and social content

Guild space stations is pretty much a given, although maybe not at launch. But obviously the Space Station would have defense abilities and hopefully will be more interactive and open then Eve Stations. As far as crafting goes.. they haven't said much from what i know. Im not even sure it has a place in Star Trek. ??? What would you craft? Food? Weapons? Armor? Potions? The only thing that would make sense is Starship crafting and components. but 2 professions hardly make up a good market. And considering that the use those proton thingies that make things out of air (cant remember what they are called) and considering that any ship in ST is so vast it takes an orbital space dock to build one.. I dont see a huge area for them to go on.

Not many MMORPGs get the 2nd chance this game is getting. The bottom line is many of the above items were the cause of much bad blood with PE. DO NOT try to be like WOW! Do the right thing and listen to the People. We only want to see STO be the best game on the market!

Anytime i hear player run ships or space stations i... then i  them until they make me  and i turn out to be the  until i  to the  loving,  eating, 's of ing  stupidity.

Funny enough, I feel the same way.

Anyways hopefully it will be a good game. I am liking what i see so far, the only thing that has me worried is the graphics are "animated" ala WOW and not realistic picture quality ala EVE.


 

 

This is not a game.

Realm-Reaper

Novice Member

Joined: 1/19/07
Posts: 507

Need a game that will allow me to Rob and Kill other players...can I Rape the corpse aswell?

8/14/08 6:33:57 AM#52

 

 
Star Trek - The Adventure #46 by finkangel.

 

 

 

 
Star Trek - The Adventure #45 by finkangel.

 

 

WHY IS THIS SO HARD?

Exar_Kun

Novice Member

Joined: 10/28/07
Posts: 246

 
8/14/08 6:37:31 AM#53

Here are a some great examples of STi(s)

 

http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/gallery/interiors1.htm

sirlynchmob

Novice Member

Joined: 8/19/07
Posts: 1

8/14/08 3:18:48 PM#54

I agree with interriors.  If a shitty game like Star Wars can have ship interiors that you can walk around in while the ship is in a battle, than surely star trek can.  You can even decorate the interiors of the ship in SWG. 

Dracus

Apprentice Member

Joined: 7/14/04
Posts: 1396

"Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars."
- Brian Littrell

8/14/08 6:02:04 PM#55
Originally posted by Realm-Reaper

<images>

 

F.decorate(_ge('button_bar'), F._photo_button_bar).bar_go_go_go(2223338990, 0);

WHY IS THIS SO HARD?

This is technically possible, the difficulty lies more with Investing and getting the biggest Return On Investment (ROI) as possible.  It is not a matter of making a fun game, but rather making a very profitable game that is fun by the masses.

When thinking about the features, think along these lines:

- Is it fun?

- Will it make money?

- How much resources and effort are required?

And that is why...

Conservatives' pessimism is conducive to their happiness in three ways. First, they are rarely surprised -- they are right more often than not about the course of events. Second, when they are wrong they are happy to be so. Third, because pessimistic conservatives put not their faith in princes -- government -- they accept that happiness is a function of fending for oneself. They believe that happiness is an activity -- it is inseparable from the pursuit of happiness.

banthis

Advanced Member

Joined: 3/19/07
Posts: 1766

8/14/08 6:18:00 PM#56

Wow...*eyes the ideas* obviously ship interiors should be in most definilty..player guild own ships..only if their non combat ships.    You can only play as a Federation or a Klingon Member last time I checked their most recent article...and neither allows you to have personal armed ships (atleast not to memory) and you definitly work for the Federation and own your own battleship to go out into the world. 

Whens the last time you watched Star Trek and Jo Bob showed up to fight the borg?   I think anything thats utterly destructive to the premise of the World should be left out, but if it can be made to accomodate and work with the lore like player owned cargo ships or short ranged shuttle ships now that'd be more in line with the game.

No oen wants to play the game and be Jo Bob they want to be Captain Kirk or one of the FEderation / Klingon members thats kinda the whole idea to games based in IP your getting to live out the world.  It was easy to make SWG more open world since there was a bevy of lore and jobs and characters outside the two main factions of Empire & Rebels.  There's really not that much lore or interesting roles to play outside of being a member of the Federation, The Borg, Klingons etc and even then they were all military / corporations that are already established.

The recent gameplay video that was shown does show players get to control ships and shoot people inside the ship (interior battles) no clue if you own them or you charter to work on them.

I look forward to seeing what they plan to do with this game. But I'm not going to set my expectations on it being like pre NGE SWG either ...I just don't see that happening.

 

anyway here's some gameplay trailers from Cryptic

http://pc.ign.com/articles/897/897788p1.html

Nerf09

Novice Member

Joined: 3/14/04
Posts: 1648

8/15/08 12:05:15 AM#57
Originally posted by Lasastard

Not sure about the sanbox part -

 

Without the "sandbox part" it would just be another Everquest clone (WOW is an everquest clone).  Forever Quest.  Quest quest quest.

Nerf09

Novice Member

Joined: 3/14/04
Posts: 1648

8/15/08 12:19:57 AM#58
Originally posted by Warblaze

--------------------------------------------

1) REAL Player owned / Guild owned Ships.

2) Ships we can walk around and interact from within.

3) Ships with a BRIDGE, SICKBAY, CREW QUATERS, MAIN ENGINEERING, MESS HALL / SOCIAL AREA.

10) Guild run Space Stations with commerce, defense, and social content  Not interested in being forced to join a guild with the biggest dork fanboys in the world:  Star Trek fans.

---------------------------------------------

If the devs implement these 4 features, this game is going to be a big succes.  If they dont, it will fail.  

 

betatester2

Novice Member

Joined: 2/17/08
Posts: 3

8/15/08 2:45:10 AM#59
Originally posted by sirlynchmob

I agree with interriors.  If a shitty game like Star Wars can have ship interiors that you can walk around in while the ship is in a battle, than surely star trek can.  You can even decorate the interiors of the ship in SWG. 

 

It`s going to be rather cool to see it in STO...

Realm-Reaper

Novice Member

Joined: 1/19/07
Posts: 507

Need a game that will allow me to Rob and Kill other players...can I Rape the corpse aswell?

8/15/08 6:05:47 PM#60
Originally posted by betatester2
Originally posted by sirlynchmob

I agree with interriors.  If a shitty game like Star Wars can have ship interiors that you can walk around in while the ship is in a battle, than surely star trek can.  You can even decorate the interiors of the ship in SWG. 

 

It`s going to be rather cool to see it in STO...


 

If they allow it...As of now it's not what they are planning. Which is going to suckass big time!

adavis72

Novice Member

Joined: 12/24/07
Posts: 14

8/15/08 6:08:09 PM#61

how they gunna have commerce without money? money was gotten rid of in like the 22nd century i think

banthis

Advanced Member

Joined: 3/19/07
Posts: 1766

8/15/08 6:11:22 PM#62
Originally posted by Realm-Reaper
Originally posted by betatester2
Originally posted by sirlynchmob

I agree with interriors.  If a shitty game like Star Wars can have ship interiors that you can walk around in while the ship is in a battle, than surely star trek can.  You can even decorate the interiors of the ship in SWG. 

 

It`s going to be rather cool to see it in STO...


 

If they allow it...As of now it's not what they are planning. Which is going to suckass big time!

Really so the videos of players being shot inside of their ship at the HELM even by Klingons in the recent play video is a lie? Or are you thinking about the PREVIOUS implementation of the game by a Crap company thats no longer exists.
 

Last I heard no true details about the game other than videos has been released.

Realm-Reaper

Novice Member

Joined: 1/19/07
Posts: 507

Need a game that will allow me to Rob and Kill other players...can I Rape the corpse aswell?

8/15/08 6:20:27 PM#63
Originally posted by banthis
Originally posted by Realm-Reaper
Originally posted by betatester2
Originally posted by sirlynchmob

I agree with interriors.  If a shitty game like Star Wars can have ship interiors that you can walk around in while the ship is in a battle, than surely star trek can.  You can even decorate the interiors of the ship in SWG. 

 

It`s going to be rather cool to see it in STO...


 

If they allow it...As of now it's not what they are planning. Which is going to suckass big time!

Really so the videos of players being shot inside of their ship at the HELM even by Klingons in the recent play video is a lie? Or are you thinking about the PREVIOUS implementation of the game by a Crap company thats no longer exists.
 

Last I heard no true details about the game other than videos has been released.


 

Dude...

I will believe when I see it. The bottom line is as long as Darren Stinnet is the Lead Dog in this pony show, it's gonna be borked. Just my opinion, but I really don't think "the vision" has changed that much since Cryptic took over. Again I hope they prove me wrong, but in the end...

Shit in a shiney new box is still Shit.

SonofSeth

Hard Core Member

Joined: 12/17/05
Posts: 1738

Find a form
is free to roam

8/16/08 4:46:39 AM#64
Originally posted by Realm-Reaper

ude...

I will believe when I see it. The bottom line is as long as Darren Stinnet is the Lead Dog in this pony show, it's gonna be borked. Just my opinion, but I really don't think "the vision" has changed that much since Cryptic took over. Again I hope they prove me wrong, but in the end...

Shit in a shiney new box is still Shit.


 

Didn't Stinnet go down with his ship?

kryton1

Novice Member

Joined: 8/03/08
Posts: 1

8/16/08 8:43:09 AM#65

Ok with the lists people are putting up i just wanted to add my 2 cents.

Player controled crews, ok thats not a big hit because you never can tell when or if your friends are on BUT how about this

THEME PARKS

people can group up and then enter a "THEME PARK" this lets them choose there role on a ship that is in a battle vs "INSERT RACE" Engineers can repair things in real time, medical personal can heal wonded caused by explosions tatical handles targeting, science officers for scanning ect ect ect. the only slot that CANT be controled in the theme park idea is captain.

on another note " LARGE SHIPS " there is a game out now that many dont know about called STARQUEST, its like a spin off of star trek and even though the graphics are dated the game its self is HUGE and open ended, some of you might just like to try it out. Anyway the ships in that game can be small to out right HUGE and you can walk around inside them all decorate them how you like and what not. Also you can work on the engines, weapons, shields, power regulators ect ect to make them work at over 100% this takes a lot of time to get very small bonus and can actualy damage the parts then you woul dneed to repair them :P. I had my engines at 115% in that game and weapons and shields at 110%. Also you could explore planets, set up colonies, mine, craft ect ect. and the space was huge at warp 9 would take a week or more to reach the center ( o.o.o )

im just adding this to let people know that being a captian isnt the ONLY thing that is or can be fun if done right. Also as we all know there are some hard core guilds out there that would be able to man and run a player controled ship 24/7 this option should be open for said guilds.

what we all want in this game has been done before and has actual been put into a single game but needs a large company with better designers to build on it. I just hope this isnt some hashed out POS that has a life span of 1 month wich you get free when buying the game.

Force_Fire

Novice Member

Joined: 5/18/08
Posts: 118

8/16/08 6:13:00 PM#66
Originally posted by SonofSeth
Originally posted by Realm-Reaper

ude...

I will believe when I see it. The bottom line is as long as Darren Stinnet is the Lead Dog in this pony show, it's gonna be borked. Just my opinion, but I really don't think "the vision" has changed that much since Cryptic took over. Again I hope they prove me wrong, but in the end...

Shit in a shiney new box is still Shit.


 

Didn't Stinnet go down with his ship?


 

No,  Cryptic threw him a floatation device. You know in some older, more civilized cultures, when someone failed a badley as Darren Stinnet, They would throw themselves on their swords...this is not the case as Mr. Stinnet remains at the helm of this somewhat questionable project. Like a Cat, Darren has many lives and will complete this venture to HIS specifications. A game that is NOT for Star Trek Fans.

Brenelael

Hard Core Member

Joined: 10/19/06
Posts: 1932

"If I'm not back in 5 minutes... Just wait longer." -Ace Ventura

8/16/08 10:26:27 PM#67
Originally posted by Force_Fire
Originally posted by SonofSeth
Originally posted by Realm-Reaper

ude...

I will believe when I see it. The bottom line is as long as Darren Stinnet is the Lead Dog in this pony show, it's gonna be borked. Just my opinion, but I really don't think "the vision" has changed that much since Cryptic took over. Again I hope they prove me wrong, but in the end...

Shit in a shiney new box is still Shit.


 

Didn't Stinnet go down with his ship?

No,  Cryptic threw him a floatation device. You know in some older, more civilized cultures, when someone failed a badley as Darren Stinnet, They would throw themselves on their swords...this is not the case as Mr. Stinnet remains at the helm of this somewhat questionable project. Like a Cat, Darren has many lives and will complete this venture to HIS specifications. A game that is NOT for Star Trek Fans.


I'm sorry but you are very wrong sir. He has absolutely nothing to do with this new project at all. Craig Z (Can't remember how to spell his last name so I'm not even going to try) is the Project Lead of the new STO and as far as I know Mr. Stinnett wasn't even offered a job at Cryptic, period. The only thing they are even using from the previous project is some of the concept art PE had. Try to at least read a little about the game you're talking about before you start talking out of your ass, please.

 

Bren

while(horse==dead)
{
beat();
}

pdxgeek

Apprentice Member

Joined: 6/02/08
Posts: 659

8/16/08 11:51:15 PM#68
Originally posted by Brenelael
Originally posted by Force_Fire
Originally posted by SonofSeth
Originally posted by Realm-Reaper

ude...

I will believe when I see it. The bottom line is as long as Darren Stinnet is the Lead Dog in this pony show, it's gonna be borked. Just my opinion, but I really don't think "the vision" has changed that much since Cryptic took over. Again I hope they prove me wrong, but in the end...

Shit in a shiney new box is still Shit.


 

Didn't Stinnet go down with his ship?

No,  Cryptic threw him a floatation device. You know in some older, more civilized cultures, when someone failed a badley as Darren Stinnet, They would throw themselves on their swords...this is not the case as Mr. Stinnet remains at the helm of this somewhat questionable project. Like a Cat, Darren has many lives and will complete this venture to HIS specifications. A game that is NOT for Star Trek Fans.


I'm sorry but you are very wrong sir. He has absolutely nothing to do with this new project at all. Craig Z (Can't remember how to spell his last name so I'm not even going to try) is the Project Lead of the new STO and as far as I know Mr. Stinnett wasn't even offered a job at Cryptic, period. The only thing they are even using from the previous project is some of the concept art PE had. Try to at least read a little about the game you're talking about before you start talking out of your ass, please.

 

Bren

Is there any way to confirm this? My interest in this game is 100% dependent on Darren Stinnet not having anything to do with it.

Brenelael

Hard Core Member

Joined: 10/19/06
Posts: 1932

"If I'm not back in 5 minutes... Just wait longer." -Ace Ventura

8/17/08 12:44:46 AM#69
Originally posted by pdxgeek
Originally posted by Brenelael
Originally posted by Force_Fire
Originally posted by SonofSeth
Originally posted by Realm-Reaper

ude...

I will believe when I see it. The bottom line is as long as Darren Stinnet is the Lead Dog in this pony show, it's gonna be borked. Just my opinion, but I really don't think "the vision" has changed that much since Cryptic took over. Again I hope they prove me wrong, but in the end...

Shit in a shiney new box is still Shit.


 

Didn't Stinnet go down with his ship?

No,  Cryptic threw him a floatation device. You know in some older, more civilized cultures, when someone failed a badley as Darren Stinnet, They would throw themselves on their swords...this is not the case as Mr. Stinnet remains at the helm of this somewhat questionable project. Like a Cat, Darren has many lives and will complete this venture to HIS specifications. A game that is NOT for Star Trek Fans.


I'm sorry but you are very wrong sir. He has absolutely nothing to do with this new project at all. Craig Z (Can't remember how to spell his last name so I'm not even going to try) is the Project Lead of the new STO and as far as I know Mr. Stinnett wasn't even offered a job at Cryptic, period. The only thing they are even using from the previous project is some of the concept art PE had. Try to at least read a little about the game you're talking about before you start talking out of your ass, please.

 

Bren

Is there any way to confirm this? My interest in this game is 100% dependent on Darren Stinnet not having anything to do with it.

Well here is a Gamespot interview with the new Executive Producer Craig Zinkievich. He is the project head for STO at Cryptic and all design decisions are made by him. This is his baby now not Darron Stinnett's. The direction of this game is totally different then PE's. With 2 factions at launch and player ship interiors it seems that Cryptic was paying close attention to the fans during PE's development. Also Jack Emmert has already stated in the webcast from Vegas that this game is not level based. As we all know PE was working on a Class/Level based quest grinder, basically WoW with Star Trek skins. Cryptic is going in a completely different direction with this development than PE did and if some of the people posting in this thread(not you) would go and actually read something about this new incarnation of STO they might know that already.

 

Bren

while(horse==dead)
{
beat();
}

Cerion

Elite Member

Joined: 3/23/04
Posts: 827

8/17/08 5:12:36 AM#70
Originally posted by zaxxon23

 But make no mistake about it, the primary bulk of the game will involve combat and warfare, which are hardly concepts that were the primary aspect of any Star Trek series.  Remember, they're building a *game*, not a Star Trek simulator.


 

First of all, game =! combat/warfare.  Plenty of games, and successful ones at that, do not involve combat.

Secondly, you and others really fail to internalize this concept: Game and simulator are not opposite ends of a spectrum.  Some of you continue to bandy about this false dichotomy between game and simulator.  It just doesn't exist. It doesn't have to exist.

_____________________________
Currently Playing: LOTRO; Fallen Earth
Played: AC2, AO, Auto Assault, CoX, DAoC, DDO, Earth&Beyond, EQ1, EQ2, EVE, Jumpgate, Roma Victor, Second Life, SWG, V:SoH, WoW, World War II Online.

Games I'm watching: Infinity: The Quest for Earth, Force of Arms.

Find the Truth: http://www.factcheck.org/

RANGER_BATT

Novice Member

Joined: 7/21/08
Posts: 19

8/17/08 7:32:38 AM#71

This is a real shame...that Stinnett guy has no Idea wtf STAR TREK is all about. Guess I won't be playing STO.

eNDIE

Novice Member

Joined: 1/02/07
Posts: 21

8/17/08 7:42:30 AM#72

stinnet isnt involved anymore cryptic is running the show now:)

Brenelael

Hard Core Member

Joined: 10/19/06
Posts: 1932

"If I'm not back in 5 minutes... Just wait longer." -Ace Ventura

8/17/08 10:55:42 AM#73
Originally posted by RANGER_BATT

This is a real shame...that Stinnett guy has no Idea wtf STAR TREK is all about. Guess I won't be playing STO.

 

*Shakes head in disbelief* Read my posts above please and maybe go and read a little about the game itself before you post. Not doing so just makes you look stupid.

 

Bren

while(horse==dead)
{
beat();
}

jaxsundane

Elite Member

Joined: 5/20/07
Posts: 1053

8/17/08 2:44:22 PM#74

"I'm just saying that some of your expectations are unrealistic and that you will be dissapointed if you keep these expectations."
 

 

And it was pointed out to you features that he asked for had been in mmo's for four plus years and you went on into another post that made even less sense that said something to the effect of these classes were new.  Most of the listed classes were Med Officer,Security etc. how hard would it be to impliment a tool where by these professions were utilized in game if you actually think it's that hard you my friend are a pretty big reason mmo companies shovel crap to us now.

 

"It has nothing to do with how much I'm interested in those features, I like to see developers try new things, I wish they did it more often"

The funny thing is you just changed your position to say they either shouldn't or wouldn't do these things because they are new and might not work what is your point?

Exar_Kun

Novice Member

Joined: 10/28/07
Posts: 246

 
8/17/08 3:14:15 PM#75
Originally posted by RANGER_BATT

This is a real shame...that Stinnett guy has no Idea wtf STAR TREK is all about. Guess I won't be playing STO.


 

True that,

I admire the guys passion but he really needs to learn to listen to the player base. I really don't see why Cryptic kept him on. This is but one reason I won't play this game. They simply don't understand how to make a real ST game.

FAIL!

4 Pages « 1 2 3 4 » Search