| 40 posts found | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dead just like the game lol |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hah thats kinda old, I remember seeing that someplace else but not the same page colors. I think people made these up. I voted for Obama. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is not old and is not made up. http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&state=ie6g3u.1.1 type in Darkfall |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Typed Drawing
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lazy trolls are amusing.. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Er...that just details merchandising of the brand has been closed....nothing more... Don't know if you can run it? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
then
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wonder if abandoning T shirts DvD and other things had any connection to deals signed for publishing. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
looks like they were just updating stuff
Trademark Document Retrieval 008-08-07 - Abandonment Notice Mailed - No Use Statement Filed 2008-08-07 - Abandonment - No use statement filed 2008-01-18 - TEAS Change Of Correspondence Received 2007-11-07 - Extension 1 granted 2007-11-07 - Extension 1 filed 2007-11-07 - TEAS Extension Received 2007-05-15 - Notice of allowance - mailed 2007-02-20 - Published for opposition 2007-01-31 - Notice of publication 2006-12-29 - Law Office Publication Review Completed 2006-12-28 - Approved for Pub - Principal Register (Initial exam) 2006-12-28 - Amendment From Applicant Entered 2006-12-27 - Communication received from applicant 2006-12-27 - TEAS Response to Office Action Received 2006-12-15 - LIE Checked Susp - To Atty For Action 2006-12-12 - Assigned To LIE 2006-08-08 - Assigned To Examiner 2006-05-15 - Report Completed Suspension Check Case Still Suspended 2005-10-19 - Report Completed Suspension Check Case Still Suspended 2005-09-27 - LIE Checked Susp - To Atty For Action 2005-02-23 - Report Completed Suspension Check Case Still Suspended 2004-08-09 - LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED 2004-07-16 - Amendment From Applicant Entered 2004-07-16 - Communication received from applicant 2004-07-16 - TEAS Response to Office Action Received 2004-01-22 - Non-final action e-mailed 2004-01-21 - Assigned To Examine |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kyleran
Elite Member
Joined: 9/13/06
"In EVE, no one gives a damn about a fair fight." - chafin |
Yeah, its been known for a bit that if DF actually goes to release, they don't have a right to use the name.
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon EVE Cult member since May 2007 Regarding EVE: "To be honest, I think God himself created this game." - Shek Regarding new players in EVE: "Think of yourself as a child released into a park full of pedophiles..." - Eleazaros |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So they are still live with the core video games but dead with a bunch of other related material |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Respond to the Notice of Abandonment by filing one of the following petitions: 1. Petition To Withdraw Holding of Abandonment (See Where an applicant contends that the application is not in fact abandoned (e.g., there is disagreement as to the sufficiency of the reply, or as to controlling dates), a petition under 37 CFR § 1.181(a) requesting withdrawal of the holding of abandonment is the appropriate course of action. Any petition under 37 CFR § 1.181, to withdraw the holding of abandonment not filed within 2 months of the mail date of a Notice of Abandonment may be dismissed as untimely under 37 CFR § 1.181(f). For a petition to be granted, the evidence must be sufficient according to one of the following standards:
what it means ABOVE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Do not need to post it twice we see it. Now we need to know what it means |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since you need somewhere to land, much better ;)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Know what the funny thing is? They were actually already granted the right to use that before they abandoned it. 2007-05-15 - Notice of allowance - mailed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Damn, I wanted some Darkfall action figures I especially wanted the Tasos doll. Everytime you pull his string, a new lie comes out of his mouth.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why don't they just change the name if it's that much of a hassle? Could be something like "Fall of Darkness" or something. >Nope, problem is you can't contruct a halfway logical counterpoint to anything, probably because you don't understand what it is you're arguing about in the first place. - Hellmoob |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Originally posted by Friction2u
Originally posted by ghoul31 LOL |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
talismen351
Hard Core Member
Joined: 11/01/07
"Easy" only equals "better" for crack addicts and MMORPG developers. |
Originally posted by Roin
There is no hassel. This is simply showing they didn't feel it necessary to TM the Darkfall name. Once you have the TM it is really no problem keeping it up. It costs nothing. Why change the name? More of a hassel to TM a new name. Fan or no Fan of DF, still gotta wonder why let the TM go if they are planning on launching in 08. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chillingham
Novice Member
Joined: 8/11/08
Originally posted by Xris375 |
Originally posted by talismen351
There is no hassel. Sure there is. They've been trying to get that trademarked since 2003 and still don't have it. This is simply showing they didn't feel it necessary to TM the Darkfall name. The one they abandoned is a different one. They still have the other (which is suspended) and has had all the problems since 2003. Two different markets. That's why the one they abandoned was allowed through. Fan or no Fan of DF, still gotta wonder why let the TM go if they are planning on launching in 08. Wondering is the joy of following Darkfall
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Originally posted by talismen351
There is no hassel. This is simply showing they didn't feel it necessary to TM the Darkfall name. Once you have the TM it is really no problem keeping it up. It costs nothing. Why change the name? More of a hassel to TM a new name. Fan or no Fan of DF, still gotta wonder why let the TM go if they are planning on launching in 08.
The trademark for the Game itself though still says live. Its the trademarks for everything else that was let go. Wonder if it could be part of some publishing deal. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
sinjin
Novice Member
Joined: 12/31/04
The king and the pawn go back to the same box at the end of the day. |
Originally posted by ghoul31
This is so full of epic poportions that I give this comment a 11 out of 10. Thank you sir you win the comment of the year award
------------------------------------------ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||